Friday, June 10, 2016

You are about to learn something new.  Smart people will, upon learning something new, adjust their opinion.   Most people just dig in and say it doesn't matter. 




2000 speeches, 
Thousands of letters
But most of all, Lincoln's radical kick ass actions...

Northern leaders, and Southern leaders, accused Lincoln of being a "Nigger lover"  who was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Not a few nuts -- but the most powerful speakers and Senators of the day,  (Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, Robert Toombs, Alexander Stephens, ect) accused Lincoln of things that could have gotten him a bullet in the head a lot sooner, if Lincoln had not used his own rhetorical skills, to shove that shit back down their throats.



Was Stephen A Douglas lying, over and over, in Lincoln Douglas debates, when he said Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and that Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with and marry Niggers"?

Were Southern leaders lying, when they claimed Lincoln, for just being against the spread of slavery, was going to "exterminate the white race"   or "burn us slowly to death"?

So when Lincoln spoke -- remember this -- he faced a crowd, and general public -- that were told by the most powerful leaders of the day that Lincoln WANTED their daughters to "sleep with and marry with Niggers"

Lincoln  a "Nigger worshipper" who will "exterminate the white race"  by stopping the spread of slavery......"

Holy fuck -- the shit they could not put in US text books, because Southern crybabies...and because they are such ugly things.

 See the video -- click on it.  

 No one has ever made a movie as ghastly as the truth about slavery, and how Southern leaders boasted of killing to spread slavery for God, or how Lincoln attacked, North and South, for being a "Negro Worshipper"  who will destroy the white race.

But in this video, though they cleaned up Douglas's language, you can see Lincoln's basic problem.  How to be against slavery, but not be shot, or not be accused of "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Douglas typically used "Nigger.  But you will see no "Nigger rant" in several cities, a term described by reporters in Quincy and Charleston.  In Quincy, an apparently intoxicated Douglas blased out "Nigger rants"  tying Lincoln to the fear so many white males had -- their wives or daughters would have to "be with, and sleep with, Niggers".

The idea of a black man even walking free down the street was foreign to whites in Illinois, at the time. Illinois law prevented blacks from moving to that state! 

Over, and over, and over-- and over -- Lincoln's speeches were masterpieces, and changed the minds of people who heard him.  Most people in the North would not walk across the street to stop the torture of slaves,  and they sure as hell were not going to fight a war to free anyone. 

Lincoln -- over and over -- seemed to agree with a prejudice of the day in one sentence, but then in the next sentence, or later in the speech, Lincoln kicked the shit out of that very prejudice, and did it in a way that WORKED. 

Which words do they quote Lincoln today -- the full quotes, in context?   No.  You can't show his full quotes and show context and claim Lincoln was not  -- as accused -- radical and zealous to end slavery.

In other words, those who hated Lincoln with a passion then, were right. He was obsessed with equality. He would, and did, end slavery as soon as humanly possible.


From the 1856 killing sprees led by the US Senator who passed Kansas Act, (see below) Lincoln spent nearly 24  hours a day, 365 days a year, going place to place, exposing the violence and subtrafuge used by Southern leaders to spread slavery by force, into areas -- and states -- that voted, or would vote if they could - to reject slavery. 

Obsessed?  Can't be. Your history teacher, and a bunch of books, told us of Lincoln's letter to Greeley (see below), or about those dozen quotes from Lincoln,  which proved Lincoln didn't give a shit about slaves, or slavery.


A little knowledge is a terrible thing.  
In fact, over and over -- repeatedly, loudly, and emphatically, Stephen A Douglas told crowds Lincoln was a traitor who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

None of this -- absolutely none of this -- is taught in US schools.   Lincoln was actually a radical mo fo -- yes  he was -- to kick slavery in the ass, and did.    See the full story, and no, you don't know yet. 


 After Douglas (Stephen A) sought Southern support to be President, he changed his words in the Senate.  Most Senators -even Southern Senators, did not use "Nigger"  on the Senate floor.

But Douglas did -- and Douglas, according to newspapers at the time -- went into "Nigger rants" in the debates, telling the crowds Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".   

The fear of black men being free --coming North - and taking white women, was very much the raw nerve Douglas aimed at, and hit, time after time.  Douglas beat Lincoln in that Senate race, and would have beaten him for President, using the same "Niggers will take your women" rants, if three pro-slavery, and pro spread of slavery candidates, did not run.

Lincoln was the only one of four candidates to be absolutely  against the violent spread of slavery into Kansas and the West.   A fact no one told you, either.   If those three other candidates had not split the vote, Douglas would have been President, instead of Lincoln. Sixty percent of the public -- even in the North -- were not going to lift a finger to stop the spread of slavery.   

If you don't know -- and you don't -- that 60% of the public were fine with slavery and the spread of it, and if you don't  know Southern leaders were killing to spread slavery, you don't know Lincoln's dilemma.  

Virtually NO ONE wanted to fight the South, who were the "toughs" of the day,. Violent men, boasting of violence, and promising violence -- delivering violence.   Southern leaders did not just yap about killing to spread slavery, see below-- they BOASTED about killing to spread slavery.



Even Southern Senators rarely said "Nigger"  on the Senate floor, but Douglas did, almost certainly to pander to Jeff Davis and other Southern leaders, to show how loyal he was to the South. 

The fear of "Niggers"  sleeping with your daughters, was about as powerful weapon as Douglas could use -- so he did.  Over and over.

Not just in Lincoln Douglas debates, but in his own speeches and messages to the public.  Nor was Douglas alone -- any politician who dared to be anti slavery, was instantly accused of being for black men taking white women. 

This may be far too raw and disturbing truth to teach grade school children -- even high school.   But torture, slavery, and the spread of slavery for GOD, was a disturbing truth.   We can't teach it?   Actually it's not taught, even in college text books. As far as we know, no college text books shows Southern War Ultimatums and speeches by Southern leaders boasting they were killing for God, and killing to spread slavery.

tthe video above, just like our text books, is white washed from the very ugly reality of what Lincoln -- and the country -- faced.

Nor does the video show Douglas running from one side of the stage to the other, exciting the crowd just before Lincoln spoke, on the dangers of electing Lincoln -- because he would have your daughters sleep with "Niggers". But it can help you understand what was going on, and how Lincoln responded. 

Douglas, though he was from Illinois, was the "South's man in the North". 

 In the South itself, Southern leaders were telling crowds Lincoln would  "EXTERMINATE THE WHITE RACE"  by this obsession for equality.

Just stopping the spread of slavery into Kansas (Kansas voted overwhelmingly to reject slavery) Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race?

Yes, that's what they shouted to cheering crowds.  Let that sink in.

In the South, they were told Lincoln would not only have their daughters "sleep with Niggers" -- but that Lincoln was going to "exterminate the white race".

Don't forget that, next some some shit head tells you some isolated quotes by Lincoln.

Get ALL of Lincoln's full speeches, and his actions.  While Lincoln did not "WANT"  this person or that, to sleep with black men or white men, Lincoln was focused, and when able he proved the Southern leaders right.  Lincoln really would kick slavery to death, once he got the chance.

The Southern leaders killing sprees, boasting of killing to spread slavery, and their boasting of starting the Civil War to spread slavery (yes, they boasted of starting the Civil War to spread slavery, see proof below), gave Lincoln the opporunity to kick the shit out of slavery, and kill the Southern God of slavery.

Of course, Lincoln would eventually be shot -- hours after his speech about voting rights for blacks.   Never mind  how carefully Lincoln spoke about voting rights for blacks -- Booth heard the speech, changed his plan from kidnap to killing, and shot Lincoln hours later.

No one even told you that, did they?

 But you get some idea of what was going on, even if watered down, in the highly tamed video above, taken from a 1939 movie, which just happened to touch on this point.   

You are not taught, either, that Southern leaders were even more fear mongering -- Lincoln will DESTROY THE WHITE RACE -- just by stopping the spread of slavery.

The governors of Florida and Georgia were quite clear, too.  Just stopping the spread of slavery -- remember that, because no one else is going to tell you -- just stopping the violent spread of slavery was going to destroy the white race. 

If you don't understand the violet -- ISIS like lunacy really -- of Southern killing sprees, Southern War Ultimatums, Southern leaders boasting of killing to spread slavery,  you can not understand Lincoln, or the Civil War. 

Yet the ISIS like killings, tortures, public whippings, drownings, and hangings, were very real.   Boasting of killing to spread slavery -- was very real.  All white washed now.

Lincoln was radical mo-fo, just as his enemies and friends said alike, at the time.   But to know just how radical, you have to know what the fuck was going on, and the danger to Lincoln to even speak where he spoke, and how he spoke. 




While you are told Lincoln "didn't really care about equality or slavery" -- actually, his 3000 speeches, and his amazing actions, say differently.

Even more, Lincoln's actions kicked that falsehood in the ass, sideways.

Lincoln was hated in the South, for his "Negro Worshiping"  from 1846 on.  Did you know that? Lincoln gained national attention as a freshman congressmen, when he stood up to President Polk, and bluntly accused Polk of doing the South's bidding, by starting a war against Mexico, in  order to spread slavery.

You probably never heard that the war against Mexico, was, as Lincoln and others exposed,  was a war to spread slavery.   Lincoln was called a traitor by Stephen A Douglas, and the public was told Lincoln betrayed the "soldiers in the field".


Officially, in speech and in print, the Gov of Florida told crowds Lincoln would destroy us, just by stopping the SPREAD of slavery. 

Guess who knew this -- guess who knew what Southern leaders accused Lincoln of (and anyone against slavery) was going to destroy the white race?

Just being against the spread of slavery in Kansas (Kansas was already a free state, when they issued war ultimatums that Kansas must be a slave state) was going to destroy the white race.

Your daughters will sleep with "Niggers"

Your wife will be "with Niggers on the street".

All because of Lincoln.




Frederick Douglass knew.

Guess who knew this -- guess who knew what Northern leaders accused Lincoln of?

If you read Lincoln's FULL speeches, in context (meaning, you know what the fuck was going on) Douglass was right, Lincoln was radical, obsessed, and determined to end slavery.

If you read LIncoln's FULL speeches, in context (see above)  Stephen A Douglas was right, too. Lincoln was obsessed, he spoke "over and over"  about equality of the races. 

But  you have no clue of that, if you accept the edited bullshit, and ignore, or don't know, what was going on.

No one -- remember that  -- no one, did this like Lincoln. NO one went were Lincoln went (including Kansas) and spoke like this.   The big abolitionist speakers never dared go where LIncoln went.  And Lincoln was running for office, trying to get elected. He was not trying to get killed.

LIncoln would eventually get killed -- maybe you heard?   He was killed after Booth heard  his speech about voting rights for blacks. Lincoln parsed words even there --  allow "educated" blacks to vote.  But that was far too much for Booth, who changed the kidnap plan to kill, because of Lincoln's speech.

Maybe someone should have told you. Or, you could not be so fucking lazy, and read his full speeches, and learn what was going on. Either way, Lincoln was a radical and effective champion of equality, no matter what your dumb ass uncle says.


Frederick Douglass knew. 

Douglass did not read some bullshit approved by Southern school boards, or some bullshitter who never bothered to list Lincoln's actions, or give his full speeches.

Douglas did not need to talk to your high school or college "history teacher,"  whatever opinion they might have.

Douglass knew what the fuck happened.


How did Lincoln react to being called "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"?

See for yourself....


Forty-Seven times, Lincoln tried to pass legislation to bar slavery in the land just stolen from Mexico (yes, it was stolen -- by force).   Of course, those who just caused a war to spread slavery, were not about to agree to keep slavery out of that stolen territory.




When you know the complete story, in context, as Frederick Douglass himself said - Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous and determined"  to end slavery, and for equality of blacks under the law.

Why would Douglass -- the genius of the 19th century, be so easily fooled?  

Douglass was not fooled.  Douglass knew all about what Lincoln was up against -- like Lincoln being called "Nigger lover"   who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  by the most powerful speaker of the day, Stephen A Douglas, over and over.

Douglass knew that most whites in the North did not give a shit about slaves in the South, and would not piss on them if they were on fire.     

In fact, crowds cheered Stephen A Douglas, when he told them Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Lincoln lost that election, because Stephen A Douglas was able to make people fear their daughters would have to "sleep with Niggers" if Lincoln was successful.

No one -- not one text book in the United States -- shows the biggest theme of the election of 1858 and 1860, was not just the violent spread of slavery demanded by the South, but also, the fear that your wife and your daughter will "be with Niggers". 

But it was.  How do you put that in US text books?  

Southern leaders chimed in -- the white race will "be exterminated"   and whites will be equal with blacks, which would cause the phyiscal death of the white race.

Sound odd?   It was common fodder, and Southern leaders screamed it from the rooftops.  Crowds cheered to speeches about the SPREAD of slavery, by violence, because the white race was at stake.

No one tells you that.

But -- you have to read more than a few partial quotes.  Even in the speeches -- like the famous Peoria speech -- you can (and many have) misquoted Lincoln, by not revealing the entire speech.

Over, and over, and over, in fact, Lincoln would SEEM to agree with the prejudice of the day.  But that was how Lincoln "set up 'em up"  said one historian, so he could now them down, in the next sentence or paragraph. "That's when Lincoln brought the thunder".


This was Lincoln's regular technique -- seen in the video below.  Go on, watch it.   You can quote him incorrectly if you want.  That's fine.  But show his COMPLETE responses,  his complete speeches, and you can't play those word games honestly. 

Lincoln kicked ass -- and did it effectively.  People would come to Lincoln's speech believing blacks were more or less dogs that could talk, they believed blacks should be enslaved, and it made no difference if the "stupid blacks" were enslaved.

Lincoln changed that.  People left his speeches thinking and feeling differently.   Much could be said about Lincoln's life -- he left this life with people thinking and feeling differently, because he was in this earth.
No one else --- none of the big abolition speakers -- had this effect. Nor did they dare even go where he went (see below). 

No one ever told you, did they, that Lincoln went were others would not go, and say things they would not say.  See below how Lincoln went to Kansas, where it was still AGAINST THE LAW to speak publically or write publicly against slavery.

No one told you that either.    That's why, to understand LIncoln or the Civil War, you have to understand what the fuck was going on - specifically the violent, vile, ISIS like behavior, killings, and threats by Southern leaders. 

You had no clue -- it's not in any US history text book -- that Southern leaders boasted of killing not just to spread slavery, but they also boasted of killing those who spoke against slavery.

It's time you learned just how vile Southern leaders were.

From his time in Congress -- standing up to President Polk, accusing (correctly) the President and Southern leaders of starting a war in order to spread slavery in even more land,  Lincoln was about as radical as you can get.

True Lincoln sometimes parsed words. but read his full speeches, in context.  Learn how "mo fo" radical Lincoln was, when he was, where he was.

47 times - 47 times -- Lincoln tried to ban slavery in the land just stolen (yes stolen) from Mexico.    He stood up to the President and the South, and from that moment on, Lincoln was on a mission to kick slavery in the fucking ass.

And he did. He just had to be smart about it, or he would have been shot a lot sooner. 


From that point on, after Lincoln tried 47 times to ban slavery in the land just stolen by war, Lincoln was a marked man in the South.   They accused him of "Negro Worship"  and that he "refused to support our troops in time of war".

In thousands of speeches, Lincoln's message was radical -- he parsed words, yes, so he would not be killed as others were, who spoke too candidly (see below).

If you don't know people were still being killed in 1850's for speaking against slavery, blame your stupid teacher and Southern crybaby dominated text book publishers.


Linclon was hated, by some in the North and by virtually all leaders in  South, for being a "Nigger lover" who "was obsessed for equality fore the Nigger".

And -- Stephen A Douglas could and did, list why he said Lincoln was obsessed with equality.  No one even mentions that, much less teaches it. 

Funny -- (not really) how now, stupid fucks like to trash LIncoln for not caring, not even being against slavery.

And the only way they can say this -- or believe it -- is to be dumb as fuck about Lincoln's full actions, and full speeches.



It may sound preposterous, but Southern states controlled  US text books.  Texas (naturally) was the home of the text book publishers, and those publishers had to produce a product acceptable to Southern school boards. 

They did not want to create three sets of text books -- one for the Deep South, one for the Upper South, and one for the North and West.   Not some big plot, just an economic reality. They needed their books to sell, all over.

Southern school boards insisted nothing horrible be told about Southern leaders or the Confederacy. 

So no mention, for example, of Robert E Lee's torture of slave girls, no mention of Davis's cowardice.

NO mention especially, of Southern leaders -- from the very top -- boasting they were enslaving and torturing for GOD, and would spread this "very special" kind of "Godly" slavery to the rest of the US  -- and the world.

See, the South did indeed have a "very special" kind of slavery, and they boasted of it.  It was "Of God" and it was meant to punish the black race for biblical sins.

They did not admit that, they BOASTED of it. Lee boasted that his torture of slave girls was "necessary for their instruction"  and that God "knew and intended slaves endure painful discipline."

Remember that, the tortures, killings, and slavery itself, was for biblical obedience.  If you were against slavery -- you were against GOD.

In fact, it was illegal in the South to even preach a God that was kind to all, that whole "do unto others"    and "unto the least of these "  was a sermon that could get you arrested and tortured, if you implied or said God was against slavery.

Bet no one told you Southern government controlled what people could preach. 

And also, mentions of Southern War Ultimatums.

Generally, what Southern leaders boasted out the ass about before the Civil War, was not allowed in any US text book.



Instead, text books  inserted weasel words, Orwellian bullshit, and watered down nonsense.    They even inserted, and still do, the absurd claim that Southern leaders cared about "state's rights" 

State's rights? Uh-- nonsense. In fact, Southern leaders hated states rights, when it came to slavery. 

State's rights? 

Actually Southern leaders hated states rights, when Kansas rejected slavery,  and sent 1000 killers to Kansas in 1856, not to debate, or negotiate, but to kill and terrorize anyone who even spoke against slavery. 

 They made it a law -- by setting up a "bogus legislature" as it's now called,  that speaking against slavery, writing newspapers against slavery, was a crime.   

Even speaking against their "bogus legislature" in public was a crime.  People were hung, tortured, drowned, and Southern leaders were PROUD of that,

No one told you that.  Their vile killings in KS, boasted of by Southern leaders at the time, went on all through the Civil War.

No one told you that.  



Without all the basic facts, you can not possibly know a valid narrative. 

Leave out, for example, Southern leaders killing sprees of whites who were against slavery, long before the civil war, and you will not understand what the US faced.

Omit, for another example, Southern leaders boasting of killing and boasting of torturing folks, and promising endless torture killings and war, unless slavery was spread to all (yes all) of the US, and you will not understand what Lincoln faced.

Never learn that Lincoln was hated in the NORTH for being a "Nigger lover" who "wants your daughters for to sleep with Niggers" -- and you won't understand why Lincoln, at times, had to parse words.

Not know that Southern leaders regularly told the public the white race would be exterminated, and that to avoid extermination of white race, SLAVERY MUST SPREAD -- and you will have no clue what was in the minds of many Southern people. 

BECAUSE South controlled text books, and what they would show about the South,  you would never learn, in text books, that over, and over, and over, the public was told your daughters will sleep with Niggers, if Lincoln gets his way.

Not just once, not just here or there.  The basic tool Southern leaders used to make the public afraid and hateful, was this -- "niggers will take the white women".

That's hard to tell anyone, in any level.   It's no wonder you don't explain that to kids in grade school.

But we don't teach this in high school or college, either.

Most newspapers, even at the time, changed "Niggers" to Negro.  But read the full newspaper articles, North and South. Lincoln would have "Nigger" men will be with your daughter and your wife.

Lincoln had to deal with that. Lincoln had to get up, and speak, moments after the most powerful speaker of the times, Stephen A Douglas, accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with Niggers.

How did Lincoln handle that?  See the video. That shows you exactly how he handled it. 

Lincoln might have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had spoken any more powerfully against slavery.


Just like the bible -- you can quote Lincoln anyway you like. In Lincoln's 3000 or more speeches, and hundreds of comments and writings, are various words you can shape into anything you fucking want.

So if you leave out Lincolns thousand plus statements of why slavery must end, why we must stop the spread of slavery now, and how Southern leaders had made it impossible to stop slavery all over the US -- you don't know shit.

Over, and over, and over, and over, Lincoln exposed South's plan to spread slavery by means "foul and more foul".   That would be his "House Divided Speech"  -- and many others -- outlining just how the South was and is planning to spread slavery to all of the US.

And Lincoln was right -- yes, he was.  Southern leaders actually boasted of this, as you will see, including Jeff Davis.  Including US Senator Atchison, the man who got Kansas Act passed, then rushed to Kansas and started terrorizing and killing anyone who dared speak or try to vote against slavery.

Did you know that?  Did you know the US Senator who passed Kansas Act, then rushed to Kansas, and began what  he called the war to spread slavery "for the entire South".

That's why we need to teach what Southern leaders did, and boasted of.   Even Jeff Davis -- see below -- boasted about spreading slavery "by force of arms" into the North.

If you leave all this out of US text books, which the US has done, thanks to Southern school boards crying and lying -- no wonder people can't make sense of Lincoln or the Civil War.

The South was killing to SPREAD slavery, and boasting out the ass about it. Not kinda, not sorta, not in a way.   That is not in US text books.

You will have to find those speeches, documents, boasting, in the South's own documents, in their own speeches, in their own books.  It was always there, and always common knowledge in the South and North -- Southern leaders were killing to spread slavery, and their killign sprees and boasting of it, plus Kansas Act, and Dred Scott decision, made Civil War inevitable.

Because the SOUTH said it was inevitable -- they boasted they would have the spread of slavery, or war.  It was an "act of war"  to elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery.


Lincoln HAD to speak carefully, or he would have gotten a bullet to the brain much sooner, as you will see.   People who hear this now, think that's crazy. Nonsense. Others were killed, or beaten, or jailed, for speaking like Lincoln did, in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

Did you know people were killed, tortured, arrested for speaking against slavery in almost all Southern states?  Did you know Southern leaders invaded Kansas and created their own "Deep South" set of laws,  making it a crime to tell a slave they were free, or to publish newspapers against slavery, or to try to vote against slavery?

You had no clue, did you.


Even so -- despite Lincoln parsing words at times -- no one was as radical and as effective as LIncoln.  He was "radical as hell"  and no one left his speeches at all confused.  Slavery must go, or the US will go. One or the other ends. House Divided.  

The House Divided speech was 100% -- every word -- about the Southern efforts to spread slavery to all of the US.   And Lincoln was right. BY Kansas Act, and then Dred Scott (Dred Scott decision ordered - yes ordered -- the federal government to protect slavery even in states it was rejected by public votes).   

The Dred Scott decision - said Jefferson Davis correctly -- changed everything. Jefferson Davis pointed out what Lincoln did, the decision was the legal basis for spreading slavery by force, into areas that did not want it.  Davis himself called the resistance to slavery into Kansas "intolerable" because of the Dred Scott decision.




Remember, the people of Kansas voted 90% against slavery.  That did not matter, according to Jeff Davis.  And Lincoln pointed this out, again, and again. "The purpose of the Dred Scott decision ... is to spread slavery in all of the United States".

If Kansas could not reject slavery, even with 90% vote against slavery, because of Dred Scott, either slavery must end, or the United States must end.   One or the other.

Lincoln added -- but he did not expect the United States to end.  One or the other would end -- but not the United States.  In other words, slavery would end.

And he was right.


Most people -- sadly, even most history teachers -- have no clue whatsoever the dangers Lincoln faced, physical dangers, when he spoke. They do not know other whites were beaten, and even killed, for speaking as Lincoln did. Others were drowned, others burned to death. The violence -- including violence in the North -- against people who spoke against slavery, is simply not discussed now. And certainly not taught.


LIncoln spoke regularly spoke in an very effective way -- a way that worked to change the minds of millions, then.   But also,  the same dynamic Lincoln used to change people's minds then,(when distorted as it often is ) let liars, dumbasses, and haters trash him now.


Seeming to agree, then beat the shit out of that prejudice

For example, in one sentence LIncoln would speak in a way that SEEMED to agree with a prejudice of the day.   But in the next sentence, or in the next paragraph, or by the end of the speech, LIncoln would "kick the shit out of that which moments ago, he seemed to agree with.

Such as Lincoln claiming he was not for "perfect equality" --right after Stephen A Douglas scared the shit out of the crowd by claiming Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

To which LIncoln would have to get up, and say he never said blacks should have "perfect equality" --  which Lincoln haters quote.  But Lincoln went on to kick ass, and brought down the thunder -- showing that any slave should have the same rights as any white man.    

In 'certain respects"   the slave woman (Douglas just referred to her as a Nigger) is not my equal, any more than I am Judge Douglas's equal, in certain respects.   But in her natural right to eat the bread she made with her own hands, she IS my equal and the equal of any man".

Guess-- go on, guess, which part Lincoln haters tell you about?  They tell you about the "set up"  where LIncoln seems to agree.  They sure as fuck don't dare mention Lincoln kicking ass moments later.

Nor -- of course, do they show his actions, 1847 on.  

If all you knew about Lincoln was from your text book, and from his haters, you would not know much at all. 


Douglas (Stephen A) told the crowds repeatedly, with great emphasis, Lincoln wants your "daughter to sleep with Niggers".   Your wife would "be" with "Niggers walking down the street".

Douglas would also tell the crowd he saw Lincoln  -- that day -- with a white woman and Frederick Douglas, in a carriage (a complete falsehood, by the way). 

In Charleston, Douglas went from side to side of the stage, spewing out - actually spitting the words "Lincoln wants  your daughters to sleep with Niggers".    And the crowd was terrified, as a result, of Lincoln.

Lincoln lost that election, because Douglas sucessfully painted LIncoln as radial abolitionist intent on your daughter sleeping with "Niggers".

No one told you that, because it's a vile and ugly truth, one which Southern school boards would never allow in the text books, and Northern schools were not eager to show that kind of talk either.

Black men "in bed with your daughter"  was very much an issue, North and South, if slavery ended.  There is not a single text book in the US that even mentions that, never mind how many times Douglas screamed it, no matter how many times the issue was in the press at the time.

It's not taught now.  But Lincoln had to deal with that.  Try to grasp that.


You are never told this, at all, not even in college courses.  But Douglas's fear mongering were the kind of thing that got his enemies beaten -- killed in Kansas.  Douglas Senate enemy, Charles Sumner, was beaten, almost to death, on the Senate floor -- while Douglas sat by smiling. Did anyone ever tell you that?


But it was common knowledge then.   When Douglas told crowds their daughters would "sleep with Niggers"  and their wives would "be with Niggers" -- that was for a reason.  To make Lincoln back off.

Lincoln did not back off.  But Lincoln had to handle this carefully, to not be beaten, like Sumner and others were recently, but to have any chance of being elected.

As it was, Lincoln lost that 1858 election, because Douglas painted Lincoln as too radical, obsessed with equality for the "Nigger".



LINCOLN'S REACTION.....   in this speech, and generally, even when speaking extemporaneously, LIncoln had to be careful what he said, because most people, even in the North, did not give a damn about slaves, and certainly were not eager to fight the South for any reason.

So how did Lincoln handle it? Over and over, and over, and over, he did it by seeming to agree, then kicking ass.  He never said, (and true, he did  not ever say in public) that he was for "perfect" equality".    He never said he was against perfect equality either -- but factually, he was correct.  

As to marrying "Niggers"   Lincoln rephrased Douglas's vile and often used "NIgger"  to be "Negro marriage".  He did not need to marry a "colored" woman -- he could just leave her along. 

 Then Lincoln brought down the thunder.   "In her natural right she IS the equal of me and any other man"

But guess how liars and dumb asses quote Lincoln -- the part where Lincoln said he "never said he was for perfect equality".

There are at least 12 such quotations -  each of them deceptive, each of them leave out context.    Mostly, they leave out context that Southern leaders were talking about genocide against blacks, if they had to free them.  No one ever told you that, either? 

But none of the LIncoln haters tell you Lincoln's amazing FULL ACTIONS from 1846 on, nor will they dare show you his full quotes. 

Over and over -- thousands of times -- Lincoln spoke, regardless of the danger to himself -- of equality of the races, under the law. "There should be no distinction between this color and this,  this race and that".

The lowest slave  "CERTAINLY IS EQUAL TO ME OR ANY MAN" in their inalienable rights. "

Lincoln did little else -- from when Kansas Act was passed, to push slavery into Kansas by subtrafuge and violence -- but speak against slavery, go place to place, nearly ever day, blasting the living shit out of Kansas Act as a ruse, and how Southern leaders were engaged in process that would spread slavery to the entire US.

And he was right.

In fact, Lincoln was hated and feared, even in the North, for being so "radical for Nigger rights".   Somehow, no one teaches that.     


Yes, there were other speakers for equality.  But none went where Lincoln went, when Lincoln went there.  No one did what Lincoln did. 


What most people don't know today, is that to be called an "abolitionist"  was like being called a child molester now, in much of the US, including much of the North.  The more blunt way -   as Stephen A Douglas used -- was to call Lincoln a "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughter's to sleep with  and marry with Niggers".

This was not some casual slam at Lincoln -- it was the very heart of Stephen Douglas successful campaign against Lincoln -- Douglas won in 1858, in his senate race against Lincoln, precisely because the public, even in the North, did not want their daughters to "sleep with Niggers".

To speak too bluntly for equality "for the Nigger"  as Stephen Douglas would say, was dangerous.  Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed, probably burned to death, in Illinois, for publishing an anti slavery paper.   

People were still be arrested, tortured, hung, even in Kansas, at the time Lincoln spoke. In all of the South, states had laws against public speaking against slavery -- you could be arrested and tortured for owning the wrong book.

In Illinois it was not against the law to speak against slavery, but it was still dangerous in some areas.   Lincoln's friend's brother was killed -- likely burned to death -- in Alton, after he refused to stop publishing an anti slavery paper.

 People today have no clue -- "abolitionist"  did not go just anywhere to speak, and they spoke to folks who usually agreed with them already.  Lincoln did not do that. Lincoln even when to Kansas, when it was still illegal to speak in public against slavery.  You were never told that, were you?  


From 1847 on -- Lincoln a marked man for what he did in Congress.

Lincoln's actions matter, too.  From 1847 on, Lincoln was called a "Negro Worshiper" and hated in the South, and considered radical in the North.

.  No one told you this either -- Lincoln stood up to President Polk in 1847, and called him on starting the war in Mexico in order to help spread slavery. Polk was unsuccessful, despite Lincoln trying 47 times to prohibit slavery in the land just stolen from Mexico.

 Forty seven times - Lincoln tried to stop slavery spread into the land US stole to spread slavery. You are not told any of these facts, that Lincoln tried to stop the theft, that he tried to stop the spread of slavery, or that US killed to gain land to spread slavery. 

LIncoln spoke about the US starting this war to spread slavery -- no one told you.  LIncoln tried to stop the spread of slavery in these stolen lands. No one told you.

Lincoln was called a coward, someone "unwilling to support our own soldiers".   No one told you. Lincoln was hated in the South, and much of the North, from then on.  No one told you.


KILLED IN KANSAS....For example, in Kansas, Southern leaders had made it a crime to speak or publish anti-slaver newspapers.  Jefferson Davis, as Secretary of War, in 1856, sent over 1000 men to Kansas, under his official "General of Law and Order" to arrest or kill folks who continued to speak against slavery.

Did anyone ever tell you it was a crime in many states to even speak or write against slavery?   You could be arrested, and tortured, and jailed, for just owning the wrong book -- a book that even suggested slavery was wrong, could get you tortured.

No one told you that, did they?

Guess who knew that?   When Frederick Douglass spoke about Lincoln, Douglass knew all kinds of things -- like how people could be tortured or killed, for even speaking against slavery.  

Just speaking against slavery was a crime in states controlled by Southern leaders. No one told you that.

Guess who went to Kansas and spoke against slavery, anyway?   No one told you this either, did they?

There is a reason Lincoln's enemies, even in the North, said "Mr. Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Because he was.   Yes, yes, at times (a few times) Lincoln spoke in terms of Union.  In one famous letter -- he even highlighted keeping the Union together.  But typically, Southern leaders and Stephen A Douglas (the South's man in the North) would tell crowds things like this -- "Mr Lincoln want's  your daughters to sleep with Niggers."


Stephen Douglas knew LIncoln well.   He knew him socially for most of his adult life, and was scared shitless Lincoln would defeat  him for the Senate in 1858.

Stephen Douglas knew Lincoln had already made thousands of speeches, and would make thousands more, and in each speech, Lincoln would bring up "all men are created equal"  and from 1856 on, Lincoln would predict either slavery would end, or the Union would end.

So  when Stephen Douglas accused Lincoln of "repeating over and over"   that all races are equal, Douglas was right.  Lincoln had said such things over and over.

Stephen Douglas was also right -- the US Supreme Court had ordered - yes ordered-- in Dred Scott decision, that slavery be protected in Kansas, even though 90% of white citizens there, were against slavery.

Frederick Douglass knew Lincoln well, too. 

  Plus, he was an ex slave,  helped Lincoln on Emancipation Proclamation,  pushed him to enlist blacks in the US military (and give them guns).

But more than all that -- Douglass knew a million things that never showed up in your text book, or any book you ever read.  

Such as -- Lincoln was called "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   To his face -- in public, Lincoln was accused by the most powerful speaker of the 19th century, of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  and wanting

And more.   But this was not some idle thing, some "throw away" comment.  Lincoln the "Negro Worshiper"  who wants your daughters to "sleep with and marry with Niggers"  was the very basis -- the nerve, the real issue --that kept Lincoln out of office for so long.

LIncoln LOST repeatedly, because he was painted as a man who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   and would "destroy the white race".  LIncoln only won the Presidency when four men ran for the office, and he was the ONLY one against the spread of slavery.   The others were fine with the spread of slavery, and they divided the proslavery vote.

Douglass also knew -- as you do not -- that Lincoln was in danger of being shot, or attacked, or even burned to death, as a given mob may decide, if the hate mongers like Stephen A Douglas, and the fear mongers like Robert Toombs,  could incite the crowds enough.

Others were beaten - including a US Senator beaten on the Senate floor. Other anti-slavery candidates were killed, and it was illegal to even be or speak against slavery in the South, with torture (public whipping) and jail awaiting those who even owned the wrong book.  

The  hate and fear -- pumped up by men like Stephen A Douglas, Robert Toombs and others, was so great, violence was not only common,  Southern leaders promised war--- yes war -- if the North dared elect anyone against the spread of slavery. 

No one told you that, did they?  Well they should have. And I will tell you. 

Hang on to your fucking hat, you are about to learn what your history book was never going to tell you. 


"Mr Lincoln constantly repeats, over and over, his belief that all men are created equal, including the Nigger...  ( this is treason) , contrary to this stands the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott"

Lincoln repeated " constantly"  and "over and over"  according to politicians of the day -- and indeed, he did.  

Yes, Lincoln parsed words -- in thousands of speeches, he probably spoke 2 million words. Lying bastards and shit heads now quote Lincoln in deceptive ways.

But no one was confused then.   Anyone who left a Lincoln speech knew exactly what he wanted -- and why.

LIncoln wanted to end slavery -- and start, by ending the cancer of the SPREAD of slavery.   Just that was radical as hell. 


Lincoln, from 1854 on, did little BUT repeat that, in thousands of speeches, one way or another, and do so for the rest of his life, till he was shot in the head for speaking of voting rights for blacks., 

Most dumb asses could not even find Lincoln's 2000 or more speeches, nor bother to read them fully.   If they did, and if they knew what the fuck was going on (killings, war ultimatums, just to name two), Lincoln would indeed seem like he did to folks then -- radical.

Not every sentence was radical -- Lincoln didn't particularly like getting shot, or burned to death, as others, even in Illinois, were.  And of course, he prefered to win an election, which would mean slave power wins and slavery spreads, than lose.

Small details most dumb asses don't seem to grasp.  


Northern hate mongers just accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter and wife to "sleep with Niggers".

In the South, leaders told the crowds, to pump up fear and hate, that Lincoln "was going to exterminate the white race".

Try to grasp that.  

Try to grasp, too, that Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed, as were others, for speaking too bluntly for equality.


Lincoln was not the only one against slavery, and everyone who       who even hinted slavery was bad was hit with this shit -- oh, you want Niggers to sleep with our women?  Oh, you want to destroy the white race.

This is what Lincoln had to deal with, whenever he spoke. Whenever he got up in public.


Your text books don't even mention this -- but you don't have a clue what was going on, and how amazing Lincoln was in rebuttal, if you don't know this.

Lincoln had to deal with the hate and fear from such wide spread fears and hate.  Remember, this was common attack by thousands of people who hated abolitionist, or hated anyone against slavery -- because black men would take your women.

  This is not just a few people afraid.  In Illinois, for example, it was against the law for blacks to even move there.  When you hear that the North was "prejudice"  what you DO NOT HEAR, is how pro slavery folks pumped up the hate and fear of black men -- taking your women. Your daughter will sleep with Niggers?  

Remember too, as you see by the transcripts and newspaper accounts in papers then, Douglas told the crowd repeatedly, in his "Nigger rant"  as a Quincy editor put it, that Lincoln wants-- actively wants -- your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one even hinted this to you, at all.  Surely no text book.

And that's not all Stephen Douglas did in the debates.  

Douglas went on, and on. He told the crowd he saw Lincoln and a white woman, in a carriage with Frederick Douglass!   If you were seen with a white woman, and a black man, you were all but a criminal, you were formenting the "extermination of the white race"  said Robert Toombs, Secretary of State in the Confederacy.

Lincoln had to respond to that. And he had to use humor, he had to allay the fears of the people.  He would say we "MAY NOT BE" equal in all respects,  or "We may not be equal in skin color" (no duh)  but in our natural rights any black slave is equal to any white man.

THUNDER.  Remember, Lincoln brought down the thunder, like no one else.  

The way Lincoln brought the thunder -- he first seemed to agree with a prejudice -- we "may not be equal"  - or, "I never said I was for perfect social equality"    Each time, Lincoln parsed words.  I never said?   Right, to that crowd, he never said he was for "perfect social equality".    But he was about to bring down the thunder in the next fucking sentence, and over and over, Lincoln did that.

Over, and over, Lincoln "set up"  his thunder of any slave woman being equal to ANY white man, with a sentence or two parsing words. Words absolutely needed, or Lincoln would have been shot much sooner.  

Guess -- go on, guess -- which part of Lincoln's speech his haters quote today?  They sure as fuck don't quote the parts Lincoln brought down the thunder and kicked ass.

They sure don't quote Stephen A Douglas, and many others, accusing Lincoln of being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

They sure don't show you Lincoln's long  history of kicking slavery in the ass, since his 1846 term in Congress.  Gee, I wonder why those dick wads leave that out? Oh, you think maybe they are lying bastards, or stupid bastards?  

Some are lying, some are stupid, but it does not matter.  Lincoln was a radical zealot, according to Frederick Douglass, and when you understand Lincoln's  FULL MEASURE -  Douglass used that term "FULL MEASURE"  Lincoln was the most radical and effective of them all, and absolutely indespensible to stop slavery. No one else came close.

Oh others talked in safe areas. Others were paid, others only appeared before crowds that agreed with them.

But Lincoln -- Lincoln went anywhere and kicked ass.  Yes, he had to parse words -- so the fuck what?  He ended up killing slavery with these parsed words, so fuck those that act offended Lincoln said this or that sentence on a give day. Get his FULL speeches, you ass wipes, and see what he did. 


Nobody else was doing this, like Lincoln.  Lincoln even went to Kansas, where it was still illegal to speak in public against slavery, per the laws Jeff Davis man, US SEnator David Rice Atchison passed, in 1855. Lincoln went there -- in fact, he went to Atchison Kansas, the city named after the man who invaded Kansas and set up the violent "thuggery"  and formed the "bogus legistlature"   that made it a crime to speak or write against slavery.


Can you name anyone else that did this?  Probably you never heard of any of this.

Guess who knew all this-- Frederick Douglass knew. 

That's why Stephen Douglas rightly called Lincoln (who he hated) "obsessed with equality".   By his actions, his 3000 speeches, his actions in Congress, he was obsessed with equalty. What the fuck do you think LIncoln did every day, nearly every hour, from 1854 on?   From the day Davis Rice Atchison invaded Kansas, after passing the Kansas Act, Lincoln was on the road, or prepairing to do so, giving thousands of speeches,.

He was not fucking selling pots and pans. He was trying to kick slavery in the ass by first stopping the spread of it, and making blacks and whites "equal under the law"  as they should be already, and were already, if you went by the Declaration of Independence.  ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.  

Did you know the US Surpreme Court ruled that blacks are not even human beings?

Did you know that Lincoln was called "traitor"  and "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  by the most powerful speakers of that day?

Did you know that when Lincoln spoke, he was actually in danger, as others were beaten and killed -- and Lincoln himself would be killed -- when Southern fear and hate mongering propelled Booth to shoot Lincoln -- and call him a traitor - for going against the Dred Scott decision?

Did you know Jeff Davis specifically said Dred Scott decision that blacks are not humans (see below) meant that Southern leaders could take "appropriate actions" including war, to spread slavery?


No one told you that.  The ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders has been completely whitewashed in US text books,.


Over, and over, and over, and over, and over, thousands of times, week, after week, for several years, Lincoln pushed "all men are created equal" .   Did any Lincoln hater tell you this?

Do you know what LIncoln did -- virtually every day of his life -- from 1854 on?  He went from place to place, large and small, speaking of why we need to stop the spread of slavery -- because slavery will spread to the entire US.  SLavery is a cancer, he said, and to stop the cancer, stop the spread of it.

That was radical as hell -- and quite against the Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott.

Did anyone ever even mention that to you? 

Fuck no.

LIncoln the "Nigger Worshipper"  . Lincoln the "Traitor"  deserves death -- and was eventually killed for speaking of voting rights for blacks.  His speech about voting rights was very timid, he introduced the radical idea very softly.   Allow "educated" blacks to vote, he suggested.

A few hours later, Lincoln had a bullet in the brain, put there by a man who heard that speech.

Did you know that?


 This was not some isolated case, this was as common as common gets: fear of "Niggers"  being with "sleeping with and marrying Niggers"   as Stephen Douglas said.

No one told you that, either. In fact, go look at any 50 or 100 books about Lincoln or Civil War.  The don't even mention, whatsoever, the barrage Lincoln faces about "Niggers sleeping with your women. 

The Secretary of State of the Confederacy, claimed Lincoln was exterminate the white race!  Crowds cheered.

 Southerners claimed Lincoln was going to DESTROY THE WHITE RACE. 

When Southern men joined or were drafted to fight in the Civil War, they had heard nothing but talk like that -- your wife and your daughters will be with Negro men - for years.


Frederick Douglass made it clear -- he knew Lincoln had to appeal to a nation that feared blacks, and he knew that people would have shot Lincoln much sooner,  and he would never have been elected dog catcher, if he spoke any more candidly that he did, at times.


But Douglass also knew Lincoln's actions -- hundreds of them, many you never heard of.  Certainly no book trashing Lincoln will mention any, and even those supposedly objective about Lincoln,  never point out.

Under his rule -- see what Douglass thought was important, and you have little or no clue even happened......

Do Douglass knew Lincoln's words- - and actions.  More, he knew what Lincoln was up against.

Like Southern leaders said Lincoln would destroy the white race -- exterminate the white race -- by stopping the spread of slavery.

Lincoln again, and again, and again, said to end slavery, we have to stop the growth.  He was right.  Slavery had to expand, or slavery, like any cancer, will kill the host.

And the South agreed. 

 There is very little Lincoln agreed with Southern leaders about -- except the need to spread slavery to survive.

Southern leaders -- try to grasp this -- made it very clear. We MUST expand slavery or we will be exterminated. The white race will be overtaken, the slaves will revolt and kill us.  Over and over this is the kind of thing Southern leaders said -- with a smattering of "GOD WANTS US TO ENSLAVE".

GODS will -- white survival, Southern leaders would use anything.   Over and over -- and over. 

Lincoln spoke too-- over and over-- of the best way to end slavery, was to stop the spread of it.  There was no other solution in the 1850's -- almost no one alive was willing to fight Southern toughs.  The South was very much a violent place, and their leaders were almost all slave owners, who did not hesistate to torture, kill, and even burn to death, slaves who fought back.

Nor did Southern leaders bluff.  If they said they were going to kill and torture -- which they did -- they meant it.  You are  not told about this.


And there was  no earthly way to stop  slavery, unless first, we stop the spread of it. So Lincoln DID speak about ending the spread of slavery -- as  a way to end slavery everywhere, over time.  There was no will in the North to fight to end slavery -- that would not come till late in the Civil War, when finally, many men like Grant (who earlier said he would never fight to end slavery) realized Lincoln was right all along -- slavery had to end.

  So when you hear these stupid shits tell you Lincoln didn't care about slavery.... the fuck he didn't.  There was no one else going where he went, saying what he did, as effectively as he did. 

It was an "act of war" said Southern leaders, to elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery.   No, they did not care if someone was anti-slavery. Just being against the SPREAD of slavery, elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery, was an act of war.

That is what they said -and meant.  If the North elected anyone against the SPREAD of slavery, that was an act of war.

Not sorta, not kinda.  And remember, they did not bluff.


Let me repeat that.  Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, said it was an act of war to elect anyone against the spread of slavery.

Jeff Davis not only said it, he sent killers to KS to kill and terrorize anyone who published anti slavery newspapers, or tried to give public speech against slavery. 



Why was "spread of slavery"  such a huge fucking thing to Lincoln?

Because Southern leaders were already -- already -- sending killers to Kansas, as they had sent them to Missouri, as they would send them later --- to spread slavery.

Over, and over, all through US history, from 1800 on -- no one teaches you this -- Southern leaders had been killing to spread slavery.   Most people think white folks in the South loved slavery. Oh fuck no.  The slave owners, and the politicians, made sure you could not even speak against slavery, preach against slavery,  or own books against slavery, from 1840's on.

You could be tortured for simply owning the wrong book in the South.

You could be killed, even in the North, in some areas (Illinois was one)  for speaking too openly against slavery.

How many of those trashing Lincoln, tell you that?  How many even know?   Probably none.

Southern leaders pumped up the fear and hate -- hate for anyone who spoke against slavery, hate for anyone who just was against the SPREAD of slavery.

Try to grasp that.

They told the public, North and South, that stopping the SPREAD of slavery would destroy the white race by making "Niggers sleep with your daughter".

Try to grasp this -- and no one told you. This is new information to you. 

Actually  the value of slaves, the price of slaves,  was going down, down down, as there were just too many slaves.  There were slave FARMS pushing out 12-14 slave babies per slave woman.  There was also illegal importing of more slaves from Cuba -- thousands arrived illegally every year. 

By 1850, Southern leaders had so many slaves, there were more black people than white in many areas of the South.   |And whites were worried as hell.

They knew -- and said, that if they did not spread slavery, blacks would outnumber whites and eventually they would kill the whites. 

That's what crowds were told.  That's  how you got crowds to hate men like Lincoln.  And that's why LIncoln had to be careful what he said, to who. 

Stopping  the spread of slavery-- would have destroyed slavery.  And the only way to stop the spread of slavery, was to keep the Union together. 

Lincoln said -- and so did the South say -- if the Union stays in tact, slavery can not spread.  Try to grasp that.

If slavery can not spread, slavery dies.

When those fucks blame Lincoln for trying to keep the Union together, understand this -- keeping Union together was the only way to keep slavery from spreading.  Southern leaders agreed.  Lincoln agreed. Keeping Union together = ending slavery, one way or another. 

No one really tells you, what Lincoln was up against -- the ISIS like SOuthern lunatic leadership were in many ways as violent as ISIS. Leaders promised war,  got crowds cheering about GOD and slavery, got crowds eager for war, by claiming Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.

No one told you anything about this. But it was extremely well known then -- Southern leaders boasted of it, in speeches, in books, in sermons.

Try to grasp that.

And Douglass knew it all.

Douglass saw the black race go from being considered "dogs that could talk"  that "God ordained to be enslaved and punished,"   to men who were in the Union Army, who would get to vote,  and get to actually be considered HUMAN.

Did you know that?   Seriously, did you?

Did you know that in 1854, when LIncoln got back into politics, blacks were not even considered human beings by most whites in the US.


And did you know, that the United States Supreme Court ordered --  yes ordered-- that blacks be seen not as human beings, but as property?

Officially, blacks were not human beings, by law.  By order of the court.

Not sorta, not kinda.  Not as a trivial detail.


Lincoln got called a traitor -- by Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, emphatically, specifically because Lincoln said blacks were human beings!!  

Did anyone tell you that?  No. 

Read Stephen A Douglas's speeches.  He was called a traitor behind his back, in Douglas speeches, but to his face, Douglas would not call him a traitor, just call him "obsessed with equality or the Nigger" who "will cause a revolution by disobeying the Supreme Court".

No one told you that.

That's the kind of thing your history teacher should tell you, but they don't know either. They would have to read all of the Lincoln Douglas debates, and newspapers of the time.  Instead, they read whitewashed bullshit, published since.



No one told you that the United States Supreme Court ordered -- ordered -- blacks to be seen as NON HUMAN.  Did you know that?

That was a big fucking deal -- and well know-- at the time.  But this amazing fact is not taught in any US text book.

Blacks are NOT HUMANS by order of the court.  Jefferson Davis himself said this order --this decision -- by the Supreme Court changed everything, and changed it because now, the federal government, the states too, could not stop slavery.  The government must respect and protect slavery, as property.

No one told you that?  This was the whole fucking point of most of Lincoln's speeches.    And it was the basic point Stephen A Douglas threw into Lincoln's face, time, and time again.

Should be easy to spot, just read the damn LIncoln Douglas debates. Or just read Lincoln's other speeches too. He said this repeatedly. 

Lincoln said this again, and again, the Supreme Court had ruled that blacks are NOT HUMAN BEINGS but property.  And Lincoln said -- then did --we must undo that decision.  His 13th Amendment was 100% in response to the Dred Scott decision that ordered, yes ordered, blacks not to be seen as persons, not human beings, but property.

No one told you that.  So when Lincoln got up and was accused of treason for being against the Dred Scott decision, when Lincoln got up after being accused of wanting y our daughter to sleep with "Niggers" --- Lincoln was a radical mother fucker.   

That is why Frederick Douglass called Lincoln radical -- because he fucking WAS.

Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass sideways, and knew his FULL speeches.  Douglass knew Dred Scott decision, and how blacks were officially NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  You are never told that.

Douglass knew -- see Lincoln's speeches about this, in the debates. Again, and again, and again, Lincoln railed against the Dred Scott order that blacks are property, not human beings.

In other words, if Lincoln had been any more radical, the whites would not do shit to keep the Union together, if they thought the war was to end slavery.

And that is true, even US Grant said (as did many others) they would not fight for the Union, if they thought the war would end slavery.  Grant would later say Lincoln was right, slavery had to go.  But at the out set of the war, most whites did not want to, and would not, walk across the street to free a slave, must less go fight, or send their children to fight, for freedom for slaves.

Lincoln knew that better than anyone, And Lincoln had to SEEM to agree with the prejudices of the day, or he is not only never be elected, he probably would have been shot. 

Why is that not taught? Virtually nothing that was vile, ugly, and true, about Southern leaders, is taught.   But of course, Frederick Douglass knew it, first hand.

Lincoln must -- must -- appease the people of the North, or they would never have fought the Civil War.   Douglass knew that. 

 If Lincoln said "Yeah, I want your daughter's to sleep with Niggers, like my opponents tell you," He would not live to get home that night.

So Lincoln had to deal with that, somehow. He often chose humor, followed by kick ass in your face powerful statements. 

So most Southern whites were hateful and fearful of freedom for slaves.   Even if they didn't own slaves (most did not)  they were still terrified of free slaves walking down the street, talking to white women, dating and sleeping with white women.

How would Lincoln exterminate the white race?   By making your daughters and wife "be with Niggers".


We are  not told anything in US text books about the "Niggers will sleep with  your daughters" rant, that endangered everyone against slavery.

Not one fucking word about the most basic aspect of life leading up to the Civil War, for those who tried to speak against slavery.

Yes, there were abolitionist speakers -- but they did not go where Lincoln went.  They did not run for office where he did.

They were hated too -- but Lincoln had the most powerful speakers of the day, including Stephen A Douglas, blasting him to his face (and behind his back) of being a "Nigger worshiper"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Very basic -- and not mentioned in any US text book.

The great abolitionists speakers, like Garrison and Douglass, did not dare go when Lincoln went.   Lincoln even went to Kansas,  spoke there, after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak publicly against slavery, in Kansas.

Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed, in Alton IL, by a crowd, after he was warned to stop publishing an anti slavery paper. Lovejoy may have been burned to death, inside his own print shop, were he printed anti slavery papers. Burned to death, or killed otherwise, he was taunted and warned, as was Lincoln, to stop speaking so bluntly against slavery.

Did anyone tell you that?

Abolitionist, in the way they used the word at the time, was a dangerous word to identify with.  Danger to you physically, if you went to the wrong place, at the wrong time.


 Lincoln also had a history of DOING against slavery. You never hear that, either.  He stood up to President Polk, while in Congress in 1847, and accused him of starting the war against Mexico, in order to spread slavery to the lands US stole from Mexico.

Lincoln could not stop US from going to war, so he tried to pass laws to prevent slavery in the land we just stole from Mexico.   He tried 47 times.  So fuck those who say Lincoln didn't care, or "evolved".  Lincoln was kicking ass for 15 years, from the moment he got to DC, to stop slavery.

But you have to know more than a few out of context quotes, to understand that.

And no one told you.

Guess who knew that?  Frederick Douglass. 

Guess who had no clue?

That would be you.


It might sound pompous to say your "history teacher"  -- including Pulitzer Prize winning historians  -- don't know shit about Lincoln, when they claim he did not really care about slavery, or was reluctant to end slavery, or "evolved" to want to end slavery.

Did you know Southern leaders were talking about genocide of blacks if they had to free them --ever.   

Lincoln was radical as fuck -- the union will end, or slavery will end, and I don't expect slavery to end. One or the other will end. 

Did you know the House Divided Speech is about Lincoln saying the nation will end, or slavery will end, one or the other. ?

The other part of the speech, was Lincoln showing the "machinery"  the deliberate efforts by Southern leaders to spread slavery by duplicity -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott.

When Southerners got wind of LIncoln's House divided speech, they shit a brick.  Stephen A Douglas, who was an ally of the South, again, and again, and again, hit LIncoln on the House divided speech.   The nation will end, or slavery will end?  Hell no, said Davis.  We can exist forever -- and be "terror of the world"  by keeping slavery.

Go see his speech.  You probably have no clue.

It would help if "historians"  would explain what the fuck was going on.  Most history books are endless bullshit.

Why killed who, and why, is real history. All else is bullshit.

 These "experts" like Bruce Catton, Eric Foner, and James McPherson are not stupid. But they are bullshitters who cared more for dreaming up some nonsense that sounded good, than telling the basics- - who killed who, and why.  So, their books do not reflect factually, what was going on, nor Lincoln said or did.


When we searched for 10 specific facts -- such as Lincoln standing up to President Polk, accusing him for starting the Mexican War to help the South spread slavery, 0-- absolutely 0 -- US text books even hinted at it, much less made it a major turning point in.

We did not yet cover all text books, or even close to all.   But so far, no text book in any public school shows things like SOuthern War Ultimatums or Lincoln being called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers" 

And of course, those who trash Lincoln as not being against slavery, or whatever crap they posit, they do not include, in any meaningful way, information that would show why Frederick Douglass would say Lincoln was radical, swift, zealous, and determined.  

Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and accused him of helping the South spread slavery, by the Mexican War?  Yes, he did.  And no one told you.

Lincoln's hero -- Henry Clay -- stood up to President Polk too, in the most amazing way, which shocked the shit out of his own state, and the entire South.  Clay, a slave owner, stood up in the most amazing speech of the 1840's, and accused Polk of pushing slavery further, by the war against Mexico -- stealing Mexico's land.

Lincoln did the same thing Clay did.  Stood up and accused Polk of helping the South spread slavery.

Guess who know all this -- Frederick Douglass. 

Guess who didn't have a damn clue -- YOU.

 Douglass actually explained it very well, and if those "experts" would read more original sources, they would likely come to the same conclusion as he did.

But Lincoln was "marked man" for his candid stand on Mexican War.  He was accused of "not supporting the troops"  and had to explain to the stupid, that yes, he supported the troops, but not the killing and creating a war to spread slavery -- the mission.

Lincoln knew, and so did most people know, that the War was started to expand slavery,  with the rah rah bullshit that American was blessed by GOD.   Apparently God hated the Christians in Mexico.

Also, Lincoln tried 47 times to have slavery banned in the territory just stolen from Mexico, per his own explanation.    Of course, no dice.  They were not about to ban slavery, in the lands they just stole, to spread slavery.

The killings to spread slavery were nothing new -- and would of course come back from 1854 on, as you will see. with Jeff Davis sending David Rice Atchison to kill and torture in Kansas.  And it almost worked.

In the North, Lincoln was exposed for "Wanting your daughter to sleep with Niggers"

In the South, Lincoln was exposed for "extermination of the white race.

And no one told you.  So how the hell would you know?

Southern leaders sure told folks then. Northern supporters of slavery -- like Stephen A Douglas -- told folks then.

Your  history teacher never said a word -- probably no one told them.


At least one teacher put some mention of slavery into his power point presentation, about Mexican war.

That's rare.  But even then, it's not front and center. Slavery and the spread of it, sure as hell was front and center,  back and all sides, of national life from 1820-1860.


TO justify the spread of slavery, Southern leaders had precisely two arguments.  Lincoln, and everyone in the USA, had to deal with the excuses to spread slavery, and the actions by Southern leaders, such as invading and killing, torturing, drowning, and hanging.

1) God wanted it.

2) White race will be exterminated if we can't spread it.

Just stopping the spread of slavery will kill the white race, or "burn us slowly to death" .

Did you know that?

Your daughters will sleep with "Niggers".  God wants slavery.  Lincoln will destroy the white race.  This was the rhetoric of the time.

And people were still being killed for being "too abolitionist".   Abolitionist was a dirty word in the 1850s, even in much of the North,


Were Southern leaders wrong when they declared just stopping the spread of slavery would kill the white race?

Were they wrong when they told crowds, expand slavery or we will perish?

Fuck yes they were wrong, but it worked to enrage the stupid.  It worked very well. 

It was illegal in the South to preach, teach, or write anything contrary to such drivel.   That's right, against the law.   If you were against slavery, you best shut the fuck up or leave. 

Did anyone -- ever -- ever  -- ever -- tell you Southern leaders claimed God wanted slavery, and the SPREAD of slavery.   That may sound goofy to you, but slavery was "Ordained by GOD"  and even Robert E Lee said it is not up to us to question God.

Stephen A Douglas (and others) made this "Nigger worship"  by Lincoln a central emotional feature of not only the debates, but of the but of the entire argument to justify slavery and the spread of it. That's right, a central argument (particularly in the South) was that whites would be exterminated, if slavery was not spread.

We do not even teach that Southern War Ultimatums were about 1 thing -- the SPREAD of slavery.   We not teach what Southern leaders boasted of then.  Of the five war ultimatums Southern newspapers boasted of in 1861, all five were about the spread of slavery, one way or another.

Not one word, in these War Ultimatums, about tariff. Not one.  Not one word about the right of Kansas to decide the issue themselves, because Kansas already decided, and said no to slavery.

Not one word out economic oppression by the North --all words were about the South's "right" to take their slaves to Kansas, and as Davis would say in "Perpetual Speech"  to take slaves and have slavery protected North, South, and West.
And why not? Remember slavery WAS OF GOD.  Slavery was ordained by God.  If you are against slavery, said the official declarations by state of Texas, you are against GOD.   



When Jefferson Davis explained in his own book, about the reasons for the Civil War, he wrote that the resistance to the SPREAD of slavery was "the intolerable grievance".    

Think of that.  The intolerable grievance, the sin that could not be forgiven, was Kansas resistance to the spread of slavery.


  Davis wrote, in his own book, in context, that the resistance to the spread of slavery -- into Kansas  -- was intolerable.   When Davis wrote this, Kansas had already voted 90% against slavery.

Davis insisted Kansas could not reject slavery, by "logic" of Dred Scott decision, which ordered -- yes ordered -- blacks not be seen as human beings, not persons.

Very clear -- and Lincoln exposed this about 50 times, almost in every speech from 1857 on.  Davis was boasting blacks were not humans and Kansas therefore could not keep them out -- they were property. Nothing but property.


 THE CONSTITUTION (in other words, we on SCOTUS) see blacks not as human, but as property.  Further, the federal government must protect slavery.  Lincoln had to obey that, until the undid the shit, by 13th Amendment. 
The Dred Scott decision, as Davis made clear, ordered the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that voted against slavery.

So Southern leaders did not dare say they gave a shit about state's rights at this point.   The excuse, suddenly, was that Kansas citizens, Kansas legislature, not even the federal Congress, could keep slavery out.

THE SCOTUS had just decided slavery.  And oh, by the way, we order the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that were against slavery.

 Remember, those boasting of killing to spread slavery, were not some drunks. They were the US Senator, and his men.  Their own documents.  Their own publications.

And Jeff Davis himself, along with other top Confederates, boasted about it, one way or another. 

I can't help it that  your teacher didn't tell you.

Let that percolate.  Davis did not say Kansas citizens wanted slavery, or that Kansas citizens  held a fraudulent vote.  Davis said Kansas citizens, nor their legislature, nor Congress, could deny slavery. In fact, Kansas MUST respect and protect slavery.

And his logic -- God gave the black race to the white race, to enslave.  Blacks were "so inferior" they were not persons, not human beings, for purposes of the Constitution.

Davis was clear -- Kansas must not just allow slavery, but respect and protect slavery.  Clear too, about his logic -- blacks were not persons, and could not be seen as persons.

Did anyone ever tell you that?   Did anyone ever tell you the logic of Southern War Ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings?  But by decree -- inferior beings.


Lincoln, however, said this over, and over.  Dred Scott was part of the ruse, to make blacks not human beings, but property.   He said that, over and over in one way or another.  
Was he wrong?   No -- Davis boasted of it. Lincoln and many people said this -- Dred Scott decision was to make    blacks into NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  

Davis said that -- but he was proud of it.

Not one text book, and not one Pulitzer Prize winning book about Lincoln or Davis, saw fit to include this basic fact, as important enough to make clear.  James McPherson used the words "Southern Ultimatums"  but could not bring himself to tell the read what the fuck those ultimatums were. 

Go read McPherson. Go on. Not one word about the basic justification for attacks and war ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings.  

Go read Eric Foner -- that fucking idiot.  He claims Dred Scott was "a narror ruling"  about Congress's inability to decide slavery in Kansas.  Fucking idiot, Dred Scott decision itself was clear -- BLACKS ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS by order of the court.

And then, Jeff Davis boasted of that.  Davis own book bragged that Dred Scott changed everything.   Maybe Foner could actually read Dred Scott decision, or Jeff Davis book, or Lincoln's statements in dozens of speeches.  Dred Scott was done to make slaves into property -- NOT HUMANS.

Did Foner, Catton, McPherson tell you that?  FUCK NOT.

You can't just go around hanging and torturing, nor can you go around issuing war ultimatums (see below) without bringing God and survival into it.  So, Southern leaders did just that.

Stephen A Douglas regularly, and with great fanfare, great emphasis,  used the "Nigger will sleep with your daughter" argument, but you could not possibly know that, from any US text book.  Not one mentions it, much less show how powerful and violent the arguments were about this. 

In an informal quick survey (we are conducting a more systematic survey) of text books and major prize winning biographies of Lincoln, we found no US textbooks even mentioned that Lincoln was hated North and South for being a "radical" for equality for the "Nigger"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".


"You really don't know Lincoln, unless you know what ISIS like bastards he was up against.  US text books don't tell you about the religious lunatics, violent fucks, and sociopaths Lincoln had to defeat, to end slavery." 

Why would Northern papers call Lincoln a "Negro worshipper"?

Why would Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly, loudly, claim Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"  and wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"?

Why would Southern crowds cheer, and sometimes lynch or torture people, when told Lincoln was going to "exterminate" the white race by stopping the spread of slavery.


Let me repeat that -- Lincoln, they said, was going to exterminate the white race, just by stopping the spread of slavery.


Southern leaders claimed Lincoln -- and anyone else -- who even spoke against the SPREAD of slavery, was really out to destroy the South, and would exterminate the white race by this "Ungodly"   resistance to slavery.

Slavery was "OF GOD"  and to be against slavery, was to be against GOD himself, said the Texas official Declaration of secession.   Individual Southern leaders claimed they would like to see every Yankee dead, because of the "heritic belief that slavery is wrong.

The North, said Southern documents, was committing a "grave sin"  just to be against the SPREAD of slavery.

Why?   Because GOD ordained slavery, and the white race will be destroyed- -your daughter will sleep with "Niggers" as Douglas said repeatedly.

NO one even mentioned this.This is the hysteria of the era -- pumped up by men like Jefferson Davis, Robert Toombs, Stephen A Douglas  and others, in the North.


Go on, ask a "historian" or even a  history teacher about this.  They won't know what you are talking about, first, because they get their information from books, not original sources -- from Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern sermons, Southern documents, Southern declarations.

But they will still pretend they know all this, then say "Oh I never said it was not a factor, sure, it was a factor, but there is a multitude of factors....."

Blah blah blah.   Southern leaders THEMSELVES said why the killed and tortured.  Not me. Southern leaders themselves wrote their War Ultimatums, not me.   Southern leaders themselves boasted and promised to keep killing till slavery was spread. 

This is the kind of basic shit you never heard of, because Southern school boards sure as hell was not going to allow this in the national text books.   Texas was, and still is, the state most responsible for US text book printing, and due to the school boards there, editing.

Nothing true and horrible about Southern leaders -- like their boasting of killing to spread slavery, boasting that anyone against slavery should be in prison, boasting they would keep killing till slavery was in all of the US.

Let me guess, no one told you Jeff Davis himself boasted he would like to see, by force or Confderate arms, invasion of the North and capture of all blacks there, and make them slaves, too.

Well, we show you that  -- but there is so, so much more.  And you never had a clue.
 New York paper Making fun of Lincoln for his "worship" of the Negro.  Lincoln said blacks were equal to whites under the law, any black is equal to any white.  Go read the Lincoln Douglas full debates, not the edited bullshit.
One paper in New York suggested Lincoln should obey Southern War Ultimatums -- did you even know Southern leaders made specific  War Ultimatums?  

The War Ultimatums -- Kansas (already a free state by this time)  must respect and protect slavery. Not just accept it, but RESPECT slavery and PROTECT slavery.

Kansas was a free state by then.

Should Lincoln obey that? FUCK NO.  Did he?  FUCK NO.

Are you even told about Southern War Ultimatums?  Southern leaders were quite proud of them at the time.   Why not show the War Ultimatums in US text books?  




As you will see below, no one spoke more powerfully against slavery, and for equality under the law, than Lincoln.  Yes, at times, in some places, he parsed words. He spoke carefully, or he would have been shot sooner.

But read his full speeches, not this bullshit out of context crap, were Lincoln parsed words in one sentence, but then kicked ass in the next sentence. 

Tellingly, those who trash Lincoln always leave out one of two things -- context, or the full speech.

No one who ever went to a Lincoln speech, left confused.  Lincoln was going to kick slavery in the ass as soon as possible.  Not only was slavery vile shit, but the men pushing to spread slavery were lying bastards  using violence and subterfuge. 

We perish as a country -- or slavery perishes  I don't expect us to perish.
__LINCOLN'S HOUSE DIVIDED SPEECH____________________

Everyone heard of Lincoln's "House Divided Speech".  But your history teacher acts like Lincoln is bemoaning the fact the country is divided over slavery.

Fuck no.  Lincoln's house divided speech -- and he gave versions of it repeatedly -- was about one thing: how  Southern leaders conspired by means "foul and more foul" to spread slavery.

Specifically, LIncoln cited, in nearly ever speech he ever gave after 1854, the Kansas Act, as the "first bit of machinery"   in a concerted effort to spread slavery.  

Remember that, because David Rice Atchison is the US Senator, with Stephen A Douglas, who got Kansas Act passed.


Part of House Divided was about Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision as the two main ways Southern leaders operated against the will of the people, and against any decency of any kind, to spread slavery.

The other part of the speech, was about how, because of Kansas Act, now slavery had to be all over the US, or it would have to end.   It would "be one thing or the other".

All slave, or all free. 

And when Lincoln said that, Southern leaders about had a cow.  Again, and again, and again, Stephen A Douglas berated Lincoln, told the crowds LIncoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  Quincy papers called it "Douglas 'nigger' rant".

Douglas "nigger"  rant was this -- anyone against slavery was against the United States Supreme Court, AND wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one ever told you any of this, did they.   Yet newspaper editors were so familiar with Douglas on this point, when they discussed that part of Douglas debate, the Quincy editor just said "nigger rant".


Meanwhile, Southern leaders were saying Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.  So in the North, Lincoln was accused of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers'  and in the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.

Equality for the negro -- the hate mongers would drive the point home -- means your daughters, your wife, and your life, would be with "Niggers" allowed to roam where they wanted, have sex with who they wanted, marry who they wanted.

To be for those positions, at the time, got you killed. Remember that. Abolitionist was a dirty word in 90% of white America, including the North. In the South, abolitionist were "of the devil"


Generally, historians never even mention this. If they dare mention it, it's in a sentence or two, toward the back of the books, and never shown to be the central and spoken issue of the day.

Lincoln, though, gave over 2000 speeches, for  years, that's all he did, go place to place, speaking against slavery, and arguing for equality under the law

Yes, he had to parse words at times, but read the full speeches. Holy fuck, once Lincoln got going, he kicked ass.  The lowest slave woman is equal to me, and equal to Judge Douglas, and equal to ANY man.

Why the fuck not quote Lincoln there?

Lincoln gets back in politics, because of KANSAS ACT

  But not only did Lincoln mention Southern subterfuge and deceit in spreading slavery into Kansas, he specifically said  the KANSAS ACT -- passed by Atchison himself, was the South's effort to push slavery into Kansas and beyond.


How fucking stupid are "history teachers"  that, not only don't they know Lincoln got back into politics because of what David Rice Atchison did -- they don't even fucking know what the hell David Rice Atchison did!

And Atchison was boasting of it. 


But of course, history teachers are not stupid. They only know what they are told.  Since the very beginning of US text book publishing, Southern crybabies and liars, have made sure nothing gets in text books, that shows how fucking ISIS like, violent, and proud Southern leaders were -- with the focus to SPREAD SLAVERY.



Funny thing is --  Southern leaders agreed with Lincoln. Kansas Act was the start of spreading slavery into millions of square miles, it was off limits before.  It was off limits before, because Southern leaders made slavery "open" in millions of square miles in the South, by Mexican War, and then demanding more land, in the "COMPROMISE OF 1850".

There was never a compromise -- Southern leaders made demands, they were met, and called compromises.

Lincoln asked, in one of the Lincoln Douglas debates --"What compromises"   We should have always taught how Southern leaders, again, and again, and again, promised violence if slavery was not spread.

Each time, they got what they demanded.  Each time, they came back and demanded -- not suggested -- more.  And if you don't fucking believe that, read Southern War Ultimatums

But when any "historian" even bothers to comment on Lincoln's hundreds of accusations that the South was trying to "nationalize" slavery, like the idiot y others -- including SOUTHERNERS bragging about it.  The South was in no ways sorry or ashamed of Kansas Act, remember, David Atchison boasted he passed Kansas Act, and boasted he went to Kansas and used men to invade Kansas, and kill, terrorize, to push slavery West.

Lincoln was not guessing or dreaming up some conspiracy, because Southern leaders cited those two exact things -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision, as justification for invasion of Kansas, and justification for Southern War Ultimatums (See Jeff Davis own book, and see more in this  blog). 

Southern leaders -- already, from 1856, before Lincoln even ran for Senate -- were boasting they were spreading slavery and would continue to kill and torture,  until slavery was spread to the Pacific, even spread into places that were already free states. And the Kansas Act was the specific justification, then Dred Scott came along, and they of course used that, too.

In fact, Dred Scott decision came about because Atchison could not get enough people killed, fast enough.  He predicted a quick victory in Kansas against civilians, with his armed men, but it did not work that way.

So Southern leaders had to justify Atchison's killings after his initial efforts failed.  Jeff Davis himself claimed Dred Scott justified everything Atchison did.  Did you know that?

No one told you that, did they?

So when Lincoln said slavery will spread everywhere -- or it will end -- he was not kidding.  Southern leaders said the same thing, before and after Lincoln gave House DIvided Speech.

See, facts matter.

No one mentions that, not in any US textbook.  So it's impossible to know what Lincoln actually faced, from those text books, which have been whitewashed since text books started, to the satisfaction of Southern state school boards, mostly Texas.

In fact it seems wacky, when you first hear that Southern leaders were killing and torturing, and boasting of it, to spread slavery into areas that were already free states. But that was well known at the time. Lincoln wrote and spoke about it, but oddly, that's not given any credence in US text books. Those kinds of things, Southern school boards would not allow in books.  Not ever. Not once. 

Lincoln was not that blunt, in public. In letters, yes, he was far more blunt.  But in public, Lincoln spoke a much kinder and more diplomatic tone.  Yet stopping the spread of cancer (slavery was a cancer, that would kill the hose, or be killed if it could not spread) was always the central point Lincoln made.  

Slavery was vile - it was a cancer, it would either destroy the US, or the US would destroy it.


What most people today, even "historians", don't get, is how violent Southern lunatics were, and how they were proud of it.

Slave owners tortured women, sold children, and were PROUD that they did what GOD wanted.  If we taught history honestly, everyone would know this ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders. But we teach none of that.

Jefferson Davis, and others, were used to getting what they wanted -- spread of slavery, over and over -- by violence and threats. Every single time South spread slavery, they did it by violence.  There was no exception.

  Jeff Davis. 

Ulysis Grant quoted Jeff Davis proud claim that he would "wipe up all the blood" spilled below the Mason Dixon line, with his handkerchief.   

This is typical of the bravado and macho duck dance, Southern leaders always did. 

David Rice Atchison predicted all the South had to do, was a quick show of force, and they would get to spread slavery, as they always had before, by force, into Kansas and beyond.  Give me 5000 men, Atchison boasted, and I will kill every abolitionist in Kansas.  

Pollard, boasting.  Just voting for someone who was against slavery, was "a declaration of war" against the South

"We will annihilate from our shores".  As events proved, 90% of Kansas citizens were against slavery. Atchison tried to spread slavery there anyway, with quick show of violence.

It almost worked. 


And Atchison would have killed them all,  if he had been able to  hire 5000 reliable men, instead of about 1000 unreliable men, there only for the money.

See below, for actual speech promising war.  They were not kidding, and they delivered the violence they boasted about.

There was no desire on part of the North for a war against the violent, ISIS like South.  


It was radical as fuck -- and dangerous as hell -- to be against the "Godly" spread of slavery, because if you dared to say the black man was your equal, Davis, Atchison, Douglas, and others, would make people believe you wanted their daughters to "sleep with Niggers"

 Remember, every Southern leader could and did quote the bible extewnsively for their justification not to just keep slavery, but SPREAD slavery..

Many people in the North thought blacks were more like monkeys, and believed like many in the South, that God ordained slavery in his wisdom! 

Only one man tried to fight the South, in the South, John Brown, and he was caught in an hour, and hung in a week. 

 Speech by US Senator, bragging about killing to spread slavery, calling it a war "For the entire South"  1956. More important than any speech Lincoln made, and Lincoln makes no sense, unless you know what the hell was going on, like this. 

We will be destroyed as a country, or slavery will be destroyed, is the  blunt version of Lincoln's House DIvided Speech, which drove Southern leaders crazy.   Lincoln did not overtly threaten anyone -- Southern leaders issued macho threats and promises of death, Lincoln was not about to get into a macho man trade of threats with them.

But that is how Southern leaders took Lincoln's House Divided Speech, and Lincoln gave that speech, or used the idea from it, in many of his speeches. 

 Jeff Davis used his friend (yes, Stephen Douglas was personal friends with Jeff Davis) to scare Lincoln off the national state.

Lincoln didn't scare that easy, as you will see. 

Douglas knew which cities in Illinois he could call Lincoln a "Nigger lover" --or other such epitaph  - and which he could not.   The cities Douglas could call Lincoln "obsessed with equality"  included Quincy Alton, and Charleston.

Quincy papers spoke of Douglas going into his "nigger rant" against Lincoln, which no one was surprised about, except maybe your history teacher. 

Douglas made it a point, before the debate began, to tell the crowd he saw Lincoln with Frederick Douglass, and a white woman, in a carriage.  That was a direct enticement to violence, and not the first time Douglas said such things, nor the last. 

No one told you this, but Stephen A Douglas taunted Lincoln to his face, and all but urged the white males in the audience to attack Lincoln.  

Douglas's "rant about Niggers and Lincoln"  was covered in newspapers at the time, but not even mentioned now.   

Douglas used that  hate and fear to excite the crowd, and to scare Lincoln.  He was not just exercising his jaw.  The basic message to the crowd was always "Lincoln is a dangerous abolitionist who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Entirely overlooked now. 




 Others were attacked -- in fact, Stephen A Douglas sat a few feet away from US Senator Sumner as he was beaten on the Senate floor, for speaking too powerfully against slavery.

Douglas, papers reported at the time, almost predicted Sumner would be beaten, and seemed pleased as the beating took place. Douglas used the same type of rhetoric against Sumner, as he did against Lincoln. 

Sumner was beaten -- 10 feet from Douglas's chair -- nearly to death, 34 wackes in the head with a  heavy gold cane.   The cane was and still is, shown as a bit of bravery in the South

 Sumner being beaten in US SENATE

Some of the men watching, are laughing.
Douglas reportedly was amused. 

Two years later, Douglas was once again essentially threatening Lincoln, by telling the crowd all kinds of things, like Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

How did Lincoln handle that?  See the video.  

Go on, to learn how LIncoln handled those kinds of charges, SEE THE VIDEO. You won't know unless you do, cause no one told you any of this in school.

Nor are you told, either, that Stephen A Douglas won --because Douglas was able to scare the voters re Lincoln's love for the "Nigger"  and the danger of being against just the spread of slavery.  
You hear this nonsense about Douglas being for "right of the people to choose".   Sounds nice, and stupidly historians have accepted Douglas public con game.  But behind the scenes, as Lincoln knew, and so many others did too, Douglas had helped Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison force, or try to force, slavery into Kansas.

Douglas did beat Lincoln for Senate; Douglas's  enemy in the Senate (Charles Sumner) was in a coma for six months.  And thousands of people would die, before the violent men who promised killing sprees, and actually committed killing sprees, were defeated. 

Douglas fear and hate mongering, worked,  because he stayed in the Senate, and was able to help his friends Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison behind the scenes as Chairman of the House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

 This led directly to the Civil War.  Lincoln could not overcome the stigma of his "Nigger Worship"  as New York paper called it.

So how does a "Nigger worshiper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  end  up being called all kinds of bad things later?

This same man -- Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly and dramatically told crowd after crowd that Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Southern newspapers were even worse -- "Lincoln will destroy the white race"  Lincoln will make your children work besides blacks, your daughters sleep with blacks, etc etc.

Every politician who was against slavery got this kind of treatment -- Lincoln just got it a lot worse.  He got it in person, spoken by the most powerful speaker of the day -- Stephen A Douglas.

 You have not heard any of this, UNTIL NOW.


You didn't have to be a slave owner to be afraid of Lincoln -- North and South, liars like Stephen A Douglas, many newspapers, and almost all Southern leaders, made damn sure  you saw Lincoln as giving away your daughter to a "Nigger".


Above all Lincoln was EFFECTIVE.

100 years of textbook bullshit. 

 For over 100 years, US textbooks were essentially written by Southern school boards, because they made sure none of the stuff that showed how ISIS like, how violent,  and how cowardly, Southern leaders were.   It's ironic-  (not really) -- that those who pushed for killing and torturing and war to spread slavery (yes, they pushed and got a war to spread slavery, as you will see), were personal cowards.  One of the many facts that never made it into any US text book.



When you show the speeches by Southern leaders to most folks, they will say "Oh that's just one guy".  Fuck no, it's not one guy, it's dozens of speeches, documents, and war ultimatums.   

And these are the top leaders, not some nut in a bar.

Jeff Davis boasting of spreading slavery into the North by force of arms.

NO one told you.

Southern leaders boasting of killing to spread slavery.

No one told you.

The fact anyone who dared be against spread of slavery was called a "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

No one told you.

 Remember that.

 If Abraham Lincoln boasted about killing and torturing anyone, I'm sure Southern school boards would put that in their math books, their biology books, and their first grade readers.

But for their own leaders boasting of killing, boasting of torturing, boasting of spreading slavery for GOD -- go look for it. It seems bizarre because, that entire aspect of US history is whitewashed. If they mention it at all, it's in Orwellian double speak or vague phrases in the back of some book, without attributing names or context.


Yes, Lincoln was going to "destroy the white race"  by being against the violent spread of slavery.  And yes, the spread of slavery was violent.


This sounds goofy if you did not know, the excuse by those who were killing and terrorizing to spread slavery (see below)  claimed the white race would "perish" if we can't spread slavery to the  rest of the USA.

Did you know about this?  Hell no

But the killing and promises of endless killing to spread slavery, was common knowledge at the time.  


ABE LINCOLN --- who helped more?

In fact, Frederick Douglass only knew one white man more dedicated than Lincoln to end slavery and make blacks equal under the law -- that other man was John Brown.

But Brown gave his life for no effective improvement of any black life.  He was caught within a few  hours, and hung in a week.  Few slaves even knew who he was, but were hated and feared even more, because of Brown's ineffective way?
John  Brown was hung by the neck until dead for his efforts. Lincoln would get a bullet to the brain for his efforts.  But Lincoln was effective, and Frederick Douglass cared about that, most of all.


It would do the world, the country, and Lincoln, no good, to be killed, like others were, earlier than he was.    As Frederick Douglass himself pointed out, LIncoln had to parse words at times.  


"It mattered little to us what language he might employ on special occasions, it mattered to us, when we fully knew him, whether he was swift or slow in his [actions] "



TORTURE. Not sorta-- the punishment was torture.

So from 1820's on, Southern states wrote "anti-incendiary laws"-- and when Southern leaders send killers to Kansas in 1856, the first thing they did, was to make it a crime to speak or publish newspapers against slavery.   Not one person in the USA was surprised that Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas, they had done exactly that for a generation already, in the South.

To be fair -- the South did warn the North that they would have to make it a crime to publish articles against slavery --see this from Congressional record, 1836.  And soon after, they did indeed, in Virginia, pass such laws...

Closer look..

Not long after -- since the North refused to make it against the law to write against slavery in North, anything which might make it to the South, the state of Virginia did indeed to exactly that -- made it a crime to have or publish or EVEN SPEAK against slavery.

See this.

All other slave states passed similiar laws, and citizens could be tortured -- even preachers could be tortured, for just owning the wrong book. Very ISIS like.

Guess who knew that? 

Lincoln. And Frederick Douglass.  And most people alive in 1840s - 1860 in the USA.   

But no one told you, because it's not even mentioned, much less emphasized, in US text books.   But nothing came close to perpetuating slavery, and expanding slavery, than making it a crime to speak or write against it.


Since no one told you shit about this- - you had no idea people were still being arrested, even killed, for speaking against slavery, in most of the USA in the 1850s.

In all of the South, in all of the slave states and in the Kansas Territories, slave power had made it a crime to speak or write anything against slavery, on the bullshit claim that to do so would "dissatisfy"  a slave.

Slaves, said Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, were "contented laborers"   and only became "discontent"  if the "lie of freedom was whispered in their ears".

Blacks, of course, could not read, and it was a crime to teach them to do so. It was also a crime for them to meet together off the slave plantation, or to preach against slavery themselves.

Slave power was not that concerned about BLACKS hearing things against slavery in the press, or in books, or in speeches.   But to allow whites to speak or write against slavery -- that is how slavery ended in the North.

You either made it a crime to speak or write against slavery, and made it a crime to preach against slavery, or slavery was going to end. 

And the Southern leaders knew it.

Whites were still being killed for speaking against slavery, when Lincoln was in politics -- and unless you know that, you don't have a damn clue how bad ass Lincoln was to go to Kansas, or even to speak in Charleston, or Quincy or Alton.

Lincoln's friend's brother was killed in Alton Illinois for speaking (writing) anti slavery newspaper.   Later, Southerners made it a crime in Kansas to speak or write against slavery, too.

You are not told any of this, at all. But this is the shit Lincoln had to deal with.



You hear or read all this shit by "scholars" who claim Lincoln was reluctant or hesitant or had to be dragged into ending slavery.    These stupid bastards never tell you, and do not see to know, how amazing Lincoln was, when you understand where he was, and when he was.

Some "scholars" will name abolitionist like Garrison,  and others, and claim Lincoln fell short of their dedication to end slavery.  Fucking idiots.  None of those -except John Brown -- dared even travel to where Lincoln went, or spoke to crowds Lincoln spoke to.

Not only do they not seem to grasp Lincoln was doing what no one dared do (except Brown, who was quickly killed for it), but they refuse to give Lincoln's full quotes or full speeches.  While Lincoln did parse words at times -- necessary to stay alive as you will see -- he kicked ass if you read the full speeches. Leaving out the full and clear meanings  lets these dumb fucks lay out the bullshit.   They don't exactly lie, they just don't include all the basic facts.

Lincoln speaking in Kansas is one example.



Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas, and spoke there, AFTER Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery.  Has your history teacher, any movie, any documentary, anyone every told you about that?

NO. There is no known text book in US that even mentions Lincoln went to Kansas, and related that to Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison's "bogus legislature" (a violent group sent to Kansas to pass anti free speech laws).

Since you don't know all slave states made it a crime to preach or speak publically or write publicly against slavery, and you don't know Davis sent Atchison to Kansas, where he made the most violent punishment-- death --the effective "remedy" to stop speech against slavery,  you can't know then, how bad ass Lincoln was.

 You need all the facts, to make a reasonable narrative. You don't get all the facts, if these "experts" leave out how violent, (systematic violence) the South was, and how Lincoln and others were killed by the kind of violence -- the violence against SPEECH.


It takes a special kind of stupid for "experts" to belittle or minimize Lincoln - notice if you read them, not one of them mentions Lincoln got a bullet in the brain, precisely because of his "radical" speech.

The speech Lincoln gave -- was about voting rights for some blacks --  just after the unofficial end of Civil War.  Booth heard Lincoln give that speech about possible voting rights, and changed the plan from kidnap to kill.

No one told you that, did they?






If you don't know even US Senators were attacked, on and off the Senate floor, one was beaten almost to death, for speaking about things Lincoln spoke about, you don't know shit.



The main problem in US history -- Southern cry babies and liars have made damn sure no one says anything horrible about their leaders. 

Southern war ultimatums? No mention.

SOuthern leaders sending killers to Kansas and calling it war to spread slavery?  No mention.

Southern leaders bragging they were just doing the will of God to punish the black man for biblical sins?  No mention.



Lovejoy killed in Illinois.
Lincoln would appoint his brother to Attorney General. 


Southern leaders said Lincoln would not just have your daughters "sleep with Niggers"  but that Lincoln and "black republicans"  would destroy the white race,  by allowing black men to "be with"  white women.

Did the politicians who said such things believe them?  Did LIncoln "want" your daughters to sleep with this person or that?

Was Lincoln going to destroy the white race?   Who knows if they believed it -- or not. The point is, they used this kind of fear and hate mongering against Lincoln, and he had to deal it.



Lincoln's friend -- Lovejoy - was killed, very likely burned to death -- in his print shop, by a crowd who hated him for being too blunt about equality. Anyone against slavery faced the same charge -- you want black men to "sleep with and marry" white women.

That was always the rant, the appeal to white men.  Not that slavery was good, but that black men, if freed, would take your wife or daughter.

And it worked.  The appeal to be afraid your daughter, or wife, would take up, or "be with" or be raped, was the nerve which men like Stephen A Douglas, and many others, stabbed again and again, to get or keep political power.

This basic aspect of that era, is 100% white washed from any US text book.  Yet nothing came close to as central to Lincoln's opponents, and how the attacked him, and beat him, for Senate in 1858.

No one told you that, did they?   The central issue of 1854,  1856, 1858, and 1860 elections, was black men taking white women.  


Get the full story. Not the edited bullshit partial story.  Like Lincoln's political enemies calling him "Negro Worshipper" who is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

No one told you.  It's  not even hinted at in your history text books, but was - by far --the major issue of Lincoln's attempt to get into the Senate.   His opponents all but urged his assassination or physical assault (yes, really) by this approach -- and it worked. Lincoln lost the race for Senate, and never did get a majority of votes, even for President.  

"Mr Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 

No one ever told you -- did they -- that Lincoln was hated in much of the North, and attacked in public repeatedly, to his face, that he was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

IN fact, no one told you, either, that Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality from 1846 on. Nor do they show  you his full quotes, full speeches, or tell you of his full actions.

 Did you know LIncoln, as freshman Congressmen, stood up to President Polk, and called Polk out, for invading Mexico, and stealing their land (which he did) for the South's efforts to double the size of slavery?

Did you even know many considered (rightly) that the slave owning President, according to Frederick Douglass, had made up the war to double the size of land for slavery?   

Lincoln agreed.   No one ever told you that, either?  It would be almost 20 years before Lincoln and Frederick Douglass met. 



nor does the idea even creep into, US text books.....

Lincoln had to deal with that -- and he did.  This is a perfect example of  how Lincoln dealt with it, see the video.




Detractors game -- is to quote Lincoln out of context, and ignore his actions.

You can pull up 500 Lincoln quotes, in about 2 seconds.  Fine.  Get all Lincoln quotes, there are plenty that kick ass-- 

But quotes won't do it -- you need context, and his full actions.  Get his letters to Joshua Speed, get his actions refusing to obey Southern War Ultimatums. Get the full picture.  Get the full Lincoln Douglas debates.


Every "history teacher" I ever met, insists they know the Lincoln Douglas debates well, and read them all.  

OH really, now?  I have yet to meet one history teacher that even knows that Douglas accused Lincoln, over and over, with great emphasis, of wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

Nor do they know that Douglas was emphatic - and gave evidence for - LIncoln's obsession with equality.


How the hell did they miss that in Lincoln Douglas debates?  Because they skimmed it, that's how.




1856  1856 1856




. David Rice Atchison boasted of it.   He made his own war ultimatums, in his own speeches and writings.  We will kill until we have slavery to the Pacific.

Atchison even told his men, they would be "amply paid" and could keep anything they stole from the houses they looted.


WTF?  Was Frederick Douglass stupid?   Did he not know about Lincoln's letter to Greeley at New York Times? (Yes, he knew, he ran it in his own paper).   See more about that famous letter, below...

Yes of course Douglass knew, and he knew the "full measure" of Lincoln, not the edited or out of context bullshit.

And more, Douglass knew what was going on at the time. 

Lincoln was called  "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" -- repeatedly, loudly, proudly, in public, to his face, by the most powerful speaker of that generation.   And no one ever bothered to tell you. 

Not in any text book. Not one text book. Let me repeat that, not one single text book in US, has ever made it clear, Lincoln was repeatedly, emphatically, to his face, charged again and again, with "obsession for equality for the Nigger".

But those text books will include partial quotes, out of context,  by Lincoln, to claim Lincoln didn't really care, or Lincoln was reluctant.

Bullshit -- Lincoln was reluctant, okay, reluctant to get his head smashed in, or a get a bullet to the brain, any sooner than he did. And such things did befall folks who, even in Illinois, were perceived as too radical for the "black man"  because the "black man" wanted to "sleep with, be with, your daughter".

Black men. Would take. Your wife. Your daughter.

Lincoln would "slowly burn us to death"  by not allowing the spread of slavery. That's right, very clear, just not allowing the spread of slavery -- was like burning us to death.

The open letters to the public by other Southern governers, much the same thing. Lincoln would destroy the WHITE RACE, just by not allowing us to spread slavery.

That was the big fear, and Southern leaders jumped up and down on that raw never. Lincoln was vile -- he was destroying the white race, don't believe him that he does not intend to force the South to give up slavery.  He will destroy us, just by trying to keep slavery out of the rest of the country.

Were you ever told? FUCK NO. 

Go on, go find any text book that mentions it, much less shows what a BFD that meme of Lincoln being obsessed with equality was, and the impact it had on how he stayed alive, and how he hoped to win elections despite the hateful physical attacks on others, including his friends, and the threats to him personally.

No one told you that, did they?.

And that was in the NORTH -- remember that.



In the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.  Southern editors and leaders boasted that electing Lincoln -- or anyone against the spread -- yes spread -- of slavery was like an ACT OF WAR.

Did you ever see that in your history book. Electing anyone against the SPREAD of slavery was an act of war?   Think about that, think real hard. 

And they boasted of it, they did not admit it, they fucking boasted of it. And they were not bluffing. 

To understand those times, you either know, or you don't know,  how important it was that  Lincoln was regularly called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshiper" by powerful people in the NORTH.  Not the South -- they were even worse.  

But in the NORTH, Lincoln was hated by the most powerful people in Washington, including US Senators Davis, Douglas, and David Rice Atchison, because he was"obsessed with equality for the Nigger".



Did Jefferson Davis hate Lincoln personally, did Stephen A Douglas?   Did Davis really believe God sent him the black race to enslave?   Did Davis really believe it was cruel to blacks NOT to enslave them?

No.   But Davis, Douglas, Atchison, Toombs, etc, got power, got status, got prestige, got money, from spouting such things.   Yet their followers, who believed this shit, were dangerous. God ordained slavery - the white race will be exterminated? - Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

It worked.

All those things, and many more, Southern leaders shouted to crowds, said in 100 ways, and it worked.   Those who did that demagoguery got the leadership, got the presidency of confederacy, got to be US Senators.

Did Foner ever tell you that Lincoln was widely accused of being a "Nigger lover"?  Did McPherson, Catton?Did Ken Burns mention anything like it? 

No. Only one historian I know mentioned this basic aspect, and he did that rather late in one book, that book is " Lincoln and Douglas, by Allen Guelzo.

But even Guelzo presents the "Nigger rant" in an almost comical way, showing Douglas went from side to side of the stage shouting it, perhaps even drunk.   The "Nigger rant"  was always about white women being with,sleeping with, or walking with black women.

So even when this "Nigger rant" habit of Douglas is mentioned, you don't see it, or hear of it, in context of the killing sprees, the violence, the hangings and tortures.   Southern leaders hit this again, and again.  If we do not spread slavery, we will be equal to blacks, and we will be exterminated, or have to live in equality with them.

Unless you understand that -- you can not know or even imagine how fucking radical Lincoln was, to stand up, and push back, and claim in the most amazing powerful term, that "any slave is the equal of me any and man.....  she is my equal, and the equal of Judge Douglas.

Gee-- wonder why they never show those parts of the speech? Wonder why they don't show how fucking stunning Lincoln was, to push back against the "You want our daughters to sleep with Niggers" accusation.



Guess who knew Lincoln was called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  Guess who knew what happened to men that were thusly accused (they could be killed).  

Frederick Douglass knew.  Lincoln knew. Stephen A Douglas knew, Jefferson Davis knew. 

Hell yes, Stephen A Douglas knew -- that's why he used this approach. That's why he brought it up, and spoke of it for hours, wove it into every speech.   This was the basic message of Stephen A Douglas  "Mr. Lincoln is radical and obsessed about equality, and would have your daughters sleep with Niggers".

 Every Southern leader knew the power of hate and fear by whites, of black men "sleeping with white women" --and how that would "exterminate the white race". Oddly, though, Southern leaders were not nearly as quick to shout "Nigger".  Douglas did that, very likely to show his Southern friends (like Jeff Davis) that he was worthy of their support of President and or Chairman of House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

This is so vile -so strange- - to our ears, but it was not strange or even unusual at the time.  Your "history books" just skim over it, or not mention it, at all.

ut if you read Southern books, Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern documents, Southern letters, at the time, and if you know of the ongoing killing and torturing and terror used by the South -- proudly -- to spread slavery, you won't be so easily fooled by academic bullshitters like Foner and McPherson and others.  

But it was central to the times, to the elections, and to the nation.  How Lincoln was hated for being a "Nigger lover" and who wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"  was the very real, very powerful, and very dangerous meme -- that worked.

This has been whitewashed for at least 100 years.  Southern crybabies and liars have never allowed that stark, ugly truth into any US text book.

In fact, entire books, entire series of books, have painted LIncoln as a "racist who wanted to send blacks to Africa"   and paint Southern leaders as principled men who intended to end slavery.   Such bizzaro bullshit is accepted as rational, and worthy of merit.

Fuck that. Learn what the hell was going on.

To his face, repeatedly, the best speaker of the 19th century, beat Lincoln in a race for US Senate, by calling Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 
The reason it's important -- you are not taught the hatred and fear of black men, taking white women,  and how THAT was central to the Civil War.   Southern leaders made it very clear -- if they could not spread slavery, the white race would be destroyed.

The hate and fear pushed by Southern leaders, and by men like Stephen A Douglass, is simply not mentioned in any meaningful way, by any historian in the last 50 years. Whitewashed by bullshit. 


I was almost 60 years old, before I realized  historians, like most folks, are full of bullshit.  

Sadly, "historians"  are often afraid to praise Lincoln too much, lest they be accused of hero worship.  Others just trash Lincoln for attention.

Some trash Lincoln,  omit  his actions (like his amazing battle in Congress to stop the war with Mexico, and to prevent slavery in the territory we stole from Mexico).

Why not show that amazing story? 

Maybe some bullshitters want to "appear balanced"  -- and fuck all that. I'm still waiting for a biography of Lincoln that tells what he did.  You get maybe one or two sentences about Lincoln push back against US theft of land to spread slavery, and they dont even mention, Lincoln rightly accused the South and Polk of creating a war to spread slavery.

When you learn what Lincoln did --  and see what the fuck was going on -- it's hard to disagree with Frederick Douglass, paraphrased,  Lincoln was a bad ass, radical mother fucker.


Read any -- any -- US text book, you would never have a clue about that, or hardly a clue, from any Lincoln biography that I know of. 



These came from NORTHERN politicians and NORTHERN PRESS.  Bet no one told you that.  

Not sorta, not kinda.  That was the big hammer, the sometimes spoken clearly, sometimes spoken in code, told to demonize those who sought to end slavery. That too, is completely, 100%, absent from US text books.  

Even as early as 1890, "old timers" like one of the men who founded the GOP,   had to remind the public that at one time, abolitionist was a dirty word, on parr now with child molesters in some areas.  

Palmer also explained how vile and violent the south was.  Southern leaders used to brag -- before they lost the Civil War, that they would spread slavery anywhere they wanted, and Northern men would run away.   Jeff Davis himself said he could wipe up all the blood spilled in the South, if any way came because of the efforts to spread slavery.  He did not believe anyone would stand up to the manhood of the South, and he was nearly correct, until a man named John Brown proved them wrong, in Kansas,

You never heard of Southern leaders boasting of the killing, have you?  Nor boasting of how easy it would be to spread slavery where they wanted -- no one told you that, did they?

Really, this sounds absurd to people today, but it would be no surprise at the time. 



Who did what, to whom, is real history. All else is bullshit.

To get a narrative -- an overarching theme -- for a period in history, it should come as no surprise, that you need first to know facts -- most importantly, who killed who, and why.

If you approach US history from 1800 to 1865, but you don't know, care, or base your narrative on who killed who, and why, you don't know shit.  

Here is a basic important fact --Lincoln and other knew it, said it, and acted upon this truth.

You are not taught this --  slavery was always spread by violence.  Killers and the most cruel men, were hired, or volunteered to spread slavery.  Slavery never spread by consent of the white public, by vote, contrary to what you may assume.

In fact, where there was free speech, free press, and preachers were allowed to speak ill of slavery, slavery died.  The reason slavery ended in North -- it could be despised in public.  Books and newspapers could report the tortures, the rapes, the cruelty of the slave owners.

No one could do that in the South.  It was illegal.

No one even told you that much, did they?

This is what Lincoln had to  deal with - --- not the watered down nonsense that makes Southern leaders seem like rational men.

War ultimatums -- demanding Lincoln (the federal government)  help the spread of slavery into Kansas, which rejected slavery -- was irrational as hell.

 Their war ultimatums were were as nuts as anything you will ever learn in world history.  But it made perfect sense to Jeff Davis, who made it very clear, that was a war ultimatum.    He said the "intolerable grievance"  was the resistance to slavery in Kansas, even after Kansas became a free state by 90% vote.

The South knew Lincoln would not help them spread slavery by force.  It was not a serious demand, just posturing to stupid people.  Southern leaders created a toxic hate and fear filled narrative -- and had people hateful, fearful that their daughters would sleep with "Niggers" . 


STEPHEN A DOUGLAS  Speaking, making the case, a vote for Lincoln is a vote for your wife being with "Niggers" 

"The last time I came here to make a speech, while talking from the stand to you, people of Freeport,  I saw a carriage—and a magnificent one it was—drive up and take a position on the outside of the crowd; a beautiful young lady was sitting on the box-seat, whilst Fred Douglass and her mother reclined inside, and the owner of the carriage acted as driver. I saw this in your own town........ All I have to say on that subject is, that those of you who believe that the negro is your equal and ought to be on an equality with you socially, politically, and legally, have a right to entertain those opinions, and of course will vote for Mr. Lincoln.  (No, No, down with the Niggers)"
Papers often, even at the time, cleaned up "Nigger"  to "Negro", but some quoted Douglas verbatum. Douglas was well known for using "Nigger"  even on Senate floor,  and was admonished for it, repeatedly.   Even Southern Senators used the term "Negro"  in such settings., Not Stephen A Douglas. 

In the Charleston debate, Douglas, well aware of the fear of black men taking white women had in that city, screamed these things about Lincoln wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  as Douglas went from side to side of the stage. in the most dramatic way possible.

This was a basic approach Douglas used to some extent, in the debates, and when he spoke around the country without Lincoln being there. In some places he would be more extreme - some say he was drunk -- but always, in each speech, his goal was to get people to fear anyone who was against slavery.   

Douglass -- Frederick Douglass -- knew what Lincoln was up against.   


That was in the newspapers at the time, and was no surprise to anyone.  Fear of black man sleeping with your daughter and "being with" your wife, was the common retort to anyone who was against slavery.  And it worked.  

The fear and hate mongering by Douglas, worked very well.  Lincoln lost that election, and would have lost the Presidential election too, if the hate and fear mongers did not split the pro slavery vote three ways. 



Scaring the crap out of the males in the audience -- the only ones that could vote -- worked. Despite all his efforts,

  Lincoln had to use humor and much of his time, deflecting this claim he wanted "your daughters to sleep with Niggers"

 Lincoln lost to Douglas in the Senate race, and would have likewise lost in the Presidential race, but the pro-spread of slavery folks had three candidates. 

 Lincoln was the ONLY candidate against slavery, with the very mild platform of no spread of slavery.


White people were still being killed, even in the North for being "radical abolitionist"  .

Southern leaders BRAGGED blacks were subhuman, did you know that - or not? 

Southern leaders BRAGGED their "new nation" was based on the "great moral and scientific truth" that blacks were inferior beings, not human beings like whites.  

But Lincoln is the bad guy?



"Lincoln would have taken a bullet to the brain, much sooner than he did, if he was not careful what he said --what  good would a dead Lincoln do, in 1856?"


Yes, Lincoln did parse words -- but read the full speeches.


The Southern War Ultimatums -- printed first in Richmond papers, with headline "THE TRUE ISSUE".

How war ultimatums appeared in Douglass's paper.

Full text of Southern paper

The TRUE ISSUE -- and their war ultimatums, were that Lincoln allow the spread of slavery into Kansas, and Kansas "accept and respect slavery."

The WAR ultimatum, let that sink in WAR ULTIMATUM -- that Kansas accept and respect slavery.

Kansas had REJECTED slavery and become a free state, and by a 95% vote!!   Do you grasp that?   FUCKING HELL.

No one told you -- ever -- that Southern War Ultimatums demanded a free state turn into a slave state. Did they? You never heard that? FUCK NO.

It would help if US text books mentioned it- - so all the US would know what scum sucking pigs and lunatic Confederate leaders were.  

COnfederate leaders didn't suggest it, didn't say it would be preferable.  They said in writing the war ultimatums.


They were not fucking bluffing.  They issued their war ultimatums, Lincoln would not obey, and they attacked.  They were already killing in Kansas, anyway.


Lincoln did evolve-- on his awareness how he could kill slavery so bad, for the next 150 years, Southern leaders would deny the very things they bragged about then.


Lincoln called "Negro Worshiper"  by New York papers.



Every high school history teacher can tell you about Lincoln's letter to Greeley, where LIncoln says if he could save the union without freeing and slaves, he would.

Sounds horrible?

Why would Lincoln write that letter to Greeley??

Actually, Lincoln did NOT write that letter to Greeley  -- he wrote to the border states, via Greeley, because Lincoln knew that in 24-48 hours, most people that mattered would read his letter to "Greeley".

More about that, below.

Meanwhile, Southern leaders are killing to spread slavery, bragging about it, and that's fine. Lincoln is the bad guy?  Seriously?

Remember, Southern leaders were BRAGGING they were killing to spread slavery.  And LIncoln is the bad guy because he, at that time, spoke about Union? 

He fucking had to.  A few more days, and those Southern states go with Jeff Davis. Do you grasp that or not?




Killing the God of Slavery. Lincoln's final gesture


No one seems to grasp this now -- but once Lee surrendered, do you know that no Southern leader, not one, not for the next 150 years, ever claimed that bullshit again, about God intended slavery, intended slaves be tortured (yes, they claimed that before, often) and that God wanted white men to enslave the black race.

That all stopped -- instantly.  An amazing difference.  Blacks were still beaten, some were in slavery illegally, many of the horrible things continued.

But that "God of slavery" was a very real God-- at least used daily by Southern leaders.   Lincoln killed that excuse.


Plus Lincoln's actions.  Have you ever heard about his "radical" actions from 1846-65?

Douglass knew all these.  Did anyone bother to mention them, to you?


The fact you do not know this -- everyone knew it in 1850's -- show how whitewashed the Dred Scott decision has been, we now teach it as something about "citizenship"  and Congress can not decide slavery "issues" in the territories.

As Jefferson Davis said -- Dred Scott was about blacks as persons or not. They are not persons, specifically they are not persons.

John Brown lasted about two hours, in Virginia, kicking slavery in the ass his way. Then he was hung, and so were his sons.

His other son already got killed, back in Kansas.

Lincoln fought a bit smarter -- and got the job done.



People  were arrested in the South, just for owning the wrong  book-- even preachers were arrested.

The article claims the South is the most moral, religious, and contented law abiding people on earth.   But those abolitionist are against God, against religion, against decency, and should be hung.  

The US Senator from Missouri boasted in his speech, he would kill to spread slavery, and kill to stop folks from speaking openly against slavery. That's not from some nut -- that was a US Senator boasting of it.

Those against slavery are against human virture, against modesty, they "must be hung or put in the penitentary" or the South will secede at once.


Frederick Douglass knew about articles like this -- because he reprinted them, in his own paper.

So Douglas knew the dangers to Lincoln -- and he knew Lincoln was trying to win elections, to get support of folks who thought blacks were sorta dogs that could talk and walk upright.

But Frederick Douglass already knew that.