Friday, June 10, 2016

You are about to learn something new.  Smart people will, upon learning something new, adjust their opinion.   Most people just dig in and say it doesn't matter. 




There is a reason Lincoln's enemies, even in the North, said "Mr. Lincoln want's  your daughters to sleep with Niggers."

See if you can guess why Lincoln was accused, thousands of times, of being everything from "Nigger Worshipper"   to "Mr. Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" 

How could anyone accuse Lincoln of being obsessed with equality for blacks?   Did they not know those quotes from Lincoln speeches? 

Did they not know Lincoln's letter to Greely?

OH hell yes, they knew.  But they also knew Lincoln spoke thousands of times -- and took amazing actions -- to kick slavery in the ass sideways.

No one, and we mean no one, was as radical and as effective as Lincoln.  In his full speeches, he was amazing, and effective. 

And you can not possibly know that, unless you know what the fuck was going on. 


Stephen Douglas knew LIncoln well.   He knew him socially for most of his adult life, and was scared shitless Lincoln would defeat  him for the Senate in 1858.

Stephen Douglas knew Lincoln had already made thousands of speeches, and would make thousands more, and in each speech, Lincoln would bring up "all men are created equal"  and from 1856 on, Lincoln would predict either slavery would end, or the Union would end.

So  when Stephen Douglas accused Lincoln of "repeating over and over"   that all races are equal, Douglas was right.  Lincoln had said such things over and over.

Stephen Douglas was also right -- the US Supreme Court had ordered - yes ordered-- in Dred Scott decision, that slavery be protected in Kansas, even though 90% of white citizens there, were against slavery.

Frederick Douglass knew Lincoln well, too. 

  Plus, he was an ex slave,  helped Lincoln on Emancipation Proclamation,  pushed him to enlist blacks in the US military (and give them guns).

But more than all that -- Douglass knew a million things that never showed up in your text book, or any book you ever read.  

Such as -- Lincoln was called "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   To his face -- in public, Lincoln was accused by the most powerful speaker of the 19th century, of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  and wanting to your wife to "be with Niggers".

And more.   But this was not some idle thing, some "throw away" comment.  Lincoln the "Negro Worshiper"  who wants your daughters to "sleep with and marry with Niggers"  was the very basis -- the nerve, the real issue --that kept Lincoln out of office for so long.

LIncoln LOST repeatedly, because he was painted as a man who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   and would "destroy the white race".  LIncoln only won the Presidency when four men ran for the office, and he was the ONLY one against the spread of slavery.   The others were fine with the spread of slavery, and they divided the proslavery vote.

Douglass also knew -- as you do not -- that Lincoln was in danger of being shot, or attacked, or even burned to death, as a given mob may decide, if the hate mongers like Stephen A Douglas, and the fear mongers like Robert Toombs,  could incite the crowds enough.

Others were beaten - including a US Senator beaten on the Senate floor. Other anti-slavery candidates were killed, and it was illegal to even be or speak against slavery in the South, with torture (public whipping) and jail awaiting those who even owned the wrong book.  

The  hate and fear -- pumped up by men like Stephen A Douglas, Robert Toombs and others, was so great, violence was not only common,  Southern leaders promised war--- yes war -- if the North dared elect anyone against the spread of slavery. 

No one told you that, did they?  Well they should have. And I will tell you. 

Hang on to your fucking hat, you are about to learn what your history book was never going to tell you. 


"Mr Lincoln constantly repeats, over and over, his belief that all men are created equal, including the Nigger...  ( this is treason) , contrary to this stands the Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott"

Lincoln repeated " constantly"  and "over and over"  according to politicians of the day -- and indeed, he did.  

Yes, Lincoln parsed words -- in thousands of speeches, he probably spoke 2 million words. Lying bastards and shit heads now quote Lincoln in deceptive ways.

But no one was confused then.   Anyone who left a Lincoln speech knew exactly what he wanted -- and why.

LIncoln wanted to end slavery -- and start, by ending the cancer of the SPREAD of slavery.   Just that was radical as hell. 


Lincoln, from 1854 on, did little BUT repeat that, in thousands of speeches, one way or another, and do so for the rest of his life, till he was shot in the head for speaking of voting rights for blacks., 

Most dumb asses could not even find Lincoln's 2000 or more speeches, nor bother to read them fully.   If they did, and if they knew what the fuck was going on (killings, war ultimatums, just to name two), Lincoln would indeed seem like he did to folks then -- radical.

Not every sentence was radical -- Lincoln didn't particularly like getting shot, or burned to death, as others, even in Illinois, were.  And of course, he prefered to win an election, which would mean slave power wins and slavery spreads, than lose.

Small details most dumb asses don't seem to grasp.  


What your text books never even hint at, was the basic fear and hate, pushed by Southern scum, and their supporters in the North. Over, and over, and over, the public was told your daughters will sleep with Niggers, if Lincoln gets his way.

Not just once, not just here or there.  The basic tool Southern scum used to make the public afraid and hateful, was this -- "niggers will take the white women".

Most newspapers, even at the time, changed "Niggers" to Negro.  But read the full newspaper articles, North and South. Lincoln would have "Nigger" men will be with your daughter and your wife.

Lincoln had to deal with that. Lincoln had to get up, and speak, moments after the most powerful speaker of the times, Stephen A Douglas, accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with Niggers.

How did Lincoln handle that?  See the video. That shows you exactly how he handled it. 

Lincoln might have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had spoken any more powerfully against slavery.

 See the video -- click on it.   They cleaned up Davis language (no "Nigger rant")  and used "Negro".     They did not show Douglas running from one side of the stage to the other.

 But you get some idea of what was going on, even if watered down.  

You are not taught, either, that Southern leaders were even more fear mongering -- Lincoln will DESTROY THE WHITE RACE -- just by stopping the spread of slavery.


Officially, in speech and in print, the Gov of Florida told crowds Lincoln would destroy us, just by stopping the SPREAD of slavery. 

Guess who knew this -- guess who knew what Southern leaders accused Lincoln of (and anyone against slavery) was going to destroy the white race?

Just being against the spread of slavery in Kansas (Kansas was already a free state, when they issued war ultimatums that Kansas must be a slave state) was going to destroy the white race.

Your daughters will sleep with "Niggers"

Your wife will be "with Niggers on the street".

All because of Lincoln.




Frederick Douglass knew.

Guess who knew this -- guess who knew what Northern leaders accused Lincoln of?

If you read Lincoln's FULL speeches, in context (meaning, you know what the fuck was going on) Douglass was right, Lincoln was radical, obsessed, and determined to end slavery.

If you read LIncoln's FULL speeches, in context (see above)  Stephen A Douglas was right, too. Lincoln was obsessed, he spoke "over and over"  about equality of the races. 

But  you have no clue of that, if you accept the edited bullshit, and ignore, or don't know, what was going on.

No one -- remember that  -- no one, did this like Lincoln. NO one went were Lincoln went (including Kansas) and spoke like this.   The big abolitionist speakers never dared go where LIncoln went.  And Lincoln was running for office, trying to get elected. He was not trying to get killed.

LIncoln would eventually get killed -- maybe you heard?   He was killed after Booth heard  his speech about voting rights for blacks. Lincoln parsed words even there --  allow "educated" blacks to vote.  But that was far too much for Booth, who changed the kidnap plan to kill, because of Lincoln's speech.

Maybe someone should have told you. Or, you could not be so fucking lazy, and read his full speeches, and learn what was going on. Either way, Lincoln was a radical and effective champion of equality, no matter what your dumb ass uncle says.


Frederick Douglass knew. 

Douglass did not read some bullshit approved by Southern school boards, or some bullshitter who never bothered to list Lincoln's actions, or give his full speeches.

Douglas did not need to talk to your high school or college "history teacher,"  whatever opinion they might have.

Douglass knew what the fuck happened.


Northern hate mongers just accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter and wife to "sleep with Niggers".

In the South, leaders told the crowds, to pump up fear and hate, that Lincoln "was going to exterminate the white race".

Try to grasp that.  

Try to grasp, too, that Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed, as were others, for speaking too bluntly for equality.


Lincoln was not the only one against slavery, and everyone who       who even hinted slavery was bad was hit with this shit -- oh, you want Niggers to sleep with our women?  Oh, you want to destroy the white race.

This is what Lincoln had to deal with, whenever he spoke. Whenever he got up in public.


Your text books don't even mention this -- but you don't have a clue what was going on, and how amazing Lincoln was in rebuttal, if you don't know this.

Lincoln had to deal with the hate and fear from such wide spread fears and hate.  Remember, this was common attack by thousands of people who hated abolitionist, or hated anyone against slavery -- because black men would take your women.

  This is not just a few people afraid.  In Illinois, for example, it was against the law for blacks to even move there.  When you hear that the North was "prejudice"  what you DO NOT HEAR, is how pro slavery folks pumped up the hate and fear of black men -- taking your women. Your daughter will sleep with Niggers?  

Remember too, as you see by the transcripts and newspaper accounts in papers then, Douglas told the crowd repeatedly, in his "Nigger rant"  as a Quincy editor put it, that Lincoln wants-- actively wants -- your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one even hinted this to you, at all.  Surely no text book.

And that's not all Stephen Douglas did in the debates.  

Douglas went on, and on. He told the crowd he saw Lincoln and a white woman, in a carriage with Frederick Douglass!   If you were seen with a white woman, and a black man, you were all but a criminal, you were formenting the "extermination of the white race"  said Robert Toombs, Secretary of State in the Confederacy.

Lincoln had to respond to that. And he had to use humor, he had to allay the fears of the people.  He would say we "MAY NOT BE" equal in all respects,  or "We may not be equal in skin color" (no duh)  but in our natural rights any black slave is equal to any white man.

THUNDER.  Remember, Lincoln brought down the thunder, like no one else.  

The way Lincoln brought the thunder -- he first seemed to agree with a prejudice -- we "may not be equal"  - or, "I never said I was for perfect social equality"    Each time, Lincoln parsed words.  I never said?   Right, to that crowd, he never said he was for "perfect social equality".    But he was about to bring down the thunder in the next fucking sentence, and over and over, Lincoln did that.

Over, and over, Lincoln "set up"  his thunder of any slave woman being equal to ANY white man, with a sentence or two parsing words. Words absolutely needed, or Lincoln would have been shot much sooner.  

Guess -- go on, guess -- which part of Lincoln's speech his haters quote today?  They sure as fuck don't quote the parts Lincoln brought down the thunder and kicked ass.

They sure don't quote Stephen A Douglas, and many others, accusing Lincoln of being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

They sure don't show you Lincoln's long  history of kicking slavery in the ass, since his 1846 term in Congress.  Gee, I wonder why those dick wads leave that out? Oh, you think maybe they are lying bastards, or stupid bastards?  

Some are lying, some are stupid, but it does not matter.  Lincoln was a radical zealot, according to Frederick Douglass, and when you understand Lincoln's  FULL MEASURE -  Douglass used that term "FULL MEASURE"  Lincoln was the most radical and effective of them all, and absolutely indespensible to stop slavery. No one else came close.

Oh others talked in safe areas. Others were paid, others only appeared before crowds that agreed with them.

But Lincoln -- Lincoln went anywhere and kicked ass.  Yes, he had to parse words -- so the fuck what?  He ended up killing slavery with these parsed words, so fuck those that act offended Lincoln said this or that sentence on a give day. Get his FULL speeches, you ass wipes, and see what he did. 


Nobody else was doing this, like Lincoln.  Lincoln even went to Kansas, where it was still illegal to speak in public against slavery, per the laws Jeff Davis man, US SEnator David Rice Atchison passed, in 1855. Lincoln went there -- in fact, he went to Atchison Kansas, the city named after the man who invaded Kansas and set up the violent "thuggery"  and formed the "bogus legistlature"   that made it a crime to speak or write against slavery.


Can you name anyone else that did this?  Probably you never heard of any of this.

Guess who knew all this-- Frederick Douglass knew. 

That's why Stephen Douglas rightly called Lincoln (who he hated) "obsessed with equality".   By his actions, his 3000 speeches, his actions in Congress, he was obsessed with equalty. What the fuck do you think LIncoln did every day, nearly every hour, from 1854 on?   From the day Davis Rice Atchison invaded Kansas, after passing the Kansas Act, Lincoln was on the road, or prepairing to do so, giving thousands of speeches,.

He was not fucking selling pots and pans. He was trying to kick slavery in the ass by first stopping the spread of it, and making blacks and whites "equal under the law"  as they should be already, and were already, if you went by the Declaration of Independence.  ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.  

Did you know the US Surpreme Court ruled that blacks are not even human beings?

Did you know that Lincoln was called "traitor"  and "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  by the most powerful speakers of that day?

Did you know that when Lincoln spoke, he was actually in danger, as others were beaten and killed -- and Lincoln himself would be killed -- when Southern fear and hate mongering propelled Booth to shoot Lincoln -- and call him a traitor - for going against the Dred Scott decision?

Did you know Jeff Davis specifically said Dred Scott decision that blacks are not humans (see below) meant that Southern leaders could take "appropriate actions" including war, to spread slavery?


No one told you that.  The ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders has been completely whitewashed in US text books,.


Over, and over, and over, and over, and over, thousands of times, week, after week, for several years, Lincoln pushed "all men are created equal" .   Did any Lincoln hater tell you this?

Do you know what LIncoln did -- virtually every day of his life -- from 1854 on?  He went from place to place, large and small, speaking of why we need to stop the spread of slavery -- because slavery will spread to the entire US.  SLavery is a cancer, he said, and to stop the cancer, stop the spread of it.

That was radical as hell -- and quite against the Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott.

Did anyone ever even mention that to you? 

Fuck no.

LIncoln the "Nigger Worshipper"  . Lincoln the "Traitor"  deserves death -- and was eventually killed for speaking of voting rights for blacks.  His speech about voting rights was very timid, he introduced the radical idea very softly.   Allow "educated" blacks to vote, he suggested.

A few hours later, Lincoln had a bullet in the brain, put there by a man who heard that speech.

Did you know that?


 This was not some isolated case, this was as common as common gets: fear of "Niggers"  being with "sleeping with and marrying Niggers"   as Stephen Douglas said.

No one told you that, either. In fact, go look at any 50 or 100 books about Lincoln or Civil War.  The don't even mention, whatsoever, the barrage Lincoln faces about "Niggers sleeping with your women. 

The Secretary of State of the Confederacy, claimed Lincoln was exterminate the white race!  Crowds cheered.

 Southerners claimed Lincoln was going to DESTROY THE WHITE RACE. 

When Southern men joined or were drafted to fight in the Civil War, they had heard nothing but talk like that -- your wife and your daughters will be with Negro men - for years.


Frederick Douglass made it clear -- he knew Lincoln had to appeal to a nation that feared blacks, and he knew that people would have shot Lincoln much sooner,  and he would never have been elected dog catcher, if he spoke any more candidly that he did, at times.


But Douglass also knew Lincoln's actions -- hundreds of them, many you never heard of.  Certainly no book trashing Lincoln will mention any, and even those supposedly objective about Lincoln,  never point out.

Under his rule -- see what Douglass thought was important, and you have little or no clue even happened......

Do Douglass knew Lincoln's words- - and actions.  More, he knew what Lincoln was up against.

Like Southern leaders said Lincoln would destroy the white race -- exterminate the white race -- by stopping the spread of slavery.

Lincoln again, and again, and again, said to end slavery, we have to stop the growth.  He was right.  Slavery had to expand, or slavery, like any cancer, will kill the host.

And the South agreed. 

So Lincoln DID speak about ending the spread of slavery -- as  a way to end slavery everywhere, over time.   So when you hear these stupid shits tell you Lincoln didn't care about slavery.... the fuck he didn't.

It was an "act of war" said Southern leaders, to elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery.

Let me repeat that.  Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, said it was an act of war to elect anyone against the spread of slavery.

He not only said it, he sent killers to KS to kill and terrorize anyone who published anti slavery newspapers, or tried to give public speech against slavery. 



Why was "spread of slavery"  such a huge fucking thing to Lincoln?

Because Southern leaders were already -- already -- sending killers to Kansas, as they had sent them to Missouri, as they would send them later --- to spread slavery.

Over, and over, all through US history, from 1800 on -- no one teaches you this -- Southern leaders had been killing to spread slavery.   Most people think white folks in the South loved slavery. Oh fuck no.  The slave owners, and the politicians, made sure you could not even speak against slavery, preach against slavery,  or own books against slavery, from 1840's on.

You could be tortured for simply owning the wrong book in the South.

You could be killed, even in the North, in some areas (Illinois was one)  for speaking too openly against slavery.

How many of those trashing Lincoln, tell you that?  How many even know?   Probably none.

Southern leaders pumped up the fear and hate -- hate for anyone who spoke against slavery, hate for anyone who just was against the SPREAD of slavery.

Try to grasp that.

They told the public, North and South, that stopping the SPREAD of slavery would destroy the white race by making "Niggers sleep with your daughter".

Try to grasp this -- and no one told you. This is new information to you. 

Actually  the value of slaves, the price of slaves,  was going down, down down, as there were just too many slaves.  There were slave FARMS pushing out 12-14 slave babies per slave woman.  There was also illegal importing of more slaves from Cuba -- thousands arrived illegally every year. 

By 1850, Southern leaders had so many slaves, there were more black people than white in many areas of the South.   |And whites were worried as hell.

They knew -- and said, that if they did not spread slavery, blacks would outnumber whites and eventually they would kill the whites. 

That's what crowds were told.  That's  how you got crowds to hate men like Lincoln.  And that's why LIncoln had to be careful what he said, to who. 

Stopping  the spread of slavery-- would have destroyed slavery.  And the only way to stop the spread of slavery, was to keep the Union together. 

Lincoln said -- and so did the South say -- if the Union stays in tact, slavery can not spread.  Try to grasp that.

If slavery can not spread, slavery dies.

When those fucks blame Lincoln for trying to keep the Union together, understand this -- keeping Union together was the only way to keep slavery from spreading.  Southern leaders agreed.  Lincoln agreed. Keeping Union together = ending slavery, one way or another. 

No one really tells you, what Lincoln was up against -- the ISIS like SOuthern lunatic leadership were in many ways as violent as ISIS. Leaders promised war,  got crowds cheering about GOD and slavery, got crowds eager for war, by claiming Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.

No one told you anything about this. But it was extremely well known then -- Southern leaders boasted of it, in speeches, in books, in sermons.

Try to grasp that.

And Douglass knew it all.

Douglass saw the black race go from being considered "dogs that could talk"  that "God ordained to be enslaved and punished,"   to men who were in the Union Army, who would get to vote,  and get to actually be considered HUMAN.

Did you know that?   Seriously, did you?

Did you know that in 1854, when LIncoln got back into politics, blacks were not even considered human beings by most whites in the US.


And did you know, that the United States Supreme Court ordered --  yes ordered-- that blacks be seen not as human beings, but as property?

Officially, blacks were not human beings, by law.  By order of the court.

Not sorta, not kinda.  Not as a trivial detail.


Lincoln got called a traitor -- by Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, emphatically, specifically because Lincoln said blacks were human beings!!  

Did anyone tell you that?  No. 

Read Stephen A Douglas's speeches.  He was called a traitor behind his back, in Douglas speeches, but to his face, Douglas would not call him a traitor, just call him "obsessed with equality or the Nigger" who "will cause a revolution by disobeying the Supreme Court".

No one told you that.

That's the kind of thing your history teacher should tell you, but they don't know either. They would have to read all of the Lincoln Douglas debates, and newspapers of the time.  Instead, they read whitewashed bullshit, published since.



No one told you that the United States Supreme Court ordered -- ordered -- blacks to be seen as NON HUMAN.  Did you know that?

That was a big fucking deal -- and well know-- at the time.  But this amazing fact is not taught in any US text book.

Blacks are NOT HUMANS by order of the court.  Jefferson Davis himself said this order --this decision -- by the Supreme Court changed everything, and changed it because now, the federal government, the states too, could not stop slavery.  The government must respect and protect slavery, as property.

No one told you that?  This was the whole fucking point of most of Lincoln's speeches.    And it was the basic point Stephen A Douglas threw into Lincoln's face, time, and time again.

Should be easy to spot, just read the damn LIncoln Douglas debates. Or just read Lincoln's other speeches too. He said this repeatedly. 

Lincoln said this again, and again, the Supreme Court had ruled that blacks are NOT HUMAN BEINGS but property.  And Lincoln said -- then did --we must undo that decision.  His 13th Amendment was 100% in response to the Dred Scott decision that ordered, yes ordered, blacks not to be seen as persons, not human beings, but property.

No one told you that.  So when Lincoln got up and was accused of treason for being against the Dred Scott decision, when Lincoln got up after being accused of wanting y our daughter to sleep with "Niggers" --- Lincoln was a radical mother fucker.   

That is why Frederick Douglass called Lincoln radical -- because he fucking WAS.

Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass sideways, and knew his FULL speeches.  Douglass knew Dred Scott decision, and how blacks were officially NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  You are never told that.

Douglass knew -- see Lincoln's speeches about this, in the debates. Again, and again, and again, Lincoln railed against the Dred Scott order that blacks are property, not human beings.

In other words, if Lincoln had been any more radical, the whites would not do shit to keep the Union together, if they thought the war was to end slavery.

And that is true, even US Grant said (as did many others) they would not fight for the Union, if they thought the war would end slavery.  Grant would later say Lincoln was right, slavery had to go.  But at the out set of the war, most whites did not want to, and would not, walk across the street to free a slave, must less go fight, or send their children to fight, for freedom for slaves.

Lincoln knew that better than anyone, And Lincoln had to SEEM to agree with the prejudices of the day, or he is not only never be elected, he probably would have been shot. 

Why is that not taught? Virtually nothing that was vile, ugly, and true, about Southern leaders, is taught.   But of course, Frederick Douglass knew it, first hand.

Lincoln must -- must -- appease the people of the North, or they would never have fought the Civil War.   Douglass knew that. 

 If Lincoln said "Yeah, I want your daughter's to sleep with Niggers, like my opponents tell you," He would not live to get home that night.

So Lincoln had to deal with that, somehow. He often chose humor, followed by kick ass in your face powerful statements. 

So most Southern whites were hateful and fearful of freedom for slaves.   Even if they didn't own slaves (most did not)  they were still terrified of free slaves walking down the street, talking to white women, dating and sleeping with white women.

How would Lincoln exterminate the white race?   By making your daughters and wife "be with Niggers".


We are  not told anything in US text books about the "Niggers will sleep with  your daughters" rant, that endangered everyone against slavery.

Not one fucking word about the most basic aspect of life leading up to the Civil War, for those who tried to speak against slavery.

Yes, there were abolitionist speakers -- but they did not go where Lincoln went.  They did not run for office where he did.

They were hated too -- but Lincoln had the most powerful speakers of the day, including Stephen A Douglas, blasting him to his face (and behind his back) of being a "Nigger worshiper"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Very basic -- and not mentioned in any US text book.

The great abolitionists speakers, like Garrison and Douglass, did not dare go when Lincoln went.   Lincoln even went to Kansas,  spoke there, after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak publicly against slavery, in Kansas.

Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed, in Alton IL, by a crowd, after he was warned to stop publishing an anti slavery paper. Lovejoy may have been burned to death, inside his own print shop, were he printed anti slavery papers. Burned to death, or killed otherwise, he was taunted and warned, as was Lincoln, to stop speaking so bluntly against slavery.

Did anyone tell you that?

Abolitionist, in the way they used the word at the time, was a dangerous word to identify with.  Danger to you physically, if you went to the wrong place, at the wrong time.


 Lincoln also had a history of DOING against slavery. You never hear that, either.  He stood up to President Polk, while in Congress in 1847, and accused him of starting the war against Mexico, in order to spread slavery to the lands US stole from Mexico.

Lincoln could not stop US from going to war, so he tried to pass laws to prevent slavery in the land we just stole from Mexico.   He tried 47 times.  So fuck those who say Lincoln didn't care, or "evolved".  Lincoln was kicking ass for 15 years, from the moment he got to DC, to stop slavery.

But you have to know more than a few out of context quotes, to understand that.

And no one told you.

Guess who knew that?  Frederick Douglass. 

Guess who had no clue?

That would be you.


It might sound pompous to say your "history teacher"  -- including Pulitzer Prize winning historians  -- don't know shit about Lincoln, when they claim he did not really care about slavery, or was reluctant to end slavery, or "evolved" to want to end slavery.

Did you know Southern leaders were talking about genocide of blacks if they had to free them --ever.   

Lincoln was radical as fuck -- the union will end, or slavery will end, and I don't expect slavery to end. One or the other will end. 

Did you know the House Divided Speech is about Lincoln saying the nation will end, or slavery will end, one or the other. ?

The other part of the speech, was Lincoln showing the "machinery"  the deliberate efforts by Southern leaders to spread slavery by duplicity -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott.

When Southerners got wind of LIncoln's House divided speech, they shit a brick.  Stephen A Douglas, who was an ally of the South, again, and again, and again, hit LIncoln on the House divided speech.   The nation will end, or slavery will end?  Hell no, said Davis.  We can exist forever -- and be "terror of the world"  by keeping slavery.

Go see his speech.  You probably have no clue.

It would help if "historians"  would explain what the fuck was going on.  Most history books are endless bullshit.

Why killed who, and why, is real history. All else is bullshit.

 These "experts" like Bruce Catton, Eric Foner, and James McPherson are not stupid. But they are bullshitters who cared more for dreaming up some nonsense that sounded good, than telling the basics- - who killed who, and why.  So, their books do not reflect factually, what was going on, nor Lincoln said or did.


When we searched for 10 specific facts -- such as Lincoln standing up to President Polk, accusing him for starting the Mexican War to help the South spread slavery, 0-- absolutely 0 -- US text books even hinted at it, much less made it a major turning point in.

We did not yet cover all text books, or even close to all.   But so far, no text book in any public school shows things like SOuthern War Ultimatums or Lincoln being called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers" 

And of course, those who trash Lincoln as not being against slavery, or whatever crap they posit, they do not include, in any meaningful way, information that would show why Frederick Douglass would say Lincoln was radical, swift, zealous, and determined.  

Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and accused him of helping the South spread slavery, by the Mexican War?  Yes, he did.  And no one told you.

Lincoln's hero -- Henry Clay -- stood up to President Polk too, in the most amazing way, which shocked the shit out of his own state, and the entire South.  Clay, a slave owner, stood up in the most amazing speech of the 1840's, and accused Polk of pushing slavery further, by the war against Mexico -- stealing Mexico's land.

Lincoln did the same thing Clay did.  Stood up and accused Polk of helping the South spread slavery.

Guess who know all this -- Frederick Douglass. 

Guess who didn't have a damn clue -- YOU.

 Douglass actually explained it very well, and if those "experts" would read more original sources, they would likely come to the same conclusion as he did.

But Lincoln was "marked man" for his candid stand on Mexican War.  He was accused of "not supporting the troops"  and had to explain to the stupid, that yes, he supported the troops, but not the killing and creating a war to spread slavery -- the mission.

Lincoln knew, and so did most people know, that the War was started to expand slavery,  with the rah rah bullshit that American was blessed by GOD.   Apparently God hated the Christians in Mexico.

Also, Lincoln tried 47 times to have slavery banned in the territory just stolen from Mexico, per his own explanation.    Of course, no dice.  They were not about to ban slavery, in the lands they just stole, to spread slavery.

The killings to spread slavery were nothing new -- and would of course come back from 1854 on, as you will see. with Jeff Davis sending David Rice Atchison to kill and torture in Kansas.  And it almost worked.

In the North, Lincoln was exposed for "Wanting your daughter to sleep with Niggers"

In the South, Lincoln was exposed for "extermination of the white race.

And no one told you.  So how the hell would you know?

Southern leaders sure told folks then. Northern supporters of slavery -- like Stephen A Douglas -- told folks then.

Your  history teacher never said a word -- probably no one told them.


At least one teacher put some mention of slavery into his power point presentation, about Mexican war.

That's rare.  But even then, it's not front and center. Slavery and the spread of it, sure as hell was front and center,  back and all sides, of national life from 1820-1860.


TO justify the spread of slavery, Southern leaders had precisely two arguments.  Lincoln, and everyone in the USA, had to deal with the excuses to spread slavery, and the actions by Southern leaders, such as invading and killing, torturing, drowning, and hanging.

1) God wanted it.

2) White race will be exterminated if we can't spread it.

Just stopping the spread of slavery will kill the white race, or "burn us slowly to death" .

Did you know that?

Your daughters will sleep with "Niggers".  God wants slavery.  Lincoln will destroy the white race.  This was the rhetoric of the time.

And people were still being killed for being "too abolitionist".   Abolitionist was a dirty word in the 1850s, even in much of the North,


Were Southern leaders wrong when they declared just stopping the spread of slavery would kill the white race?

Were they wrong when they told crowds, expand slavery or we will perish?

Fuck yes they were wrong, but it worked to enrage the stupid.  It worked very well. 

It was illegal in the South to preach, teach, or write anything contrary to such drivel.   That's right, against the law.   If you were against slavery, you best shut the fuck up or leave. 

Did anyone -- ever -- ever  -- ever -- tell you Southern leaders claimed God wanted slavery, and the SPREAD of slavery.   That may sound goofy to you, but slavery was "Ordained by GOD"  and even Robert E Lee said it is not up to us to question God.

Stephen A Douglas (and others) made this "Nigger worship"  by Lincoln a central emotional feature of not only the debates, but of the but of the entire argument to justify slavery and the spread of it. That's right, a central argument (particularly in the South) was that whites would be exterminated, if slavery was not spread.

We do not even teach that Southern War Ultimatums were about 1 thing -- the SPREAD of slavery.   We not teach what Southern leaders boasted of then.  Of the five war ultimatums Southern newspapers boasted of in 1861, all five were about the spread of slavery, one way or another.

Not one word, in these War Ultimatums, about tariff. Not one.  Not one word about the right of Kansas to decide the issue themselves, because Kansas already decided, and said no to slavery.

Not one word out economic oppression by the North --all words were about the South's "right" to take their slaves to Kansas, and as Davis would say in "Perpetual Speech"  to take slaves and have slavery protected North, South, and West.
And why not? Remember slavery WAS OF GOD.  Slavery was ordained by God.  If you are against slavery, said the official declarations by state of Texas, you are against GOD.   



When Jefferson Davis explained in his own book, about the reasons for the Civil War, he wrote that the resistance to the SPREAD of slavery was "the intolerable grievance".    

Think of that.  The intolerable grievance, the sin that could not be forgiven, was Kansas resistance to the spread of slavery.


  Davis wrote, in his own book, in context, that the resistance to the spread of slavery -- into Kansas  -- was intolerable.   When Davis wrote this, Kansas had already voted 90% against slavery.

Davis insisted Kansas could not reject slavery, by "logic" of Dred Scott decision, which ordered -- yes ordered -- blacks not be seen as human beings, not persons.

Very clear -- and Lincoln exposed this about 50 times, almost in every speech from 1857 on.  Davis was boasting blacks were not humans and Kansas therefore could not keep them out -- they were property. Nothing but property.


 THE CONSTITUTION (in other words, we on SCOTUS) see blacks not as human, but as property.  Further, the federal government must protect slavery.  Lincoln had to obey that, until the undid the shit, by 13th Amendment. 
The Dred Scott decision, as Davis made clear, ordered the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that voted against slavery.

So Southern leaders did not dare say they gave a shit about state's rights at this point.   The excuse, suddenly, was that Kansas citizens, Kansas legislature, not even the federal Congress, could keep slavery out.

THE SCOTUS had just decided slavery.  And oh, by the way, we order the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that were against slavery.

 Remember, those boasting of killing to spread slavery, were not some drunks. They were the US Senator, and his men.  Their own documents.  Their own publications.

And Jeff Davis himself, along with other top Confederates, boasted about it, one way or another. 

I can't help it that  your teacher didn't tell you.

Let that percolate.  Davis did not say Kansas citizens wanted slavery, or that Kansas citizens  held a fraudulent vote.  Davis said Kansas citizens, nor their legislature, nor Congress, could deny slavery. In fact, Kansas MUST respect and protect slavery.

And his logic -- God gave the black race to the white race, to enslave.  Blacks were "so inferior" they were not persons, not human beings, for purposes of the Constitution.

Davis was clear -- Kansas must not just allow slavery, but respect and protect slavery.  Clear too, about his logic -- blacks were not persons, and could not be seen as persons.

Did anyone ever tell you that?   Did anyone ever tell you the logic of Southern War Ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings?  But by decree -- inferior beings.


Lincoln, however, said this over, and over.  Dred Scott was part of the ruse, to make blacks not human beings, but property.   He said that, over and over in one way or another.  
Was he wrong?   No -- Davis boasted of it. Lincoln and many people said this -- Dred Scott decision was to make    blacks into NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  

Davis said that -- but he was proud of it.

Not one text book, and not one Pulitzer Prize winning book about Lincoln or Davis, saw fit to include this basic fact, as important enough to make clear.  James McPherson used the words "Southern Ultimatums"  but could not bring himself to tell the read what the fuck those ultimatums were. 

Go read McPherson. Go on. Not one word about the basic justification for attacks and war ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings.  

Go read Eric Foner -- that fucking idiot.  He claims Dred Scott was "a narror ruling"  about Congress's inability to decide slavery in Kansas.  Fucking idiot, Dred Scott decision itself was clear -- BLACKS ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS by order of the court.

And then, Jeff Davis boasted of that.  Davis own book bragged that Dred Scott changed everything.   Maybe Foner could actually read Dred Scott decision, or Jeff Davis book, or Lincoln's statements in dozens of speeches.  Dred Scott was done to make slaves into property -- NOT HUMANS.

Did Foner, Catton, McPherson tell you that?  FUCK NOT.

You can't just go around hanging and torturing, nor can you go around issuing war ultimatums (see below) without bringing God and survival into it.  So, Southern leaders did just that.

Stephen A Douglas regularly, and with great fanfare, great emphasis,  used the "Nigger will sleep with your daughter" argument, but you could not possibly know that, from any US text book.  Not one mentions it, much less show how powerful and violent the arguments were about this. 

In an informal quick survey (we are conducting a more systematic survey) of text books and major prize winning biographies of Lincoln, we found no US textbooks even mentioned that Lincoln was hated North and South for being a "radical" for equality for the "Nigger"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".


"You really don't know Lincoln, unless you know what ISIS like bastards he was up against.  US text books don't tell you about the religious lunatics, violent fucks, and sociopaths Lincoln had to defeat, to end slavery." 

Why would Northern papers call Lincoln a "Negro worshipper"?

Why would Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly, loudly, claim Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"  and wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"?

Why would Southern crowds cheer, and sometimes lynch or torture people, when told Lincoln was going to "exterminate" the white race by stopping the spread of slavery.


Let me repeat that -- Lincoln, they said, was going to exterminate the white race, just by stopping the spread of slavery.


Southern leaders claimed Lincoln -- and anyone else -- who even spoke against the SPREAD of slavery, was really out to destroy the South, and would exterminate the white race by this "Ungodly"   resistance to slavery.

Slavery was "OF GOD"  and to be against slavery, was to be against GOD himself, said the Texas official Declaration of secession.   Individual Southern leaders claimed they would like to see every Yankee dead, because of the "heritic belief that slavery is wrong.

The North, said Southern documents, was committing a "grave sin"  just to be against the SPREAD of slavery.

Why?   Because GOD ordained slavery, and the white race will be destroyed- -your daughter will sleep with "Niggers" as Douglas said repeatedly.

NO one even mentioned this.This is the hysteria of the era -- pumped up by men like Jefferson Davis, Robert Toombs, Stephen A Douglas  and others, in the North.


Go on, ask a "historian" or even a  history teacher about this.  They won't know what you are talking about, first, because they get their information from books, not original sources -- from Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern sermons, Southern documents, Southern declarations.

But they will still pretend they know all this, then say "Oh I never said it was not a factor, sure, it was a factor, but there is a multitude of factors....."

Blah blah blah.   Southern leaders THEMSELVES said why the killed and tortured.  Not me. Southern leaders themselves wrote their War Ultimatums, not me.   Southern leaders themselves boasted and promised to keep killing till slavery was spread. 

This is the kind of basic shit you never heard of, because Southern school boards sure as hell was not going to allow this in the national text books.   Texas was, and still is, the state most responsible for US text book printing, and due to the school boards there, editing.

Nothing true and horrible about Southern leaders -- like their boasting of killing to spread slavery, boasting that anyone against slavery should be in prison, boasting they would keep killing till slavery was in all of the US.

Let me guess, no one told you Jeff Davis himself boasted he would like to see, by force or Confderate arms, invasion of the North and capture of all blacks there, and make them slaves, too.

Well, we show you that  -- but there is so, so much more.  And you never had a clue.
 New York paper Making fun of Lincoln for his "worship" of the Negro.  Lincoln said blacks were equal to whites under the law, any black is equal to any white.  Go read the Lincoln Douglas full debates, not the edited bullshit.
One paper in New York suggested Lincoln should obey Southern War Ultimatums -- did you even know Southern leaders made specific  War Ultimatums?  

The War Ultimatums -- Kansas (already a free state by this time)  must respect and protect slavery. Not just accept it, but RESPECT slavery and PROTECT slavery.

Kansas was a free state by then.

Should Lincoln obey that? FUCK NO.  Did he?  FUCK NO.

Are you even told about Southern War Ultimatums?  Southern leaders were quite proud of them at the time.   Why not show the War Ultimatums in US text books?  




As you will see below, no one spoke more powerfully against slavery, and for equality under the law, than Lincoln.  Yes, at times, in some places, he parsed words. He spoke carefully, or he would have been shot sooner.

But read his full speeches, not this bullshit out of context crap, were Lincoln parsed words in one sentence, but then kicked ass in the next sentence. 

Tellingly, those who trash Lincoln always leave out one of two things -- context, or the full speech.

No one who ever went to a Lincoln speech, left confused.  Lincoln was going to kick slavery in the ass as soon as possible.  Not only was slavery vile shit, but the men pushing to spread slavery were lying bastards  using violence and subterfuge. 

We perish as a country -- or slavery perishes  I don't expect us to perish.
__LINCOLN'S HOUSE DIVIDED SPEECH____________________

Everyone heard of Lincoln's "House Divided Speech".  But your history teacher acts like Lincoln is bemoaning the fact the country is divided over slavery.

Fuck no.  Lincoln's house divided speech -- and he gave versions of it repeatedly -- was about one thing: how  Southern leaders conspired by means "foul and more foul" to spread slavery.

Specifically, LIncoln cited, in nearly ever speech he ever gave after 1854, the Kansas Act, as the "first bit of machinery"   in a concerted effort to spread slavery.  

Remember that, because David Rice Atchison is the US Senator, with Stephen A Douglas, who got Kansas Act passed.


Part of House Divided was about Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision as the two main ways Southern leaders operated against the will of the people, and against any decency of any kind, to spread slavery.

The other part of the speech, was about how, because of Kansas Act, now slavery had to be all over the US, or it would have to end.   It would "be one thing or the other".

All slave, or all free. 

And when Lincoln said that, Southern leaders about had a cow.  Again, and again, and again, Stephen A Douglas berated Lincoln, told the crowds LIncoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  Quincy papers called it "Douglas 'nigger' rant".

Douglas "nigger"  rant was this -- anyone against slavery was against the United States Supreme Court, AND wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one ever told you any of this, did they.   Yet newspaper editors were so familiar with Douglas on this point, when they discussed that part of Douglas debate, the Quincy editor just said "nigger rant".


Meanwhile, Southern leaders were saying Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.  So in the North, Lincoln was accused of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers'  and in the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.

Equality for the negro -- the hate mongers would drive the point home -- means your daughters, your wife, and your life, would be with "Niggers" allowed to roam where they wanted, have sex with who they wanted, marry who they wanted.

To be for those positions, at the time, got you killed. Remember that. Abolitionist was a dirty word in 90% of white America, including the North. In the South, abolitionist were "of the devil"


Generally, historians never even mention this. If they dare mention it, it's in a sentence or two, toward the back of the books, and never shown to be the central and spoken issue of the day.

Lincoln, though, gave over 2000 speeches, for  years, that's all he did, go place to place, speaking against slavery, and arguing for equality under the law

Yes, he had to parse words at times, but read the full speeches. Holy fuck, once Lincoln got going, he kicked ass.  The lowest slave woman is equal to me, and equal to Judge Douglas, and equal to ANY man.

Why the fuck not quote Lincoln there?

Lincoln gets back in politics, because of KANSAS ACT

  But not only did Lincoln mention Southern subterfuge and deceit in spreading slavery into Kansas, he specifically said  the KANSAS ACT -- passed by Atchison himself, was the South's effort to push slavery into Kansas and beyond.


How fucking stupid are "history teachers"  that, not only don't they know Lincoln got back into politics because of what David Rice Atchison did -- they don't even fucking know what the hell David Rice Atchison did!

And Atchison was boasting of it. 


But of course, history teachers are not stupid. They only know what they are told.  Since the very beginning of US text book publishing, Southern crybabies and liars, have made sure nothing gets in text books, that shows how fucking ISIS like, violent, and proud Southern leaders were -- with the focus to SPREAD SLAVERY.



Funny thing is --  Southern leaders agreed with Lincoln. Kansas Act was the start of spreading slavery into millions of square miles, it was off limits before.  It was off limits before, because Southern leaders made slavery "open" in millions of square miles in the South, by Mexican War, and then demanding more land, in the "COMPROMISE OF 1850".

There was never a compromise -- Southern leaders made demands, they were met, and called compromises.

Lincoln asked, in one of the Lincoln Douglas debates --"What compromises"   We should have always taught how Southern leaders, again, and again, and again, promised violence if slavery was not spread.

Each time, they got what they demanded.  Each time, they came back and demanded -- not suggested -- more.  And if you don't fucking believe that, read Southern War Ultimatums

But when any "historian" even bothers to comment on Lincoln's hundreds of accusations that the South was trying to "nationalize" slavery, like the idiot y others -- including SOUTHERNERS bragging about it.  The South was in no ways sorry or ashamed of Kansas Act, remember, David Atchison boasted he passed Kansas Act, and boasted he went to Kansas and used men to invade Kansas, and kill, terrorize, to push slavery West.

Lincoln was not guessing or dreaming up some conspiracy, because Southern leaders cited those two exact things -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision, as justification for invasion of Kansas, and justification for Southern War Ultimatums (See Jeff Davis own book, and see more in this  blog). 

Southern leaders -- already, from 1856, before Lincoln even ran for Senate -- were boasting they were spreading slavery and would continue to kill and torture,  until slavery was spread to the Pacific, even spread into places that were already free states. And the Kansas Act was the specific justification, then Dred Scott came along, and they of course used that, too.

In fact, Dred Scott decision came about because Atchison could not get enough people killed, fast enough.  He predicted a quick victory in Kansas against civilians, with his armed men, but it did not work that way.

So Southern leaders had to justify Atchison's killings after his initial efforts failed.  Jeff Davis himself claimed Dred Scott justified everything Atchison did.  Did you know that?

No one told you that, did they?

So when Lincoln said slavery will spread everywhere -- or it will end -- he was not kidding.  Southern leaders said the same thing, before and after Lincoln gave House DIvided Speech.

See, facts matter.

No one mentions that, not in any US textbook.  So it's impossible to know what Lincoln actually faced, from those text books, which have been whitewashed since text books started, to the satisfaction of Southern state school boards, mostly Texas.

In fact it seems wacky, when you first hear that Southern leaders were killing and torturing, and boasting of it, to spread slavery into areas that were already free states. But that was well known at the time. Lincoln wrote and spoke about it, but oddly, that's not given any credence in US text books. Those kinds of things, Southern school boards would not allow in books.  Not ever. Not once. 

Lincoln was not that blunt, in public. In letters, yes, he was far more blunt.  But in public, Lincoln spoke a much kinder and more diplomatic tone.  Yet stopping the spread of cancer (slavery was a cancer, that would kill the hose, or be killed if it could not spread) was always the central point Lincoln made.  

Slavery was vile - it was a cancer, it would either destroy the US, or the US would destroy it.


What most people today, even "historians", don't get, is how violent Southern lunatics were, and how they were proud of it.

Slave owners tortured women, sold children, and were PROUD that they did what GOD wanted.  If we taught history honestly, everyone would know this ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders. But we teach none of that.

Jefferson Davis, and others, were used to getting what they wanted -- spread of slavery, over and over -- by violence and threats. Every single time South spread slavery, they did it by violence.  There was no exception.

  Jeff Davis. 

Ulysis Grant quoted Jeff Davis proud claim that he would "wipe up all the blood" spilled below the Mason Dixon line, with his handkerchief.   

This is typical of the bravado and macho duck dance, Southern leaders always did. 

David Rice Atchison predicted all the South had to do, was a quick show of force, and they would get to spread slavery, as they always had before, by force, into Kansas and beyond.  Give me 5000 men, Atchison boasted, and I will kill every abolitionist in Kansas.  

Pollard, boasting.  Just voting for someone who was against slavery, was "a declaration of war" against the South

"We will annihilate from our shores".  As events proved, 90% of Kansas citizens were against slavery. Atchison tried to spread slavery there anyway, with quick show of violence.

It almost worked. 


And Atchison would have killed them all,  if he had been able to  hire 5000 reliable men, instead of about 1000 unreliable men, there only for the money.

See below, for actual speech promising war.  They were not kidding, and they delivered the violence they boasted about.

There was no desire on part of the North for a war against the violent, ISIS like South.  


It was radical as fuck -- and dangerous as hell -- to be against the "Godly" spread of slavery, because if you dared to say the black man was your equal, Davis, Atchison, Douglas, and others, would make people believe you wanted their daughters to "sleep with Niggers"

 Remember, every Southern leader could and did quote the bible extewnsively for their justification not to just keep slavery, but SPREAD slavery..

Many people in the North thought blacks were more like monkeys, and believed like many in the South, that God ordained slavery in his wisdom! 

Only one man tried to fight the South, in the South, John Brown, and he was caught in an hour, and hung in a week. 

 Speech by US Senator, bragging about killing to spread slavery, calling it a war "For the entire South"  1956. More important than any speech Lincoln made, and Lincoln makes no sense, unless you know what the hell was going on, like this. 

We will be destroyed as a country, or slavery will be destroyed, is the  blunt version of Lincoln's House DIvided Speech, which drove Southern leaders crazy.   Lincoln did not overtly threaten anyone -- Southern leaders issued macho threats and promises of death, Lincoln was not about to get into a macho man trade of threats with them.

But that is how Southern leaders took Lincoln's House Divided Speech, and Lincoln gave that speech, or used the idea from it, in many of his speeches. 

 Jeff Davis used his friend (yes, Stephen Douglas was personal friends with Jeff Davis) to scare Lincoln off the national state.

Lincoln didn't scare that easy, as you will see. 

Douglas knew which cities in Illinois he could call Lincoln a "Nigger lover" --or other such epitaph  - and which he could not.   The cities Douglas could call Lincoln "obsessed with equality"  included Quincy Alton, and Charleston.

Quincy papers spoke of Douglas going into his "nigger rant" against Lincoln, which no one was surprised about, except maybe your history teacher. 

Douglas made it a point, before the debate began, to tell the crowd he saw Lincoln with Frederick Douglass, and a white woman, in a carriage.  That was a direct enticement to violence, and not the first time Douglas said such things, nor the last. 

No one told you this, but Stephen A Douglas taunted Lincoln to his face, and all but urged the white males in the audience to attack Lincoln.  

Douglas's "rant about Niggers and Lincoln"  was covered in newspapers at the time, but not even mentioned now.   

Douglas used that  hate and fear to excite the crowd, and to scare Lincoln.  He was not just exercising his jaw.  The basic message to the crowd was always "Lincoln is a dangerous abolitionist who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Entirely overlooked now. 




 Others were attacked -- in fact, Stephen A Douglas sat a few feet away from US Senator Sumner as he was beaten on the Senate floor, for speaking too powerfully against slavery.

Douglas, papers reported at the time, almost predicted Sumner would be beaten, and seemed pleased as the beating took place. Douglas used the same type of rhetoric against Sumner, as he did against Lincoln. 

Sumner was beaten -- 10 feet from Douglas's chair -- nearly to death, 34 wackes in the head with a  heavy gold cane.   The cane was and still is, shown as a bit of bravery in the South

 Sumner being beaten in US SENATE

Some of the men watching, are laughing.
Douglas reportedly was amused. 

Two years later, Douglas was once again essentially threatening Lincoln, by telling the crowd all kinds of things, like Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

How did Lincoln handle that?  See the video.  

Go on, to learn how LIncoln handled those kinds of charges, SEE THE VIDEO. You won't know unless you do, cause no one told you any of this in school.

Nor are you told, either, that Stephen A Douglas won --because Douglas was able to scare the voters re Lincoln's love for the "Nigger"  and the danger of being against just the spread of slavery.  
You hear this nonsense about Douglas being for "right of the people to choose".   Sounds nice, and stupidly historians have accepted Douglas public con game.  But behind the scenes, as Lincoln knew, and so many others did too, Douglas had helped Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison force, or try to force, slavery into Kansas.

Douglas did beat Lincoln for Senate; Douglas's  enemy in the Senate (Charles Sumner) was in a coma for six months.  And thousands of people would die, before the violent men who promised killing sprees, and actually committed killing sprees, were defeated. 

Douglas fear and hate mongering, worked,  because he stayed in the Senate, and was able to help his friends Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison behind the scenes as Chairman of the House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

 This led directly to the Civil War.  Lincoln could not overcome the stigma of his "Nigger Worship"  as New York paper called it.

So how does a "Nigger worshiper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  end  up being called all kinds of bad things later?

This same man -- Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly and dramatically told crowd after crowd that Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Southern newspapers were even worse -- "Lincoln will destroy the white race"  Lincoln will make your children work besides blacks, your daughters sleep with blacks, etc etc.

Every politician who was against slavery got this kind of treatment -- Lincoln just got it a lot worse.  He got it in person, spoken by the most powerful speaker of the day -- Stephen A Douglas.

 You have not heard any of this, UNTIL NOW.


No white politician was as radical as Lincoln, or went where Lincoln went, and was as effective as Lincoln.

In fact, he was shot in the head, hours after Booth heard him speak of voting rights for blacks.

100 years of textbook bullshit.

As Lincoln said, what is in the textbooks today, is the reality people believe tomorrow.   It does not matter what happened, it matters what people are told happened.  How could it be otherwise, none of us were there.   

The basic message of Southern edited text books - the South controlled the textbook business for over 100 years, and essentially wrote the history text books, because they simply did not allow horrible vile -- but true -- things to get in text books. Companies did not want to make two separate publications, so what was taught, in text books, was the same in Maine, as Texas.

Big mistake. The companies SHOULD have said - fuck you, you piece of shit, we will include what your leaders did and bragged about.  

But they said "Okay," instead. 


Lincoln's main enemy in the North, again, and again, and again, insulted Lincoln to his face, saying "Mr. Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers." 

Go find that in any US text book.   It's not there. Go find it in any "history" book by guys like Foner, McPherson, Catton.  It's not there either.  

To an astonishing extent, Lincoln was right, as you will see, the South factually, and by their own boasting, were killing and terrorizing to spread slavery into Kansas, and beyond.

But that never got into our text books --the facts showing how vile and violent Southern leaders were from 1830's on. 

  What is in textbooks today, becomes the reality of tomorrow.   We need to change our text books, to show what Southern leaders boasted of, and did, and how intelligently Lincoln kicked their ass.



Did you know that people were still being shot (as Lincoln would be) for speaking too bluntly against slavery?

Did you know Southern leaders boasted-- BOASTED - they were killing and torturing folks for speaking or writing against slavery?

Hell no, you didn't know, and neither did I, until I started to read Southern newspapers, Southern speeches, Southern documents, and Southern War Ultimatums that never made it into our "history"  text books-- probably because Southern crybabies and liars have controlled the national text book publications.

 It's not even mentioned, much less taught as a basic.  But this was the most basic way slave power scared whites in the North and South -- "Niggers will sleep with your daughters". 

These were very real fears --and Southern leaders were experts and jumping up and down, and making people scared as hell.

Even in the North, Lincoln's enemies made people afraid -- "Lincoln WANTS your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Then, Lincoln  had to get up to speak.  Try to grasp that. 

The video gives you some idea how Lincoln handled those fear and hate mongering guys like Stephen A Douglas, and Robert Toombs.

No one told you any of this -- ever -- did they.  Fuck no. They'd have to actually read the transcripts and newspapers of the time closely.

Nor was this just in the LIncoln Douglas debates -- this attack against ANYONE who was against slavery, was the same thing. You will cause our daughters to "sleep with Niggers".

You didn't have to be a slave owner to be afraid of Lincoln -- North and South, liars like Stephen A Douglas, many newspapers, and almost all Southern leaders, made damn sure  you saw Lincoln as giving away your daughter to a "Nigger".


Unless you know -- really know-- what the fuck was going on, who was killing who, who was torturing who, who promised endless wars to spread slavery, you don't know Lincoln, the USA, or the Civil War.  

 The vile shit by Southern leaders -- including killing to spread slavery and boasting of it -- has been whitewashed by Southern crybabies, by refusing to allow anything truthful to be in US text books about Southern  killing sprees, War Ultimatums, and boasting of killing to spread slavery for God.

Above all Lincoln was EFFECTIVE.

100 years of textbook bullshit. 

 For over 100 years, US textbooks were essentially written by Southern school boards, because they made sure none of the stuff that showed how ISIS like, how violent,  and how cowardly, Southern leaders were.   It's ironic-  (not really) -- that those who pushed for killing and torturing and war to spread slavery (yes, they pushed and got a war to spread slavery, as you will see), were personal cowards.  One of the many facts that never made it into any US text book.


When you show the speeches by Southern leaders to most folks, they will say "Oh that's just one guy".  Fuck no, it's not one guy, it's dozens of speeches, documents, and war ultimatums.   

And these are the top leaders, not some nut in a bar. Remember that. If Abraham Lincoln boasted about killing and torturing anyone, I'm sure Southern school boards would put that in their math books, their biology books, and their first grade readers.

But for their own leaders boasting of killing, boasting of torturing, boasting of spreading slavery for GOD -- go look for it. It seems bizarre because, that entire aspect of US history is whitewashed. If they mention it at all, it's in Orwellian double speak or vague phrases in the back of some book, without attributing names or context.


Was that comment by some nut?  Hell no, that was from Stephen A Douglas, the man who beat Lincoln for US Senate, by scaring the crap out of people that Lincoln's "radical abolitionism"  would mean your daughter and your wife would sleep with "NIGGERS".

HE did not say that just once, by the way. He said it repeatedly, and with great fan fare.  He shouted it, he went from side to side of the stage in Charleston IL, screaming it.  In Quincy, drool ran down his face, as he went into a "rant about Niggers"  according to the local paper.

Did you know that?  And that is mild -- MILD -- compared to what Southern leaders claimed.  While Douglas did not promise to kill and torture to spread slavery -- his business and political partner did just that, David Rice Atchison, US Senator from Missouri, and the man who, with Douglas, got Kansas Act passed.

Again and again, in hundred different ways, in person, in print, in speeches with Lincoln, in speeches apart from Lincoln, Stephen A Douglas, and much of the North, drummed up hate and fear for blacks, in order to scare the shit out of voters.

And it worked- - Douglas won the election, Lincoln lost.   Lincoln only won the later election, because out of three men running, he was the only one against slavery.   The other three were pro slavery, and split the pro slavery vote.

It's time these basic truths are know -- as they were then.


Did you know, Lincoln's enemies claimed (with good reason) that Lincoln was "Obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Nor was this unusual. Anyone, even Southerners who were not eager to spread slavery, could be called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro worshipper".

It was an effective technique, North and South.  Get the public to fear and hate black men, fear that the men would sleep with white women. You were protecting the white race, by pushing slavery.

Yes, Lincoln was going to "destroy the white race"  by being against the violent spread of slavery.  And yes, the spread of slavery was violent.


This sounds goofy if you did not know, the excuse by those who were killing and terrorizing to spread slavery (see below)  claimed the white race would "perish" if we can't spread slavery to the  rest of the USA.

Did you know about this?  Hell no

But the killing and promises of endless killing to spread slavery, was common knowledge at the time.  


ABE LINCOLN --- who helped more?

In fact, Frederick Douglass only knew one white man more dedicated than Lincoln to end slavery and make blacks equal under the law -- that other man was John Brown.

But Brown gave his life for no effective improvement of any black life.  He was caught within a few  hours, and hung in a week.  Few slaves even knew who he was, but were hated and feared even more, because of Brown's ineffective way?
John  Brown was hung by the neck until dead for his efforts. Lincoln would get a bullet to the brain for his efforts.  But Lincoln was effective, and Frederick Douglass cared about that, most of all.


It would do the world, the country, and Lincoln, no good, to be killed, like others were, earlier than he was.    As Frederick Douglass himself pointed out, LIncoln had to parse words at times.  


"It mattered little to us what language he might employ on special occasions, it mattered to us, when we fully knew him, whether he was swift or slow in his [actions] "



History is (or should be) this- - who killed who, and why. Get that right first, then add all the bullshit you want.

The history of the US, 1800-1861,  seen thru "Who killed who, and why" would be all about Southern leaders sending killers,  using terror and violence, to spread slavery.  Why? Well, the excuse they always gave was religious bullshit, but the real reason was POWER. 

But "historians" love to lay on the bullshit, and not get the "who killed who, and why"  part correct FIRST.  Lay on all the damn bullshit you want, but get the facts right.

That is not what happened in our US text books.  There is essentially no mention, much less an emphasis, on who killed who, and why. 



If you show Lincoln's FULL actions,  his FULL speeches and letters, in context of who killed who and why, Lincoln is one radical mofo.

John Brown was more radical  -- and was captured within minutes, killed within days, for his approach.  

Brown's approach was not effective.  You could not entice slaves to revolt, because slaves were tortured or even killed for any act of disobedience, or even tortured for reading the wrong book, or hearing an anti slavery sermon.

Brown, whose son was killed in Kansas by US Senator David Rice Atchison's men,  was in no mood to turn the other cheek.  Brown went direct to pay back for his son's death. Brown envigorated the whites of Kansas to fight back, but also envigorated the fear and hatred in the South, to fever pitch.

Lincoln knew that would not work.  First, Lincoln had to overcome the hatred and fear of blacks, caused by endless accusations that blacks would "sleep with your daughter" -- which was very much an issue in publics mind.  

Brown's actions actually fed into Southern leaders fear and hate mongering.  Finally, that had one example of someone going into the South and trying to free slaves.  To the whites in the South, this proved their leaders were right -- we face death if we do not spread slavery.

That's right -- Southern leaders had convinced the public they must SPREAD slavery or white race would be exterminated. 

No one was going to fight to end slavery in the South, if they thought the blacks freed would sleep with your daughter, or "be with" your wife.

As Frederick Douglass himself (he loved John Brown) Brown actually caused more trouble than his raid on Harpers Ferry was worth.    Slaves could not trust some guy they never heard of, never met, and face near certain death if they joined him.  No slave joined Brown's effort.  It would take more than a white man sneaking into an armory to make 4 million slaves rebel. 

If you don't know Douglass said that, and how Brown's raid caused a back lash, just add that to the list of shit they don't teach.

Above all Lincoln was EFFECTIVE.

LIncoln did it SMART. Above all, Lincoln was smart.  And his approach fucking worked.  His approach -- no one else had his approach -- was to at times, in certain speeches, seem to agree, but then in the same speech, completely obliterate that sentiment and kick ass.

The Lincoln "shuffle"  historians should call it, but they are too busy quoting him out of context, to piss on him, or push their bullshit.

How do they belittle him?  By misquoting, by out of context quotes, and by not knowing, or not telling, what the fuck was going on.

Mostly, by not showing Lincoln's actions.

Lincoln's words brought down the thunder -- he kicked slavery in the fucking ass sideways, with words too. Get all the words, not edited bullshit, not slogans. No one spoke more powerfully against slavery, than Lincoln, no one spoke more powerfully, against inequality than Lincoln.

But it was his actions that killed slavery, kicked slavery so hard, so fast, and would not stop kicking, until slavery was dead, and the GOD of slavery was dead, too.


WORD GAMES AND BULLSHIT -- repeated endlessly.

The power of words -- Lincoln knew the power of words, and used them to kill the God of Slavery.  You probably don't even know there was a very real God of slavery.  A God that -- to preach against that God -- could get preachers tortured in public.

 Unless you know that preachers could be -- and were -- tortured in public for owning the wrong book, or giving a sermon against slavery -- you don't know shit about US history 1830-1861


Lincoln --again, and again, and again -- compared slavery to a cancer.  Again and again slavery expanded, like a cancer expands (by violence, as Lincoln pointed out) and then becomes resistant to any attempt to stop the cancer.


The way slavery/cancer became resistant to any end --slave power made it a crime to speak, write, or even own books against slavery.   Bet you never knew that?

Most "history teachers"  can tell you that certain books were "banned" in the South, such as Uncle Tom's Cabin.


That's a weak ass, bullshit way of telling students what the fuck was going on.  There was no "list" of books banned. Anything -- anything --anything -- did I mention anything? -- that might "dissatisfy a slave"  was a crime. Ban?   As if they had a list somewhere?
Fuck no. No list existed.  Anyone could report you to law officials and you could be arrested for just owning the wrong book, or getting the "wrong" pamphlets in the mail.  Ships were searched for anti slavery material. 

It was not always like this, but once slavery ended in the North, (because of public outrcy and sermons, books, pamphlets, and speeches against slavery) slave owners and slave power realized they had no choice.  If free speech against slavery stayed legal, slavery ends.

This is just part of what Lincoln and others were up against. Lincoln eventually got a bullet to the brain, for his speech about voting rights for blacks.   Though Lincoln's speech on that matter is shown by many to trash him--because he suggest "educated blacks" get to vote -- it was far too radical a speech for Booth, who changed his plan from kidnap, to kill, because of it.

Did anyone ever tell you Lincoln was killed, rather than just kidnapped, because of that "radical" speech?  Fuck no.  And, people will use that Lincoln speech to trash Lincoln as a racist or not for equality.  

If you understand the context, and what the fuck was going on, instead of the bullshit drivel in your history text book, you may understand how fucking radical Lincoln was, and what slave power did to him (and many others) in response.



TORTURE. Not sorta-- the punishment was torture.

So from 1820's on, Southern states wrote "anti-incendiary laws"-- and when Southern leaders send killers to Kansas in 1856, the first thing they did, was to make it a crime to speak or publish newspapers against slavery.   Not one person in the USA was surprised that Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas, they had done exactly that for a generation already, in the South.

To be fair -- the South did warn the North that they would have to make it a crime to publish articles against slavery --see this from Congressional record, 1836.  And soon after, they did indeed, in Virginia, pass such laws...

Closer look..

Not long after -- since the North refused to make it against the law to write against slavery in North, anything which might make it to the South, the state of Virginia did indeed to exactly that -- made it a crime to have or publish or EVEN SPEAK against slavery.

See this.

All other slave states passed similiar laws, and citizens could be tortured -- even preachers could be tortured, for just owning the wrong book. Very ISIS like.

Guess who knew that? 

Lincoln. And Frederick Douglass.  And most people alive in 1840s - 1860 in the USA.   

But no one told you, because it's not even mentioned, much less emphasized, in US text books.   But nothing came close to perpetuating slavery, and expanding slavery, than making it a crime to speak or write against it.


Since no one told you shit about this- - you had no idea people were still being arrested, even killed, for speaking against slavery, in most of the USA in the 1850s.

In all of the South, in all of the slave states and in the Kansas Territories, slave power had made it a crime to speak or write anything against slavery, on the bullshit claim that to do so would "dissatisfy"  a slave.

Slaves, said Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, were "contented laborers"   and only became "discontent"  if the "lie of freedom was whispered in their ears".

Blacks, of course, could not read, and it was a crime to teach them to do so. It was also a crime for them to meet together off the slave plantation, or to preach against slavery themselves.

Slave power was not that concerned about BLACKS hearing things against slavery in the press, or in books, or in speeches.   But to allow whites to speak or write against slavery -- that is how slavery ended in the North.

You either made it a crime to speak or write against slavery, and made it a crime to preach against slavery, or slavery was going to end. 

And the Southern leaders knew it.

Whites were still being killed for speaking against slavery, when Lincoln was in politics -- and unless you know that, you don't have a damn clue how bad ass Lincoln was to go to Kansas, or even to speak in Charleston, or Quincy or Alton.

Lincoln's friend's brother was killed in Alton Illinois for speaking (writing) anti slavery newspaper.   Later, Southerners made it a crime in Kansas to speak or write against slavery, too.

You are not told any of this, at all. But this is the shit Lincoln had to deal with.



You hear or read all this shit by "scholars" who claim Lincoln was reluctant or hesitant or had to be dragged into ending slavery.    These stupid bastards never tell you, and do not see to know, how amazing Lincoln was, when you understand where he was, and when he was.

Some "scholars" will name abolitionist like Garrison,  and others, and claim Lincoln fell short of their dedication to end slavery.  Fucking idiots.  None of those -except John Brown -- dared even travel to where Lincoln went, or spoke to crowds Lincoln spoke to.

Not only do they not seem to grasp Lincoln was doing what no one dared do (except Brown, who was quickly killed for it), but they refuse to give Lincoln's full quotes or full speeches.  While Lincoln did parse words at times -- necessary to stay alive as you will see -- he kicked ass if you read the full speeches. Leaving out the full and clear meanings  lets these dumb fucks lay out the bullshit.   They don't exactly lie, they just don't include all the basic facts.

Lincoln speaking in Kansas is one example.



Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas, and spoke there, AFTER Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery.  Has your history teacher, any movie, any documentary, anyone every told you about that?

NO. There is no known text book in US that even mentions Lincoln went to Kansas, and related that to Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison's "bogus legislature" (a violent group sent to Kansas to pass anti free speech laws).

Since you don't know all slave states made it a crime to preach or speak publically or write publicly against slavery, and you don't know Davis sent Atchison to Kansas, where he made the most violent punishment-- death --the effective "remedy" to stop speech against slavery,  you can't know then, how bad ass Lincoln was.

 You need all the facts, to make a reasonable narrative. You don't get all the facts, if these "experts" leave out how violent, (systematic violence) the South was, and how Lincoln and others were killed by the kind of violence -- the violence against SPEECH.


It takes a special kind of stupid for "experts" to belittle or minimize Lincoln - notice if you read them, not one of them mentions Lincoln got a bullet in the brain, precisely because of his "radical" speech.

The speech Lincoln gave -- was about voting rights for some blacks --  just after the unofficial end of Civil War.  Booth heard Lincoln give that speech about possible voting rights, and changed the plan from kidnap to kill.

No one told you that, did they?






If you don't know even US Senators were attacked, on and off the Senate floor, one was beaten almost to death, for speaking about things Lincoln spoke about, you don't know shit.



The main problem in US history -- Southern cry babies and liars have made damn sure no one says anything horrible about their leaders. 

Southern war ultimatums? No mention.

SOuthern leaders sending killers to Kansas and calling it war to spread slavery?  No mention.

Southern leaders bragging they were just doing the will of God to punish the black man for biblical sins?  No mention.



Lovejoy killed in Illinois.
Lincoln would appoint his brother to Attorney General. 


Southern leaders said Lincoln would not just have your daughters "sleep with Niggers"  but that Lincoln and "black republicans"  would destroy the white race,  by allowing black men to "be with"  white women.

Did the politicians who said such things believe them?  Did LIncoln "want" your daughters to sleep with this person or that?

Was Lincoln going to destroy the white race?   Who knows if they believed it -- or not. The point is, they used this kind of fear and hate mongering against Lincoln, and he had to deal it.



Lincoln's friend -- Lovejoy - was killed, very likely burned to death -- in his print shop, by a crowd who hated him for being too blunt about equality. Anyone against slavery faced the same charge -- you want black men to "sleep with and marry" white women.

That was always the rant, the appeal to white men.  Not that slavery was good, but that black men, if freed, would take your wife or daughter.

And it worked.  The appeal to be afraid your daughter, or wife, would take up, or "be with" or be raped, was the nerve which men like Stephen A Douglas, and many others, stabbed again and again, to get or keep political power.

This basic aspect of that era, is 100% white washed from any US text book.  Yet nothing came close to as central to Lincoln's opponents, and how the attacked him, and beat him, for Senate in 1858.

No one told you that, did they?   The central issue of 1854,  1856, 1858, and 1860 elections, was black men taking white women.  


Get the full story. Not the edited bullshit partial story.  Like Lincoln's political enemies calling him "Negro Worshipper" who is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

No one told you.  It's  not even hinted at in your history text books, but was - by far --the major issue of Lincoln's attempt to get into the Senate.   His opponents all but urged his assassination or physical assault (yes, really) by this approach -- and it worked. Lincoln lost the race for Senate, and never did get a majority of votes, even for President.  

"Mr Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 

No one ever told you -- did they -- that Lincoln was hated in much of the North, and attacked in public repeatedly, to his face, that he was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

IN fact, no one told you, either, that Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality from 1846 on. Nor do they show  you his full quotes, full speeches, or tell you of his full actions.

 Did you know LIncoln, as freshman Congressmen, stood up to President Polk, and called Polk out, for invading Mexico, and stealing their land (which he did) for the South's efforts to double the size of slavery?

Did you even know many considered (rightly) that the slave owning President, according to Frederick Douglass, had made up the war to double the size of land for slavery?   

Lincoln agreed.   No one ever told you that, either?  It would be almost 20 years before Lincoln and Frederick Douglass met. 



nor does the idea even creep into, US text books.....

Lincoln had to deal with that -- and he did.  This is a perfect example of  how Lincoln dealt with it, see the video.


Lincoln radical to end slavery?   WTF?   Swift?  Zealous?

If you weren't to lazy to see that video above, and watch it through, you saw Lincoln SEEM to agree with the sentiment that blacks re not equal.

But then you say Lincoln kick fucking ass -- he brought the thunder.  BUT IN HER NATURAL RIGHT SHE IS MY EQUAL AND THE EQUAL OF ANY MAN.

The video above is from a movie in 1939, and happens to show -- sanitized -- how Douglas attacked Lincoln on his obsession for equality.  


The poorest slave woman ever born, is equal to ANY MAN, including equal to Lincoln, and to Douglas.

No one ever showed you that, did they.   Lying bastards, and goofy fucks, eager to minimize LIncoln make damn sure you don't see just things.

Nor will you see how dangerous it was -- physcially dangerous -- for people to speak loudly and candidly against slavery where Lincoln did.

Did you know, for example, Lincoln went to Kansas, after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas?

No - fuck no. There is not any US text book that tells the story of Southern leaders -- by force -- making it a crime to speak against slavery, or write newspapers against slavery, in Kansas.

And no US text book, which shows Lincoln then went to Kansas, and spoke against slavery.

Not one fucking text book in this entire country tells that story. Why?   Because Southern crybabies and liars have always controlled what is put in US text books, and they didn't allow anything like this.

Did you know LIncoln was, from that point on, a marked man, not just in the South. Lincoln was attacked for "not supporting our troops in war".  

Lincoln had to parse words -- so he did.  But see his stunning full speeches -- he kicks ass.  He beats the living shit out of slavery, but in ways that people found acceptable.



Detractors game -- is to quote Lincoln out of context, and ignore his actions.

You can pull up 500 Lincoln quotes, in about 2 seconds.  Fine.  Get all Lincoln quotes, there are plenty that kick ass-- 

But quotes won't do it -- you need context, and his full actions.  Get his letters to Joshua Speed, get his actions refusing to obey Southern War Ultimatums. Get the full picture.  Get the full Lincoln Douglas debates.


Every "history teacher" I ever met, insists they know the Lincoln Douglas debates well, and read them all.    But they don't have a clue -- not a clue -- that Douglas accused Lincoln, over and over, with great emphasis, of wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

Nor do they know that Douglas was emphatic - and gave evidence for - LIncoln's obsession with equality.


How the hell did they miss that in Lincoln Douglas debates?  Because they skimmed it, that's how.

How did they miss that Douglas went from side to side of the stage, yelling to a crowd, that LIncoln want's your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

Because you'd have to read the unedited whitewashed versions, and know what was going on.  That's why they have no clue.

And they are the "teachers".  

Detractors always claim Lincoln "was not really" against slavery, that he just "used the issue" to get elected. How fucking stupid can you get?

Lincoln lost elections because he was "A Negro Worshipper" -- did you know that?

Hell no.

He did win POTUS -- because there were four candidates, the other three were all pro slavery, one way or another, and pro spread of slavery.

Did you even know THAT?  Hell now. 

Southern leaders brag about shit you never heard ...  you won't learn this, in school.... 


If you don't know  how ISIS like the South was, you don't know shit about Lincoln and just how amazing he was. 

How could you know anything about it-- it's simply not in any US text book, in any clear, meaningful way.

You don't know who killed who -- and why. You don't know for example, Jefferson Davis War Ultimatums, and how he sent a US Senator to Kansas and paid 1000  men to invade Kansas, to make sure they did not speak publically, or vote, against slavery. 




1856  1856 1856




. David Rice Atchison boasted of it.   He made his own war ultimatums, in his own speeches and writings.  We will kill until we have slavery to the Pacific.

Atchison even told his men, they would be "amply paid" and could keep anything they stole from the houses they looted.


WTF?  Was Frederick Douglass stupid?   Did he not know about Lincoln's letter to Greeley at New York Times? (Yes, he knew, he ran it in his own paper).   See more about that famous letter, below...

Yes of course Douglass knew, and he knew the "full measure" of Lincoln, not the edited or out of context bullshit.

And more, Douglass knew what was going on at the time. 

Lincoln was called  "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" -- repeatedly, loudly, proudly, in public, to his face, by the most powerful speaker of that generation.   And no one ever bothered to tell you. 

Not in any text book. Not one text book. Let me repeat that, not one single text book in US, has ever made it clear, Lincoln was repeatedly, emphatically, to his face, charged again and again, with "obsession for equality for the Nigger".

But those text books will include partial quotes, out of context,  by Lincoln, to claim Lincoln didn't really care, or Lincoln was reluctant.

Bullshit -- Lincoln was reluctant, okay, reluctant to get his head smashed in, or a get a bullet to the brain, any sooner than he did. And such things did befall folks who, even in Illinois, were perceived as too radical for the "black man"  because the "black man" wanted to "sleep with, be with, your daughter".

Black men. Would take. Your wife. Your daughter.

Lincoln would "slowly burn us to death"  by not allowing the spread of slavery. That's right, very clear, just not allowing the spread of slavery -- was like burning us to death.

The open letters to the public by other Southern governers, much the same thing. Lincoln would destroy the WHITE RACE, just by not allowing us to spread slavery.

That was the big fear, and Southern leaders jumped up and down on that raw never. Lincoln was vile -- he was destroying the white race, don't believe him that he does not intend to force the South to give up slavery.  He will destroy us, just by trying to keep slavery out of the rest of the country.

Were you ever told? FUCK NO. 

Go on, go find any text book that mentions it, much less shows what a BFD that meme of Lincoln being obsessed with equality was, and the impact it had on how he stayed alive, and how he hoped to win elections despite the hateful physical attacks on others, including his friends, and the threats to him personally.

No one told you that, did they?.

And that was in the NORTH -- remember that.



In the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.  Southern editors and leaders boasted that electing Lincoln -- or anyone against the spread -- yes spread -- of slavery was like an ACT OF WAR.

Did you ever see that in your history book. Electing anyone against the SPREAD of slavery was an act of war?   Think about that, think real hard. 

And they boasted of it, they did not admit it, they fucking boasted of it. And they were not bluffing. 

To understand those times, you either know, or you don't know,  how important it was that  Lincoln was regularly called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshiper" by powerful people in the NORTH.  Not the South -- they were even worse.  

But in the NORTH, Lincoln was hated by the most powerful people in Washington, including US Senators Davis, Douglas, and David Rice Atchison, because he was"obsessed with equality for the Nigger".



Did Jefferson Davis hate Lincoln personally, did Stephen A Douglas?   Did Davis really believe God sent him the black race to enslave?   Did Davis really believe it was cruel to blacks NOT to enslave them?

No.   But Davis, Douglas, Atchison, Toombs, etc, got power, got status, got prestige, got money, from spouting such things.   Yet their followers, who believed this shit, were dangerous. God ordained slavery - the white race will be exterminated? - Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

It worked.

All those things, and many more, Southern leaders shouted to crowds, said in 100 ways, and it worked.   Those who did that demagoguery got the leadership, got the presidency of confederacy, got to be US Senators.

Did Foner ever tell you that Lincoln was widely accused of being a "Nigger lover"?  Did McPherson, Catton?Did Ken Burns mention anything like it? 

No. Only one historian I know mentioned this basic aspect, and he did that rather late in one book, that book is " Lincoln and Douglas, by Allen Guelzo.

But even Guelzo presents the "Nigger rant" in an almost comical way, showing Douglas went from side to side of the stage shouting it, perhaps even drunk.   The "Nigger rant"  was always about white women being with,sleeping with, or walking with black women.

So even when this "Nigger rant" habit of Douglas is mentioned, you don't see it, or hear of it, in context of the killing sprees, the violence, the hangings and tortures.   Southern leaders hit this again, and again.  If we do not spread slavery, we will be equal to blacks, and we will be exterminated, or have to live in equality with them.

Unless you understand that -- you can not know or even imagine how fucking radical Lincoln was, to stand up, and push back, and claim in the most amazing powerful term, that "any slave is the equal of me any and man.....  she is my equal, and the equal of Judge Douglas.

Gee-- wonder why they never show those parts of the speech? Wonder why they don't show how fucking stunning Lincoln was, to push back against the "You want our daughters to sleep with Niggers" accusation.



Guess who knew Lincoln was called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  Guess who knew what happened to men that were thusly accused (they could be killed).  

Frederick Douglass knew.  Lincoln knew. Stephen A Douglas knew, Jefferson Davis knew. 

Hell yes, Stephen A Douglas knew -- that's why he used this approach. That's why he brought it up, and spoke of it for hours, wove it into every speech.   This was the basic message of Stephen A Douglas  "Mr. Lincoln is radical and obsessed about equality, and would have your daughters sleep with Niggers".

 Every Southern leader knew the power of hate and fear by whites, of black men "sleeping with white women" --and how that would "exterminate the white race". Oddly, though, Southern leaders were not nearly as quick to shout "Nigger".  Douglas did that, very likely to show his Southern friends (like Jeff Davis) that he was worthy of their support of President and or Chairman of House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

This is so vile -so strange- - to our ears, but it was not strange or even unusual at the time.  Your "history books" just skim over it, or not mention it, at all.

ut if you read Southern books, Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern documents, Southern letters, at the time, and if you know of the ongoing killing and torturing and terror used by the South -- proudly -- to spread slavery, you won't be so easily fooled by academic bullshitters like Foner and McPherson and others.  

But it was central to the times, to the elections, and to the nation.  How Lincoln was hated for being a "Nigger lover" and who wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"  was the very real, very powerful, and very dangerous meme -- that worked.

This has been whitewashed for at least 100 years.  Southern crybabies and liars have never allowed that stark, ugly truth into any US text book.

In fact, entire books, entire series of books, have painted LIncoln as a "racist who wanted to send blacks to Africa"   and paint Southern leaders as principled men who intended to end slavery.   Such bizzaro bullshit is accepted as rational, and worthy of merit.

Fuck that. Learn what the hell was going on.

To his face, repeatedly, the best speaker of the 19th century, beat Lincoln in a race for US Senate, by calling Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 
The reason it's important -- you are not taught the hatred and fear of black men, taking white women,  and how THAT was central to the Civil War.   Southern leaders made it very clear -- if they could not spread slavery, the white race would be destroyed.

The hate and fear pushed by Southern leaders, and by men like Stephen A Douglass, is simply not mentioned in any meaningful way, by any historian in the last 50 years. Whitewashed by bullshit. 


I was almost 60 years old, before I realized  historians, like most folks, are full of bullshit.  

Sadly, "historians"  are often afraid to praise Lincoln too much, lest they be accused of hero worship.  Others just trash Lincoln for attention.

Some trash Lincoln,  omit  his actions (like his amazing battle in Congress to stop the war with Mexico, and to prevent slavery in the territory we stole from Mexico).

Why not show that amazing story? 

Maybe some bullshitters want to "appear balanced"  -- and fuck all that. I'm still waiting for a biography of Lincoln that tells what he did.  You get maybe one or two sentences about Lincoln push back against US theft of land to spread slavery, and they dont even mention, Lincoln rightly accused the South and Polk of creating a war to spread slavery.

When you learn what Lincoln did --  and see what the fuck was going on -- it's hard to disagree with Frederick Douglass, paraphrased,  Lincoln was a bad ass, radical mother fucker.


Read any -- any -- US text book, you would never have a clue about that, or hardly a clue, from any Lincoln biography that I know of. 



These came from NORTHERN politicians and NORTHERN PRESS.  Bet no one told you that.  

Whenever I  mention Lincoln was called Nigger Lover, Negro Worshiper, or that some claimed Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" -- the reply is "Oh, well, some did in the South".

Fuck -- many did that in the NORTH.  Furthermore, that's how Lincoln was defeated for Senate, and almost POTUS.  By getting enough people to buy into the fear that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Sorry for use of that word, but it sure as hell was used, and used by Stephen A Douglas, over and over, to crowds, in the Lincoln DOuglas debates.  Not just the word, but Douglas, in Charleston IL, actually shouted out the word "Nigger"  as he essentially ran from one end of the stage to the other, getting the crowd worked up.

Then -- Lincoln had to speak.  Try to grasp that. The best and most powerful speaker of that era, just got the crowd worked up about Lincoln being a "obsessed" with equality for the Nigger"   and wants your "daughter to sleep with and marry with Niggers".

Gee -- it's not taught that way. Instead, you get this bullshit nonsense about Douglas being for "popular sovereignty" which was likewise nonsense, Douglas had thrown his support behind the scenes, when it mattered, to the men killing and torturing in Kansas, to prevent popular sovereignty and freedom of press in Kansas.

There is a reason at Lincoln Douglas debates, some folks put up "Free Kansas"  and "Freedom of Press" -- but there is not any "history teacher"  we know that could tell you about those signs, or why they up, in 1858. 

Harsh business, slavery.  Cruel. Violent.   And that is whitewashed too.  White wash is what our US text books do best.


Not just idle comments, either, but the basic approach to trash LIncoln, and others, to justify the spread of slavery, to justify the cruelty to blacks,  was to pump up the fear of white women being with -- sleeping with -- having sex with -- black men.

Not sorta, not kinda.  That was the big hammer, the sometimes spoken clearly, sometimes spoken in code, told to demonize those who sought to end slavery. That too, is completely, 100%, absent from US text books.  

Even as early as 1890, "old timers" like one of the men who founded the GOP,   had to remind the public that at one time, abolitionist was a dirty word, on parr now with child molesters in some areas.  

Palmer also explained how vile and violent the south was.  Southern leaders used to brag -- before they lost the Civil War, that they would spread slavery anywhere they wanted, and Northern men would run away.   Jeff Davis himself said he could wipe up all the blood spilled in the South, if any way came because of the efforts to spread slavery.  He did not believe anyone would stand up to the manhood of the South, and he was nearly correct, until a man named John Brown proved them wrong, in Kansas,

You never heard of Southern leaders boasting of the killing, have you?  Nor boasting of how easy it would be to spread slavery where they wanted -- no one told you that, did they?

Really, this sounds absurd to people today, but it would be no surprise at the time.   And we would know that if US text books were candid, and not controlled by Southern crybabies.

So the violent, and vile boasting from Southern leaders, is completely  absent from the minds of US "history" teachers, North and South,  because such things have been squeezed out by bullshit nonsense double talk, acceptable to Southern crybabies, and school districts. What total horshit. If you don't want to teach who killed who and why, don't teach history.  Teach what Southern leaders boasted of, boasted about killing, boasting of killing for God, boasted the Northern men were too cowardly to stand up to them, or shut the fuck up, and don't teach history at all.

Oh yes, pompous bullshitters, like Foner and McPherson, wax on about how "prejudiced"  most people were, and they make sure you have all the quotes from Lincoln that seem to put him in the same boat.

But they also make sure you don't have a clue how fucking radical Lincoln was -- in words, and actions - against slavery and inequality.   If you find anything about how vile Southern culture was, how religious scum sucking pigs (such as Woodrow Wilson's father, and almost all Southern leaders of the Confederacy) justified torture and violence against slave women and men, it's on page 194, in subdued words, buried in a way not to make anything clear.

Lincoln had to deal with the reality -- not the bullshit white washed crap in our history books.   This is a sentence that never appears

Back to the video -- what this video does not begin to show, is the hatred and fear for blacks -- how ubiquitous  the charge that anyone who was against slavery,  had to be urging white women to "be with" black men.

Just like your history books white washed the fact Lincoln (and many others) were hated, killed, tortured or chased, for trying to end slavery, by men who screamed they were trying to have blacks "sleep with" white women,  the same history books have a narrative that Lincoln was not so radical to end slavery.

The fuck he wasn't.  He was smart about it, he wisely did not get himself killed any sooner than he was killed. Nor did he destroy any chance to end slavery by being stupid in his answers.

There were some who tried to be more candid than Lincoln in public, who did not parse words, who bravely put out things to the public about equality -- like Lovejoy, LIncoln's friend, who was burned to death for his brazen outspokeness.

And remember, LIncoln was trying to get ELECTED.   You had to be very careful what group you spoke to, and what you said.   Otherwise, not only do you lose the election, you could get killed.

That's not in any -- not any -- US text book. But it's the maze of violence and hate Lincoln had to pass through, to get elected.

Deal with that, you bastards McPherson, Foner, and the rest of you shit heads.


As Southern leaders themselves pointed out, LIncoln was "the most dangerous" type of abolitionist, one who spoke about Union publically, but was really out to destroy the spread of slavery, and by destroying the spread of slavery, destroy slavery itself.

Lincoln's actions -- and private letters -- prove those who accused Lincoln of that "crime" were correct.

Radical?   Lincoln radical to end slavery??

Lincoln called Nigger lover, obsessed with equality for Niggers?

And no one told you? But Frederick Douglass knew.

Lincoln stood up to President Polk and called him out for helping Southern lunatics by starting an illegal vile war against Mexico -- to steal their land, in order to double the size of slavery?

And no one told you? But Frederick Douglass knew.

Stephen A Douglas all but urging crowds to violence against Lincoln, as he had justified beating to death (nearly) of a US Senator on Senate floor?

And no one told you? But Frederick Douglass knew.

Lincoln's trip to Kansas, after Jeff Davis and US Senator David Rice Atchison made it a crime to speak or write against slavery in Kansas?

And no one told you? But Frederick Douglass knew.

There is one hell of a lot left out of your history books about Lincoln -- hundreds of things that Frederick Douglass, and most other in the US  -- knew at the time, but are glossed over, or omitted entirely from US text books.

The fact that Lincoln got a bullett to the brain after Booth heard him in person, speak about voting rights for blacks, hell, most people don't even know that much.

Lincoln was actually lucky he didn't get the bullet to the brain sooner -- and you are lucky too.

What is white washed in our history books is how ISIS like the South was, how they tortured, killed, boasted of killing, and boasted they were doing GODS will, and boasted they would continue killing until slavery was spread all over the US -- North and South.

Did you know Southern leaders boasted they would spread slavery all over the US -- FUCK NO. NO one tells you. Jeff Davis himself was one of them boasting of such things.

What you don't know, and can't know because no one told you, is how dangerous it was for anyone, including Lincoln, to speak or write against slavery,  for their physical safety, in the wrong place, even in Illinois.

Lincoln was radical as hell, for where  he went, when he went, and you can easily miss that, yet get a degree in US  history, right here in USA.

And no one told you? But Frederick Douglass knew.


Come on, every high school history teacher knows better.  Lincoln radical?   Douglass must be some stupid Lincoln worshiper, right? 

Yeah, Douglass was an escaped slave, but he was stupid, right?

Yeah Douglass  knew all the actors in this drama. But he was stupid, right?

Yeah Douglass was brilliant, but he was stupid.  He had no reason to claim Lincoln was radical zealous and determined. He had no reason to pick Lincoln out (with John Brown) as the two men most responsible for leading the whites in a fight to kill slavery.  Yes, kill it, which they had to do.

You are not taught that Southern leaders said -- loudly, this was a fight to the death. This was all or nothing. We will have slavery all over, or we will have war.   See the speeches below -- your history teacher sure as hell wont show you, he or she has no clue. 


  At times, as you will see, Frederick Douglass was pissed as  hell at Lincoln --and criticized him repeatedly in his paper and "The Northern Star".

But in total, as Douglass himself would point out, Lincoln alone was able to do what he did, and he did what most people thought impossible.  

Why was Lincoln right?  Because first, first, Lincoln had to sell the war as about "Union"  or whites in the North would just not fight.

And Lincoln was exactly right.  Until Lincoln himself slowly turned the huge war into a fight to end slavery, by his rhetoric, most folks in the North would not piss on a  slave if they were on fire.  Did you know that?

Most people in the North did not like slavery, but they didn't like blacks either. They did not want blacks near them.  Blacks were inferior, the males were sex starved and would "sleep with your daughter"  as Stephen A Douglas, and others, yelled at the top of their lungs.

And, many whites in North thought slavery was a biblical matter.  There are all kinds of things in the bible that says slavery and torture -- even killing your slave women -- is fine.  Did you know that.

Lincoln sure as hell did.  And Lincoln had to kill that God, to discredit that god. 


In fact, Lincoln killed not only the spread of slavery, not only slavery, he killed the Southern God of slavery, made it an embarrassment, to the point no one even mentions that God, that Southern leaders were so proud of at the time.

We are not even taught -- not one word -- about the very real Southern God of slavery. The God that Southern leaders said mandated slavery, and the torture of slaves.  You never heard one word in any US history book about Southern leaders boasting -- not admitting -- boasting -- that they worshiped a God who mandated torture for slaves who disobeyed or tried to flee slavery.

In fact, Jeff Davis himself, with the Vice President of the Confederacy, repeatedly, clearly, incontext, made it very clear they based their entire Confederacy on the "great truth" that blacks were inferior beings, prescribed by GOD above to be enslaved and punished.

Guess who knew that -- it's not at all in your text book, but guess who was well aware of such things?  All Southern leaders were aware, they boasted of it.  But Lincoln was keenly aware as was Frederick Douglass. If your history text books taught what Southern leaders boasted of, it would not be so easy to fool you how amazing Lincoln was, to defeat these violent bastards.

The Southern leaders were so proud of the God of slavery, they tortured, they whipped, they sold children, they even burned men to death who fought back.


But when the South lost -- you never again heard, then or now, any rational person saying GOD wants you to torture blacks for biblical sins. Yes, at the time, Southern leaders BOASTED -- you never heard it -- that they tortured blacks per the bible, and actually proudly boasted they were the first nation on earth (THE CSA) to be based on torture of blacks, to be BASED --founded -- on the "great truth" that blacks were inferior, and whites should punish them for biblical sins.

No one told you that, did they?  That Southern leaders, in context, repeatedly, boasted they were doing the will of GOD to enslave and punish blacks for biblical sins.

So, no one told you that the all -- every damn Southern leader -- never mentioned that kind of shit again.  What they bragged out the ass about, and what they did, killing and torturing whites too, they dared not to whisper after that. 

It's time you learned what the fuck made Lincoln so amazing --and no, no one told you, yet,

Lincoln killed the Southern GOD of slavery, something "historians" have never pointed out.  There was a very real GOD to Southern leaders, a GOD they worshiped, and used to justify torture, killing and the Civil War.   We deal with those things in another place.

But here, we show how "historians" have trashed Lincoln for various reasons -- some love Southern leaders, and are too dishonest to admit Southern leaders were cowardly men -- yes, they were -- who enjoyed torturing slaves, who sold and raped women, and even sold their own children from those rapes into slavery.

To show what made Lincoln amazing, you would have to first show what kind of evil, sadistic, cruel, and cowardly men led the South from 1840 on.  Lincoln had to defeat those men, and their lies, their terrorizing, and their violence.

And he had to kill the Southern God of slavery.


Did Douglass not know of the 10 or 12 quotes from the Lincoln - Douglas debates (yes, he knew, he reported them in his own paper).

Lincoln DID say those words -- but see the full speeches, and the full context.    Just like you can make the bible say any dayum thing you want, you can edit Lincoln, by omitting his full texts.  



Fred Douglass was talking out of his ass?  No.  Frederick Douglass knew what the hell he was talking about, because he knew ALL of Lincoln's speeches, debates, and actions.

Does it bother, or even slow down,  those ass wipes today who belittle or minimize what Lincoln did, that Frederick Douglass -- who they all know of -- gave a long and very detailed assesment of Lincoln?  Do they even mention what Douglass said, or of the facts Douglass used?

Hell no.  And "historians" are like that, not just about Lincoln, but they like to bullshit. They have a "narrative,"  and are quite fond of it.   It's mostly human nature.   If they told you how radical Lincoln was, how his full speeches and actions were radical as hell, they can't then wax on, wax off about Lincoln "evolving"  or "not really caring".

Eric Foner, IMHO not a historian at all, but a bullshitter, does in the end faintly praise Lincoln, but claims Lincoln was "nothing special"   as "as racists as anyone".


Word games -- to trash Lincoln, you have to play word games.  Lincoln said this, said that, blah blah.  Never mind if Lincoln did NOT say this or that, he not only doesn't get elected, but if he spoke too candidly, like Lovejoy, he is not only not elected, but he would have been killed.

Douglass, of course, knew all that, which he alluded to in his own amazing speech about Lincoln.  

And more, Douglas knew what everyone knew then, the Southern killing sprees and Southern boasting of killing to spread slavery for GOD.

Have you ever -- in your life- -seen a side by side image of things Lincoln was saying, vs the things Southern leaders like Davis were saying?  

FUCK NO, you never saw such a side by side comparison.

Southern leaders were saying they would kill blacks if they had to free them, that just ending the spread of slavery was going to exterminate the white race, that blacks are gifts from GOD, meant to be enslaved. 

Lincoln, meanwhile, in public, had to be careful  how he said anything, but even then, he was powerful-- more powerful than anyone else running for political office where he was.  He was in Illinois, where at least in Southern Illinois, it was much like being in slave state Kansas or Missouri.   People were still being arrested in some states just for owning a book which questioned slavery.

Others were beaten -- like US Senator Sumner was beaten on the floor of the US Senate -- for speaking too candidly and graphically about Southern killing sprees and oppressions.   Did you know that?


It was the federal authorities, namely Jefferson Davis and Stephen A Douglas, who protected Atchison and his killers. In fact, Jefferson named Atchison officially as "General of Law and Order in Kansas"  
 Until Lincoln got in office, therefore, there simply was no earthly way, to defeat Atchison's killers and hired men, with the US Army.

Southern leaders controlled the white house, and Congress.,

Jeff Davis controlled the military.    Stephen A Douglas, who was the "South's Man" in the North, controlled House and Senate Committee on Kansas territory.


Lincoln wanted to end the white race -- and would, if the South could not spread slavery, by violence, into the rest of the country.

Lincoln's enemies, North and South, sure as fuck pounced on him daily, and in public, for begin a radical "abolitionist"  who wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

And it worked. Stephen A Douglas defeated Lincoln for Senate, because he made people in the North afraid Lincoln wanted your "daughters to sleep with Niggers".

In fact, the best and most powerful speaker of the day, Stephen A Douglas, blasted the living shit out of Lincoln, to his face, repeatedly, in public that Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger".

Very basic.   So basic, in fact, that unless you understand that, you don't understand shit about the era, or the Civil War, or Lincoln.

Just being against the spread of slavery was to be against GOD and an attempt to defile white women.  Did you know that?

This Southern governor made that clear, in this official document.   Go on, read it. 

Lincoln took the position that no, slavery will not spread. Kansas had just been admitted as a free state -- did you know that?  Kansas citizens voted 90% against slavery, and Southern leaders issued war ultimatums. That's right war ultimatums, that Kansas must accept and respect slavery.

Did you know, yes or no, that AFTER Kansas became a state, Southern leaders demanded Kansas be a slave state?   FUCK NO.  That is basic as hell, too, and not taught.


It was not just Stephen A Douglas -- it was the entire pro slavery growth folks, North and South, that went after Lincoln in ways that could have gotten Lincoln killed -- as he would eventually be killed.  

No one told you that Stephen A Douglas stood by, and very likely was part of the planning, for US Senator Charles Sumner, to be beaten in 1856, on Senate floor.  Douglas sat close by, watched the beating, and said Sumner got what he deserved.   

Douglas (Stephen) also repeatedly told crowds that he saw Lincoln personally in a carraige with a white woman, and a black man, which could get you attacked at the time.

Did you know that? Hell no.

But it's in the Lincoln Douglas debates, and central to it. Douglas, throughout the Lincoln Douglas debates, was trying to do ONE thing -- make the whites in the North see Lincoln as a "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  and your wife to "be with Niggers".

Oh, you missed that in history class? Do tell.

This central aspect -- nothing is more basic -- has been white washed, along with the endless violence against whites by whites, regarding the spread of slavery.

Yet Southern leaders boasted out the ass of their violence, and promised more of it.  Did you know that, or not?



 Southern crybabies, after the Civil War, did an about face, once they lost.  Before they lost, Southern leaders, Southern killers, Southern apologist like Stephen A Douglas were all for violence to spread slavery.  You never were told that.

But that is what Lincoln had to deal with.  

And Douglas speeches -- in the Lincoln Douglas debates -- were about the threats from black men, who would take the white women.   That was IN THE DEBATES!


You will see entire books about Lincoln Douglas debates, and that fact is glossed over, or not mentioned at all.  

Thats like talking about how US got in WWII  without mentioning Pearl Harbor.  It's that stupid.  But Southern crybabies, after they lost, changed their story.  Before the war, they boasted they were killing and had every right, to spread slavery by violence, and did spread it by violence.  Slavery was always spread by violence, never, ever by peaceful or honest means. 

In fact, Lincoln was called -- by Southern leaders -- a radical abolitionist, a nigger lover, a man who "wants your daughters to be with and marry with niggers".

In fact, in the Lincoln Douglas debate, Stephen A Douglas repeatedly told the crowds, with venom and volume only he could create -- that Mr. Lincoln wants your daughter and your wife to "be with"  Niggers.

In the South, it was even worse, but in the Norther papers, Lincoln was called a "Negro Worshiper" who belives the "Negroes" are as intelligent as whites -- at a time when most whites, even in the North, considered black folks to be as dumb as farm animals, and the male blacks to be the biggest threat to take you wife or daughter.

No one told you that, did they?  Fuck no, no one told you.

But Lincoln got a bullet to the brain -- and so did some of his friends -- for being "too radical"  for the "Nigger".



No one else was going where LIncoln went, doing what Lincoln did, saying what Lincoln said.

Did you know that? HELL NO.

Lincoln was hated, 1846 on, for calling out, making public, whatever everyone knew.   The war against Mexico, like everything else in US politics, was about slavery, one way or another.

Slavery was the oxygen in the air.  Every election, every speech, every newspaper article about current events, was about slavery, or the impact of some event on slavery.

Likewise, Lincoln's campaigns, his 3000 or so speeches, his letters, his travels -- were all focused on one thing.   SLAVERY.   Go on, read his speeches, read his personal letters, learn his actions.   All about slavery, day in, day out. 


  See this....


As you see, you COULD take a few words here, and a few words from there, and make Lincoln say, "blacks are certainly not my equal".

This  movie clip  is edited so Stephen A Douglas says "Negro." 
Slavery, and how to stop it.  


Southern leaders were obsessed with spreading slavery -- always by FORCE.

Who said so?  Lincoln for one, but also the facts themselves.  Every step of the way, and at the current time, when Lincoln got in politics the first time, and later, Southern leaders were killing to spread slavery. 

You would have to know why Lincoln had to be careful what he said to some groups --  because he could have been killed or attacked (and would eventually be killed because of what he said in a speech, by Booth)  much sooner. 

But Lincoln spoke plenty -- and powerfully, if you get all his speeches, not a distortion of his overall speeches and letters.

In fact, no school text book even includes, or mentions, Lincoln's letters and speeches about how violent people were, who spread slavery.  

That's just not included. 



Nothing is more basic -- and nothing is overlooked as much, as Southern states official, relentless violence against anyone who spoke or wrote against slavery.

Preachers could be, and were, subjected to torture -- torture -- yes torture -- for just owning a book against slavery. 
Remember that, TORTURED.  

Slavery  Slavery was always spread by killing -- and killing any whites against it, as Lincoln would be killed, as Lincoln's friend was killed.

Slavery was always maintained by killing -- and killing any whites against it. You are not taught that either.


 Stupidly, history teachers today think most  people in the South wanted slavery. Or that slavery was spread by honorable men "doing what they thought best".

No, and you can tell they were lying bastards, because they always restorted to violence -- not just voilence against slavery men, women and children.

But violence against anyone who spoke, wrote, preached against slavery.


This web page is ABOUT the Mexican War.  Not one fucking word about US causing the war to, in order to steal land, to spread slavery.

So of course, not one fucking word, of Lincoln publically accusing President Polk of causing the war in order to help spread slavery.

So no, US history books and generations of history teachers, never get the basics.   Was Lincoln lying?  Was the Mexican war not about stealing 500,000 miles for more slave states?

Lincoln was not the only one to accuse Polk and the US about the reasons for the war. In fact, it was common knowledge,    And this relentless violence by those eager to spread slavery, was at the heart of everything in US history, 1800-1865.

Even though most Southerners not want slavery,  they didn't have a choice --because it was against the law to speak against it, because you could be tortured.   In his very important book "Impending Crisis,"  Hinton Helper wrote that if an honest election was held in the South, and people allowed to speak, slavery would have been rejected in the SOUTH by whites.

But those who controlled everything -- even what you could read, what was preached, what was in the newspapers, made it illegal to be against slavery in any meaningful way.


The entire government in the South, and much of the federal government, was focused on spreading slavery -- including the Mexican War, where we invaded Mexico, stole .    The violent spread of slavery -- not by voting, not by agreement of whites, but by force.   And Lincoln said so.

Maybe history teachers should teach Lincoln's letters and speeches about that.  You never do see those. 

You might think others were more radical than Lincoln -- no, not where he was, when he was.   His full speeches, his full letters, show a radical person.  Yes, he did parse words, he had to parse words or get killed much sooner.

If you don't believe Lincoln would have been killed sooner, if he had not spoken carefully in some settings, you don't know shit about the murders and killings, tortures, even burning people to death, who spoke against slavery.

Really -- you don't know shit, if you don't know how dangerous it was go speak the wrong words, to the wrong people.    It was a crime to even speak against slavery in most of the US -- did you even know that?

It was a crime in most of the US, to preach against slavery. Did you know that? 


No you did not know.   It was legal to speak against slavery in the North -- which is why it ended in the North.

But in the South,  people could be and were arrested for preaching against slavery, or owning the wrong book which even suggested slavery was evil.

In fact, even idle comments in the South, in public, could get a woman stripped and whipped IN PUBLIC.   Did anyone ever tell you that? Fuck no.  It's true - and if taught, it would change what we think about US history.

Torturing people in public? Yes. ISIS like? Yes.   But many things Southern leaders did was ISIS like, including how they bragged about torture and war for GOD.  No one told you, did they, that Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, said slavery was from GOD, a "Divine gift"  and that to be against slavery was to be against GOD.

They also bragged they would kill to spread slavery for GOD.  

Let me repeat that -- THEY BRAGGED they were killing to spread slavery for GOD.  All such things, basic as they are, have been whitewashed.

Instead, they trash Lincoln.  That's how fucked up our history books are. They trash Lincoln for not being against slavery, and omit the Southern leaders boasting they were killing for GOD, or they were killing to spread slavery.

Unless you know that -- and even history teachers seem dumb ass hell about this basic fact -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, the South, or about Civil War. 


We got Lincoln wrong largely because Southern crybabies and liars have completely white washed the ISIS like violence South used to torture, kill, hang, drown, to spread slavery.

Specifically we are not taught about Southern War Ultimatums, issued AFTER Kansas became a state. Yes, Kansas became a free state, before Lincoln got elected, by election of the white male citizens.

A US Senator goes to Kansas, invades Kansas with 1000 or so men hired by Jeff Davis, and boasts he is there to kill to spread slavery. He does not mumble. And he almost succeeds.

Did South accept Kansas election as a free state  FUCK NO. They had already sent killers to Kansas for years, and done all they could, violently to make sure Kansas could not vote, and did not even publish anti slavery newspapers.   They made it a crime -- as was the case in the South -- to preach or write newspapers against slavery.

Lincoln went to Kansas-- did you know that? - and bravely spoke in an area that had been strong hold of the killers and terrorist, who were terrorizing and killing in Kansas.

You wont even see LIncoln's "Kansas trip" mentioned in any US text book. What the fuck?

Southern leaders didn't just not accept it, they issued war ultimatums that Kansas MUST accept and respect slavery. 

And they bragged about it.  Southern leaders boasted of their killing and efforts to spread slavery.  They were not ashamed. 

Did you ever hear - one time, in your life -- that Southern leaders repeatedly,  clearly and proudly, officially and unofficially, boasted they were killing to spread slavery?


Did you know that Southern leaders hired paid killers to torture and kill, drown, and terrorize people who were voting against slavery?


Did you know this was common knowledge at the time -- and Southern leaders boasted of it?  No.  You never heard such things.

We show you. It's not hard to find, Southern leaders were doing everything but renting billboard space, as you will see.



It's more than a shame -- it's stupidity and cowardice, that most US historians go along with the bullshit about Southern honor and bravery. No, they were not, Southern leaders, in fact every Southern leader who before the war was bad mouthing, and promising endless killing to spread slavery for GOD- - ended up being cowards. Every single one.  We will show you the main cowards.

It's important you know -- Southern leaders hired men to  hang other WHITES, torture other WHITES, drown other whites.  Slavery was always spread by violence.  There was never -- ever -- a peaceful honest vote about slavery, and its dumb as fuck for your history teacher to assume otherwise.

Slavery was all about violence -- not just to the slave, but to any white who stood in the way, or ever wrote against slavery, as you will see.

Did you ever hear anything like that? HELL NO.

Over and over.  Entire books have been written how Lincoln was not for equality, how he didn't care about blacks or slavery, but only used slavery for public support.

But we will show  how that is horse shit, and how Lincoln, while he did at times parse words, did, if you read his full speeches, his full letters, and see his actions, was a radical mo fo, and was called radical, by his friends and enemies.

In fact, his political enemies in the North made sure he never won an election outright, even the Presidency, by a majority of votes, because they were able to tag Lincoln as obsessed with equality for the Nigger.

They said Nigger.

Did you ever hear anyone mention that Lincoln was considered "obsessed with equality"  and that he was accused of that dozens of times, in public, and repeatedly, in press?   No, you never got that information.

What horse shit.  In some areas, to be an abolitionist was almost as bad then, as being a child molester is now.  And Lincoln was from one of those areas.

Did you know that?



Still, did LIncoln say those things, like that his paramount aim was to save the Union, not to free the slave?

Yes -- he said that, and much more. He also said, repeatedly that to save the Union MEANT we will end slavery.  In the House Divided SPeech, and dozen other times, Lincoln explained this. The Union will dissolve, or slavery will end. One or the other. 

And he would not let, did not expect, the Union to dissolve. 

When LIncoln said this -- that either slavery or the Union would end -- do you know what happened? Riots in the South.   Lincoln's political enemies in the North shit the bed-- Stephen A Douglas, and many others, screamed that this was tantamount to declaring war on the South.

Do you know who else said Lincoln's comments about the Union ending, or slavery ending, was declaring war on the South?

Southern leaders.

Gee -- no one ever told you that, did they.

Amazing what can happen if someone tells you only part of the story.


Sadly, you don't hear this from just stupid people.  This bullshit came from "historians" right?     Surely they didn't give us distorted quotes, of context, right?

And surely they would not forget to tell you about Lincoln's long history of kicking slavery in the ass sideways, from 1846 on, when he stood up to President Polk and spoke the truth -- you are causing this war with Mexico, to steal the land, to have for slave states.

Did you even know that much?   Did you even know slave power is the power that caused US to invade Mexico, steal they land -- and everyone, North and South, knew it was to double the size of slave states. Open secret.

Lincoln got up and spoke about that candidly, and was from then on hated, detested, by Southern leaders who knew, of course, Lincoln was right, that they had caused the war for SLAVE POWER.


Lincoln's efforts against slavery did  not stop in 1846.   Lincoln introduced legislation 40 times -- 40  times -- to prevent slavery from going into the land US stole from Mexico.

No one told you that either?  SOund like Lincoln didnt care?

Do you know who else pushed that legislation in Congress 40 times?  No you don't have a clue. Lincoln was the radical on that, pushing it over and over. SOuthern scum and slave power stopped him at every turn.

But but but -- these historians would know that and tell about it?   Well they should know -- but they don't mention it.   They don't mention many of the things Lincoln did and said that were fucking radical as hell -- because it does not fit in their bullshit narrative.

That's  how historians are, you will find out, when you get older.

Surely they would include LIncoln's actions, and what dangers he faced, right?

Uh -- no.  They did give us distorted quotes -- not the full quotes, and not in context,  Because Lincoln was a "radical mo fo"  for his time and place, and at great personal danger.   He was eventually shot in the  head, and earlier, he friend was burned to death for speaking too bluntly about equality.

Should Lincoln have been more blunt in every sentence, and been shot sooner?  Would that make these "historians" happy?  What good would that do?

But Lincoln spoke radically as  hell -- and shocked the shit out of the North and South, before he was elected, and after.   Maybe you need to learn the whole damn thing, not some bullshit slogans.





BOTTOM LINE: Lincoln, the radical.

I have not met a single person -- even a single history teacher  --that knows Lincoln was repeatedly called a "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

It was not just "some guy"  who called Lincoln, to his face, repeatedly, in front of crowds, a man who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

It was, by all accounts, the most powerful speaker of the day -- Stephen A  Douglas.   And he was not the only one, he was just one that yelled it to the crowds.



In fact, Lincoln was killed, got the bullet in the brain, for a speech he gave about voting rights for blacks.   Yet some will use that speech, which LIncoln was killed for, to "prove" Lincoln did not really care about equality.

The onslaught of calling Lincoln a "Negro Worshiper"  who is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and who will "destroy the White Race"   finally worked.

The surprising thing,  Lincoln was not killed sooner.

Lincoln had to disarm the claims he was "A Negro Worshiper"  who wants your wife and daughters to "be with Negros".    Otherwise, Lincoln would have gotten the bullet to the brain sooner.

It's time you learned about this -- and no, no one has ever told you.  It's not in any history text book, college or high school, in the USA.

But it should be. 



'Radical, Nigger lover, who will destroy the white race, and degrade your wives and your daughters....'

The violent nature of the South -- the public tortures, burning to death, whipping people who spoke against slavery -- even whipping preachers for owning the wrong book,  is not taught, has never been taught, in US text books.

Did you know women could be stripped and whipped in public, for speaking against slavery in the South?

Did you know almost every slave state made it a crime for whites to preach, write, speak, or have any book,  that even questioned slavery?

Did you know that for 12 years, Southern leaders would not allow slavery to be even DISCUSSED in Congress?

Did you know that Jeff Davis, in 1856, sent over 1000 men to Kansas, to invade that territory, and led by a US Senator, install what is now called "bogus legislature"  by force, and immediately passed laws making in a crime punishable by torture, to publish any newspaper article against slavery?

See below.   Southern leaders were not ashamed of this -- they were proud of it. 

Did you know that AFTER Jeff Davis and US Senator Atchison made it illegal to speak against slavery in Kansas, Lincoln actually went to Kansas and spoke against slavery anyway?

Did you know that the famous abolitionist speakers -- like Garrison -- would not dare do what Lincoln did, go where he did, but stayed safely away from areas or groups that might well blow a hole in their head.

Did you know who WOULD go -- at great danger -- and kick slavery in the ass?   Lincoln.

It's about time people knew this.


This are basic things

See how Lincoln reacted to the crowd, after Stephen A Douglas told them repeatedly that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one ever told you that, did they?  Hell no. So we will. And its about damn time. 


Why would Lincoln's enemies claim Lincoln was "radical for equality for the "Nigger"?

Any clue?  At all?

Why would Frederick Douglas claim Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous, and determined"  for equality?

Were these men stupid?   Or did you just get a distorted part of the story?

  Mostly, learn the actions and boasting of Southern leaders, BRAGGING they were killing not just to spread slavery, but killing to silence opposition to slavery.  Learn Southern War Ultimatums. Learn the speeches they gave, at the time, BOASTING they were killing to spread slavery, and would continue killing -- and spread slavery TO ALL OF THE USA.

Did you ever hear that? No. No one ever told you of Southern leaders boasting they would continue killing -- against states rights -- to spread slavery.  That's been wiped out entirely, but it was common knowledge then.



But despite that, Lincoln was MORE radical than anyone, where he was, and when he was.

Yes, others spoke more bluntly -- but not where Lincoln went, not in Lincoln's position.     

Garrison, Douglass, others, spoke to crowds that already agreed with them.  They did not go to Kansas, did not go to Alton or Charleston, and give their speeches.

In fact -- Lincoln had to be very very careful what he said -- not only to maybe get elected, from a population of men, many of whom thought blacks were more like apes that could talk, and if freed, would "take your women"  and "marry your daughters".

If you don't know that -- to be blunt -- you don't know shit about Abe Lincoln or the attitudes of whites, even in the North.

Lincoln's speech was not just a few slogans.

But read the FULL speeches Lincoln did give -- the ENTIRE speech.  Over and over, and over, Lincoln would say things in one part of the speech, that seemed to agree with a sentiment of the day.  But moments later, or minutes later, Lincoln revisited the sentiment, and kicked the shit out of it, in a clever way.  

No one walked away from a Lincoln speech, and had any delusions -- slavery was going to go, or the Union was going to go, and as Lincoln put it "I don't expect the Union will disolve".


You won't hear anyone tell you this -- but it was a huge deal then.  WHen Lincoln said -- repeatedly -- that the Union would have to end, or slavery would end, and "I do not expect the Union to dissolve" -- the South went ape shit.

Ape. Fucking. Shit. 

Did you know that?  Did you know there were riots about this in the South?  War ultimatums about this?  Douglas brought this up repeatedly in the LD debates.   Saying the union would end if slavery did not end,  was essentially an act of war upon the South, said some at the time.

If Lincoln had said such word in the South, he would not have lived till evening.   Did you know people were killed in the South for speaking or preaching against slavery?


Do you know how nuts Southern scum were about slavery, about anyone even speaking badly about it?  


Well, they were.  The crazy violent Southern scum leaders were like ISIS today, they were PROUD of torturing, and killing to spread slavery, as you will see.



Lincoln went to Kansas and spoke -- one of the more dangerous places he could legally go, where people had, not long before, been killed and terrorized just for speaking against slavery.

Did anyone tell you that?  

Lincoln was quite radical -- especially in letters, he was very clear, he knew exactly the violent nature of Southern scum.   If he did not want to get shot a lot sooner -- and he did not want to get shot a lot sooner -- he had to watch what he said, where he said it.

So unless you know his full speeches in context, and what was violent bastards Southern leaders were, you don't know the real history of slavery or Lincoln or the US Civil War. You just know watered down bullshit.

Even so, Lincoln found ways to be extremely radical -- in an effective way, using humor, and his amazing ability to befuddle those tho trashed him to his face.

He had to.  And it worked.  But you would have to see his full speeches, and know that the hell was going on. 

 Those who spoke more radically,  spoke in places they were safe, would not get shot, and remember, Lincoln was trying to GET ELECTED.

Too complicated?  Need time?

Lincoln AT TIMES  parsed words, wisely,  about how to end slavery, and why.  He would have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had not.     But his actions, and his full words, his full letters and speeches,  show a radical zealot,  a fanatic for his time, to end slavery.    And he did.

What good what it do, if Lincoln had, in every sentence, in every speech or letter, been as radical as he sometimes was?  He would have been shot sooner, as others were.  Try to grasp that. 

As Frederick Douglass knew, and said, Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous and determined"   to end slavery.

As  Southern leaders said, Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".   


Why are you not taught this basic fact?  We show you why.

If you do not know that people were still being arrested, tortured, and even killed, for speaking against slavery in the US -- you do not know shit about Lincoln, or what led to the Civil War.

What has  been covered up -- because the crybaby lying pieces of shit Southern apppologist --  is the ISIS like tortures, killings, and boasting of more killings, to spread slavery.   Get that right first, understand how people (including Lincoln) was killed for being for equality,  and you won't be so easily fooled by the bullshit. 

We all heard it -- all our lives.

Lincoln had to be "dragged" into ending slavery.

Lincoln was not "really" against slavery,  he was for the Union, and used slavery as a way to keep Union together.

Lincoln was a racist, and wanted to send the blacks back to Africa. On and on.   Even "historians"   seem to say the same thing, in various ways.

The problem is -- facts, and Lincoln's enemies at the time, say a drastically different thing.   Basically, they claimed Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality for the "Nigger"  and he wants your daughters to "sleep with Niggers".

Leaders North and South claimed Lincoln was a "Nigger lover".   Did anyone ever tell you that?

Stephen Douglas, as you will see, all but urged violence on Lincoln, a fact well known then (he did urge violence on Senator Sumner, who was then beaten almost to death, while Douglas smiled nearby).

Learn all the facts -- mostly, learn what a bad ass Lincoln was, when you know the complete story, not edited bullshit, out of context. 

Oh, no one ever told you?  Surprise, surprise.   They should have. 
Mr. Lincoln is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".



Lincoln is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  Stephen A Douglas, 1858, repeatedly, and to Lincoln's face. 

Southern leaders were even more vocal -- Lincoln will destroy the white race,  just by stopping the spread of slavery.

We will have to "exterminate"  the black race in the US, if Lincoln is elected. 

Lincoln's "real plans"  all along, were to invade the South and force them to give up slavery, according to Southern leaders, who actually declared war (see below) BECAUSE they claimed LIncoln intended to end slavery by force. 

Gee, leave a few basic facts out, and you can make Lincoln seem anyway you want. 

So why don't we hear about that?


Abraham Lincoln: "[any slave] is equal to me, to Judge Douglas, and to any man, in her natural rights........ "





It's amazing, and sad, that our greatest president is pissed on by dumb asses, liars, and bullshitters.

Lincoln was considered a "Nigger lover" in his day, by Southern and Northern leaders, and would have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had not parsed words at times.

Lincoln could have done what his friend Lovejoy did -- and NOT parse words, and got a bullet to the brain sooner, would that make these idiots happy?

But parse words or not -- read ALL -- ALL -- ALL - of Lincoln's words, in letters and speeches, and you won't be so easily fooled by bullshitters. 

No one -- no one - was as radical and effective as Lincoln.   Unless you understand what was going on, you can not possibly understand the bad ass brilliance of Abraham Lincoln.

You don't know.

If you don't know Southern War ultimatums, of 1856 and 1861,  you really cant know shit about Lincoln, slavery, or the Civil War.

Why?  Because you can't know the violent, ISIS like Southern leadership, who made it a crime to speak, preach, or even own a book that questioned slavery.

Did you know -- yes or no -- that preachers were arrested, individuals were arrested, and subject to torture, for not just speaking against slavery,  but owning a book or pamphlet that QUESTIONED slavery.

LET ME REPEAT...  at the time Lincoln ran for office, people were still be arrested, tortured, and even killed for speaking, just speaking, against slavery in most of the USA.

Even in the North, people were killed, during Lincoln's time, for speaking against slavery.

And if you don't fucking know that (and you do not) then you don't know shit about Lincoln or the Civil War. 



From 1854 onward, Southern leaders -- including men who would later be President of the Confederacy, Vice President,  and Cabinet members, all spoke clearly and powerfully about the war ultimatums to spread slavery.

Southern crybabies, however, have keep that and much else about their leaders, out of US history books.



Who did what, to whom, is real history. All else is bullshit.

To get a narrative -- an overarching theme -- for a period in history, it should come as no surprise, that you need first to know facts -- most importantly, who killed who, and why.

If you approach US history from 1800 to 1865, but you don't know, care, or base your narrative on who killed who, and why, you don't know shit.  

Here is a basic important fact -- slavery was always spread by violence.  Killers and the most cruel men, were hired, or volunteered to spread slavery.  Slavery never spread by consent of the public, by vote, contrary to what you may assume.

In fact, where there was free speech, free press, and preachers were allowed to speak ill of slavery, slavery died.  The reason slavery ended in North -- it could be despised in public.  Books and newspapers could report the tortures, the rapes, the cruelty of the slave owners.

No one could do that in the South.  It was illegal.

No one even told you that much, did they?

That is what Lincoln dealt with - a violent and cruel set of people, who were killing and torturing, and trying to SPREAD slavery.

In the North and South, at the time, Lincoln was called, and eventually killed, for being for equality.     Yes, at times, Lincoln had to parse words, or he would have been killed much sooner, as others were, and as his friend, Lovejoy was killed.

If you don't know that -- and few people do, then you don't know Lincoln, or what caused the Civil War.


Abolitionist one rung above child molesters...

Did you know that?

Being called an abolitionist in 1850 is nothing like you imagine it today. Today abolitionist are the heroes.   But at the time, they were portrayed as lunatics who wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

Yes, they were.  Negro Worshipper was a common refrain.  

Even New York papers made fun of Lincoln for being for equality, and showed a handicapped black slave, and suggested Lincoln said that "Negro"  is intellectually the same as whites.

Those folks at the center of the storm -- like John Palmer, who helped Lincoln start the Republican party in Illinois -- wrote that people in 1890 could have little awareness how vile it was-- North and South -- to be called an abolitionist.  You might as well be called a child molester today.

SO when Lincoln got up and said he was for equality --  which  he did, and did it powerfully, if you read all his full speeches -- to get anyone's support, to get any votes in Illinois, he would say "I am not an abolitionist  --" and then kick slavery in the ass anyway.

No one -- NO ONE -- left a LIncoln speech under any confusion. Slavery had to go -- it was going.  The Union would go, or slavery would go, and he did not expect the Union to end.

He said it carefully -- the Union will end, or slavery will end -- but he said it with thunder.   And Southern leaders shit the bed -- even Northern politicians attacked Lincoln for saying one or the other has to end.

That's declaring WAR on the South, Southern leaders said. Just saying slavery or the Union will end-- (because of Dred Scott and Kansas Act)  caused riots in the South.

Did you know that?  


And there is not one text book in the USA -- not one -- that shows this.   

Stephen A Douglas, the most powerful speaker of that amazing era -- shouted to the public, repeatedly, that Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

No one fucking mentions it.

It was much more than this -- Douglas was, essentially, trying to get someone in the crowd to attack Lincoln, phsycically attack if possible, but at the very least, Douglas wanted -- and did -- push the fear of black men sleeping with "your daughter"   into the minds of white folks, and Douglas won that election.


People today do not realize -- because their stupid "history teachers" don't know or tell them, how violent Southern scum were -- the ISIS like nature of slaver owners and their henchmen, like Stephen A Douglas.   Idiotically, Stephen A Douglas is shown as a sincere man who "tried to deal with the slavery issue, by promoting popular sovereignty.

As you will see, Douglas behind the scenes was helping the men who killed to STOP popular sovereignty.  Lincoln was well aware of this.  

Douglas was part of a group who laughed as Senator Charles Sumner was beaten on the floor of the Senate -- another fact stupidly glossed over,  and his business partner, David Rice Atchison, was the US Senator who led 1000 Texas men in an invasion of Kansas in 1856, with the help and early support of Stephen A Douglas. 

If you don't know what the fuck was going on -- especially the violence -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, and how really amazing and kick ass he was. 




It's time we told the ISIS like violence by Southern scum, and show how it almost worked.   

It was not just Stephen A Douglas urging violence -- Southern leaders made it a crime, punishable by torture and hanging, to even SPEAK against slavery, or publish anti slavery newspapers, in some areas.

ISIS LIKE SOUTHERN SCUM... all white washed now.

If there is any group like Southern leaders, those who were killing to push slavery, and boasting of, you have to compare them to ISIS of today.

Tortures and hangings in public, for just SPEAKING against slavery.  Did you know that?

Did you know preachers could be arrested and tortured -- in public,  in front of crowds, ISIS like -- for owing the wrong book?

Did you know even in Illinois, people could be (and were) attacked, even killed, for writing against slavery?   Lincoln's personal friend, 


Really -- did anyone ever even hint that?  FUCK NO.  But it was a way of life in much of the South.   There were laws against speaking, writing, or preaching against slavery, called the "anti - incendiary" laws.

Hinton Helper wrote that if not for the anti-incendiary laws, slavery might have ended much sooner, because it became impossible to openly preach, openly write, openly speak against slavery.  

In fact, as you will see, Jeff Davis paying killers to invade Kansas in 1856, under the leadership of US Senator David Rice Atchison,  was the DIRECT result of a newspaper continuing to publish anti-slavery paper, against the "law"  announced by David Rice Atchison. 

A US Senator was beaten on the United States Senate floor -- after his speech ABOUT these laws and what Atchison was doing in Kansas.

Read Charles Sumner Speech about Atchison,
and his killings and tortures to stop speech against slavery.

Punishable by TORTURE -- public whippings.   Even women could be stripped, and whipped, in public for anti - slavery comments. No one told you that, did they?

Your teacher will insist they "are well aware"  of Charles Sumners famous speech. No, they aren't.   If they bothered to read it, they would know -- it was a very detailed report of US Senator Atchison's killing and tortures in Kansas, when Kansas citizens kept speaking and writing against slavery, after Atchison and Jeff Davis claimed it was illegal to do to in Kansas (as it was in all of the South).

Did you know that?  

Fuck no.   There is this good adoration of Southern scum, entirely bogus, and based on nonsense.  Southern leaders were torturing, killing, whipping, and BOASTING of it.

What the fuck?  Why not show what these guys BOASTED about at the time?

Not a few nuts, but the top Southern leaders -- including the guy who got Kansas Act pass, boasting of killing and torturing.  And then, actually killing and torturing.

How about mentioning what the fuck happened?  Who killed who is real history.

Start there.  Start with what happened. Who killed who, and why, is what happened. 


Frederick Douglass was there.

Douglass knew the violent bastards --- he knew exactly what Southern leaders said about Lincoln, and how they would have killed him (or any abolitionist)  sooner, if they could.

Douglass knew that Stephen A Douglas was doing his best to "dog whistle" crowds into either attacking Lincoln, or at least fearing him and hating Lincoln.  Douglass knew that Stephen A Douglas was part of the group that delighted -- laughed -- when US Senator Sumner was beaten almost to death on Senate floor.

Douglas knew a million things that you have no clue about.

And he knew Lincoln.


We hear this shit all the time. Lincoln was not really against slavery, he had to be dragged in, blah fucking blah.

Lincoln only ended slavery for political advantage.  How fucking stupid can you get?  At the outbreak of the Civil War,  most whites in the North would not walk across the street to help the slaves in the South.

Lincoln had to entice -- lead -- the Northern whites into helping in the Civil War, by speaking in terms of Union.  So he fucking did.  And all the while, Lincoln was kicking the living shit out of slavery.  

Who else was doing what Lincoln did?


More absurd yet, is while dip shits are repeating this bullshit about Lincoln, and not telling the basic story of his actions and his full speeches and letters,  is what the South was saying and doing.

Southern leaders -- WHILE Lincoln had to tip toe around carefully in some speeches,  were boasting out the ass they were killing to spread slavery.  Did anyone ever tell you that?

Did anyone ever tell you US Senator Atchison was in Kansas, boasting he was killing  -- and promising to keep killing "for the entire South"  to spread slavery to the Pacific Ocean?

Did anyone ever tell you the Vice President of the Confederacy, boasted in a series of speeches -- to cheering crowds - that the whole reason they created the Confederacy was to "bring the great moral truth" to the world, that God ordained slavery AND PUNISHEMENT of the blacks for biblical sins?

Fuck no.   

Somehow Lincoln is the bad guy, because in SOME speeches, and in a letter for the public, he parsed words?  Never mind Lincoln kicked the living shit out of slavery, never mind that taken in total, Lincoln's speeches were kick ass against slavery,  these fucktards will pull up some quotes (out of context) and belittle Lincoln.

Southern leaders sure as fuck hated Lincoln -- and said he was "the worst sort of abolitionist"  whose real intent was to violently end slavery in the South.  Did you know that?

Lincoln's Northern political enemies repeated -- emphatically, at length --- told crowds Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  

Try to grasp that. 


Actually, Lincoln's enemies were quite clear, loud, and specific. Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Obsessed. With. Equality.  For. The.  "NIGGER"

The most powerful speaker of that era -- Stephen A Douglas, stood in front of crowds and in the most bombastic hateful language, told the crowds Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers". 

Not just once.  And not just a quick quip about it. Douglas made a very clear, loud, proud point of it.   In Charleston,  according to reporters there, Douglas went from side to side of the stage, in dramatic fashion,  shouting as loudly as he could, that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Then Lincoln had to speak.

Do you know why Sumner was beaten almost to death on the Senate floor? No, you don't.  I will tell you, below.



Completely white washed how -- largely because Southern crybabies have made sure US text books, since 1890, never showed how crazy violent Southern leaders and operators were.

ISIS like.


If you don't know Southern leaders  boasted about torture, boasting about killing, and boasted they will kill anyone who got in the way of the spread of slavery, you don't know shit about the 1850's.

No one told you that, did they?   They killed Lincoln's friend, and Southerners would kill Lincoln as soon as they could.  Did you know Lincoln was killed after a speech about voting rights for blacks?

Yet, the same ass wipes who tell you Lincoln didn't care about equality, will tell you Lincoln was NOT for voting rights.  Actually he said he was for voting rights -- and was shot for it.

They leave that out.

Lincoln gave over 3000 speeches -- you can quote him any way you want.  The problem is, asswipes, liars, and stupid people quote him out of context, and ignore his full speeches, and his actions.  That crap is repeated by those who don't know better.


Guess who did know about the endless killing sprees, the promises of more violence, and the speeches boasting about torturing and killing anyone who even SPOKE against slavery?

Lincoln knew. So did most people alive at the time.

It's just not taught now. Southern cry babies have made sure this is whitewashed.   But that's what Lincoln had to deal with.

 See Lincoln's letter about it, to his friend Joshua Speed.  And read Southern documents, books, speeches, at the time BOASTING they were killing to spread slavery, and would kill anyone who got in their way.

You probably think that's crazy -- no, it's exactly what was going on, and why most in the North did not want to fight the ISIS like bullies in the South.  Why fight for "Niggers"?

Lincoln therefore, had to shape (at first) support for war in terms of Union. Most whites in the North would not walk across the street, much less lay down their life, to free slaves.

And Lincoln knew it.


 Southern War Ultimatums were not hidden. They were headlines in Richmond paper, and very much in almost every Southern newspaper, in various levels of candor, for years.

Even immediately after the Civil War, Southern apologist wrote the war was not their fault -- they TOLD the North they would have slavery in Kansas, and electing anyone against the spread of slavery into Kansas was "an act of war".

Did you know that?

Did you know SOuthern War Ultimatums -- not suggestions -- was about ONE thing? The spread of slavery.,  Not kinda, not sorta.

After they lost, Southern cry babies and liars (yes liars) acted like "Us, for slavery?  For the forces spread of slavery?  Oh, no no no.

But before they lost, the lying bastards were boasting of, in their own speeches, their own books, and their own newspapers.



As Lincoln made clear, slavery was all about violence. Always. It could only spread by violence.  Southern politicians pushed slavery with a religious fervor you never hear about -- GOD ordained slavery, and if you are against the spread of slavery, you are against GOD.

The killings were going on, the entire time.  There was never a time leading up to Civil War that slave power folks were not killing to spread slavery.  They had always been killing and terrorizing to spread slavery, but it reached a fever pitch when Kansas rejected slavery 

US Senators were beaten, both off the Senate floor, and Charles Sumner was beaten almost to death on the Senate floor -- for talking about Senator Davis Rice Atchison.
 In fact, Richmond newspapers boasted of their War Ultimatums,  which were repeated in Northern papers the next day, in 1861.

Bet no one ever told you -- or even mentioned - them.   How the fuck do you leave Southern War Ultimatums out, or barely mention them?  Very carefully, that's how.

This is what Lincoln had to  deal with - --- not the watered down nonsense that makes Southern leaders seem like rational men.

War ultimatums -- demanding Lincoln help the spread of slavery into Kansas, which rejected slavery -- was irrational as hell. As nuts as anything you will ever learn in world history.  The South knew Lincoln would not help them spread slavery by force.  It was not a serious demand, just posturing to stupid people/


Did you know the great "abolitionist" speakers dare not go -- with good reason -- were Lincoln went, speak to who Lincoln spoke to?

No one ever told you that, did they?


Name one "fire breather" speaker,   who went to Kansas, as Lincoln did, when it was still illegal there to speak against slavery.

No one did.

Name anyone who stood up to President Polk,  and essentially called him on going to war to spread slavery for the benefit of Southern slave owners?

Did you even know Lincoln stood up to Polk?

Did you even know Polk went to war against Mexico, stole their land by military conquest, and that land all became slave states?

Really, really basic stuff.   Yet this is not taught -- and Lincoln's role in standing up to Polk, is not even mentioned.


You probably had no clue Southern leaders made it a crime to speak or write against slavery there. 

Did you know that?  Funny how people will tell you they knew that, but can't show where they found it out. It's not taught in any US text book -- but nothing was more important, more central, to the spread of slavery than the laws against speaking against it.

Did you know preachers could be tortured -- anyone could be tortured -- for owning the wrong book in the South?

Fuck no -- the ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders has never been taught in any US text book, and so of course, never made clear to the public.

But guess who knew all this ?  Lincoln, did, of course, but so did most people at the time -- North and South.  The violence is the South was systematic -- part of the structure of the Southern states, officially. Not kinda, not in away.

In fact, Jeff Davis paying 1000 men to invade Kansas in 1856 -- also glossed over as "trouble in Kansas" bullshit -- happened because Kansas citizens kept  speaking and writing against slavery.




Guess who didn't tell you that -- your history teacher, nor anyone else.

Guess why it makes a difference?

Because Lincoln was a radical MOFO.   If you learn his full speeches in those places, Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass sideways, in very smart, very effective ways.

Lincoln's speeches were working, changing minds.  Too complicated?  Your history teacher never told you?

Literally, the big speakers of the day, would not DARE go places Lincoln did -- and Lincoln was running for office, trying to get elected, by people who would not piss on a black man if he were on fire.


In fact, Lincoln's friend was burned to death for publishing a 
newspaper that was too blunt about equality.


Did you know people in Illinois were killed for speaking against slavery?

Did you know one of Lincoln's friend was one of those killed?

Surprise, surprise, no one told you.

Did you know Southern leaders demanded the NORTH arrest anyone who wrote newspaper articles against slavery?

Did you know in all of the South, it was against the law to preach, write, or speak publicly against slavery?

Did anyone ever mention to you, that people were tortured -- and killed - for speaking against slavery in the South?




Kansas rejected slavery -- and everyone knew it - and became a free state in 1861,  before Lincoln was US President.

Yet Jeff Davis made it VERY clear -- the resistance to the spread of slavery, into Kansas, was "intolerable".

You heard right.  At the time, this was common knowledge. Southern demands to spread slavery -- even into Kansas, which had rejected slavery over and over.

It probably does not compute in most people's minds, that Southern leaders BOASTED about killing to spread slavery, and demanded slavery spread even in areas that rejected it.

But this was common knowledge at the time. 

And Southern leaders had an excuse -- the Dred Scott decision -- that they claimed meant Kansas citizens could not reject slavery, even if they wanted to.

When Lincoln refused to obey the War Ultimatums -- printed in Richmond newspapers in 1861 -- the South attacked.  Not just at Fort Sumter, but 12 other places, too.

And they had already been killing, torturing, and calling it a war to spread slavery, 1856 on.   Bet you did  not know that, either.

Southern War Ultimatums.

Important shit, your teacher has no clue about. None.

Do you know the map above? You should.

This should take no explanation, because at the time, Southern leaders -- specifically Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison were loud, proud, and violent about it.

They had already spread -- always by violence -- slavery into the area in white.  Much of that land was stolen from Mexico, in order to have more slave states.   No one told you that, which is a fucking shame.  It was common knowledge then.

Furthermore, after Southern leaders and slave power got the area in white, for slavery -- they demands, very clearly, very loudly, very proudly, they would have slavery in the area with the red outline.

Citizens were whipped, crowds gathered to see the whippings, okf people who spoke against slavery.  Did you know that?

In Kansas, Southern leaders sent 1000 Texas men, in 1854, to form a "bogus legislature"  which, like in all the South, made in crime to speak against slavery.   And when citizens in Kansas kept speaking against slavery, a US Senator -- David Rice Atchison -- led 1000 paid men into Kansas to enforce his own law against speaking anti slavery sentiment.

Did you know that?

Hell no.  No one told you.   

It's not your fault you don't know -- these were well known at the time. Southern newspapers boasted of them. Southern leaders boasted of their killing sprees 

If you don't know that Southern leaders were still killing, torturing, and bragging they would kill more, and torture more, to spread slavery, you really do not know what Lincoln faced.

Lincoln COULD have been more candid -- in public -- and shot a lot sooner.  But he would have done no good, being dead.  

No one -- NO ONE -- went were Lincoln went, when Lincoln went, and was more radical than he.  No one told you that, did they?   Yes, there were abolitionist speakers, but they did not go to Kansas, as Lincoln did, and go to Alton, as Lincoln did, and Charleston, as Lincoln did.  

Most people, even in the North, considered abolitionist something like child molesters of today.  Did you know that?   The term abolitionist was a vile term, in the minds of most people, because that meant white women could be taken -- and have sex with -- black men.

You never heard that, did you?   Abolitionist, as it was used then, was far far different than you see the term today.  You have to understand that basic fact, too.

His personal friend was killed -- probably burned to death -- for speaking too bluntly against slavery.

If Lincoln had been any more vocal about ending slavery, he would likely have been shot in the head -- as others were -  sooner.

If you do not grasp that, you don't not grasp the 1850's.

Yes, at times, L incoln did parse words -- at times.   But get all his speeches, and he was as his enemies claimed, intent on destroying slavery, as soon as possible, by any means, including fight back against Southern War Ultimatums. 





Each time -- 100% of the time -- those who belittle Lincoln's efforts and desire for equality, have a half dozen, or dozen quotes that seem to back that  up, especially Lincoln's famous letter to Greeley.

So -- why did Southern leaders say Lincoln was a "Negro Worshiper"  and "the worst sort of abolitionist?

Why did  Stephen A Douglas said Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".   Douglas even claimed Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Could it be that Lincoln's full actions -- from 1846 on (as Lincoln haters said them) and his full words (as LIncoln haters said then) have something to do with it?

The power of selective quotes.


We have all heard it -- Lincoln didn't care about slavery, not really.  There are entire books, page after page, proving on every sentence that Lincoln had to be "dragged" into ending slavery, and only did so to save the Union, or win the Civil War.

Fucking bullshit. 

Lincoln was always looking for a way to gather public support to end slavery.    The problem was, most people in the North didn't give a shit about slaves, and thought freeing the blacks would allow black men to "sleep with"  white women.

No one told you that did they?

That fear -- that black men would take white women -- was the overriding issue in the North, and politicians, like Stephen A Douglas, used it to attack Lincoln,  over, and over and over.

No one told you that, did they?

It does not get any more basic. Southern leaders said Lincoln would "exterminate" the white race, just by being against the forced spread of slavery.

No one to you that, either, did they?


The problem with that -- it's not true.  For one thing, Lincoln was hated from 1846 on, by anyone in the South who knew him, and he was called "A Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshiper"   more times than you can count. 

In fact, the big charge against Lincoln, by people in the NORTH -- is that Lincoln was too radical.   

Lincoln wants your daughters to SLEEP WITH NIGGERS -- did you know that sentence was thrown at Lincoln over and over, to his face -- in the Lincoln Douglas debates.

That was cleaned up, by some, at the time, to say "Negroes"  but Douglas (Stephen A) could not be more clear or loud. Very Trump like, Douglas would even go side to side on the stage, in Charleston IL, screaming, and slurring his words, that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with NIGGERS.

That was the real fear -- by the way -- of most white men.  That black men would be free, and that meant black men would be around their wives and daughters.  No one told you that either -- but it Southerners and Northerners alike harped on that, again, and again, not just against Lincoln, but against anyone who was against Lincoln.

It just so happens, the most powerful, bombastic, and loud speaker of the generation, Stephen A Douglas, stabbed Lincoln again, and again, and again with that knife- and was effective.  He defeated Lincoln for Senate, and would have beat Lincoln for president if the pro slavery folks did not divide the vote, three ways.


Did you know Lincoln's friend was killed -some say burned to death in front of a cheering crowd -- because he (Lovejoy) was too much of an "abolitionist"?   Did you know that others were still being killed in the US for speaking too bluntly against slavery?

No one told you that?

Douglass knew, if you did not, that most white  people, even in the North,  would not walk across the street, to help a slave, and even in Illinois, Lincoln's state, blacks could not move there.   

If you know Lincoln's FULL quotes, and actions, you will know how radical he was, for his time, and place.

Southern leaders had Lincoln right -- they accused him of being an abolitionist --"the worst sort" of abolitionist, who really sought to destroy slavery in the entire country.  They used his history in Congress, and his House Divided speech to prove it.

Lincoln correctly said, slavery will spread to the entire US, or it will be eliminated in the entire US, because of the Kansas Act fraud, and Dred Scott fraud, both of which, Lincoln knew and said, were contrived "machinery" to spread slavery to all states, North and South.

Supposed "historian" Eric Foner claimed Lincoln was "nothing special"  and had to "evolve".  
Trouble is -- facts show, when you get all Lincoln actions, and all his writings and speeches, LIncoln was a radical mother fucker, like no other, for where he was, and when he was.


Inexplicably, Foner and other "historians"  said, for example, that Dred Scott decision was "a rather narrow decision that Congress can't stop the spread of slavery into the Territories"

Did Foner ever bother to READ the Dred Scott decision?     Lincoln sure as fuck read it. So did Jeff Davis (Davis probably wrote it).  Dred Scott was about one thing -- according to Lincoln.   To spread slavery by declaring blacks are not human beings.

That's not sorta what Dred Scott decision said -- that is exactly fucking what Dred Scott decision said.  And that is exactly what Jeff Davis quoted -- about blacks not being human, and therefore slavery must spread.     Lincoln got it right.

But Foner claims  Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling".   You have to be a stupid fuck, or a liar, to get that wrong.    More about Foner's amazing stupidity, below.  


When you tell people today that Lincoln exposed the plans of Southern leaders to spread slavery, North and South, they look at you like you lost your mind.

You can hardly find a history teacher, let alone regular person, who seems to have read Lincoln's House Divided Speech -- voted his second most famous speech, behind Gettysburg Address.

Lincoln's House divided speech (he have versions of it dozens of times) was about ONE thing -- Southern attempts to spread slavery by any means, their orchestrated, decade long attempts to force slavery where it was rejected.

Lincoln (and many others) repeatedly pointed out the violence and killings in Kansas, how the Kansas Act and Dred Scott were a planned "construction" to push slavery to the entire US

In fact, Southern leaders said the same thing.

US Senator David Rice Atchison -- who boasted about passing Kansas Act -- bragged out the ass he was in Kansas killing and spreading terror to spread slavery.

 But indeed, that is EXACTLY what they were planning, and bragging of.   The Southern War ULtimatums, killing sprees, and endless violence, bragged of at the time,  was not unusual. You just were never told of it, in school.

The violence was unrelenting -- Southerners wanted the North to send to the South, for punishment, anyone that wrote against slavery in the NORTH, but the book or pamphlet got to the South.

Preachers were arrested in the South --for preaching against slavery, or even for owning the wrong book.  Don't believe me?   Violence against anyone speaking against slavery in a public way, was just common from 1840's on.

In fact, Southern leaders sent 1000 men to Kansas in 1856, led by a US Senator, David Rice Atchison.  Atchison boasted- boasted -- he was there to stop folks in Kansas from putting out anti-slavery newspaper. 

Lincoln had to deal with reality -- the violence, the promises of endless violence -- the war ultimatums, the killing sprees, the subterfuges of Kansas |Act and Dred Scott decision.

What an easy job Lincoln would have had, if he just faced the white washed shit in our US text books, that never mention the killing sprees, tortures,  boasts by Southern leaders, and their War Ultimatums. 

But Lincoln had to deal with what was going on, not what bullshit Southern school board crybabies allowed in US text books. 

Did you know that no famous abolitionist speaker went where Lincoln did, and spoke to people Lincoln spoke to?  They went to places -- and were paid to go -- to crowds that already were against slavery. They dare not go where Lincoln went, and talk to who Lincoln talk to.

Lincoln went to Kansas -- where Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison had made it a crime, yes a crime, to speak against slavery. No US history text book, even college text books, explain that Lincoln went to Kansas after Jeff Davis had made it a crime to speak publically or write publicly against slavery (via his General of Law and Order, David Rice Atchison).

There are entire "scholarly articles" about Lincoln going to Kansas - and their bullshit focus is the weather, where Lincoln crossed some fucking river, not a damn fucking word about Kansas killing sprees, Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison's laws against speaking against slavery.  Lincoln to Kansas.... bullshit article about Lincoln's trip to Kansas

The article was  not wrong -- he went on those dates, likely the weather was like they said, he crossed certain rivers in certain ways, blah fucking blah.   But not one word WHY it was amazing and brave for Lincoln to even go to Kansas, though most of the paid killers sent by Jeff Davis, were already dispersed.   Not one word of what happened to previous men, who were killed or attacked and terrorized, for publishing anything against slavery.

So you could read that, and not have a damn clue.

Davis was no longer Secretary of War, or Lincoln likely would have been killed much sooner than he was.

And if you don't know that Jeff Davis  had people killed, you missed the entire history of expansion of slavery under Davis.  No one was more radical -- not even Robert Toombs -about spreading slavery into Kansas and beyond.  Davis spoke in Orwellian double speak, but he spoke often and at length. 


  Davis had fixated on spreading slavery since he was a young man, trying to impress his buddies by talking smack about slavery into all the West -- specifically Kansas. In fact, at one time, he got in a pushing match, with another young man, who would later be killed as Confederate general toward late in war (ironically fighting the war started by Southern War Ultimatums to spread slavery into Kansas, per Jeff Davis).

Davis was always obsessed with slavery into Kansas

 As Secretary of War, he orchestrated by proxie, but with his authorization, and help, killing sprees in Kansas. It was Davis who sent US Senator David Rice Atchison to Kansas, who immediately and proudly started terrorizing local Kansas citizens.   Importantly, Atchison managed to walk into a federal armory in Missouri, and get all the guns for his paid men, that he wanted.  Some call this a "raid" on the Army's armory in Missouri. It was no raid, no one threatened or shot.  Atchison reported to Jeff Davis -- literally sent him reports.  No doubt Davis, as Secretary of War, simply sent orders to let Atchison have whatever he wanted.


Importantly, Atchison sent reports to Davis on the progress of his killing sprees, and apparently over promised Davis very quick results. Both men apparently thought Kansas citizens would fold like cowards -- Atchison told his men they would.

Not so much. Not after they killed John  Brown's son. That changed every fucking thing - and you probably didn't know who killed Brown's son, or how Brown finally was pissed enough to fight Davis and Atchison's men, using their own rules.

Lincoln, of course, knew all this. See his letter to Speed, for example. Lincoln was exceedingly aware of Kansas, and got back into politics because of what Atchison did.  And Atchison, remember, worked officially for Jeff Davis.



STEPHEN A DOUGLAS  Speaking, making the case, a vote for Lincoln is a vote for your wife being with "Niggers" 

"The last time I came here to make a speech, while talking from the stand to you, people of Freeport,  I saw a carriage—and a magnificent one it was—drive up and take a position on the outside of the crowd; a beautiful young lady was sitting on the box-seat, whilst Fred Douglass and her mother reclined inside, and the owner of the carriage acted as driver. I saw this in your own town........ All I have to say on that subject is, that those of you who believe that the negro is your equal and ought to be on an equality with you socially, politically, and legally, have a right to entertain those opinions, and of course will vote for Mr. Lincoln.  (No, No, down with the Niggers)"
Papers often, even at the time, cleaned up "Nigger"  to "Negro", but some quoted Douglas verbatum. Douglas was well known for using "Nigger"  even on Senate floor,  and was admonished for it, repeatedly.   Even Southern Senators used the term "Negro"  in such settings., Not Stephen A Douglas. 

In the Charleston debate, Douglas, well aware of the fear of black men taking white women had in that city, screamed these things about Lincoln wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  as Douglas went from side to side of the stage. in the most dramatic way possible.

This was a basic approach Douglas used to some extent, in the debates, and when he spoke around the country without Lincoln being there. In some places he would be more extreme - some say he was drunk -- but always, in each speech, his goal was to get people to fear anyone who was against slavery.   

Douglass -- Frederick Douglass -- knew what Lincoln was up against.   


That was in the newspapers at the time, and was no surprise to anyone.  Fear of black man sleeping with your daughter and "being with" your wife, was the common retort to anyone who was against slavery.  And it worked.  

The fear and hate mongering by Douglas, worked very well.  Lincoln lost that election, and would have lost the Presidential election too, if the hate and fear mongers did not split the pro slavery vote three ways. 



Scaring the crap out of the males in the audience -- the only ones that could vote -- worked. Despite all his efforts,

  Lincoln had to use humor and much of his time, deflecting this claim he wanted "your daughters to sleep with Niggers"

 Lincoln lost to Douglas in the Senate race, and would have likewise lost in the Presidential race, but the pro-spread of slavery folks had three candidates. 

 Lincoln was the ONLY candidate against slavery, with the very mild platform of no spread of slavery.


White people were still being killed, even in the North for being "radical abolitionist"  .

Abolitionist -- the child molesters of the day.

People don't realize it now, but to be called an abolitionist in some areas then, is much like being called a child molester now. 

Today, we honor abolitionist.  

Have you ever heard our historians mention, at least in any meaningful way, how abolitionist was a term of scorn.  

Did any US textbook mention that even in the North, people were still being killed, tortured, drown, hung, for being "radical abolitionist"?

Lincoln's friend was killed by a mob in Alton Illinois, for publishing an anti slavery newspaper. The men who killed his friend, were who later Lincoln would speak in front of, in the Lincoln Douglas debates.

Did anyone ever mention that, much less make it clear?

 People were killed -- yes they were -- by crowds for being an abolitionist.

Lincoln himself was called "the worst sort of abolitionist"  and a "Nigger lover" "Nigger worshipper" who wanted your daughter to sleep with Niggers".

John Palmer, who with Lincoln started the GOP party in Illinois, wrote about this in 1890, not long before his death. He said even by 1890, people did not grasp what a vile term "abolitionist was"  and how violent people were, against abolitionist, or anyone called that.


To be an "abolitionist" in 1850-1860 was deadly in the South, and could be deadly in the North.

There were abolitionist speakers in the North -- but not where Lincoln was.

Nor would any abolitionist speaker even go, physically, to places Lincoln went, or talk to crowds Lincoln not only spoke to, but tried to get their vote.

Lincoln COULD have become an abolitionist speaker, gone to places that already agreed with him, and been more candid.

What the fuck good would that do? 

But Lincoln got back into politics BECAUSE of slavery, specifically the killing in Kansas, and the Kansas Act.

He had to be very careful what he said -- but he was amazingly powerful, stunningly powerful, in his speeches. Read all of the speech, not just edited bullhit, and know what the fuck was going on.

If you don't know how dangerous it was for Lincoln to go where he did, and say what he said, you really don't know shit about Lincoln or what caused the civil war.

Lincoln tried mightily to show the public what was going on -- how Southern leaders were pushing slavery in such a way, slavery would be all over the US, or in none of the US. 

Did you know, yes or know, that virtually everything in Lincoln Douglas debates, were about the SPREAD of slavery by violence and unconstitutional means?  Douglas was eager to "blow up" the debates into fear mongering about your daughter's sleeping with "Niggers,"  to take away Lincoln's main point, that Douglas  himself, and others, were pushing slavery into the rest of the US under the ruse of Douglas deception about "popular sovereignty".

The result is,  now, most people are perplexed upon reading the Lincoln Douglas debates. You will likely never hear your  history teacher tell you that Lincoln was exposing Douglas's duplicity on his charade of Kansas Act, and how Douglas and others were actually forcing slavery to spread, against popular sovereignty.

Douglas,  a master at Orwellian bullshit, would claim over and over he "just wanted the people to decide".     But as Lincoln and others showed, that is exactly the opposite of what Douglas was doing.  Douglas had written the Kansas Act with his business partner David Rice Atchison, who was in Kansas personally, and there, killing and terrorizing to PREVENT popular sovereignty. 

This was Lincoln's basic point -- that Southern leaders were pushing by violence and deception, what they could not push by constitutional means -- the spread of slavery. 

  Lincoln blasted the living **** out of slavery in this debate -- more than anyone else dared then, in that area,  while trying to get elected.  Your history teacher probably doesn't even suspect that, much less teach it.  

For those who claim Lincoln was not radical -- long before the CIvil War started -- they oddly can not show anymore more radical AND effective.   

Lincoln was able to actually change people's minds, in Illinois and the nation, to see what is not taught candidly today. The South really was killing and torturing, and were actually violently pushing slavery in a way that it would, by necessity, be "all or nothing".

If the US would allow Douglas and his partners push slavery into Kansas this way,  there was no earthly way to stop slavery from being everywhere.    The way the South was pushing slavery, and had always pushed slavery (by force and deception) was the immediate problem.

And Southern leaders AGREED!  As you will see, Southern leaders were proud of the machinery -- as Lincoln called it -- that would spread slavery to the entire US, and beyond, a very special kind of slavery -- first in the world, they bragged.  To spread slavery for GOD to the far reeaches of the US and the white world.  Another very basic truth about Southern leaders that is entirely white washed today.


Others said  " Lincoln is the worst kind of abolitionist ... and will cause the extinction of the white race"

Lincoln's radical actions to free the slaves will cause  us necessarily to exterminate the slaves "with our own hands." 

 The stupidit about Lincoln continues, like bullshit 

"Lincoln used slavery as an excuse to keep the Union together."

"LINCOLN was a racist  content to let slavery continue."



That stupid shit, Fred Douglass. He almost acts as if he were there, was a slave himself, knew Lincoln, and all that went on from 1846-1865.

Why learn from Fred Douglass?   The average Texas grade school kid knows more than he does. 





"Amazing how you can take a few quotes here, a few there, omit the full speeches, in context, and never mention his actions, and make Lincoln look any fucking way you want."

But when you know the FULL speeches, in context, and his FULL letters (all of them)  and know what was going on, it's a completely different story than all liars, and most pompous "historians"  (including Pulitzer Prize winning historians) tell you.

To understand Lincoln -- you need to understand what Lincoln and Frederick DOuglass understood:  who killed who, and why, is real history. Everything else is bullshit.

If you don't know who was killing who, and why, from 1840-1861, you have no business teaching history. Or writing about it. 

Welcome to  history, were "who killed who, and why"  matters more than bullshit. 




You no doubt have heard -- even been taught --Lincoln didn't REALLY care about slavery. Lincoln was a racist and believed in white supremacy.  

After all, didn't your high school teacher tell you that?

Or Lincoln  had to be "pulled" into being against slavery, and only acted to keep the Union together. Entire books, entire "history careers" are based on that.

The only way to be that stupid, is to NOT know or care about Lincoln's full speeches and actions.

Yes, Lincoln spoke  -- at times -- in ways that seem to confirm he had no concern for slavery.    But read his FULL speeches, and his personal letters, and you wont be so stupid.

In fact, you can probably not name anyone who was as radical and zealous to end slavery as Lincoln,  AND as radical for equality in an effective way.

 John Brown comes to mind? Not really. As Frederick Douglas wrote of his own good friend Brown, Brown's violence actually cost the efforts to end slavery in profound ways, as you would know if you knew about Brown and Douglass friendship.



Lincoln had the effective -- and necessary -- habit, of at first seeming to agree with something, then kicking the shit out of that sentiment.  He used that rhetorical ploy to placate and validate the feelings of the audience, but then challenged that sentiments, in the strongest way possible.

If you care to know about Lincoln, slavery and the Civil War, You need to read Lincoln's FULL speeches, and read all his letters. 

You also need to know his technique -- he used it so often, it should be called "The Lincoln head fake" or something like that.

People of that time were terrified of black men stealing their women.   Did you know that?  Very basic at the time.  

Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, spoke of genocide of the black race, if they did not enslave the black race. 

Just like you need to read Southern War Ultimatums, speeches by Southern leaders boasting of killing to spread slavery, boasting of torture of slaves, threatening genocide, promising genocide of the slaves if slavery was not spread.

It's important to note -- and understand -- that Southern leaders were quite clear, quite proud, they were killing to SPREAD slavery. Not keep it. So many people today assume stupidly the Civil War had anything to do with keeping slavery.

Nonsense.  To the South, and they boasted of this, in context, loud and proud, and more, killed to spread slavery and boasted of that, too, there was one issue.  Spreading slavery -- spreading slavery for white survival, according to the leaders.

According to other leaders, spreading slavery for GOD, and biblical truth.

If you don't know about Southern War Ultimatums, don't blame me. Blame your history teacher.   Lincoln got back into politics BECAUSE of the actions of men who boasted they were killing to spread slavery.   Specifically, Senator David Rice Atchison.

Did you know that?

Lincoln had the effective -- and necessary -- habit, of at first seeming to agree with something, particularly in court cases and politics.

But then, Lincoln deftly -- often with humor -- would suddenly, but emphatically, kick the living shit out of that which moments before, he seemed to agree with.

Lincoln did this time, and time again.  He did it so often, and so well, and is rather unique in history for doing so, that historians should have a name for it.   But sadly, most don't seem to grasp this "Lincoln rope a dope" as we call it, was LIncoln's most effective tool.

Lincoln never fired a gun, in the Civil War, though he was shot at several times.  His weapons were words -- and the way he used them.

His "Lincoln rope a dope"  is central to understanding Lincoln.   And it's the only reason liars and stupid fucks can trash Lincoln using his quotes.


If you want to play word games about LIncoln -- FINE. Get all the words.  In context. And compare those to others. 



Douglas (Stephen A Douglas)  made it quite clear, over and over, that LIncoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger".

In speech after speech, Lincoln's enemies told the crowds Lincoln wants "Niggers" to sleep with white women -- your daughters.

Did anyone ever tell you that, at all?  
Fuck no.  NO one told you that.

Pieces of shit Southern apologist, and even "historians" trying to sound smart, will tell you only a tiny % of the words.

 Lincoln is powerful, even brilliant, and he kicks the living shit out of inequality.  He says -- ANY slave is equal to ANY white man.

No one told you about this?  Over and over, Lincoln would say any black is equal to any white, under the law.  Why the fuck not tell folks that?   Fucking hell, that's what Lincoln's basic argument was.


But the lying pieces of shit will leave out that part. 

Edit anyone, edit fucking Jesus, and they can made stupid fucks think that Jesus was pro devil. 

SO yes, you can take a few words here, a few there, and do not give context or the full quote. Happens all the time.  Over and over about Lincoln, because LIncoln gave over 3000 speeches.

But NO  ONE went where LIncoln did, when Lincoln did, and blasted the bastards who were pro torture, pro killing to spread slavery, pro religious lunacy.   We have never taught the insane ISIS like nature of Southern scum and Southern leaders.

Lincoln is accused of being a Nigger lover,  or worse, that he wants "Niggers" to sleep with your daughters. Did he want your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

FUCK NO.  But that is what Lincoln was accused of, repeatedly, to his face, in front of crowds.

Do you think  historians should tell you. Yes, they should, but they fucking dont.  Not in any meaningful way. And Southern scum "historians" are even worse, but guys like McPherson, Catton, Foner don't make that clear either.

Fuck heads. 

AFTER they accuse Lincoln of wanting to destroy the white race, AFTER they accuse Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers" -- Lincoln had to speak.

Do you grasp, yes or no?   Take your time.

Lincoln responds by saying he didn't say he was for perfect equality  --- he would have gotten a bullet in the brain a lot sooner if he had.  So Lincoln parses words. Read them close "I did not say I was in favor of perfect equality".

And that's right, he did NOT say that.  But then he kicks ass and says ANY slave is equal to ANY white man.

Do you wonder why they leave that out? Because they are ass wipes or stupid.  

Lincoln does not just mention blacks are equal to whites, any black is equal to any white, He YELLS that blacks and whites ARE equal. He YELLS that the lowest slave woman is equal to any white man.   

That's his central message. That is what the fuck he was doing there that day, and for years.

Maybe you should learn the whole story?


Nearly verbatim from the debates. 

But Southern leaders were the ones screaming out the ass that Lincoln was so obsessed with equality that he would -- literally -- destroy the white race.

No one bothered to tell you that?  Surprise, surprise.

Over and over -- to his face, in front of large crowds, Stephen A Douglas told crowds Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with Niggers. 

Lincoln's friend was killed for writing against slavery.Lincoln himself would be killed for speaking of voting rights for blacks.

In fact, compared to Lincoln, no one came close to being as effectively swift, radical, and zealous.   But to understand that, you have understand what the fuck was going on.

Others did speak powerfully for ending slavery -- but not to the people LIncoln spoke to, not where he spoke. In fact, none of the great "abolitionist speakers"  would dare go where Lincoln went, when Lincoln went.

Facts matter. Don't let ass wipes spewing bullshit make you hate people you should admire.

Meanwhile, Lincoln's enemies were claiming blacks were not even fucking human, but a species created by GOD to be the slaves of white men as biblical punishment.

Get the WHOLE fucking story, from original sources.  You wont be so stupid.  Most of the shit written after the Civil War is heavy on bullshit, edited quotes, and does NOT show how fucking dangerous it was to speak against slavery.


In all those examples, and much more, you can find an apparent quote or even letter, which backs that up.

But get ALL Lincoln's letters, ALL Lincoln's quotes, and mostly, learn what the fuck was going on, and you won't be so easily fooled.

Actions, of course, matter.  But in actions and words (when you get his complete words) show a fundamentally different story. 

In fact, Lincoln was kicking the shit out of slavery from 1846 on.  Not sorta, not kinda, not in a way.

Lincoln was hated -- from his first time in Congress, all the way tell they put a bullet in his head, for being radical against slavery.  

So how the hell do these "experts" claim Lincoln was "too eager to compromise"   "willing to let slavery continue"    if he was such a bad ass against slavery.

Because Lincoln was smart -- very smart.  And he waged the war the kicked the living FUCK out of slavery, so thoroughly, the Southern GOD of slavery died in the process.

And guess who said Lincoln was radical -- in fact obsessed-- for equality?

Guess who said LIncoln was "the worst kind" of abolitionist who would "destroy the white race"  by  his "love for the Nigger".

Go on, guess. 



If you want to be a bullshitter on LIncoln, it's no problem. Take a quote here, a quote from 6 years later, a letter at a certain time, ignore everything else, and you can make Lincoln seem anyway you want.

Northern and Southern folks HATED Lincoln -- and eventually killed him -- for being radical for equality.   No one told you that.  Lincoln took a bullet to the brain for being too radical -- he spoke of voting rights for blacks, and Booth changed his plan from kidnap to kill, because of that speech.

Did you know that?  

Evern NORTHERN newspapers trashed Lincoln for being a "Negro Worshipers".  Lincoln's friend was killed (burned to death) for writing against slavery.  He was trapped in his newspaper office, and Lincoln's enemies burned it down.

Douglas would say things like  "Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Niggers,  loves Niggers more than he loves his own country"

John Brown comes to mind.  He was more radical, but he was caught in about an hour, and executed.  As Frederick Douglass himself said (he was a goof friend of Brown's) John Brown harmed the overall efforts to end slavery, by feeding right into the hate and fear mongering about slave rebelling and the killings of whites in an early slave rebellion.

Southern leaders had long warned that freeing the slaves -- or even not spreading slavery -- was going to destroy the white race.  Did you know that?  

This was quite well known at the time.  The governors of Florida and Georgia wrote about this, at length.  If Lincoln just stopped the SPREAD of slavery, blacks would get their freedom and kill or degrade the white race, take the white women, and whites would be massacred or "brought to the degraded condition of the Negro" .

I can't help it if you didn't know these things. 
Blame the fucking idiots who write history books in the US.  Not me.  I am tell you who killed who and why. And what Southern leaders proudly said when they were killing people. 

More than anything, Lincoln was effective. 

 He got the job done.  

No one else did.

  No one else was able to get the majority of Northern citizens to eventually agree that slavery had to go.  

Lincoln had to deal with that fear and hate of the black man.  So he did. Another speaker -- getting paid to speak like the abolitionist speakers were, protected in crowds that already agreed with them -- did not do any good, or slavery would have ended long before.

Learn his FULL speeches.  From 1854 on, Lincoln was hated North and South for being a "Nigger lover"  a  "Negro Worshiper".

His friend was burned to death,  he would eventually get his own bullet the the brain, for being so radical about voting rights for blacks.

No one told you that -- and much more.  Funny, because facts make a difference.  Learn real history -- who killed who, and why, is real history.  All else is bullshit.



Fat lot of good that would do.

Lincoln could have been more bombastic in many of his speeches. But where he spoke, when  he spoke, to whom he spoke, no one even came close.

Lincoln's full speeches are epic, powerful,  they changed the living fuck out of the US as it was.

IF he  had been more like John Brown's speeches, he would have been radical in every sentence, and shot a lot sooner.

Did you know that?


Lincoln  himself would get a bullet in the brain,  for speaking too bluntly about voting rights for blacks.

You didn't even know that, did you?

Guess who knew?

Frederick Douglas knew. 

And Douglass knew exactly what the fuck was going on. I doubt you do, even if you are a history professor. I have yet to see a  history professor who seems to grasp just how radical Lincoln was.  Why?  Because they endlessly refer to a few out of context quotes from various speeches.

They ignore his amazing actions, usually they don't even know.

They ignore his full speeches.

They ignore what the fuck was going on. 

They ignore that others were killed, as Lincoln would be, for being too radical for equality.

SO they never tell you.


   Gee, Douglass had to be stupid, right?   


Fred Douglas saw a woman tortured to DEATH while the master shouted scriptures.

Fred Douglas was world famous, long before Lincoln ran for office.

Fred Douglas didn't take any bullshit.   He respected two white men in his life.  One was John Brown, the other was Abe Lincoln.

OF the two, Douglas said, Lincoln was far wiser in the way he fought slavery.   In fact, Douglas said Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous and determined" to end slavery.    Only Lincoln did it with more brains, and was effective.



1846 -- and for the next 19 years -- Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass, as hard as he could, where he was, when he was.

That's not how you are taught, however, because often "historians" don't even mention Lincoln's full actions and words at the time.

Frederick Douglass knew a hell of a lot better than you do, what the fuck was going on, leading up the the Civil War.

Probably 99% of Americans have no clue that the "Mexican American War" was a war to double the size of slave territory, and that Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and called him on that, specifically saying Polk did it to spread slavery.

Nor do 99% of Americans know that the spread of slavery was at the heart of everything going on from 1820-1865.   It was no some side issue, not even just a main issue.  It was everything.

And Lincoln said so.

And Lincoln was right.Every election, every bill, every dispute, every newspaper, every politican North and South, was focused on slavery.  Many in the North loved slavery and got rich on it.

When Lincoln could finally get enough support from the country, he kicked slavery so fucking hard, the God of slavery died.  Bet you didn't know that.

But yes, Lincoln AT TIMES parsed words. He had to pick his battles. He had to speak -- at times -- about Union. As if that's horrible. Meanwhile, his enemies were speaking that GOD ordained slavery and promised to kill to spread it for GOD.  You don't know that, do you?

Did you know about Southern War Ultimatums? No.

Did you know about Southern leaders proud speeches promising endless killing unless slavery was spread all over, North and South?


Did you know Southern states all made it a crime to speak against slavery, write against slavery, and they even made it impossible to SPEAK about slavery in Congress for 12 years.


Douglass knew that, and a million other things, you don't have a clue about 

Douglas knew that most white people would not piss on a black person, if they were on fire.   He knew too, that just to TALK about ending slavery could get you killed, North and South, if you were too blunt about it, in the wrong place.

Did you know, for example, that in most of the US, when Lincoln ran for the Senate, it was ILLEGAL to speak against slavery?  In all of the South, it was a crime, punishable by torture, to speak openly or preach against slavery.  

Most people have no clue.

Even in Kansas, when Lincoln ran for Senate, it was a crime to speak or write a newspaper against slavery.  Those laws stayed on the books -- and may still be there actually -- until after the US Civil War.    Bet you didn't know that.

Stephen A Douglas -- the guy from Lincoln Douglas debates -- repeatedly told the crowd that Frederick Douglas and Lincoln were with a white woman that day, in a carriage.    The same Stephen A Douglas told the same crowd "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Today, right now, stupid people trash Lincoln -- for exactly the opposite reason.  And those are not all stupid people, some of those who trash Lincoln are just fucking liars, who make damn sure not to tell you Lincoln's FULL quotes, in context, and make damn sure they don't tell  you what Lincoln did.

Stupid people will tell you, Lincoln AT best ended slavery to keep the Union together, or that he "didn't really give a shit"  about slavery until the Civil War was almost over.

You can only say shit like that, by deception. Show ALL of Lincoln's speeches, and show what was going on, mostly show what Lincoln DID, and you can't say shit like that.

See what those fucktards never tell you....... 



Lincoln was effectively kicking slavery in the ass sideways from 1846 on, when he stood up to President Polk and rightfully accused him of killing to spread slavery, and creating a war to do it, against Mexico.


From 1858 on, in fact, politicians North and South claimed Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"


The big gripe against Lincoln, North and South, is that he was a "Negro Worshipper".

Lincoln had the audacity to say blacks should be considered equal under the law -- things he could have been killed for, and WAS eventually killed for.

Lincoln was vilified in the South as someone who will "exterminate the white race -- even in the North Lincoln was derided as "cares more about the Nigger than his own race ".

Most people -- even today -- have no clue that at the time Lincoln ran for Senate and President, it was illegal,  a crime, to speak against slavery, and the punishement was torture.

Did you know that?   In all of the South, and in Kansas, Southern leaders had made it a crime --yes, punishable by torture -- to speak, preach or write against slavery.  

Very basic -- and very well known at the  time. How has this escaped notice in any US history text book?

Because Southern liars and crybabies have never allowed the  harsh truth about their heroes to be mentioned in US text books, other than in vague and or bullshit terms, if at all.


Was Jeff Davis stupid?   Davis and others   said Lincoln was "the worst kind of abolitionist".

Was Jeff Davis lying, stupid, or just didn't know??


Was the Vice President of the Confederacy stupid?   Alexander Stephens  said Lincoln stood in the way of God's will to spread slavery to the entire white world. 

Yes, God's will. Stephens and Davis both -- both-- boasted that the Confederacy was based on the SPREAD of slavery as God and nature intended.

Oh, no one told you that either?   

Stephens and Davis were both very specific -- see below.  Their type of slavery was GOD'S type of slavery.  Perpetual slavery, where the children born are also slaves, in perpetuity.   No matter how light skinned a child is, for example rape of slave women, a slave "issue" --  a child--  is a slave, and any "issue" from such children are slaves by the will of GOD.

Furthermore, Stephens famously said- - Southern slavery is not only GODLY -- but Godly because white man is supposed to punish the black race for biblical sins.

You heard right.  And they BOASTED of this,.  And much more, till they lost. 


Was the  Confederate Secretary of State (Toombs) stupid?   He said Lincoln's refusal to allow the spread of slavery into Kansas --Kansas had rejected slavery by 95% -- was going to "exterminate the white race".

Oh, no one told you that?  Gee, surprise surprise. It's almost like Southern crybabies would not allow anything in our history books,  that their own leaders were bragging about the ass about, at the time.

So -- unless you know what the FUCK was going on, and you sure don't hear any of this in your school or from "historians" who suck up to Southern apologists even today --  you don't know shit.

Really, you don't know shit. And yes, "historians" are too stupid, or too busy with bullshit, to tell you bluntly, about Southern leaders actions, killing sprees, and much else. It's as if they are still afraid to speak bluntly about Southern leaders and what they boasted of at the time.


You can make Lincoln SEEM any way you want, by selecting four or five quotes, out of context, and ignore his actions. Happens a lot.

But at the time -- Northern and Southern newspapers, Northern and Southern politicians, accused Lincoln of being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Lincoln better watch what the hell he said, and to whom, or he would have been shot a lot sooner than he was. And yes, he was shot for speaking too bluntly. Hell, your "history" teacher never even tells you that.

To get elected -- and to not get shot sooner -- Lincoln learned to parse words.  So he did.  Others did not parse words as well, and were killed, like Lovejoy, Lincoln's friend, burned to death inside his building where he printed an antislavery newspaper. 

It was ILLEGAL -- a crime -- to publish anything like that in most of the US at the time. DId you know that?  It was legal in Illinois, but still pissed off some folks, so they killed Lincoln's friend.

When Stephen A Douglas reminded the crowds -- again and again -- that Lincoln was friends with Lovejoy, he was doing  all he could to ferment more hatred against Lincoln.  No one told you that, did they?

And unless you knew US  history very very well, you would not grasp that by yourself.  But Douglas -- almost in every sentence - was urging the crowd to hate and fear Lincoln.  And it worked. Douglas won that election.

In fact, Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, to Lincoln's face, in front of crowd after crowd -- accused Lincoln of not only being obsessed with equality, but told the crowd Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

In Charleston, Douglas went from side to side of the stage, slobbering and clearly drunk, yelling  in a way only Douglas could, that Lincoln would have black men marry your daughter.

LIncoln gave 3000 or so speeches.  In those speeches were over a million words, many of them written down.  A few words here - out of context -- a few words there,  and you can make him say whatever you want.


You are never told this -- but it was common knowledge, North and South, at the time.

Ending slavery would let black men on the same sidewalk, as white women.  Southern leaders were eager to bounce upon this fear.   The white race will be exterminated-- not sorta, not kinda, not maybe.  

Just stopping the SPREAD of slavery would exterminate the white race!   That is how crazy and fearful Southern leaders made people in the South.  

Stephen A Douglas was eager, glad, and loud in calling Lincoln a "Negro Worshipper"

New  York papers called Lincoln a Negro worshipper -- a common refrain actually, to call anyone against slavery "Negro Worshiper".

In fact, Southern leaders would accuse each other of being "Negro Worshippers"  if they were not suitably rabid.    Southern leaders competed -- and had to compete -- to be the most extreme.  Very much like hate mongers compete today, in the GOP and Tea Party.  If you are not hateful enough -- the next guy will be.

This, of course, was exactly the big fear.   This fear of black men taking white women was not a side issue -- end slavery, Douglas and others said -- and you will have your daughters taken by black men, your wife will be able to talk to black men, etc. 

But even that -- even just stopping the spread of slavery, was "burning us to death" over a slow fire.

So Lincoln had to be very careful how he spoke. He spoke with amazing power -- see  his FULL speeches.   But you can take a sentence here or there, twist it, not show the full quote, and not show his actions, and make people believe anything, anything at all.

But if you know ALL of Lincolns full quotes -- not the edited shit used by lying bastards and dumb asses --- you can't make Lincoln seem that way.  Lincoln was a RADICAL mother fucker, in fact, no one even came close to Lincoln for radical effective action.

Yes, most of the quotes by Lincoln haters and detractors are true -- they have changed a word or two, but for the most part, Lincoln did say, on a give day or in a given letter, the things they show.


In order not to get killed any sooner than he was, Lincoln  would SEEM to agree with a common sentiment, over and over he did this.  

But then, in the same speech, sometimes in the next damn sentence, Lincoln would kick the shit ouf of the sentiment he just seemed to endorse. 

Lincoln would say things like "any slave is worth any white man" -- including equal to Judge Douglas.   Any slave, is equal, to any white man.   Furthermore, Lincoln exposed the violent ISIS like Southern scum that killed to spread slavery.

Gee-- you never hear of those speeches, even though Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass in virtually all his speeches.  

So what Lincoln haters do, is just quote him selectively, and run like cowards, rather than show what Lincoln did.


So in his Peoria speech, you can take a sentence out -- many do -- and make it seem like Lincoln agreed with sending free blacks to Africa, the very popular idea of "colonization".    There is not one Lincoln detractor in  history that will dare show you his FULL speech, where is first seems to agree, then cleverly comes back to the idea, and shows it as unworkable, vile, and horribly unfair.

Why not show you that?   

No one was confused, who was there.  Lincoln did not mince words, but he did speak cleverly.  He did speak in a way he would not get shot. He did speak in a way people might agree with him.

His main focus was to first stop the killings and tortures used by the South to spread slavery. I doubt many people reading this know anything about Southern killing sprees -- some paid for by Jeff Davis was he was Secretary of War -- to not just kill to spread slavery, but to kill to silence opposition to slavery.

Lincoln spoke about those killings, too.  Southern leaders were actually very proud of them, bragged about them, at the time.  Lincoln wrote about the people involved in those killings- - someone wrote him and said we need to kill all those people who are killing to spread slavery.  Lincoln wrote back -- do you know what he wrote?

No. You don't.

YOu need to understand the facts of 1846, who killed who, who tortured who, what did Southern leaders brag about and do -- to understand Lincoln.  And if you don't know that, you really don't know shit.

You came to the right place, because I will tell you the things commonly known then -- commonly  bragged about by the Southern leaders -- that you never heard of. 

Not only did Frederick Douglass claim Lincoln was "radical" to end slavery -Lincoln's enemies, including Jeff Davis, said so too. Emphatically. Repeatedly.



Stephen A Douglas, called Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and "The worst kind of abolitionist."  He said it repeatedly, at length and in context.     Maybe the most emphatic Douglas (Stephen A Douglas) got, was in Charleston Illinois, during the famous Lincoln Douglas debates.  There, Douglas went from side to side of the stage SHOUTING, with great clarity and volume, spitting out the words, a reporter said, that "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers". 

And it worked. Douglas won that election -- and would have beaten Lincoln again, using the same "Nigger lover" approach, but this time, four people ran, Lincoln was the only one against slavery.  The pro slavery candidates divided up the 60% of the vote.  


What did Douglass know -- that would make him say Lincoln was swift, radical, zealous and deternined to end slavery?   

Turns out -- Douglass knew what the fuck was going on.

   You probably do not, if you were educated by US text books, and US teachers.  Most do not seem to have a fucking clue what was going on.

Like these "details"

1)  Southern War ULtimatums.    There is not a single text book in the US that even mentions Southern War Ultimatums, issued in 1861, and reported proudly in Richmond Newspapers as "THE TRUE ISSUE".    





Not one of the "scholars" or dumb asses who trash or belittle Lincoln ever -- ever -- ever -- mention why Lincoln got back into politics, and who was killing and torturing who, from 1856 on.

Very basic -- Southern War Ultimatums and their killing sprees, not only to spread slavery, but to silence anyone speaking against slavery, even in free states, is something these bastards simply omit.  

Or -- the sneakiest bastard in this regard, is Southern apologist and Jeff Davis apologist, James McPherson.   Yes, McPHerson has never written an honest sentence, much less paragraph or book, about Southern leaders -- their bragging, ISIS like, of torture, they bragged of killing. Jeff Davis paid over 1000 Texas killers to invade KS.  The way McPherson writes about these facts - there was "disagreement"  that "led to violence",

What the fuck?   Davis hires 1000 killers when he was Secretary of War, sends them to Kansas, led by US Senator David Rice Atchison, who there, in Kansas, boasts out the ass he is there to kill and torture to spread slavery, and McPherson tells you that by saying things like "disagreement". 

Fucking ass wipe.

McPherson briefly mentions -- but never makes it clear -- what Southern War Ultimatums were.  Not one word about Southern leaders  -- including Davis, bragging or justifying the killing sprees, killing sprees not only to spread slavery, but to silence all opposition to slavery.

The fact is, people were being killed -- and Lincoln eventually would be killed -- for speaking for equality for blacks.   These same folks who trash Lincoln never tell you even that much, that Booth changed his mind from kidnap to kill, when he heard Lincoln speak about voting rights for blacks.


Are not historians supposed to tell you what  happened -- and for the Civil War, who killed who, and why, is basic.  Get that right then add all the bullshit you want.

These guys don't get the basics right, they just lay on the bullshit. 
Seriously, how the FUCK do you leave out Southern War ULtimatums -- war ultimatums that were not only spoken proudly, and headlines in Southern papers then, but acted on - Southern leaders killed and tortured BECAUSE some people refused to obey their War ULtimatums.

Did you know that -- ever hear of that?  FUCK NO.

But that is just tip of iceberg.

2) Lincoln was called "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" more times than he could count.   Douglass knew the hatred and fear in the NORTH that Lincoln had to deal with.   Lincoln's friend -- and hundreds of others -- had been killed  or tortured or jailed for speaking too bluntly about equality.    You have never been told any of that. But it was common knowledge then -- and Southern leaders were PROUD of the violence against anyone who even spoke about equality.

Did you know that? Did you know people were still being killed, for speaking against slavery in the US,  up to and through the US Civil War?

No -- you had no fucking idea. Your history teacher never told you because they don't know.  But Douglass knew -- everyone knew how violent the pro slavery lunatics were, North and South.

WTF?  LIncoln radical to end slavery???

WTF  Lincoln zealous?

WTF  Lincoln swift?


  Douglass has to be stupid.  Did he not  hear about that letter to Greeley? Lincoln was keeping the UNION together!

  Did Douglass not know those 10 sentences (picked out of 3000 speeches )?     


See, Douglas knew things your "history teacher"  never mentioned,  like how Lincoln was called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshipper"   who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers."

Douglass was no one's fool --  saw women whipped to death, chased to Europe, became the most famous AMERICAN in Europe for years,  and focused his entire life on slavery and equality for blacks.

Douglass also knew the situation -- he knew Lincoln's political enemies..

Mostly, Douglass knew that most white men would not walk across the street to piss on a black man -- and that white men were scared shitless that black men would, to be blunt, take the white women.   That's now how historians would tell you, but that's exactly what was going on.

Over -- and over -- and over -- Lincoln was accused of WANTING your daughter to sleep with black men.

No one told you that.  And that was what Lincoln got from Stephen A Douglas, openly, repeately, in the Lincoln Douglas debates!!  Not some sly comment in private, but as loudly and proudly as Stephen A Douglas could shout, that is what he shouted. Lincoln. Wants. Your. Daughters. To Sleep With. Niggers.

That is what Stephen A Douglas said, and there is not a single US text book that has the balls to tell you.

In the South, from Lincoln's Southern enemies, it was even worse, if possible. Lincoln will destroy the WHITE RACE by having your daughters sleep with "Niggers".

This entire aspect of our history is whitewashed -- not even mentioned.  Yet it was the heart and soul of the hatred of Lincoln.

So when Lincoln got up to speak, Stephen Douglas had just incited the crowd to hate Lincoln. Lincoln had to respond -- and he did, very powerfully, too.

But you have to get Lincoln's FULL quotes so you wont be so stupid.  US "historians" like Foner, McPherson, and others,  have never done that -- no, they have not. Instead these cowardly bastards try to tell you LIncoln was not "really" against slavery or some such drivel.

Fucking hell, someone should bitch slap those bastards, because no one kicked slavery in the ass like Lincoln. Lincoln used his words very carefully -- and wisely.   Yes he parsed his words, so you can take him out of context like most dumb asses, and many "historians" do.

But if you learn ALL his words, and mostly his actions, Frederick Douglass was right. Lincoln was radical. Lincoln was zealous. Lincoln was swift. 

To put it bluntly, Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass sideways like a mother fucker.   It's time people realized that.  



Telling folks that Lincoln wants  your daughters to sleep with and marry with "Niggers"  was Stephen Douglas way of trying to scare the shit out of Lincoln.

It worked. 

  Lincoln had to parse words -- but even when parsing words, Lincoln brought down the thunder.  Years later people could edit quotes, chop apart this, remove the context, and make Lincoln seem horrible.

No one left a Lincoln speech or debate with any confusion whatsoever.   No one walked away and  was confused.

You'd have to read Lincoln's full speeches -- in context.   And learn his actions, 1846 on.  


Did you know Lincoln was called "the WORST type of abolitionist" by  Southern leaders?  No.

Did you know that blacks were killed in the South, when Lincoln simply gave his "House Divided" speech -- where he said slavery had to end, or the Union had to end.

And Lincoln said -- the Union will NOT end.  Southern leaders went bat shit. Did anyone ever tell you that?   Southern leaders called this an "ACT OF WAR"  that Lincoln, then a Senate candidate, would dare say the Union or slavery would last, but not both. One would have to go.

No one ever told you that, did they?

Did you know Lincoln's friend was killed -- burned to death -- for writing a newspaper against slavery, in IL?  No.

Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas, where people were still being killed for speaking against slavery, and there, spoke against slavery?   No.

These are the kinds of things Frederick Douglass knew very well, and you never heard of.


 Do you know who accused Lincoln, to his face, in front of white crowds, that Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

No -- but Douglass knew.

In fact, Lincoln was lucky he was not shot a lot sooner.  Bet you didn't know that, either.

Did your your  history teacher ever tell you that Stephen A Douglas, again and again, to Lincoln's  face, and in other speeches, told the public Lincoln was obsessed with equality, and wants your daughter to sleep with and marry with Niggers.

No, your history teacher never told you a word about that. Probably has no clue.

Douglas (Stephen A Douglas) also insisted blacks were not even human beings -- not people, but property.   Therefore, Douglas said, Kansas could not reject slavery.  Later, Douglas had to change that line of insanity, but only after it backfired on him, and his train was met by large angry crowds, in city after city, from Boston to Chicago.

Bet your history teacher never mention that to you, either.

That's all been white washed, but was reported at the time very clearly, in papers at the time.

Lincoln wants your WIFE to walk down the street with "Niggers". 

New York papers called Lincoln the "Negro Worshiper".

No one ever told you that.  And much much.


 Douglas knew Lincoln was lucky he didn't get a bullet to the brain SOONER for his radical (yes radical, we show you) message to the public.

People today have no fucking clue how violent Southern folks, and Southern sympathizers were.  US Senator was beat on the floor of the Senate for speaking of things I tell you here.

Your history teacher SHOULD have told you -- 


You probably do not know -- your history teacher probably does not know either -- that blacks were being burned to death, and whites hung, for being against slavery.

Did your teacher ever mention that in all Southern states, and in Kansas, you could be arrested, tortured, and put in jail for just owning the wrong book? Hell no. You could be arrested and tortured for publishing anti-slavery pamplets?

Did anyone tell you that? FUCK NO.  And Lincoln went to Kansas and spoke against slavery, at a time doing so was illegal.

No one told you that, did they?

Hell no. 

Guess who knew all this -- and much more?

Frederick Douglass.

Guess who didn't know this -- YOU.  And likely your history teacher had no clue either.


It's only slightely overstating it, to say that at the time, in many areas (Southern Illinois one of those areas)  to be called an abolitionist was like today being called a child molester.

John Palmer, LIncoln's friend, wrote about this as an older man, saying that people of that day (1890) had no concept that just 30 years ago, abolitionist was a vile term in much of the US.  

No one, in fact, went were Lincoln did, and when Lincoln did, speaking as powerfully as Lincoln did. 

And if your history books weren't so full of bullshit, your text books would show you why both -- both -- Frederick Douglas and Stephen A Douglas called Lincoln radical.


Lincoln's basic message was -- keep the Union together, that will over time end slavery.  Slavery was a cancer, and Southern killing sprees, Southern War Ultimatums, were all about spreading slavery.  Stop that spread, and that has to end slavery.

No one -- absolutely no one -- seriously suggested the North should invade the South to end slavery by force.  First, there were not 100 men in the North that would try such a thing.   Southern leaders jumped up and down and accused Lincoln of that, saying if they could stop the spread of slavery, they could stop slavery where it already existed.

Stephen A Douglas, in the debates  called Lincoln, to his face "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and told the crowds "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with, and marry with, Niggers" 

Over and over -- in high school and college  history courses, the same crap -- Lincoln didn't really care about slavery. Lincoln was ambivalent.  Lincoln "evolved".  Lincoln was racist and wanted blacks to go back to Africa...   Lincoln used slavery to get public sentiment on his side for political purposes.


Yes, you can take a sentence here, and there, and make Lincoln seem anyway you like.  That's the game often played.

Sometimes Lincoln haters repeat quotes that leave out certain words,  but Lincoln DID say things that, taken out of context, make him look horrible.

But get all the words -- and more, get context, and Lincoln's actions, and you will see, Douglas, Douglass, and Jeff Davis were all correct: Lincoln really was a radical abolitionist.





Hundreds of times, Lincoln began 

And get the full words.   Lincoln was often very careful how he said something.

Lincoln's basic approach was to FIRST mollify a crowd, most of whom either hated blacks, feared black men "being with" their wives and daughters, or at best, did not give a shit.

Again, and again, and again -- hundreds times, Lincoln "set up" his powerful words for equality under the law, by seeming to agree with a basic fear or prejudice of the day.  So yes, if you get the quote from that part of his speech, and don't give the full words, scum sucking pigs can, have, and will continue to make Lincoln look horrible.

But get the FULL speech, in context.  You won't be fooled by the lying bastards, or those that repeat that bullshit.

When Lincoln went further, however, he kicked ass, he mowed down the sentiment he just seemed to agree with.

We MAY not be perfectly equal, Lincoln said, in COLOR. No duh.  PERHAPS we are not equal in intelligence.  

Lincoln's full message was this --    in our natural rights, protected by the Declaration of Independence any black person, no matter  how low, is equal to any white woman, no matter how high.

THese fucktards have taken part of Lincoln's words  -- deliberately ignored the full speech, and more, the full context.

Southerners,  -- you probably don't know this -- hated Lincoln because he was "the worst sort of abolitionist"  who deceived the public by claiming to be first for stopping the SPREAD of slavery.

Make no mistake, Southern leaders said Lincoln WAS "the worst sort" of abolitionist"

But Southern leaders shouted as loudly as they could -- Lincoln was not just a "Negro Worshipper"  but that Lincoln wanted to end the spread of slavery because Lincoln knew that would kill slavery where it was.

Do not believe Lincoln, they said. He may focus on stopping the spread of slavery -- but he is actually going to kill slavery, as soon as he can.  Keeping slavery from expanding will destroy the white race, and Lincoln knows it.


And they were right. 


Lincoln was hated -- at the time - for being a "Nigger lover"  who was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  And he was killed for his speech about voting rights for blacks.

Lincoln would probably laugh, if you told him 150 years from now, people will claim he was not really against slavery.  Or that he just used opposition to slavery to win political favor in the North.

People in the North did not, by and large, give a shit about slavery, and sure as hell were not going to fight to free anyone.   The South were the "tough guys".   They were violent, and threatening, and beating up US Senators. They were torturing slaves, promising spread of slavery in their War Ultimatums.  

Most people in the North would not walk across the street to piss on a slave.   Lincoln had to be very careful how he spoke.

There are books -- by "experts"---- who tell you Lincoln didn't care about blacks or slavery.   

Or that Lincoln brought slavery as an issue only late in the war.

Or that Lincoln only used ending slavery as political issue because it was popular (idiots, Lincoln lost elections and was eventually shot in the head because ending slavery was NOT popular.)

Others, seemingly "scholarly" books claim Lincoln was "reluctant" to end slavery and that really,  he wanted to send all blacks to Africa.
BTW - no, Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were not personal friends.  Lincoln hated him, with reason.   Lincoln knew full well Douglas duplicity in working with Jeff Davis and Davis Rice Atchison to spread slavery, but that's another story.

No one tells you -- have they - how dangerous it was for Lincoln to say many of the radical things he said. You are not told how radical Lincoln was -- for his time and place,  no one was more radical.

Even in books ABOUT Lincoln-Douglas debates, such as by David Zarefsky, somehow completely ignore Douglas amazing calls to, essentially, violence against Lincoln, which Lincoln handled well, using humor. 

For example, did you know Lincoln was hated  -- North and South -- by millions of people because, as some claimed he was a "Nigger Lover"  and a "Negro Worshipper"? 

  New York papers showed him as a goofy "Negro Worshipper"   and Stephen A Douglas told crowds, as Lincoln stood there, that "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with and marry with Niggers"

No one ever told you that did they?

ANd there is much, much more. 



We all know -- no one would be at all surprised -- that people cherry pick the bible. A few words here, tie it to a few word there, and you can make the bible say anything you want.

Same with Lincoln's 3000 speeches, and his letter to Greeley.

But get ALL of Lincoln's speeches, all of his letters,  in context, and more, his actions, and no one comes close, in being as effective and powerful as Lincoln.


The only white person more radical than Lincoln -- according to Frederick Douglass -- was John Brown.   And John Brown's approach got him captured in about 2 hours, and hung in two weeks.

Worse -- John Brown's raid actually militarized the South and gave the most extreme folks like Robert Toombs justification for their crowd pleasing hate mongering.  Frederick Douglass - a good friend of John Brown -- said Brown's raid hurt, and did  not help, the abolition cause.

Lincoln's was as radical - but smarter.  Lincoln had to speak more carefully, especially when and where he was.

Lincoln gave over 3000 speeches, and by leaving out his full speech, his full meanings, you can make Lincoln say anything you want -- as we show.

 Some of these idiots even claim Lincoln had slaves and that the South was anti slavery, Lincoln was pro slavery.  


Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed for being outspoken against slavery. 

Lincoln himself did get a bullet in the brain, after his speech about voting rights for blacks, when Booth changed his plan, because he heard that speech, from kidnap to kill.

Gee -- your "history" teacher never mentioned that.

Guess who knew all this, and more??

Not your history teacher. 

Frederick Douglass knew it.   


You can take edited out of context quotes, and many do.  Play those word games, if you want, but get all the words -- and all the actions.

Lincoln was lucky he didn't get the bullet in the brain much sooner.

Otherwise, the dialog is nearly verbatim, and show in context, with the meaning of both men faithfully expressed.

According to newspaper reports at the time, in two cities (Quincy and Charleston) Douglas spit the word "Nigger" out, with great emphasis

There is no mention of this in any US history text book, college or high school.   So how else would you know?  We got this from newspapers at the time -- and the speeches by Southern leaders, and Frederick Douglass,  at the time. 





Also  no mention that Lincoln operated in  time ENTIRELY under the Supreme Court order -- yes order -- that blacks were not human beings, not persons.  

That's another basic thing Douglass knew well -- everyone knew it.

But people today, do not.  

Dred Scott decision was far more vile than your history teacher probably bothered to mention. Douglas called Lincoln a traitor for even claiming blacks were human beings, BECAUSE the Supreme Court had ruled they were not human beings. 

That was Stephen Douglas logic -- and Jeff Davis.

The US Supreme Court had ruled blacks are not human beings. See below. NOT persons. Specifically -- by order -- NOT persons.

It did not suggest it -- did not mention it. The Court ORDERED it. Expressly ORDERED that.  

Most  history teachers look at you like you are out of your mind when you tell them. Then, you show them the decision, and how Jeff Davis/ Stephen Douglas used Dred Scott, and how they hated Lincoln for saying blacks WERE human and should entitled to all rights in the Constitution.
When you show them that -- clearly they never heard of such a thing --they act like they knew that.  They didn't know shit.

Douglas would pump Lincoln up as some kind of lunatic who WANTED - WANTED your daughters sleep with "NIGGERS"  as you will see.

That was in addition to his supposed "radical abolitionist" stance of claiming blacks should have all rights of Declaration of Independence.

By the way, the United States Supreme Court- - and Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly said the Declaration of Independence was "unconstitutional".  Another thing you never heard. In long drawn out speeches, the Declaration of Independence was unconstitutional.   Gee,  the things your "history teacher" forgets to mention.

After being called Nigger lover.  Lincoln was hit with all this.

After telling the crowd Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

After telling the crowd Lincoln was a radical abolitionist,
Lincoln had to get up and speak. 

Unless you know that -- and few people do -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, or Douglas, or what led up to the Civil War.



No one ever told you that. Frederick Douglass knew it, and much, much more.




   Measuring Lincoln by the "sentiment of his country"   Lincoln was swift,  zealous radical and determined.  

Douglass also knew Lincoln was not King.  He could, for example, end slavery be decree, or he would have.

Douglass also knew -- as did everyone alive in 1862, that Lincoln had to keep the border states in the Union.

If Lincoln did not keep those border states in the Union, the war is over.   The CSA  would be 3 times larger than USA.   

So Lincoln wrote that letter -- about Union.

Lincoln was called "Negro Worshipper"   and "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  by Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly and to his face, in the debates.

When not in debates, Douglas accused LIncoln of being a traitor -- literally a traitor -- to the United States, for the crime of claiming blacks were human beings, and as such entitled to all the rights in the Declaration of Independence.

This was in "direct violation"  of the United State's Surpreme Court ruling that blacks were not even human beings, not persons.  The court -- as you will see below - affirmatively ordered, yes ordered, that blacks will NOT be seen as human beings (not persons).

As property, blacks are indistinguishable to dogs or bucket or a load of hay. They have no rights

 The person owning them has the rights. And slavery shall therefore, by a second order in the same decision, the federal government will protect slavery, even in areas that voted 95% against slavery.

That's right. There were two orders of the court, in Dred Scott. One, that blacks are not human beings, not persons. Two, that it did not matter at all, that 95% of the people in KS were against slavery, as they were, and as they voted.

That Lincoln would dare disagree with that -- Douglas said he was a traitor. And "obsessed with equality for the N*gger"

This was the reality of the life in 1858.   Both for Lincoln -- and for Jeff Davis.

 Jeff Davis, of course, was thrilled with Kansas Act and  Dred Scott court orders. He sent Atchison to Kansas, and got reports of how the killing was going.


And contrary to what some tell you (like Erik Foner)  no, Dred Scott was NOT about citizenship and a "rather narrow ruling".

Foner insists that Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling" about citizenship and Congress's ability to decide slavery in Kansas.

Oh shit.  Far more drastic.

Blacks are NOT HUMAN beings.  Eric "forgot" to mention that, though LIncoln, and Davis, and the decision itself makes that clear.


 Did Frederick Douglass just need to learn about Lincoln's letter to Greeley?    No -- he published Lincoln's letter to Greeley.

Did Frederick Douglass just need to learn about those quotes from Lincoln in Charleston, and elsewhere?

No, Douglass knew those quotes very well.


 Douglass knew the full story -- not the selected bullshit so many people spout today, out of stupidity and or out of hatred even now of "The War Of Northern Aggression".

Sadly it is not just Southern apologist who claim Lincoln "didnt really care"   The slanted out of context bullshit is repeated so much, people believe the distoms 


But when you see ALL Lincoln said, and know how Douglas was saying LIncoln wanted your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  - no one in their right mind was confused.  

Lincoln did say -- she is "CERTAINLY NOT MY EQUAL IN CERTAIN RESPECTS"  . That's the part  quote.

 . That's the part  quote.

. That's the part  quote.

. That's the part  quote.

  But then he would reverse course and bring the thunder in the opposite direction.  


The equal of  any man.

The equal of every man.  IN her natural right -- in her rights under the Declaration of Independence -- she IS my equal. And the equal of any man.

That is a perfect metaphor for the tortured RHETORIC position Lincoln had to take.  The word game he had to play.

Try to grasp that.

No one ever left a Lincoln speech confused at all. He was FOR equality of the races under the law. Radically so. Profoundly so.

And his full actions, full speeches, make that clear.

His enemies -- to his face -- said he was a Nigger lover who wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

His friend -- Lovejoy -- was killed for abolition statements.

Others were killed for abolition statements.  It was STILL illegal in 12 states to even give speeches like LIncoln gave.   And it was dangerous to speak too bluntly to people where LIncoln spoke.

The amazing thing about Lincoln is how powerful he was -- but you need to read the FULL speeches. And know what was going on.



The famous abolitionist did NOT speak where LIncoln did, when  he did. They stayed in Maine, New York,  Chicago,  and spoke to crowds that already agreed with them. 

People paid to hear them, no one paid Lincoln. But that was a minority of people that would turn out to hear abolitionist speakers.

This was no secret then. It's just glossed over now.





Stephen A Douglas. 

Lincoln would have been arrested in South
Some in the North wanted him arrested 

If you believe Lincoln, "our fate will be that of whites in St.Domingo"  -- whites were killed by revolting slaves there, an event everyone was well aware of.

When they accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers," and told the crowds Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race --  Lincoln was actually in danger, and would eventually get killed, get the bullet in the brain, because he was for equality, NOT because he was against it.

Lincoln responded --with humor and dignity, quite a trick when the other guy is more or less urging the crowd to hate and violence.

Yes, Stephen A Douglas was pro violence, he had a role in the beating of fellow Senator Sumner, laughing at him as he was beat, and predicting he would be beaten that day, earlier.  It's likely Douglas and others planned for Sumner to be beaten the floor of the Senate that day, according to people there.

Lincoln did sometimes parse words -- but no matter how respectfully and carefully Lincoln would say things, haters like Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, and dozens of Northern Congressmen would attack him anyway, pump up the fear anyway.

Still, Lincoln had to parse words.  If he had said "Hell yes, any black woman is equal to you idiots"  he would have been shot.

But he did say -- any black woman is equal to any white man, in a way you never  hear about. Instead, they misquote Lincoln, omit the stunning statement and actions FOR equality, from 1846 on.



In fact, there Northern Congressmen who wanted Lincoln ARRESTED -- let me repeat that -- ARRESTED -- if he even said the words slavery should end, so the war could end.   They wanted to end the war, but keep slavery.

Lincoln said no.

And Lincoln had long history of kicking slavery in the ass. He stood up to President Polk, when he was a Congressmen, and called him out for stealing land from Mexico - - in order to spread slavery.  No one told you that, did they?

Lincoln also tried to get slavery outlawed in DC, as a Congressmen.

Lincoln tried 40 times to get Wilmot Proviso passed, to keep slavery out of the newly stolen territory, stolen by Polk and the US military, to spread slavery.

Gee - for a guy who didn't care, he sure spent 1846 to his death in a funny way.




What Lincoln "evolved" on was not slavery, but his ability to kill it. 

In 1861, most whites would not piss on a black person if they were on fire, much less go to war to end slavery.

The governor of Georgia said freeing the slaves would mean blacks and whites would live together contrary to the will of GOD, and nature.  And black men would  be able to talk to white women.   That was not allowed before.  Did you know that. 

No one told you that, did they?


Douglass  knew all this. And he knew Lincoln got up and blasted slavery -- again and again, as Stephen A Douglas said "repeatedly, over and over"  LIncoln spoke about equality for the the "Nigger".


Making fun of Lincoln for saying blacks were equal to whites. 


As a result, Lincoln had to parse words, which he did artfully.  His FULL quotes are quite amazing, and his actions, even more so.

Frederick Douglass was well aware of LIncoln's quotes -- and his FULL speeches, where Lincoln brought down the power.   Compared to anyone -- anyone -- where Lincoln was, when Lincoln was, speaking to whom Lincoln spoke to, no one else came close.

He was radical.  Yes, at times he parsed words, but the overall message he gave was one that stunned those who heard.  Lincoln effectively changed the course of the  nation, with those words. 


Yes,  Lincoln did not talk about Union -- in that week of 1862, those four states were about to go to the Confederacy, because John Fremont declared slaves in Missouri free, on his own authority.  

Instantly people in the border states  had extra reason to join the Confederacy.  And if they did  and the war is over.   There would only be a few states in the Union, against an overwhelming number of states in secession.

The South wins. And as the South promised, they would spread slavery.

Lincoln DID say he was trying to save the Union. No kidding. Wisely so.

But he ALSO said saving the Union was the way to end slavery.  Douglass knew that.  The House Divided Speech was about that -- about keeping Union together to end slavery.

If the Union stayed together, Lincoln said, slavery would end.  If the Union did not stay together, slavery would spread to all of the US.


 Southern leaders said Lincoln would destroy the white race -- just by refusing to spread slavery into the West against popular sovereignty.   Kansas had voted 95% against slavery -- yet (see below for proof) Southern War ultimatums were that Kansas must accept and respect slavery. 


Stephen A Douglas , and Southern leaders, said such things for a reason --  it worked. It worked to make people hateful and fearful.   Your history text books -- not even movies about slavery -- show this aspect.

Any "Western" politician (Illinois was considered west, then) who dared to be against slavery, even just against the spread of slavery, had to be very careful what they said.

No one ever told you that, did they?


  Douglass knew the whole story.  Not just the bits and pieces your are fed. 




Douglas (one s) claimed Lincoln was a "traitor" for just saying blacks and whites should be equal under the law, because Dred Scott decision said blacks were not even  human beings (not persons) but property.

Lincoln -- and many others -- had exposed Dred Scott as a way to force slavery into all of the US.  Speeches by Southern leaders verify this, they did in fact use Dred Scott decision to justify spread of slavery into rest of the US.

Douglass knew that too.



Obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"?   Huh?

It was not just Douglas (Stephen A)  that claimed Lincoln would have white women sleep with and marry blacks.   There were dozens of Northern papers, including New York papers, that ridiculed Lincoln for claiming blacks were equal to whites.

Oh - -I know, I know --  you heard the edited quotes, which were true, but out of context.  Lincoln said a LOT  of things - -- as he had to, but he was radical as hell, for his time and place.  


Lincoln was "out there" on equality-- and said so, if you get all the quotes.  This was not a word game, but if you want to play the Lincoln word game, get all his words.

Yes, he parsed words. There are a dozen of so times, Lincoln parsed words so much, his advisors were disappointed.  Like in Charleston Illinois -- but  Stephen A Douglas had just spoken, and went from side to side on the stage, calling Lincoln the usual "Nigger" stuff, but even more so now.



Douglas was extremely good at getting crowds whipped into a frenzy.   

 You may not now know,  Douglas was all but inciting hate -- he kept mentioning Lovejoy/  You probably don't even know who Lovejoy was.

Lovejoy was killed by a mob in Illinois, for being too outspoken against slavery.    When Douglas brought  up Lovejoy's name - which he did repeatedly -- Douglas was pumping up the hate. Tying Lincoln to his friend Lovejoy was good politics for Douglas, and dangerous for Lincoln/

But more that Lovejoy -- Douglas said outright -- Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers. Most newspapers and all history books have cleaned that up.  

One paper -- in Quincy and another in Charleston -- reported how mean Douglas was when he 'went into the Nigger stuff'.   He did not just say it,  he shouted it, he had drool coming down his lip.   He went side to side, shouting it.

Since you have no idea of this --  and you only know part of Lincoln's FULL speeches and quotes -- it's easy to come to exactly opposite conclusion.

Lincoln knew those people in Illinois, particularly  central Illinois, where LIncoln travelled extensively, day in, day out, for years.

Lincoln could use humor to defuse Douglas rants about wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers".

Lincoln would have been arrested if he travelled South -- it was illegal, a crime (you didn't know this either) to speak publically against slavery in the South.




Yes, at TIMES Lincoln parsed words.  But he kicked ass anyway, even when he parsed words  

It's common for stupid people -- and sadly, even common for some "historians" -- to just take the parts of Lincoln speeches where he parsed words.

They run like cowards from words -- AND ACTIONS-- where Lincoln kicked ass. 

Lincoln STILL said blacks should have equal rights under the Constitution, even though Douglas was all but physically accosting him for it. Any black person -- no matter how low in social status, no matter how dark their skin - was EQUAL TO ANY MAN. 

WAS EQUAL TO ANY MAN. The lowest of the low in social order of the time, was equal, Lincoln said to the highest of the high in their rights under the Constitution.

Why leave that out?  Fucking ass wipe lying pieces of shit, thats why.

Again, and again, and again, Douglas would tell the public Lincoln was "revolutionary"  and a "traitor" for saying blacks and whites are equal under the law, when Dred Scott decision said otherwise.


 Lincoln was  in a dangerous world for abolitionist -- in fact, the term abolitionist was a vile term at the time, North and South, to most people.  

WE consider "abolitionist" as good, now.   But  95% of the white public did not. 

  Forty  years later,  in 1890's, people writing about that time, would try to explain this. Abolitionist was like calling someone a pervert, or that they wanted your daughters to "be with"  Niggers.

   In Kansas, Southerners bragged about killing every abolitionist they could find!  You could be killed, even in Kansas, even in IL, for being too "abolitionist".

   Lincoln, of course, got a bullet to the brain, after Booth heard his speech about voting rights for blacks.

So, no kidding, Lincoln avoided that term. He would have been killed much sooner, if he did  not.

  Stephen Douglas claimed Lincoln cared more about the Negro than he did about his own race. 



You just know a small part of it, now. 

So tell me, was Frederick Doulgass stupid?

Should he have just listened to your high school teacher for 10 minutes?   Maybe read that letter to Greeley?

Consider this -- Lincoln was not the only white person to die, for being too radical for equality. He is just the best known.  It's a shame people are  now so stupid they often claim Lincoln "did not care"  or was not "really" against slavery.




  Don't pretend you knew this already


If you think you know history, and you do not know that from 1857 until just before Lincoln was killed, that officially, by order of the US Supreme Court, blacks were not human beings -- you don't know shit about Abraham Lincoln.

It's not your fault you don't know.   But Lincoln knew. Douglass knew.  Most of the country knew this. 

Small sentences.  Big wars.  

That whole "by order of the court"  that blacks are not  human beings -- you never heard that, did you?

Yes, see more below.   

Stupidly, again and again, in every US text book we have seen, and by "historians" like Eric Foner,  this is glossed over.  Foner inexplicably claims Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling" about "citizenship".

Citizenship? Jesus, do you Orwell much?   It was whether blacks were human beings, or not. The court said NO -- specifically they are property. They are to be seen as property.

They are "SO INFERIOR"  no white man could possibly think blacks are in the same caste (Jefferson Davis said blacks are in a different caste, delivered by God to be enslaved).

But at the time, this was BFD, the BIGGEST BFD. 

Douglas again, and again, and again -- dozens of times, both face to face with Lincoln, and by himself, degraded Lincoln for his obsession for equality of these "inferior beings".

Did you know that? HELL NO. You do not know that. Don't pretend you ever even heard of it.  Because this information is not in any US text book.  You have to read the Dred Scott decision itself, and newspapers books and speeches at the time -- how Jeff Davis and the South used Dred Scott to justify their killing sprees into Kansas.  And how they justified their War Ultimatums -- see below -- on Dred Scott.

Narrow ruling, said Foner?  Unreal.  Jefferson Davis and Abe Lincoln sure as hell didn't think it was a narrow ruling.     

Why the hell do you think LIncoln explained this about 50 times, in his House Divided Speech and elsewhere?  Do you think he was kidding?  

If Dred Scott held, there was no way to stop the spread of slavery into free states. No,Lincoln was not wrong.

In fact, Southern War ULtimatums prove LIncoln was not wrong.  Southern War ultimatums demanded Kansas -- already a free state by then -- must accept and respect slavery.

You had no clue about that either, did you?   Yes, Southern WAR ULTIMATUMS demanded a free state accept and respect slavery.  Kind of a big deal.

Another basic fact, overlooked in US textbooks.


Lincoln and Jefferson Davis did not agree on much.

But they both agreed, and said, Dred Scott changed everything Because of Dred Scott's order (yes order) that blacks are not to be seen as human beings (as persons) but property,  AND because Dred Scott order (yes order) that the fed government actually protect slavery, even in places is was rejected (like Kansas), there was no way to stop the spread of slavery.

This is what Lincoln said in House Divided.   It was nothing unusual -- hundreds of others had pointed it out -- including Jeff Davis and Southern leaders.    Of course, the South boasted of it. 

Lincoln decried the decision and got the 13th Amendment to supercede it. Most "history" teachers can not even tell you why LIncoln needed the 13th Amendment. The answer, was to get rid of Dred Scott decision. 

Dred Scott was  "logic" behind Southern war ultimatums, too, that appeared in Richmond newspaper headlines just before the Civil War (as you know it) started.  See more about Southern War Ultimatums.

So the Dred Scott decision was perfect -- and as Lincoln pointed out -- made that way, like a machine -- to spread slavery where it was impossible to spread slavery before.   Now, because of Dred Scott, it no longer mattered one iota if the people of Kansas rejected slavery 95% or  not. 

The Southern War Ultimatums were specific -- Kansas must accept and respect slavery. Why?  The Dred Scott decision.

So no, Lincoln was not wrong. 

He knew what the fuck he was talking about, and so did Jefferson Davis. .

I can't help it, that you don't know.  This is exactly what leaders on BOTH sides were saying -- Lincoln in the North, and Jeff Davis in the South.  Not kinda, not sorta, not in away.   This is exactly what they were saying. 

Short of renting billboard space on your ass, Lincoln could not make it any more clear.  Likewise, Davis made it clear.  

Dred Scott changed everything Davis said. Dred Scott ordered blacks to be property, and the federal government protect it.

How the hell do people not know this most basic thing? That Dred Scott court ordered blacks to be seen as not human beings (not persons).   

More importantly -- the South used this decision to justify killing and spreading slavery.  Over, and over, and over, Southern speakers, documents and newspapers referred to Dred Scott as the authority of them to put slavery wherever they wanted. 

And they wanted it -- in Kansas and all the way west -- even though Kansas voted against slavery 95%.

Southern War Ultimatums were about one thing -- spreading slavery.  

You had no clue, 30 seconds ago, that was even an issue.

Here is where most people (especially history teachers) pretend they knew.

If you don't know why Lincoln would be called a traitor, then you don't know enough about Lincoln, the Civil War, or Stephen A Douglas.




Lincoln would get a bullet to the brain,  in 1865, for the same reason Stephen A Douglas repeatedly taunted LIncoln -- to his face - for his obsession for equality "for the Nigger".

Yes, no shit, Lincoln parsed words.  He parsed words about voting rights for blacks, too, after which Booth shot him anyway. 

I can't help it, you don't know. That's not my fault. If you have a degree in history, and you don't know this, go ask for your money back. It's that basic. 

Why would Stephen A Douglas call Lincoln a traitor- - because he was disagreeing with Dred Scott, "the law of the land"  said Stephen A Douglas.

And guess what -- DOUGLAS WON.  

Gee - there is a lot, lot more you don't know.

In fact,  Stephen A  Douglas went from side to side of the stage in Charleston IL, spitting out the word "nigger" claiming Lincoln "cared more about the Niggers that he did about his own country."

Newspapers in at least two cities-- Quincy and Charleston -- reported Douglas had clearly been drinking, by the anger he displayed when saying the word "Nigger".

Lincoln wants your wife and daughters to "be with" Niggers.

People feared -- white males sure as hell feared -- that black men would be free to move to Illinois (it was illegal for blacks to even move to Illinois at the time) and "be with" their daughters.

So Douglas stabbed this raw nerve, again, and again, and again.



Lincoln was called a traitor -- and "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  for daring to say in public blacks and whites ARE equal.   Yes, he said that time after time, in various ways.

Isolated facts -- TORN FROM THEIR CONNECTION?   In other words, out of context.

Ironically, Lincoln's enemies accused him of being far far too concerned with equality -- let slavery continue, just keep it down South, was the attitude in the North. 

Douglass told folks, as plainly as he knew how, that Lincoln was radical. We can't go by this quote or that, out of context.  Lincoln had to play this game -- he was not king.  He did parse words. 

But parsing words -- he STILL kicked ass, if you know all his words.

It's just not taught like this. 

Don't pretend you knew this already -- because 99% of the people we ask, have no clue about this basic fact.   If you don't understand this, you don't know shit about Lincoln or the Civil War

" Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with and marry with Niggers." 
"Mr. Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger."  


   The United States Supreme Court ruled blacks  
   were not human beings (not persons) under the
   law, and Lincoln was a "traitor" for saying otherwise.

The fact most people today have no clue whatsoever that when LIncon ran for US Senate, then President -- the Supreme Court had already ruled blacks are not human beings.

Lincoln spoke against this with power -- over and over and over. 

And you never heard of that, did you?

Slap your teacher for that. But there is much more





You don't know what Lincoln faced,  but Douglass did. 

 Lincoln got much grief and threats from people in the NORTH.  Lincoln's political enemies in the NORTH wanted him arrested, or gave speeches to that effect, if he even said slavery should end for the war to end. 

Southern leaders were even worse -- Lincoln will destroy the white race.   When you learn what kind of violence (yes violence) Lincoln faced, you wont be so stupid.   People were still being killed for speaking too bluntly, in the wrong place, for equality.  Yet read Lincolns full speeches -- he kicked ass on equality, when you know the full speeches. 

In fact, no one spoke more powerfully than Lincoln, for where, and when he was, while running for office.   It was one thing to speak in Maine or to select crowds in Massachusetts, Lincoln was radical as hell -- when you learn his full speeches -- in Illinois and Kansas. 

  Some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested for just saying slavery should end for the war to end. 

  Southern leaders claimed Lincoln's House Divided Speech was a "declaration of war" against the South. 

   Lincoln shot in the head after Booth heard his 
  speech about voting rights for blacks

  Lincoln's Southern enemies said he was going to 
 destroy the white race and was "the worst sort of

  Lincoln's friend Lovejoy  was killed by a mob in   IL for speaking too blunty against slavery

No text book in the US shows this aspect of hatred for Lincoln IN THE NORTH -- and how dangerous it was for him to speak.


Lincoln's claim that the Negro is equal to any white man in his rights under that law is treason -- he cares more for the Nigger than he cares for his own race....


 Bullet in the head - Lincoln's reward for   being "obsessed  with equality for the Nigger".

Lincoln could  have gotten that bullet in the brain much sooner, if he had been any more blunt, sooner.

Somehow, Lincoln is the bad guy?  Here Southern leaders are bragging about killing to spread slavery for God -- and Lincoln, is the bad guy?

Lincoln's NORTHERN enemies are jumping up and down claiming Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger -- and Lincoln is the bad guy?

Fucking hell -- there was no one, no one -- like Lincoln.  Yes, some others gave speeches, for money.  Or in Boston, or Maine.

Show me anyone who went to Kansas and spoke like Lincoln.  Show me anyone who went to Alton, or Charleston, and spoke to those crowds, like Lincoln did.

Lincoln's FULL speeches are amazing.  If you want to play word games, play it, dumb ass. If you want to know what was going on, read 1000 Southern newspapers and speeches, and see what Lincoln was up against.



Douglass (Frederick)  was not fooled by word games, played later.

More than anything, Douglass knew that Lincoln HAD to parse words at times.  People were still being killed -- and Douglass knew that -- for speaking too bluntly about equality.

 As Frederick Douglass said, "we did not judge him by stray utterances" -- because Douglass knew all of Lincoln's speeches, he knew the Lincoln DOuglas debates well -- he published much of LIncoln's words in his own newspaper.

Sure -- you can play word games.  Go on, lots of people do. But if you want to know why Frederick Douglas AND Stephen A Douglas both said Lincoln was a "radical,"  you can't play word games.
You have to know what happened. 


Yes,  Lincoln  had to parse words, but if he had not,  Stephen Douglas would have been president -- Douglas was Jeff Davis buddy.

There may have been no Civil War -- Stephen A Douglas was fine with spread of slavery into Kansas.  He defended Dred Scott decision out the ass, again and again.

Dred Scott decision was the LAW OF THE LAND, per DOuglas.

So if you don't know what Dred Scott was about (and most people do not) you don't know how fucking horrible it would be, if he were President.






Douglas even showed up in a rail car with a cannon on the back, and he would come out of his car, when the cannon went off.  He was big-- real big - on theatrics. 

His central message -- Mr Lincoln is dangerous.  

His other message -- Dred Scott decision is law of the land.

The words Douglas used to give that message: Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

The effect of those words -- Douglas won that election.

Do you grasp that -- or not?  Douglas won that election.

If not for Lincoln -- Douglas also wins POTUS in 1860


Governor Brown of Georgia wrote a long "open letter" - very famous at the time, saying how Lincoln was going to make whites live a "degraded existence"   and have your daughters "be with" and marry with, Negroes (at least he said Negroes, not niggers).

Lincoln would cause the death of the white race -- just by stopping the spread of slavery 




WTF?  No one told us that.  Obsessed for equality of "Niggers"?

Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the Negro -- New York papers called him once a "Negro Worshiper" -- lingo at the time for anyone against slavery.

Read the FULL speeches -- holy shit, he kicks ass.  And learn context.  

Whatever the reason, no one  left a Lincoln speech, a debate, confused at all........ Lincoln was determined to "put slavery on the path to extinction" --and then, he did exactly that. 

Lincoln's enemies -- and all of the Southern demagogues  -- were screaming bloody murder that Lincoln was dangerous,  and would either destroy the white race, or at least make your daughters and sons be "on equal terms" with the Negro.

Lincoln was actually kicking ass about equality for the races, and ending slavery, all along.  

Lincoln HAD to empathize Union for those four border states.  And did. It worked. 

We all know now, those four states stayed in the Union -- but no one knew then.

Only Lincoln reassuring those states -- he did that through the letter to Greeley -- did LIncoln satisfy them that they would not lose slavery this way.  Lincoln would even offer slave owners in Kentucky payment to end slavery, and some accepted.

Lincoln said slavery had to end by LEGAL means -- a Constitutional AMendment. But until then, Lincoln would be obliged to deal with slavery, as the Supreme Court ordered in Dred Scott. 

Lincoln had to get 13th Amendment passed, and he did that as soon as possible.  He could not just end slavery by legislation or Presidental order.

Even the Emancipation Proclamation was a temporary order -- once the slave states stopped being in rebellion, that order would go away. It was an order based on martial - war time -- law.  When the war was over, slavery would return.

Unless Lincoln could get an Amendment to the Constitution. So he did. 


But Lincoln, before, and after,  Dred Scott decision, spoke thousands of times about the need to get rid of slavery, and how slavery would take over the US, like a cancer, or  the Union would remain.

But he would get rid of slavery legally. Not by an illegal order, or by legislation. The Dred Scott decision meant even US Congress could not end slavery. Only -- only  -- a Constitutional Amendment would work.

So LIncoln did that.

He made that clear by House Divided Speech. And, he was right. One had to go -- because the South had been killing in Kansas, and passed the Kansas Act as a ruse to justify the killing, then got Southern scum to pass Dred Scott.

Lincoln was not blunt, he was clear, however.   The issue now was -- all slavery or all free.  And he was clear too, that came from Southern leaders pushing the fraud of Kansas Act, then Dred Scott.





No one told you this, either.

The nation thought slavery issue would die a "natural death" because it was bottled up in the South.   Slavery was killing the South overall -- most people were poor as hell.  Eventually slavery would die there, too.

But the spread  of slavery  -- like the spread of a cancer, kept it alive.

In 1854, the canard, the lie, of Kansas Act pushed slavery into Kansas --as you can tell by the man who got Kansas Act passed, David Rice Atchison, boasting about it. He boasted he got Kansas Act passed, then went immediately to Kansas and started his violent attack to prevent people in Kansas from rejecting slavery.

It almost worked.

But the men Atchison hired-- yes, he had to hire men -- almost killed and terrorized enough, to frighten the citizens into giving up rejecting slavery.   A man named John  Brown changed it -- a many often malighed today, but should be heroic.   As Southern leaders sent killers- - one killed  Brown's son -- and Brown the next day fought back.

Brown used the tactics Southern leaders used -- only, he used them on those that were killing and promising death to abolitionist.

Stupidly, your  history teacher probably tells you "there is plenty of blame to go around" - fucking bullshit.  The South sent paid killers, they killed and terrorized, and the citizens there were just supposed to line up and be killed?

That's how stupid it is to blame "both sides"  but to not piss off the Southern crybabies, not only do US text books not tell the basics about Southern leaders paid killers and killing sprees, they just call it "Trouble in Kansas"  and act as if both sides were "unreasonable":.

Shelby Foote is one of the bastards that uses this bullshit, but Southern apologist like Bruce Catton, James McPhersonm, Eric Foner, also, for varioius reasons, too punk ass to tell who killed who, and why, in Kansas,

Nor will any of them tell you about the candid truth of Kansas Act and Dred Scott, which LIncoln and Davis both cited as crucial to bring on US Civil War. Lincoln was belittling Kansas Act and Dred Scott as frauds intended to do exactly what South wanted -- spread slavery by force, justify the violence needed to spread slavery.
Davis own writing, in his own book, show the same thing -- he did in fact use Dred Scott and Kansas act as justification for Southern demands to spread slavery into Kansas, against states rights..

Lincoln was hated in the newspapers -- in the South -- for House Divided. House Divided is the speech ABOUT Dred Scott decision. Go read it!

 It was a in effect, said some in the South, a declaration of war against the South, saying slavery would end everywhere, or spread everywhere.

So when Lincoln did write the letter to Greeley (to the South, really, but via Greeley) he had already said repeatedly, 


When Lincoln's letter to Greeley is a prime example.

He actually wrote it to the Border States, which were going to join the Confederacy any day -- any hour.     The stupidity of Fremont in Kentucky gave slave owners what they needed -- see, Lincoln is going to free all the slaves and they will intermarry with  your white women.

Lincoln wrote it to Greeley, knowing very well by the next day or two, many Southern newspapers would print it.

If Lincoln does  not write that letter, or if it did not work (it worked)   the Civil War is over, and slavery spreads, per the War Ultimatums.   South had issued War ultimatums before the fighting started, demanding the spread of slavery.   

Mostly, those who trash Lincoln don't explain that many people alive in 1850's,thought blacks were more like monkeys that could talk -- not actual human beings.

Southern leaders BRAGGED blacks were subhuman, did you know that - or not? 

Southern leaders BRAGGED their "new nation" was based on the "great moral and scientific truth" that blacks were inferior beings, not human beings like whites.  

But Lincoln is the bad guy?



"Lincoln would have taken a bullet to the brain, much sooner than he did, if he was not careful what he said --what  good would a dead Lincoln do, in 1856?"


Yes, Lincoln did parse words -- but read the full speeches.


The Southern War Ultimatums -- printed first in Richmond papers, with headline "THE TRUE ISSUE".

How war ultimatums appeared in Douglass's paper.

Full text of Southern paper

The TRUE ISSUE -- and their war ultimatums, were that Lincoln allow the spread of slavery into Kansas, and Kansas "accept and respect slavery."

The WAR ultimatum, let that sink in WAR ULTIMATUM -- that Kansas accept and respect slavery.

Kansas had REJECTED slavery and become a free state, and by a 95% vote!!   Do you grasp that?   FUCKING HELL.

No one told you -- ever -- that Southern War Ultimatums demanded a free state turn into a slave state. Did they? You never heard that? FUCK NO.

It would help if US text books mentioned it- - so all the US would know what scum sucking pigs and lunatic Confederate leaders were.  

COnfederate leaders didn't suggest it, didn't say it would be preferable.  They said in writing the war ultimatums.


They were not fucking bluffing.  They issued their war ultimatums, Lincoln would not obey, and they attacked.  They were already killing in Kansas, anyway.


Lincoln did evolve-- on his awareness how he could kill slavery so bad, for the next 150 years, Southern leaders would deny the very things they bragged about then.


Lincoln called "Negro Worshiper"  by New York papers.



Every high school history teacher can tell you about Lincoln's letter to Greeley, where LIncoln says if he could save the union without freeing and slaves, he would.

Sounds horrible?

Why would Lincoln write that letter to Greeley??

Actually, Lincoln did NOT write that letter to Greeley  -- he wrote to the border states, via Greeley, because Lincoln knew that in 24-48 hours, most people that mattered would read his letter to "Greeley".

More about that, below.

Meanwhile, Southern leaders are killing to spread slavery, bragging about it, and that's fine. Lincoln is the bad guy?  Seriously?

Remember, Southern leaders were BRAGGING they were killing to spread slavery.  And LIncoln is the bad guy because he, at that time, spoke about Union? 

He fucking had to.  A few more days, and those Southern states go with Jeff Davis. Do you grasp that or not?




Killing the God of Slavery. Lincoln's final gesture


No one seems to grasp this now -- but once Lee surrendered, do you know that no Southern leader, not one, not for the next 150 years, ever claimed that bullshit again, about God intended slavery, intended slaves be tortured (yes, they claimed that before, often) and that God wanted white men to enslave the black race.

That all stopped -- instantly.  An amazing difference.  Blacks were still beaten, some were in slavery illegally, many of the horrible things continued.

But that "God of slavery" was a very real God-- at least used daily by Southern leaders.   Lincoln killed that excuse.


Plus Lincoln's actions.  Have you ever heard about his "radical" actions from 1846-65?

Douglass knew all these.  Did anyone bother to mention them, to you?


The fact you do not know this -- everyone knew it in 1850's -- show how whitewashed the Dred Scott decision has been, we now teach it as something about "citizenship"  and Congress can not decide slavery "issues" in the territories.

As Jefferson Davis said -- Dred Scott was about blacks as persons or not. They are not persons, specifically they are not persons.

John Brown lasted about two hours, in Virginia, kicking slavery in the ass his way. Then he was hung, and so were his sons.

His other son already got killed, back in Kansas.

Lincoln fought a bit smarter -- and got the job done.



People  were arrested in the South, just for owning the wrong  book-- even preachers were arrested.

The article claims the South is the most moral, religious, and contented law abiding people on earth.   But those abolitionist are against God, against religion, against decency, and should be hung.  

The US Senator from Missouri boasted in his speech, he would kill to spread slavery, and kill to stop folks from speaking openly against slavery. That's not from some nut -- that was a US Senator boasting of it.

Those against slavery are against human virture, against modesty, they "must be hung or put in the penitentary" or the South will secede at once.


Frederick Douglass knew about articles like this -- because he reprinted them, in his own paper.

So Douglas knew the dangers to Lincoln -- and he knew Lincoln was trying to win elections, to get support of folks who thought blacks were sorta dogs that could talk and walk upright.

But Frederick Douglass already knew that.

Even in Illinois, speaking too candidly against slavery could get you shot - a fact Lincoln's friend Lovejoy learned too late. He was killed for his anti slavery newspaper.

Lincoln himself was shot in the head, by Booth, after Booth heard Lincoln speak for voting rights for blacks. Booth changed his plan from kidnapping, to killing, because of Lincoln's speech about voting rights.

Did anyone bother -- ever -- to tell you that?

I just did. Frederick Douglass already knew it.

People who saw Lincoln's speeches and debates did not say stupid things like "Lincoln is not really against slavery".     Nor did they say "Lincoln was reluctant to free the slaves".   
But see the video anyway, "Nigger" word cleaned up to "Negro" or not.  And go read his full speeches, his full debates -- and learn his full actions.

You may learn a  lot.  We did.

Douglass knew that most whites -- even in the North - would not walk across the street to free a slave, much less fight a war to do it.  He knew Lincoln had to gather support from millions of people who did not want blacks living anywhere near them, including Illinois, where it was illegal for a black person to move to.

Your "history" teacher may or may not know that. But Frederick Douglass lived it.  When you understand what Douglass knew, and why he said Lincoln was radical, swift, zealous, and determined, you won't be so stupid about the Civil War, or Lincoln.


Also, at the time Lincoln wrote that letter, some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested, if he even said slavery should end, for the war to end. 

They did not say Lincoln by name, but they called for the arrest of anyone who said slavery should end, for the war to end.

Did you know that,  yes or no?  Saying slavery should end was some radical shit, until the last part of the Civil War.

And if LIncoln had spoken sooner, more candidly, the border states would have joined the Confederacy.

Did you know that?   Lincoln did, that's the big reason he had to speak carefully.

Guess who knew -- Frederick Douglass knew.


Douglass not only knew Lincoln, Douglass knew the scum what  Lincoln was up against -- North and South.


From Lincoln Douglas debates.  Douglas makes up stories about Lincoln's "Nigger" friends. 


Douglass was personal friends with John Brown, and he was paid to speak to crowds in the US, once his friends could literally "buy him"  from his slave owner, who was also his biological father.

Douglass Speech about Lincoln

Charles Sumner Speech about Atchison and Crimes in KS