Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Trashing Lincoln --How, and Why?

You are about to learn something new.  Smart people will, upon learning something new, adjust their opinion.   Most people just dig in and say it doesn't matter. 







Lincoln radical to end slavery?   WTF?   Swift?  Zealous?

Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the 'Nigger'"?


Lincoln's actual intent, all along, was to pull slavery out by its roots and kick it to death?  Oh, hell no.

We got history teachers -- smug ones -- who tell us with a smile, Lincoln "didn't really care"  about slavery.  He had to be "dragged"  into ending slavery.  He just wanted to stop the spread of slavery, and promised he was just trying to keep the Union together.



Did anyone ever tell you,  much less emphasize, that Lincoln was  hated, North and South, for being a "Nigger lover who is obsessed with equality"?

No, no one told you. You only know what you are told.  What if you were told bullshit, or part of the story? 

For the last 50 years,  many folks have claimed Lincoln didn't really care about slavery.   That Lincoln "had to be dragged into" freeing the slaves.

Not so much. Slave owners, and Southern leaders generally,  owners told the public that the white race would perish -- be killed off -- if slavery was not spread.   Did you know even that?


Lincoln wanted to end the white race -- and would, if the South could not spread slavery, by violence, into the rest of the country.

Lincoln's enemies, North and South, sure as fuck pounced on him daily, and in public, for begin a radical "abolitionist"  who wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

And it worked. Stephen A Douglas defeated Lincoln for Senate, because he made people in the North afraid Lincoln wanted your "daughters to sleep with Niggers".

In fact, the best and most powerful speaker of the day, Stephen A Douglas, blasted the living shit out of Lincoln, to his face, repeatedly, in public that Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger".

Very basic.   So basic, in fact, that unless you understand that, you don't understand shit about the era, or the Civil War, or Lincoln.

Just being against the spread of slavery was to be against GOD and an attempt to defile white women.  Did you know that?

This Southern governor made that clear, in this official document.   Go on, read it. 

Lincoln took the position that no, slavery will not spread. Kansas had just been admitted as a free state -- did you know that?  Kansas citizens voted 90% against slavery, and Southern leaders issued war ultimatums. That's right war ultimatums, that Kansas must accept and respect slavery.

Did you know, yes or no, that AFTER Kansas became a state, Southern leaders demanded Kansas be a slave state?   FUCK NO.  That is basic as hell, too, and not taught.


It was not just Stephen A Douglas -- it was the entire pro slavery growth folks, North and South, that went after Lincoln in ways that could have gotten Lincoln killed -- as he would eventually be killed.  

No one told you that Stephen A Douglas stood by, and very likely was part of the planning, for US Senator Charles Sumner, to be beaten in 1856, on Senate floor.  Douglas sat close by, watched the beating, and said Sumner got what he deserved.   

Douglas (Stephen) also repeatedly told crowds that he saw Lincoln personally in a carraige with a white woman, and a black man, which could get you attacked at the time.

Did you know that? Hell no.

But it's in the Lincoln Douglas debates, and central to it. Douglas, throughout the Lincoln Douglas debates, was trying to do ONE thing -- make the whites in the North see Lincoln as a "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  and your wife to "be with Niggers".

Oh, you missed that in history class? Do tell.

This central aspect -- nothing is more basic -- has been white washed, along with the endless violence against whites by whites, regarding the spread of slavery.

Yet Southern leaders boasted out the ass of their violence, and promised more of it.  Did you know that, or not?



 Southern crybabies, after the Civil War, did an about face, once they lost.  Before they lost, Southern leaders, Southern killers, Southern apologist like Stephen A Douglas were all for violence to spread slavery.  You never were told that.

But that is what Lincoln had to deal with.  

And Douglas speeches -- in the Lincoln Douglas debates -- were about the threats from black men, who would take the white women.   That was IN THE DEBATES!


You will see entire books about Lincoln Douglas debates, and that fact is glossed over, or not mentioned at all.  

Thats like talking about how US got in WWII  without mentioning Pearl Harbor.  It's that stupid.  But Southern crybabies, after they lost, changed their story.  Before the war, they boasted they were killing and had every right, to spread slavery by violence, and did spread it by violence.  Slavery was always spread by violence, never, ever by peaceful or honest means. 

In fact, Lincoln was called -- by Southern leaders -- a radical abolitionist, a nigger lover, a man who "wants your daughters to be with and marry with niggers".

In fact, in the Lincoln Douglas debate, Stephen A Douglas repeatedly told the crowds, with venom and volume only he could create -- that Mr. Lincoln wants your daughter and your wife to "be with"  Niggers.

In the South, it was even worse, but in the Norther papers, Lincoln was called a "Negro Worshiper" who belives the "Negroes" are as intelligent as whites -- at a time when most whites, even in the North, considered black folks to be as dumb as farm animals, and the male blacks to be the biggest threat to take you wife or daughter.

No one told you that, did they?  Fuck no, no one told you.

But Lincoln got a bullet to the brain -- and so did some of his friends -- for being "too radical"  for the "Nigger".



No one else was going where LIncoln went, doing what Lincoln did, saying what Lincoln said.

Lincoln obssessed with equality?

Yes -- and his actions, before and after the start of the war, proof it.  But you need to know his actions -- like from 1846 on, when he was one of few to stand up to President Polk and accuse him -- correctly -- of starting a war against Mexico to spread slavery.

Did you know that? HELL NO.

Lincoln was hated, 1846 on, for calling out, making public, whatever everyone knew.   The war against Mexico, like everything else in US politics, was about slavery, one way or another.

Slavery was the oxygen in the air.  Every election, every speech, every newspaper article about current events, was about slavery, or the impact of some event on slavery.


Southern leaders were obsessed with spreading slavery -- always by FORCE.

Who said so?  Lincoln for one, but also the facts themselves.  Every step of the way, and at the current time, when Lincoln got in politics the first time, and later, Southern leaders were killing to spread slavery. 

That is not taught in US schools.   Instead, stupidly, history teachers seem to think slavery was spread by some magical or honorable way.

FUCK NO.  Slavery was always spread by killing -- and killing any whites against it, as Lincoln would be killed, as Lincoln's friend was killed.

 Stupidly, history teachers today think people in the South wanted slavery.  No, most did not want slavery, but because it was against the law to speak against it, because you could be tortured -- yes the punishment was torture -- to even preach against it, it was impossible as a practical matter to be anti slavery in a meaningful way, in the South.

Therefore, before long, the entire government in the South, and their lackies in the North, were focused on spreading slavery.    The violent spread of slavery -- not by voting, not by agreement of whites, but by force.   And Lincoln said so.

Maybe history teachers should teach Lincoln's letters and speeches about that.  You never do see those. 

You might think others were more radical than Lincoln -- no, not where he was, when he was.   His full speeches, his full letters, show a radical person.  Yes, he did parse words, he had to parse words or get killed much sooner.

If you don't believe Lincoln would have been killed sooner, if he had not spoken carefully in some settings, you don't know shit about the murders and killings, tortures, even burning people to death, who spoke against slavery.

Really -- you don't know shit, if you don't know how dangerous it was go speak the wrong words, to the wrong people.    It was a crime to even speak against slavery in most of the US -- did you even know that?

It was a crime in most of the US, to preach against slavery. Did you know that? 


No you did not know.   It was legal to speak against slavery in the North -- which is why it ended in the North.

But in the South,  people could be and were arrested for preaching against slavery, or owning the wrong book which even suggested slavery was evil.

In fact, even idle comments in the South, in public, could get a woman stripped and whipped IN PUBLIC.   Did anyone ever tell you that? Fuck no.  It's true - and if taught, it would change what we think about US history.

Torturing people in public? Yes. ISIS like? Yes.   But many things Southern leaders did was ISIS like, including how they bragged about torture and war for GOD.  No one told you, did they, that Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, said slavery was from GOD, a "Divine gift"  and that to be against slavery was to be against GOD.

They also bragged they would kill to spread slavery for GOD. 

Unless you know that -- and even history teachers seem dumb ass hell about this basic fact -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, the South, or about Civil War. 

Did you know that?

No -- and  no one told you, so how would you know?

Lincoln -- not the other famous "abolitionist" of the day, went places the abolitionist dare not show up without a band of armed men -- Kansas, for example.  Did you even know Lincoln went to Kansas after US Senator Atchison and Jeff Davis made it a crime to speak or write against slavery in Kansas?

So you have to know what the fuck was going on.  And no, you don't know.  What we are told in history books is watered down fucking bullshit, and completely leaves out the ISIS like violence Southern scum were imposing on anyone who even SPOKE against slavery.


We got Lincoln wrong largely because Southern crybabies and liars have completely white washed the ISIS like violence South used to torture, kill, hang, drown, to spread slavery.

Specifically we are not taught about Southern War Ultimatums, issued AFTER Kansas became a state. Yes, Kansas became a free state, before Lincoln got elected, by election of the white male citizens.

A US Senator goes to Kansas, invades Kansas with 1000 or so men hired by Jeff Davis, and boasts he is there to kill to spread slavery. He does not mumble. And he almost succeeds.

Did South accept Kansas election as a free state  FUCK NO. They had already sent killers to Kansas for years, and done all they could, violently to make sure Kansas could not vote, and did not even publish anti slavery newspapers.   They made it a crime -- as was the case in the South -- to preach or write newspapers against slavery.

Lincoln went to Kansas-- did you know that? - and bravely spoke in an area that had been strong hold of the killers and terrorist, who were terrorizing and killing in Kansas.

You wont even see LIncoln's "Kansas trip" mentioned in any US text book. What the fuck?

Southern leaders didn't just not accept it, they issued war ultimatums that Kansas MUST accept and respect slavery. 

And they bragged about it.  Southern leaders boasted of their killing and efforts to spread slavery.  They were not ashamed. 

Did you ever hear - one time, in your life -- that Southern leaders repeatedly,  clearly and proudly, officially and unofficially, boasted they were killing to spread slavery?


Did you know that Southern leaders hired paid killers to torture and kill, drown, and terrorize people who were voting against slavery?


Did you know this was common knowledge at the time -- and Southern leaders boasted of it?  No.  You never heard such things.

We show you. It's not hard to find, Southern leaders were doing everything but renting billboard space, as you will see.



It's more than a shame -- it's stupidity and cowardice, that most US historians go along with the bullshit about Southern honor and bravery. No, they were not, Southern leaders, in fact every Southern leader who before the war was bad mouthing, and promising endless killing to spread slavery for GOD- - ended up being cowards. Every single one.  We will show you the main cowards.

It's important you know -- Southern leaders hired men to  hang other WHITES, torture other WHITES, drown other whites.  Slavery was always spread by violence.  There was never -- ever -- a peaceful honest vote about slavery, and its dumb as fuck for your history teacher to assume otherwise.

Slavery was all about violence -- not just to the slave, but to any white who stood in the way, or ever wrote against slavery, as you will see.

Did you ever hear anything like that? HELL NO.

Over and over.  Entire books have been written how Lincoln was not for equality, how he didn't care about blacks or slavery, but only used slavery for public support.

But we will show  how that is horse shit, and how Lincoln, while he did at times parse words, did, if you read his full speeches, his full letters, and see his actions, was a radical mo fo, and was called radical, by his friends and enemies.

In fact, his political enemies in the North made sure he never won an election outright, even the Presidency, by a majority of votes, because they were able to tag Lincoln as obsessed with equality for the Nigger.

They said Nigger.

Did you ever hear anyone mention that Lincoln was considered "obsessed with equality"  and that he was accused of that dozens of times, in public, and repeatedly, in press?   No, you never got that information.

What horse shit.  In some areas, to be an abolitionist was almost as bad then, as being a child molester is now.  And Lincoln was from one of those areas.

Did you know that?



Still, did LIncoln say those things, like that his paramount aim was to save the Union, not to free the slave?

Yes -- he said that, and much more. He also said, repeatedly that to save the Union MEANT we will end slavery.  In the House Divided SPeech, and dozen other times, Lincoln explained this. The Union will dissolve, or slavery will end. One or the other. 

And he would not let, did not expect, the Union to dissolve. 

When LIncoln said this -- that either slavery or the Union would end -- do you know what happened? Riots in the South.   Lincoln's political enemies in the North shit the bed-- Stephen A Douglas, and many others, screamed that this was tantamount to declaring war on the South.

Do you know who else said Lincoln's comments about the Union ending, or slavery ending, was declaring war on the South?

Southern leaders.

Gee -- no one ever told you that, did they.

Amazing what can happen if someone tells you only part of the story.


Sadly, you don't hear this from just stupid people.  This bullshit came from "historians" right?     Surely they didn't give us distorted quotes, of context, right?

And surely they would not forget to tell you about Lincoln's long history of kicking slavery in the ass sideways, from 1846 on, when he stood up to President Polk and spoke the truth -- you are causing this war with Mexico, to steal the land, to have for slave states.

Did you even know that much?   Did you even know slave power is the power that caused US to invade Mexico, steal they land -- and everyone, North and South, knew it was to double the size of slave states. Open secret.

Lincoln got up and spoke about that candidly, and was from then on hated, detested, by Southern leaders who knew, of course, Lincoln was right, that they had caused the war for SLAVE POWER.


Lincoln's efforts against slavery did  not stop in 1846.   Lincoln introduced legislation 40 times -- 40  times -- to prevent slavery from going into the land US stole from Mexico.

No one told you that either?  SOund like Lincoln didnt care?

Do you know who else pushed that legislation in Congress 40 times?  No you don't have a clue. Lincoln was the radical on that, pushing it over and over. SOuthern scum and slave power stopped him at every turn.

But but but -- these historians would know that and tell about it?   Well they should know -- but they don't mention it.   They don't mention many of the things Lincoln did and said that were fucking radical as hell -- because it does not fit in their bullshit narrative.

That's  how historians are, you will find out, when you get older.

Surely they would include LIncoln's actions, and what dangers he faced, right?

Uh -- no.  They did give us distorted quotes -- not the full quotes, and not in context,  Because Lincoln was a "radical mo fo"  for his time and place, and at great personal danger.   He was eventually shot in the  head, and earlier, he friend was burned to death for speaking too bluntly about equality.

Should Lincoln have been more blunt in every sentence, and been shot sooner?  Would that make these "historians" happy?  What good would that do?

But Lincoln spoke radically as  hell -- and shocked the shit out of the North and South, before he was elected, and after.   Maybe you need to learn the whole damn thing, not some bullshit slogans.





BOTTOM LINE: Lincoln, the radical.

I have not met a single person -- even a single history teacher  --that knows Lincoln was repeatedly called a "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

It was not just "some guy"  who called Lincoln, to his face, repeatedly, in front of crowds, a man who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

It was, by all accounts, the most powerful speaker of the day -- Stephen A  Douglas.   And he was not the only one, he was just one that yelled it to the crowds.



In fact, Lincoln was killed, got the bullet in the brain, for a speech he gave about voting rights for blacks.   Yet some will use that speech, which LIncoln was killed for, to "prove" Lincoln did not really care about equality.

The onslaught of calling Lincoln a "Negro Worshiper"  who is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and who will "destroy the White Race"   finally worked.

The surprising thing,  Lincoln was not killed sooner.

Lincoln had to disarm the claims he was "A Negro Worshiper"  who wants your wife and daughters to "be with Negros".    Otherwise, Lincoln would have gotten the bullet to the brain sooner.

It's time you learned about this -- and no, no one has ever told you.  It's not in any history text book, college or high school, in the USA.

But it should be. 



'Radical, Nigger lover, who will destroy the white race, and degrade your wives and your daughters....'

The violent nature of the South -- the public tortures, burning to death, whipping people who spoke against slavery -- even whipping preachers for owning the wrong book,  is not taught, has never been taught, in US text books.

Did you know women could be stripped and whipped in public, for speaking against slavery in the South?

Did you know almost every slave state made it a crime for whites to preach, write, speak, or have any book,  that even questioned slavery?

Did you know that for 12 years, Southern leaders would not allow slavery to be even DISCUSSED in Congress?

Did you know that Jeff Davis, in 1856, sent over 1000 men to Kansas, to invade that territory, and led by a US Senator, install what is now called "bogus legislature"  by force, and immediately passed laws making in a crime punishable by torture, to publish any newspaper article against slavery?

See below.   Southern leaders were not ashamed of this -- they were proud of it. 

Did you know that AFTER Jeff Davis and US Senator Atchison made it illegal to speak against slavery in Kansas, Lincoln actually went to Kansas and spoke against slavery anyway?

Did you know that the famous abolitionist speakers -- like Garrison -- would not dare do what Lincoln did, go where he did, but stayed safely away from areas or groups that might well blow a hole in their head.

Did you know who WOULD go -- at great danger -- and kick slavery in the ass?   Lincoln.

It's about time people knew this.


This are basic things

See how Lincoln reacted to the crowd, after Stephen A Douglas told them repeatedly that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

No one ever told you that, did they?  Hell no. So we will. And its about damn time. 


Why would Lincoln's enemies claim Lincoln was "radical for equality for the "Nigger"?

Any clue?  At all?

Why would Frederick Douglas claim Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous, and determined"  for equality?

Were these men stupid?   Or did you just get a distorted part of the story?

  Mostly, learn the actions and boasting of Southern leaders, BRAGGING they were killing not just to spread slavery, but killing to silence opposition to slavery.  Learn Southern War Ultimatums. Learn the speeches they gave, at the time, BOASTING they were killing to spread slavery, and would continue killing -- and spread slavery TO ALL OF THE USA.

Did you ever hear that? No. No one ever told you of Southern leaders boasting they would continue killing -- against states rights -- to spread slavery.  That's been wiped out entirely, but it was common knowledge then.



But despite that, Lincoln was MORE radical than anyone, where he was, and when he was.

Yes, others spoke more bluntly -- but not where Lincoln went, not in Lincoln's position.     

Garrison, Douglass, others, spoke to crowds that already agreed with them.  They did not go to Kansas, did not go to Alton or Charleston, and give their speeches.

In fact -- Lincoln had to be very very careful what he said -- not only to maybe get elected, from a population of men, many of whom thought blacks were more like apes that could talk, and if freed, would "take your women"  and "marry your daughters".

If you don't know that -- to be blunt -- you don't know shit about Abe Lincoln or the attitudes of whites, even in the North.

Lincoln's speech was not just a few slogans.

But read the FULL speeches Lincoln did give -- the ENTIRE speech.  Over and over, and over, Lincoln would say things in one part of the speech, that seemed to agree with a sentiment of the day.  But moments later, or minutes later, Lincoln revisited the sentiment, and kicked the shit out of it, in a clever way.  

No one walked away from a Lincoln speech, and had any delusions -- slavery was going to go, or the Union was going to go, and as Lincoln put it "I don't expect the Union will disolve".


You won't hear anyone tell you this -- but it was a huge deal then.  WHen Lincoln said -- repeatedly -- that the Union would have to end, or slavery would end, and "I do not expect the Union to dissolve" -- the South went ape shit.

Ape. Fucking. Shit. 

Did you know that?  Did you know there were riots about this in the South?  War ultimatums about this?  Douglas brought this up repeatedly in the LD debates.   Saying the union would end if slavery did not end,  was essentially an act of war upon the South, said some at the time.

If Lincoln had said such word in the South, he would not have lived till evening.   Did you know people were killed in the South for speaking or preaching against slavery?


Do you know how nuts Southern scum were about slavery, about anyone even speaking badly about it?  


Well, they were.  The crazy violent Southern scum leaders were like ISIS today, they were PROUD of torturing, and killing to spread slavery, as you will see.



Lincoln went to Kansas and spoke -- one of the more dangerous places he could legally go, where people had, not long before, been killed and terrorized just for speaking against slavery.

Did anyone tell you that?  HELL NO.

Lincoln was quite radical -- especially in letters, he was very clear, he knew exactly the violent nature of Southern scum.   If he did not want to get shot a lot sooner -- and he did not want to get shot a lot sooner -- he had to watch what he said, where he said it.

So unless you know his full speeches in context, and what was violent bastards Southern scum were, you don't know the real history of slavery or Lincoln or the US Civil War.

Even so, Lincoln found ways to be extremely radical -- in an effective way, using humor, and his amazing ability to befuddle those tho trashed him to his face.

He had to.  And it worked.  But you would have to see his full speeches, and know that the hell was going on. 

 Those who spoke more radically,  spoke in places they were safe, would not get shot, and remember, Lincoln was trying to GET ELECTED.

Too complicated?  Need time?

Lincoln AT TIMES  parsed words, wisely,  about how to end slavery, and why.  He would have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had not.     But his actions, and his full words, his full letters and speeches,  show a radical zealot,  a fanatic for his time, to end slavery.    And he did.

What good what it do, if Lincoln had, in every sentence, in every speech or letter, been as radical as he sometimes was?  He would have been shot sooner, as others were.  Try to grasp that. 

As Frederick Douglass knew, and said, Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous and determined"   to end slavery.

As  Southern leaders said, Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".   


Why are you not taught this basic fact?  We show you why.

If you do not know that people were still being arrested, tortured, and even killed, for speaking against slavery in the US -- you do not know shit about Lincoln, or what led to the Civil War.

What has  been covered up -- because the crybaby lying pieces of shit Southern apppologist --  is the ISIS like tortures, killings, and boasting of more killings, to spread slavery.   Get that right first, understand how people (including Lincoln) was killed for being for equality,  and you won't be so easily fooled by the bullshit. 

We all heard it -- all our lives.

Lincoln had to be "dragged" into ending slavery.

Lincoln was not "really" against slavery,  he was for the Union, and used slavery as a way to keep Union together.

Lincoln was a racist, and wanted to send the blacks back to Africa. On and on.   Even "historians"   seem to say the same thing, in various ways.

The problem is -- facts, and Lincoln's enemies at the time, say a drastically different thing.   Basically, they claimed Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality for the "Nigger"  and he wants your daughters to "sleep with Niggers".

Leaders North and South claimed Lincoln was a "Nigger lover".   Did anyone ever tell you that?

Stephen Douglas, as you will see, all but urged violence on Lincoln, a fact well known then (he did urge violence on Senator Sumner, who was then beaten almost to death, while Douglas smiled nearby).

Learn all the facts -- mostly, learn what a bad ass Lincoln was, when you know the complete story, not edited bullshit, out of context. 

Oh, no one ever told you?  Surprise, surprise.   They should have. 
Mr. Lincoln is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".



Lincoln is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  Stephen A Douglas, 1858, repeatedly, and to Lincoln's face. 

Southern leaders were even more vocal -- Lincoln will destroy the white race,  just by stopping the spread of slavery.

We will have to "exterminate"  the black race in the US, if Lincoln is elected. 

Lincoln's "real plans"  all along, were to invade the South and force them to give up slavery, according to Southern leaders, who actually declared war (see below) BECAUSE they claimed LIncoln intended to end slavery by force. 

Gee, leave a few basic facts out, and you can make Lincoln seem anyway you want. 

So why don't we hear about that?


Abraham Lincoln: "[any slave] is equal to me, to Judge Douglas, and to any man, in her natural rights........ "





It's amazing, and sad, that our greatest president is pissed on by dumb asses, liars, and bullshitters.

Lincoln was considered a "Nigger lover" in his day, by Southern and Northern leaders, and would have been shot in the head much sooner, if he had not parsed words at times.

Lincoln could have done what his friend Lovejoy did -- and NOT parse words, and got a bullet to the brain sooner, would that make these idiots happy?

But parse words or not -- read ALL -- ALL -- ALL - of Lincoln's words, in letters and speeches, and you won't be so easily fooled by bullshitters. 

No one -- no one - was as radical and effective as Lincoln.   Unless you understand what was going on, you can not possibly understand the bad ass brilliance of Abraham Lincoln.

You don't know.

If you don't know Southern War ultimatums, of 1856 and 1861,  you really cant know shit about Lincoln, slavery, or the Civil War.

Why?  Because you can't know the violent, ISIS like Southern leadership, who made it a crime to speak, preach, or even own a book that questioned slavery.

Did you know -- yes or no -- that preachers were arrested, individuals were arrested, and subject to torture, for not just speaking against slavery,  but owning a book or pamphlet that QUESTIONED slavery.

LET ME REPEAT...  at the time Lincoln ran for office, people were still be arrested, tortured, and even killed for speaking, just speaking, against slavery in most of the USA.

Even in the North, people were killed, during Lincoln's time, for speaking against slavery.

And if you don't fucking know that (and you do not) then you don't know shit about Lincoln or the Civil War. 

 Southern leaders brag about shit you never heard ... what's left out of every US text book in the US


1856  1856 1856






From 1854 onward, Southern leaders -- including men who would later be President of the Confederacy, Vice President,  and Cabinet members, all spoke clearly and powerfully about the war ultimatums to spread slavery.

Southern crybabies, however, have keep that and much else about their leaders, out of US history books.



Who did what, to whom, is real history. All else is bullshit.

To get a narrative -- an overarching theme -- for a period in history, it should come as no surprise, that you need first to know facts -- most importantly, who killed who, and why.

If you approach US history from 1800 to 1865, but you don't know, care, or base your narrative on who killed who, and why, you don't know shit.  

Here is a basic important fact -- slavery was always spread by violence.  Killers and the most cruel men, were hired, or volunteered to spread slavery.  Slavery never spread by consent of the public, by vote, contrary to what you may assume.

In fact, where there was free speech, free press, and preachers were allowed to speak ill of slavery, slavery died.  The reason slavery ended in North -- it could be despised in public.  Books and newspapers could report the tortures, the rapes, the cruelty of the slave owners.

No one could do that in the South.  It was illegal.

No one even told you that much, did they?

That is what Lincoln dealt with - a violent and cruel set of people, who were killing and torturing, and trying to SPREAD slavery.

In the North and South, at the time, Lincoln was called, and eventually killed, for being for equality.     Yes, at times, Lincoln had to parse words, or he would have been killed much sooner, as others were, and as his friend, Lovejoy was killed.

If you don't know that -- and few people do, then you don't know Lincoln, or what caused the Civil War.


Abolitionist one rung above child molesters...

Did you know that?

Being called an abolitionist in 1850 is nothing like you imagine it today. Today abolitionist are the heroes.   But at the time, they were portrayed as lunatics who wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

Yes, they were.  Negro Worshipper was a common refrain.  

Even New York papers made fun of Lincoln for being for equality, and showed a handicapped black slave, and suggested Lincoln said that "Negro"  is intellectually the same as whites.

Those folks at the center of the storm -- like John Palmer, who helped Lincoln start the Republican party in Illinois -- wrote that people in 1890 could have little awareness how vile it was-- North and South -- to be called an abolitionist.  You might as well be called a child molester today.

SO when Lincoln got up and said he was for equality --  which  he did, and did it powerfully, if you read all his full speeches -- to get anyone's support, to get any votes in Illinois, he would say "I am not an abolitionist  --" and then kick slavery in the ass anyway.

No one -- NO ONE -- left a LIncoln speech under any confusion. Slavery had to go -- it was going.  The Union would go, or slavery would go, and he did not expect the Union to end.

He said it carefully -- the Union will end, or slavery will end -- but he said it with thunder.   And Southern leaders shit the bed -- even Northern politicians attacked Lincoln for saying one or the other has to end.

That's declaring WAR on the South, Southern leaders said. Just saying slavery or the Union will end-- (because of Dred Scott and Kansas Act)  caused riots in the South.

Did you know that?  


And there is not one text book in the USA -- not one -- that shows this.   

Stephen A Douglas, the most powerful speaker of that amazing era -- shouted to the public, repeatedly, that Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

No one fucking mentions it.

It was much more than this -- Douglas was, essentially, trying to get someone in the crowd to attack Lincoln, phsycically attack if possible, but at the very least, Douglas wanted -- and did -- push the fear of black men sleeping with "your daughter"   into the minds of white folks, and Douglas won that election.


People today do not realize -- because their stupid "history teachers" don't know or tell them, how violent Southern scum were -- the ISIS like nature of slaver owners and their henchmen, like Stephen A Douglas.   Idiotically, Stephen A Douglas is shown as a sincere man who "tried to deal with the slavery issue, by promoting popular sovereignty.

As you will see, Douglas behind the scenes was helping the men who killed to STOP popular sovereignty.  Lincoln was well aware of this.  

Douglas was part of a group who laughed as Senator Charles Sumner was beaten on the floor of the Senate -- another fact stupidly glossed over,  and his business partner, David Rice Atchison, was the US Senator who led 1000 Texas men in an invasion of Kansas in 1856, with the help and early support of Stephen A Douglas. 

If you don't know what the fuck was going on -- especially the violence -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, and how really amazing and kick ass he was. 




It's time we told the ISIS like violence by Southern scum, and show how it almost worked.   

It was not just Stephen A Douglas urging violence -- Southern leaders made it a crime, punishable by torture and hanging, to even SPEAK against slavery, or publish anti slavery newspapers, in some areas.

ISIS LIKE SOUTHERN SCUM... all white washed now.

If there is any group like Southern leaders, those who were killing to push slavery, and boasting of, you have to compare them to ISIS of today.

Tortures and hangings in public, for just SPEAKING against slavery.  Did you know that?

Did you know preachers could be arrested and tortured -- in public,  in front of crowds, ISIS like -- for owing the wrong book?

Did you know even in Illinois, people could be (and were) attacked, even killed, for writing against slavery?   Lincoln's personal friend, 


Really -- did anyone ever even hint that?  FUCK NO.  But it was a way of life in much of the South.   There were laws against speaking, writing, or preaching against slavery, called the "anti - incendiary" laws.

Hinton Helper wrote that if not for the anti-incendiary laws, slavery might have ended much sooner, because it became impossible to openly preach, openly write, openly speak against slavery.  

In fact, as you will see, Jeff Davis paying killers to invade Kansas in 1856, under the leadership of US Senator David Rice Atchison,  was the DIRECT result of a newspaper continuing to publish anti-slavery paper, against the "law"  announced by David Rice Atchison. 

A US Senator was beaten on the United States Senate floor -- after his speech ABOUT these laws and what Atchison was doing in Kansas.

Read Charles Sumner Speech about Atchison,
and his killings and tortures to stop speech against slavery.

Punishable by TORTURE -- public whippings.   Even women could be stripped, and whipped, in public for anti - slavery comments. No one told you that, did they?

Your teacher will insist they "are well aware"  of Charles Sumners famous speech. No, they aren't.   If they bothered to read it, they would know -- it was a very detailed report of US Senator Atchison's killing and tortures in Kansas, when Kansas citizens kept speaking and writing against slavery, after Atchison and Jeff Davis claimed it was illegal to do to in Kansas (as it was in all of the South).

Did you know that?  

Fuck no.   There is this good adoration of Southern scum, entirely bogus, and based on nonsense.  Southern leaders were torturing, killing, whipping, and BOASTING of it.

What the fuck?  Why not show what these guys BOASTED about at the time?

Not a few nuts, but the top Southern leaders -- including the guy who got Kansas Act pass, boasting of killing and torturing.  And then, actually killing and torturing.

How about mentioning what the fuck happened?  Who killed who is real history.

Start there.  Start with what happened. Who killed who, and why, is what happened. 


Frederick Douglass was there.

Douglass knew the violent bastards --- he knew exactly what Southern leaders said about Lincoln, and how they would have killed him (or any abolitionist)  sooner, if they could.

Douglass knew that Stephen A Douglas was doing his best to "dog whistle" crowds into either attacking Lincoln, or at least fearing him and hating Lincoln.  Douglass knew that Stephen A Douglas was part of the group that delighted -- laughed -- when US Senator Sumner was beaten almost to death on Senate floor.

Douglas knew a million things that you have no clue about.

And he knew Lincoln.


We hear this shit all the time. Lincoln was not really against slavery, he had to be dragged in, blah fucking blah.

Lincoln only ended slavery for political advantage.  How fucking stupid can you get?  At the outbreak of the Civil War,  most whites in the North would not walk across the street to help the slaves in the South.

Lincoln had to entice -- lead -- the Northern whites into helping in the Civil War, by speaking in terms of Union.  So he fucking did.  And all the while, Lincoln was kicking the living shit out of slavery.  

Who else was doing what Lincoln did?


More absurd yet, is while dip shits are repeating this bullshit about Lincoln, and not telling the basic story of his actions and his full speeches and letters,  is what the South was saying and doing.

Southern leaders -- WHILE Lincoln had to tip toe around carefully in some speeches,  were boasting out the ass they were killing to spread slavery.  Did anyone ever tell you that?

Did anyone ever tell you US Senator Atchison was in Kansas, boasting he was killing  -- and promising to keep killing "for the entire South"  to spread slavery to the Pacific Ocean?

Did anyone ever tell you the Vice President of the Confederacy, boasted in a series of speeches -- to cheering crowds - that the whole reason they created the Confederacy was to "bring the great moral truth" to the world, that God ordained slavery AND PUNISHEMENT of the blacks for biblical sins?

Fuck no.   

Somehow Lincoln is the bad guy, because in SOME speeches, and in a letter for the public, he parsed words?  Never mind Lincoln kicked the living shit out of slavery, never mind that taken in total, Lincoln's speeches were kick ass against slavery,  these fucktards will pull up some quotes (out of context) and belittle Lincoln.

Southern leaders sure as fuck hated Lincoln -- and said he was "the worst sort of abolitionist"  whose real intent was to violently end slavery in the South.  Did you know that?

Lincoln's Northern political enemies repeated -- emphatically, at length --- told crowds Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  

Try to grasp that. 


Actually, Lincoln's enemies were quite clear, loud, and specific. Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Obsessed. With. Equality.  For. The.  "NIGGER"

The most powerful speaker of that era -- Stephen A Douglas, stood in front of crowds and in the most bombastic hateful language, told the crowds Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers". 

Not just once.  And not just a quick quip about it. Douglas made a very clear, loud, proud point of it.   In Charleston,  according to reporters there, Douglas went from side to side of the stage, in dramatic fashion,  shouting as loudly as he could, that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Then Lincoln had to speak.

Do you know why Sumner was beaten almost to death on the Senate floor? No, you don't.  I will tell you, below.



Completely white washed how -- largely because Southern crybabies have made sure US text books, since 1890, never showed how crazy violent Southern leaders and operators were.

ISIS like.


If you don't know Southern leaders  boasted about torture, boasting about killing, and boasted they will kill anyone who got in the way of the spread of slavery, you don't know shit about the 1850's.

No one told you that, did they?   They killed Lincoln's friend, and Southerners would kill Lincoln as soon as they could.  Did you know Lincoln was killed after a speech about voting rights for blacks?

Yet, the same ass wipes who tell you Lincoln didn't care about equality, will tell you Lincoln was NOT for voting rights.  Actually he said he was for voting rights -- and was shot for it.

They leave that out.

Lincoln gave over 3000 speeches -- you can quote him any way you want.  The problem is, asswipes, liars, and stupid people quote him out of context, and ignore his full speeches, and his actions.  That crap is repeated by those who don't know better.


Guess who did know about the endless killing sprees, the promises of more violence, and the speeches boasting about torturing and killing anyone who even SPOKE against slavery?

Lincoln knew. So did most people alive at the time.

It's just not taught now. Southern cry babies have made sure this is whitewashed.   But that's what Lincoln had to deal with.

 See Lincoln's letter about it, to his friend Joshua Speed.  And read Southern documents, books, speeches, at the time BOASTING they were killing to spread slavery, and would kill anyone who got in their way.

You probably think that's crazy -- no, it's exactly what was going on, and why most in the North did not want to fight the ISIS like bullies in the South.  Why fight for "Niggers"?

Lincoln therefore, had to shape (at first) support for war in terms of Union. Most whites in the North would not walk across the street, much less lay down their life, to free slaves.

And Lincoln knew it.


 Southern War Ultimatums were not hidden. They were headlines in Richmond paper, and very much in almost every Southern newspaper, in various levels of candor, for years.

Even immediately after the Civil War, Southern apologist wrote the war was not their fault -- they TOLD the North they would have slavery in Kansas, and electing anyone against the spread of slavery into Kansas was "an act of war".

Did you know that?

Did you know SOuthern War Ultimatums -- not suggestions -- was about ONE thing? The spread of slavery.,  Not kinda, not sorta.

After they lost, Southern cry babies and liars (yes liars) acted like "Us, for slavery?  For the forces spread of slavery?  Oh, no no no.

But before they lost, the lying bastards were boasting of, in their own speeches, their own books, and their own newspapers.



As Lincoln made clear, slavery was all about violence. Always. It could only spread by violence.  Southern politicians pushed slavery with a religious fervor you never hear about -- GOD ordained slavery, and if you are against the spread of slavery, you are against GOD.

The killings were going on, the entire time.  There was never a time leading up to Civil War that slave power folks were not killing to spread slavery.  They had always been killing and terrorizing to spread slavery, but it reached a fever pitch when Kansas rejected slavery 

US Senators were beaten, both off the Senate floor, and Charles Sumner was beaten almost to death on the Senate floor -- for talking about Senator Davis Rice Atchison.
 In fact, Richmond newspapers boasted of their War Ultimatums,  which were repeated in Northern papers the next day, in 1861.

Bet no one ever told you -- or even mentioned - them.   How the fuck do you leave Southern War Ultimatums out, or barely mention them?  Very carefully, that's how.

This is what Lincoln had to  deal with - --- not the watered down nonsense that makes Southern leaders seem like rational men.

War ultimatums -- demanding Lincoln help the spread of slavery into Kansas, which rejected slavery -- was irrational as hell. As nuts as anything you will ever learn in world history.  The South knew Lincoln would not help them spread slavery by force.  It was not a serious demand, just posturing to stupid people/


Did you know the great "abolitionist" speakers dare not go -- with good reason -- were Lincoln went, speak to who Lincoln spoke to?

No one ever told you that, did they?


Name one "fire breather" speaker,   who went to Kansas, as Lincoln did, when it was still illegal there to speak against slavery.

No one did.

Name anyone who stood up to President Polk,  and essentially called him on going to war to spread slavery for the benefit of Southern slave owners?

Did you even know Lincoln stood up to Polk?

Did you even know Polk went to war against Mexico, stole their land by military conquest, and that land all became slave states?

Really, really basic stuff.   Yet this is not taught -- and Lincoln's role in standing up to Polk, is not even mentioned.


You probably had no clue Southern leaders made it a crime to speak or write against slavery there. 

Did you know that?  Funny how people will tell you they knew that, but can't show where they found it out. It's not taught in any US text book -- but nothing was more important, more central, to the spread of slavery than the laws against speaking against it.

Did you know preachers could be tortured -- anyone could be tortured -- for owning the wrong book in the South?

Fuck no -- the ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders has never been taught in any US text book, and so of course, never made clear to the public.

But guess who knew all this ?  Lincoln, did, of course, but so did most people at the time -- North and South.  The violence is the South was systematic -- part of the structure of the Southern states, officially. Not kinda, not in away.

In fact, Jeff Davis paying 1000 men to invade Kansas in 1856 -- also glossed over as "trouble in Kansas" bullshit -- happened because Kansas citizens kept  speaking and writing against slavery.




Guess who didn't tell you that -- your history teacher, nor anyone else.

Guess why it makes a difference?

Because Lincoln was a radical MOFO.   If you learn his full speeches in those places, Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass sideways, in very smart, very effective ways.

Lincoln's speeches were working, changing minds.  Too complicated?  Your history teacher never told you?

Literally, the big speakers of the day, would not DARE go places Lincoln did -- and Lincoln was running for office, trying to get elected, by people who would not piss on a black man if he were on fire.


In fact, Lincoln's friend was burned to death for publishing a 
newspaper that was too blunt about equality.


Did you know people in Illinois were killed for speaking against slavery?

Did you know one of Lincoln's friend was one of those killed?

Surprise, surprise, no one told you.

Did you know Southern leaders demanded the NORTH arrest anyone who wrote newspaper articles against slavery?

Did you know in all of the South, it was against the law to preach, write, or speak publicly against slavery?

Did anyone ever mention to you, that people were tortured -- and killed - for speaking against slavery in the South?




Kansas rejected slavery -- and everyone knew it - and became a free state in 1861,  before Lincoln was US President.

Yet Jeff Davis made it VERY clear -- the resistance to the spread of slavery, into Kansas, was "intolerable".

You heard right.  At the time, this was common knowledge. Southern demands to spread slavery -- even into Kansas, which had rejected slavery over and over.

It probably does not compute in most people's minds, that Southern leaders BOASTED about killing to spread slavery, and demanded slavery spread even in areas that rejected it.

But this was common knowledge at the time. 

And Southern leaders had an excuse -- the Dred Scott decision -- that they claimed meant Kansas citizens could not reject slavery, even if they wanted to.

When Lincoln refused to obey the War Ultimatums -- printed in Richmond newspapers in 1861 -- the South attacked.  Not just at Fort Sumter, but 12 other places, too.

And they had already been killing, torturing, and calling it a war to spread slavery, 1856 on.   Bet you did  not know that, either.

Southern War Ultimatums.

Important shit, your teacher has no clue about. None.

Do you know the map above? You should.

This should take no explanation, because at the time, Southern leaders -- specifically Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison were loud, proud, and violent about it.

They had already spread -- always by violence -- slavery into the area in white.  Much of that land was stolen from Mexico, in order to have more slave states.   No one told you that, which is a fucking shame.  It was common knowledge then.

Furthermore, after Southern leaders and slave power got the area in white, for slavery -- they demands, very clearly, very loudly, very proudly, they would have slavery in the area with the red outline.

Citizens were whipped, crowds gathered to see the whippings, okf people who spoke against slavery.  Did you know that?

In Kansas, Southern leaders sent 1000 Texas men, in 1854, to form a "bogus legislature"  which, like in all the South, made in crime to speak against slavery.   And when citizens in Kansas kept speaking against slavery, a US Senator -- David Rice Atchison -- led 1000 paid men into Kansas to enforce his own law against speaking anti slavery sentiment.

Did you know that?

Hell no.  No one told you.   

It's not your fault you don't know -- these were well known at the time. Southern newspapers boasted of them. Southern leaders boasted of their killing sprees 

If you don't know that Southern leaders were still killing, torturing, and bragging they would kill more, and torture more, to spread slavery, you really do not know what Lincoln faced.

Lincoln COULD have been more candid -- in public -- and shot a lot sooner.  But he would have done no good, being dead.  

No one -- NO ONE -- went were Lincoln went, when Lincoln went, and was more radical than he.  No one told you that, did they?   Yes, there were abolitionist speakers, but they did not go to Kansas, as Lincoln did, and go to Alton, as Lincoln did, and Charleston, as Lincoln did.  

Most people, even in the North, considered abolitionist something like child molesters of today.  Did you know that?   The term abolitionist was a vile term, in the minds of most people, because that meant white women could be taken -- and have sex with -- black men.

You never heard that, did you?   Abolitionist, as it was used then, was far far different than you see the term today.  You have to understand that basic fact, too.

His personal friend was killed -- probably burned to death -- for speaking too bluntly against slavery.

If Lincoln had been any more vocal about ending slavery, he would likely have been shot in the head -- as others were -  sooner.

If you do not grasp that, you don't not grasp the 1850's.

Yes, at times, L incoln did parse words -- at times.   But get all his speeches, and he was as his enemies claimed, intent on destroying slavery, as soon as possible, by any means, including fight back against Southern War Ultimatums. 





Each time -- 100% of the time -- those who belittle Lincoln's efforts and desire for equality, have a half dozen, or dozen quotes that seem to back that  up, especially Lincoln's famous letter to Greeley.

So -- why did Southern leaders say Lincoln was a "Negro Worshiper"  and "the worst sort of abolitionist?

Why did  Stephen A Douglas said Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".   Douglas even claimed Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Could it be that Lincoln's full actions -- from 1846 on (as Lincoln haters said them) and his full words (as LIncoln haters said then) have something to do with it?


Didn't Douglass know Lincoln didn't really care?  Didn't he read the 12 quotes by Lincoln, and that letter to Greeley?

Didn't Douglass take freshman history class?

What a dumb ass Frederick Douglass was.  


The power of selective quotes.


We have all heard it -- Lincoln didn't care about slavery, not really.  There are entire books, page after page, proving on every sentence that Lincoln had to be "dragged" into ending slavery, and only did so to save the Union, or win the Civil War.

Fucking bullshit. 

Lincoln was always looking for a way to gather public support to end slavery.    The problem was, most people in the North didn't give a shit about slaves, and thought freeing the blacks would allow black men to "sleep with"  white women.

No one told you that did they?

That fear -- that black men would take white women -- was the overriding issue in the North, and politicians, like Stephen A Douglas, used it to attack Lincoln,  over, and over and over.

No one told you that, did they?

It does not get any more basic. Southern leaders said Lincoln would "exterminate" the white race, just by being against the forced spread of slavery.

No one to you that, either, did they?


The problem with that -- it's not true.  For one thing, Lincoln was hated from 1846 on, by anyone in the South who knew him, and he was called "A Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshiper"   more times than you can count. 

In fact, the big charge against Lincoln, by people in the NORTH -- is that Lincoln was too radical.   

Lincoln wants your daughters to SLEEP WITH NIGGERS -- did you know that sentence was thrown at Lincoln over and over, to his face -- in the Lincoln Douglas debates.

That was cleaned up, by some, at the time, to say "Negroes"  but Douglas (Stephen A) could not be more clear or loud. Very Trump like, Douglas would even go side to side on the stage, in Charleston IL, screaming, and slurring his words, that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with NIGGERS.

That was the real fear -- by the way -- of most white men.  That black men would be free, and that meant black men would be around their wives and daughters.  No one told you that either -- but it Southerners and Northerners alike harped on that, again, and again, not just against Lincoln, but against anyone who was against Lincoln.

It just so happens, the most powerful, bombastic, and loud speaker of the generation, Stephen A Douglas, stabbed Lincoln again, and again, and again with that knife- and was effective.  He defeated Lincoln for Senate, and would have beat Lincoln for president if the pro slavery folks did not divide the vote, three ways.


Did you know Lincoln's friend was killed -some say burned to death in front of a cheering crowd -- because he (Lovejoy) was too much of an "abolitionist"?   Did you know that others were still being killed in the US for speaking too bluntly against slavery?

No one told you that?

Douglass knew, if you did not, that most white  people, even in the North,  would not walk across the street, to help a slave, and even in Illinois, Lincoln's state, blacks could not move there.   

If you know Lincoln's FULL quotes, and actions, you will know how radical he was, for his time, and place.

Southern leaders had Lincoln right -- they accused him of being an abolitionist --"the worst sort" of abolitionist, who really sought to destroy slavery in the entire country.  They used his history in Congress, and his House Divided speech to prove it.

Lincoln correctly said, slavery will spread to the entire US, or it will be eliminated in the entire US, because of the Kansas Act fraud, and Dred Scott fraud, both of which, Lincoln knew and said, were contrived "machinery" to spread slavery to all states, North and South.

Supposed "historian" Eric Foner claimed Lincoln was "nothing special"  and had to "evolve".  
Trouble is -- facts show, when you get all Lincoln actions, and all his writings and speeches, LIncoln was a radical mother fucker, like no other, for where he was, and when he was.


Inexplicably, Foner and other "historians"  said, for example, that Dred Scott decision was "a rather narrow decision that Congress can't stop the spread of slavery into the Territories"

Did Foner ever bother to READ the Dred Scott decision?     Lincoln sure as fuck read it. So did Jeff Davis (Davis probably wrote it).  Dred Scott was about one thing -- according to Lincoln.   To spread slavery by declaring blacks are not human beings.

That's not sorta what Dred Scott decision said -- that is exactly fucking what Dred Scott decision said.  And that is exactly what Jeff Davis quoted -- about blacks not being human, and therefore slavery must spread.     Lincoln got it right.

But Foner claims  Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling".   You have to be a stupid fuck, or a liar, to get that wrong.    More about Foner's amazing stupidity, below.  


When you tell people today that Lincoln exposed the plans of Southern leaders to spread slavery, North and South, they look at you like you lost your mind.

You can hardly find a history teacher, let alone regular person, who seems to have read Lincoln's House Divided Speech -- voted his second most famous speech, behind Gettysburg Address.

Lincoln's House divided speech (he have versions of it dozens of times) was about ONE thing -- Southern attempts to spread slavery by any means, their orchestrated, decade long attempts to force slavery where it was rejected.

Lincoln (and many others) repeatedly pointed out the violence and killings in Kansas, how the Kansas Act and Dred Scott were a planned "construction" to push slavery to the entire US

In fact, Southern leaders said the same thing.

US Senator David Rice Atchison -- who boasted about passing Kansas Act -- bragged out the ass he was in Kansas killing and spreading terror to spread slavery.

 But indeed, that is EXACTLY what they were planning, and bragging of.   This entire aspect of Southern War ULtimatums, killing sprees, and endless violence, bragged of at the time, by the Southern leaders themselves, simply does not appear in US text books.

But Lincoln had to deal with what was going on, not what bullshit Southern school board crybabies allowed in US text books. 

Did you know that no abolitionist speaker went where Lincoln did, and spoke to people Lincoln spoke to?  They went to places -- and were paid to go -- to crowds that already were against slavery.,  They dare not go where Lincoln went, and talk to who Lincoln talk to.

You need to know those kinds of things, if you want to know about Lincoln.,

Do you know that no one was a radical as Lincoln, according to his enemies, in his eagerness to destroy slavery where it was?   Were all his Southern enemies wrong?

Lincoln was a racist, he was for white superiority, he wanted to deport freed blacks, he had to be "dragged"  into being against slavery.

Lincoln was "nothing special"  said Eric Foner, about equality.  Seriously, how do you get that stupid?  You just pretend, or do now know, how vile and violent Southern leaders were. 

For example, did you know that Stephen A Douglas was essentially urging violence upon Lincoln?  No.  Did you know  Stephen A Douglas watched Charles Sumner being beaten, almost to death, and the Senate floor, and laughed about it?

Did you know Southern leaders were boasting of killing, and torturing, from 1856 on?

Killing whites, and torturing anyone who spoke or tried to vote against slavery in Kansas.

Sounds insane, right? Southern leaders boasting of killing, and actually killing, to stop people from speaking or voting against slavery.

YOu would have heard of that, right?  

Wrong.     As Lincoln pointed out in personal letters to Joshua Speed (and spoke of in parsed words in public speeches) the South was about violence -- first, and always. Every step, every moment of slavery was violence based, tortures, burnings, and terror.  Slavery existed in violence, spreads by violence, and only by violence.

Oh, you didn't read that (and other) letters, by Lincoln, about what he faced, and why he did what he did?

Well there are MANY speeches, and many letters, where Lincoln shows very well what was going on, sometimes in blunt terms (in private) and in parsed words (in public).

Lincoln know -- and Frederick Douglass knew -- that Lincoln would have been killed much sooner, if he went were he did, and said what he said, in more blunt terms.

  • 1846 Lincoln openly accused President Polk of doing the South's bidding, which he was, by invading Mexico, and provoking a war, solely to spread slavery and add to slave power and slave states. 
  • 1848 LIncoln was hated by slave owners and slave power for speaking the truth everyone knew -- the South was once again (and would endlessly) kill to spread slavery.
  • Lincoln tried 40 times to get the Wilmot Proviso passed -- to preclude slavery in the land the US stole (yes stole) from Mexico in the war slave owners and slave power wanted.
  • Lincoln tried to get slavery outlawed in Washington DC as a Congressman.
  • Lincoln got back into politics because Southern scum got Kansas Act passed, Lincoln and others knew that once again, Southern scum were deceptively and fraudulently and violently try to spread slavery by means foul, and more foul.

Even so -- even though Lincoln at times parsed words, read his words very carefully.  He knew what he was saying.   And he knew what he was doing.

Lincoln knew the public was NOT ready for an outright abolitionist to even run for office, much less win the Presidency.   Likely, an outright abolitionist -- or anyone speaking like that  -- would have been shot, if they went where Lincoln went.

What good would a dead Lincoln do, if he was killed in 1859, when he went to Kansas?   No good at all.   Others had been killed, Lincoln would just be another dead man, and you would never have heard of him.

Idiots seem to BLAME Lincoln for parsing words -- fuck them.  If you are going to blame him -- get all his words, in context, and his actions. Then play all the fucking games you want.


Did you know that in Congress, promises of death to those against slavery, was not uncommon?  And not in jest?


Not only was Sumner beaten almost to death, others were attacked, off the Senate and House floor.  And even on the House floor, promises of killing -- not in jest --was not uncommon.

And remember, Southern leaders DID NOT BLUFF.   They could not, nor did they, bluff.

These were men who tied up women to whip, sold children, bought women and children from bounty hunters.

They saw tortures at home, they were very comfortable with torture and violence, as you will see, slavery was based on violence.

You should know, but no one told you.

In fact, several of Confederate leaders made it very clear -- not taught today -- that they would kill all the slaves rather than free them.

Did you know that?  Not in the sense that they wanted to kill all the slaves, but they would, if they had to, rather than live in equality with "Niggers" .

Jeff Davis was one of the leaders who spoke about  genocide of blacks in the South. So too, the governors of Florida and Georgia.

No one told you, that did they?



You might be surprised to know, at the time, Lincoln's enemies were loud, and even violent, about Lincoln's "obsession for equality of the Nigger"   as Stephen A Douglas said repeatedly, to his face, in front of large crowds, during the Lincoln Douglas debates. 

Lincoln's "obsession for Nigger equality"  was not a side issue to Northern press --- it was central to the politics of the day, and the reason Lincoln lost the election.

Lincoln would have lost the next election too -- for President -- except there were three pro slavery candidates, and he alone was for stopping the spread of slavery.  He did not get a majority, and Southern leaders boasted they promised war if the North elected anyone against the SPREAD OF SLAVERY

Did anyone ever tell you, in any text book, that the South issued War Ultimatums?

Did they tell you that Southern editors, even just after the Civil War, said don't blame us for the war -- we told you that we would   take as an ACT OF WAR, any candidate who was against the spread of slavery,

Lincoln was eventually shot in the head, BECAUSE  Southern Booth heard Lincoln speak for voting rights for blacks.

No one told you that, did they?

Here is the map -- the area in white, Southern leaders had already pushed slavery into, by violence.

The area in red -- is the area Atchison himself boasted that he would kill enough, and torture enough, and drown enough, to spread slavery into that area too, even though two states in that area (California and Oregon) were already in the Union, and already free states.

Did you ever hear anyone mention that Southern leaders made it very clear, they were going to kill and torture enough to spread slavery into the entire West -- including California and Oregon, which were already free states?

Not some nut -- but officially, Jeff Davis man -- US Senator David Rice Atchison, and officially "General of Law and Order" in Kansas.

No one ever mentioned that.  We have yet to meet any teacher, any  history expert, who has a clue that the US Senator, who got Kansas Act passed, then rushes to Kansas, and there terrorizes and kills, and boasted about it, to spread slavery to Kansas and the entire West.

Not one teacher, even "history" experts about Kansas.  They did not know.  

Southern newspapers and speakers said Lincoln was such a "Nigger lover" that Lincoln was going "to exterminate" the white race, just by being against the spread of slavery.

Very much like ISIS, Southern leaders were absolutely convinced -- at least they said so in public speeches -- that GOD ordained slavery, and the torture, the punishment of slaves.  Did anyone tell you that?  See below.  

This entire aspect of US history -- the ISIS like lunacy of slave power, has been white washed.  Southern crybabies sure are not going to tell, if they knew.

The disappointing thing is --"historians" like McPherson, Foner and Catton, spend much more time blaming or finding fault with Lincoln, that in anything remotely like telling you candidly how violent Southern leaders were, who they tortured, who they killed, and how they boasted about it.

Can you imagine if Lincoln boasted of torturing someone, promising to kill, boasting he had already killed, and these "historians" not mentioning that? 



That Lincoln would have gotten a bullet to the brain much sooner, if he had spoken more bluntly.

Douglass also knew, no one went where Lincoln went, for the purpose Lincoln went there, and spoke more powerfully, more effectively, and more radically.

Stupid people -- and sadly, many "historians" -- do not grasp Lincoln was radical as hell, in his complete speeches.   

Instead, many people just take Lincoln out of context, a partial quote here, or one letter out of many, and ignore the ISIS like violence around Lincoln.

If you don't understand how creepy, violent, and deadly Southern leaders were -- to slaves, to anyone -- you do not know shit about Lincoln. You may know some bullshit, but you do not know what he, and the nation, faced.

No, you don't.   But Frederick Douglass knew. 

Douglass knew -- and said as much -- that Lincoln had to FIRST bring millions of whites in the North into awareness that to end slavery, the Union had to stay together.  Lincoln wisely -- and necessarily -- spoke of Union, to get support of enough whites to win the war.  

If you don't know that -- and most people do not, then you don't know shit about Lincoln or the Civil War. 

Your history teacher, of course, SHOULD know this, and teach it, but as far as we know, not a single US text book reports the violence, death threats, and eventual death of Lincoln, as the result of LIncoln's "obsession for equality".

Speaking about Union -- kicking slavery in the ass sideways -- in actions. 

You can always take Lincoln -- or anyone -- and make them seem anyway you want. It's done all the time.   



That Southern leaders would have killed and or arrested Lincoln if he had stepped foot in the South,  because to speak against slavery was a crime in all slave states.

But get ALL Lincoln's words, and ALL Lincoln's actions, as Frederick Douglass did, and you can't make up shit or distort him, if you care to be honest.

In fact, no one came close to Lincoln in effectively kicking slavery in the ass, and speaking in a way, to do it.   As Stephen Douglas made clear -- Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality for the blacks -- and if you learn all Lincoln's speeches, and actions, he was. 

Those who accused Lincoln of actually being eager to end slavery in all of the US -- turns out, were right. If he could get the chance, and get the whites behind him in the North and South (many folks in the  South were against slavery -- more about that later)  slavery had to go.

Lincoln said without public "sentiment"  nothing could get done on slavery.   He  had to have Northern folks willing to help end slavery.  He also had to have the border states state in the Union, or the Civil War is over.  

Did you know that?  Did you know if LIncoln lost just ONE border states to the Confederacy --Kentucky -- the war would be over, the nation split, and slavery would spread?

Did anyone ever tell you that?   Lincoln DID tell folks that, more than once.



That most whites, even in the North, would not walk across the street to piss on a black slave, much less fight and die to free slaves..... Lincoln knew it, too. 

So if you want to play word games about Lincoln - -add those.   Add the House Divided Speech.

Add Lincoln's words in letters about how Southern leaders were killing and torturing to spread slavery, how violent Southern lunatics were.   In his letters, Lincoln would "speak" much more bluntly than he had to in speeches, where he had to be very careful with every word, or he not only loses the election of 1860 and 64, but  he also loses the border state, and the war is over.

LINCOLN knew that, many people then knew it, your history teachers SHOULD know it, but likely, they do not.

No one disputes that to understand something - you need all the basic facts.  Then -- once you have all the facts -- the simple answer is almost certainly the correct one.

To understand Lincoln or the Civil War, you need ALL the basic facts.  If you don't know, for example, that most people in the North would not piss on a slave if they were on fire, and that virtually no white man in the North cared to fight to free the slaves, you don't understand why Lincoln had to parse words -- to carefully say things. 

Even your history teacher will say some things about Lincoln's "ambivalence"  or reluctance to free the slaves,  because you can piece together some edite quotes, ignore the full speeches and mostly, ignore his actions.

 Some folks loathe Lincoln, claiming he was pro slavery, and only used the popular hatred of slavery to get power. 

Actually, as Frederick Douglass knew, and many knew, Lincoln had to speak -- at certain times -- in a very careful way, or he would have gotten a bullet in the brain sooner.  His friend Lovejoy was killed by not speaking carefully.

Lincoln eventually got the "Bullet to the brain"  he would have gotten sooner, because he spoke too bluntly about voting rights for blacks, in a speech John Wilkes Booth heard, and changed his plan from kidnap, to kill.

Even then, Lincoln spoke carefully, in the speech Booth heard.  But it was too radical for Booth.  Any talk about voting rights for blacks, was as bad as Lincoln wanting your daughter to sleep with "niggers"  according the Stephen A Douglas. 



If you ONLY went by edited quotes, out of context quotes, and paid no attention to Lincoln's full quotes, full letters, full speeches, full documents, you can make Lincoln seem any way you want -- he gave over 3000 speeches, wrote hundreds of letters. Just like people can make the bible say anything it wants, to sound religious, so too can people make Lincoln say anything they want, to sound smart about him or the Civil War.



Frederick Douglass backed it up -- he explained  how radical Lincoln was. How swift. How zealous.   But the South, and most of the North, already knew that.  In fact, Lincoln lost elections -and almost lost the Presidential election in 1860, because he was so radical for equality for the "Nigger"  as Stephen A Douglas told the country repeatedly.

Too bad you -- nor your history teacher -- has a clue about this.  It has been whitewashed in US history books. 



Lincoln was "radical Nigger lover who will cause the extermination of the white race"


When Lincoln rose to speak -- especially after Stephen Douglas and whipped the crowd up as much as he could to hate and fear Lincoln -- he did  have to parse words.   Most people in the audience had never seen a slave -- did you know that?  Most people in the audience didn't give a damn, and would not piss on, as slave if they were on fire.

And many of the men were terrified that blacks would take their women.  You did not know that, did you?  It's never taught.



That Southern leaders would have killed and or arrested Lincoln if he had stepped foot in the South,  because to speak against slavery was a crime in all slave states.

But this a theme of those against Lincoln, at the time.  Not just Lincoln, but anyone who was against slavery, was taunted in likewise manner. "Negro Worshiper"  was a common refrain.

In the South, LIncoln was accused of trying to "exterminate the white race".   

Did you know that, or not.  Publically, to cheering crowds, Southern leaders would claim anyone against the spread of slavery -- against just the spread of slavery-- would exterminate the white race.

Douglass knew that.  Douglass (two s's) lived daily, hourly, in that atmosphere.  He and Lincoln would be surprised that this basic aspect of life, and fear mongering, would be entirely glossed over in history.

In fact, Southern leaders not only promised to kill to spread slavery, they promised to kill to stop people from even speaking against slavery, in all Southern States, and in Kansas.

Some Southern leaders, including the governors of Florida, Georgia, and Jeff Davis himself, spoke of killing all freed blacks.

No one ever mentioned that, did they?

Guess who knew all that?  Frederick Douglass. And Lincoln. 

Douglass  was a former slave, escaped after he saw a woman whipped to death by the owner, show shouted bible verses.

Douglass was not easily fooled.

Douglass knew things, a million things, large and small, that are not taught, like Lincoln was taunted and hated for being a "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

It was not some nut on the street that yelled in Lincoln's face, that he was a "Nigger lover"  who would destroy the fabric of society and push white women into the arms of black men.  It was US Senator Stephen A Douglas.

The film clip above is the  basic approach of both men, is well represented here, except for Douglas fear mongering about your daughter's sleeping with "Niggers"  is, and always has been, glossed over. 

Only Douglas (Stephen) was screaming the word "Nigger"   and they cleaned that up.

Lincoln wants your daughters AND WIVES to "be with Niggers"  Douglas would scream -- a very real fear, a very real hate, in 1858.   You could not possibly generate more hate and fear, than by this approach, and Douglas used it repeatedly -- and effectively.

Your history teacher, nor any US history book, tells you this, do they.

Show me 1 text book, One history book,  Anything at all, in high school or college level, that shows how relentless Lincoln was called "Nigger Lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"

   And Douglas was MILD compared to Lincoln's Southern enemies. Southern leaders claimed Lincoln was "the worst sort of abolitionist"   who was going to end slavery everywhere if he could.

Gee - maybe they knew something?



Show me 1 textbook that mentions it -- just MENTIONS that Lincoln was attacked politically in the North(and his friend killed) for "being obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  long before the Civil War.

You can't find one that mentions it, much less makes it clear. 

Show me 1 text book that shows Lincoln was accused, loudly, proudly, to his face, in front of large crowds,  of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Show me 1 text book that shows Lincoln's friend was burned to death, for speaking too candidly about freedom for slaves, and that Stephen A Douglas taunted Lincoln about this, in the Lincoln Douglas debates.

You won't find one.  NOT ONE.




If you don't think Douglas (Stephen A) was essentially urging the crowd to hate and fear Lincoln, if not attack him physically, consider that not long before the Lincoln Douglas debates, Douglas stood a few feet from Senator Charles Sumner, as he was beat almost to death on the Senate floor, and laughed about it, later.  Very likely, Douglas knew Sumner was going to be beaten that day. 

Then Lincoln had to speak. Remember that. Lincoln had to get up to speak after guys like Douglas just spoke -- he was the most powerful speaker of that era -- and had the crowd fearful and hateful.

No one mentions that.  Why the fuck not?  Probably because they don't have a clue.

But guess who did know?  Frederick Douglass knew.

Also, Stephen A Douglas business partner, and political ally, was the US Senator who got Kansas Act passed, then immediately went to Kansas and started his violence to make sure no one spoke or voted against slavery in Kansas.



In the Charleston debate, Douglas, well aware of the fear of black men taking white women had in that city, screamed these things about Lincoln wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  as Douglas went from side to side of the stage. in the most dramatic way possible.

This was a basic approach Douglas used to some extent, in the debates, and when he spoke around the country without Lincoln being there. In some places he would be more extreme - some say he was drunk -- but always, in each speech, his goal was to get people to fear anyone who was against slavery.   

Douglass -- Frederick Douglass -- knew what Lincoln was up against.   


That was in the newspapers at the time, and was no surprise to anyone.  Fear of black man sleeping with your daughter and "being with" your wife, was the common retort to anyone who was against slavery.  And it worked.  

The fear and hate mongering by Douglas, worked very well.  Lincoln lost that election, and would have lost the Presidential election too, if the hate and fear mongers did not split the pro slavery vote three ways. 



Scaring the crap out of the males in the audience -- the only ones that could vote -- worked. Despite all his efforts,

  Lincoln had to use humor and much of his time, deflecting this claim he wanted "your daughters to sleep with Niggers"

 Lincoln lost to Douglas in the Senate race, and would have likewise lost in the Presidential race, but the pro-spread of slavery folks had three candidates. 

 Lincoln was the ONLY candidate against slavery, with the very mild platform of no spread of slavery.


White people were still being killed, even in the North for being "radical abolitionist"  .

Abolitionist -- the child molesters of the day.

People don't realize it now, but to be called an abolitionist in some areas then, is much like being called a child molester now. 

Today, we honor abolitionist.  

Have you ever heard our historians mention, at least in any meaningful way, how abolitionist was a term of scorn.  

Did any US textbook mention that even in the North, people were still being killed, tortured, drown, hung, for being "radical abolitionist"?

Lincoln's friend was killed by a mob in Alton Illinois, for publishing an anti slavery newspaper. The men who killed his friend, were who later Lincoln would speak in front of, in the Lincoln Douglas debates.

Did anyone ever mention that, much less make it clear?

 People were killed -- yes they were -- by crowds for being an abolitionist.

Lincoln himself was called "the worst sort of abolitionist"  and a "Nigger lover" "Nigger worshipper" who wanted your daughter to sleep with Niggers".

John Palmer, who with Lincoln started the GOP party in Illinois, wrote about this in 1890, not long before his death. He said even by 1890, people did not grasp what a vile term "abolitionist was"  and how violent people were, against abolitionist, or anyone called that.


To be an "abolitionist" in 1850-1860 was deadly in the South, and could be deadly in the North.

There were abolitionist speakers in the North -- but not where Lincoln was.

Nor would any abolitionist speaker even go, physically, to places Lincoln went, or talk to crowds Lincoln not only spoke to, but tried to get their vote.

Lincoln COULD have become an abolitionist speaker, gone to places that already agreed with him, and been more candid.

What the fuck good would that do? 

But Lincoln got back into politics BECAUSE of slavery, specifically the killing in Kansas, and the Kansas Act.

He had to be very careful what he said -- but he was amazingly powerful, stunningly powerful, in his speeches. Read all of the speech, not just edited bullhit, and know what the fuck was going on.

If you don't know how dangerous it was for Lincoln to go where he did, and say what he said, you really don't know shit about Lincoln or what caused the civil war.

Lincoln tried mightily to show the public what was going on -- how Southern leaders were pushing slavery in such a way, slavery would be all over the US, or in none of the US. 

Did you know, yes or know, that virtually everything in Lincoln Douglas debates, were about the SPREAD of slavery by violence and unconstitutional means?  Douglas was eager to "blow up" the debates into fear mongering about your daughter's sleeping with "Niggers,"  to take away Lincoln's main point, that Douglas  himself, and others, were pushing slavery into the rest of the US under the ruse of Douglas deception about "popular sovereignty".

The result is,  now, most people are perplexed upon reading the Lincoln Douglas debates. You will likely never hear your  history teacher tell you that Lincoln was exposing Douglas's duplicity on his charade of Kansas Act, and how Douglas and others were actually forcing slavery to spread, against popular sovereignty.

Douglas,  a master at Orwellian bullshit, would claim over and over he "just wanted the people to decide".     But as Lincoln and others showed, that is exactly the opposite of what Douglas was doing.  Douglas had written the Kansas Act with his business partner David Rice Atchison, who was in Kansas personally, and there, killing and terrorizing to PREVENT popular sovereignty. 

This was Lincoln's basic point -- that Southern leaders were pushing by violence and deception, what they could not push by constitutional means -- the spread of slavery. 

  Lincoln blasted the living **** out of slavery in this debate -- more than anyone else dared then, in that area,  while trying to get elected.  Your history teacher probably doesn't even suspect that, much less teach it.  

For those who claim Lincoln was not radical -- long before the CIvil War started -- they oddly can not show anymore more radical AND effective.   

Lincoln was able to actually change people's minds, in Illinois and the nation, to see what is not taught candidly today. The South really was killing and torturing, and were actually violently pushing slavery in a way that it would, by necessity, be "all or nothing".

If the US would allow Douglas and his partners push slavery into Kansas this way,  there was no earthly way to stop slavery from being everywhere.    The way the South was pushing slavery, and had always pushed slavery (by force and deception) was the immediate problem.

And Southern leaders AGREED!  As you will see, Southern leaders were proud of the machinery -- as Lincoln called it -- that would spread slavery to the entire US, and beyond, a very special kind of slavery -- first in the world, they bragged.  To spread slavery for GOD to the far reeaches of the US and the white world.  Another very basic truth about Southern leaders that is entirely white washed today.


Others said  " Lincoln is the worst kind of abolitionist ... and will cause the extinction of the white race"

Lincoln's radical actions to free the slaves will cause  us necessarily to exterminate the slaves "with our own hands." 

 The stupidit about Lincoln continues, like bullshit 

"Lincoln used slavery as an excuse to keep the Union together."

"LINCOLN was a racist  content to let slavery continue."



That stupid shit, Fred Douglass. He almost acts as if he were there, was a slave himself, knew Lincoln, and all that went on from 1846-1865.

Why learn from Fred Douglass?   The average Texas grade school kid knows more than he does. 





"Amazing how you can take a few quotes here, a few there, omit the full speeches, in context, and never mention his actions, and make Lincoln look any fucking way you want."

But when you know the FULL speeches, in context, and his FULL letters (all of them)  and know what was going on, it's a completely different story than all liars, and most pompous "historians"  (including Pulitzer Prize winning historians) tell you.

To understand Lincoln -- you need to understand what Lincoln and Frederick DOuglass understood:  who killed who, and why, is real history. Everything else is bullshit.

If you don't know who was killing who, and why, from 1840-1861, you have no business teaching history. Or writing about it. 

Welcome to  history, were "who killed who, and why"  matters more than bullshit. 




You no doubt have heard -- even been taught --Lincoln didn't REALLY care about slavery. Lincoln was a racist and believed in white supremacy.  

After all, didn't your high school teacher tell you that?

Or Lincoln  had to be "pulled" into being against slavery, and only acted to keep the Union together. Entire books, entire "history careers" are based on that.

The only way to be that stupid, is to NOT know or care about Lincoln's full speeches and actions.

Yes, Lincoln spoke  -- at times -- in ways that seem to confirm he had no concern for slavery.    But read his FULL speeches, and his personal letters, and you wont be so stupid.

In fact, you can probably not name anyone who was as radical and zealous to end slavery as Lincoln,  AND as radical for equality in an effective way.

 John Brown comes to mind? Not really. As Frederick Douglas wrote of his own good friend Brown, Brown's violence actually cost the efforts to end slavery in profound ways, as you would know if you knew about Brown and Douglass friendship.



Lincoln had the effective -- and necessary -- habit, of at first seeming to agree with something, then kicking the shit out of that sentiment.  He used that rhetorical ploy to placate and validate the feelings of the audience, but then challenged that sentiments, in the strongest way possible.

If you care to know about Lincoln, slavery and the Civil War, You need to read Lincoln's FULL speeches, and read all his letters. 

You also need to know his technique -- he used it so often, it should be called "The Lincoln head fake" or something like that.

People of that time were terrified of black men stealing their women.   Did you know that?  Very basic at the time.  

Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, spoke of genocide of the black race, if they did not enslave the black race. 

Just like you need to read Southern War Ultimatums, speeches by Southern leaders boasting of killing to spread slavery, boasting of torture of slaves, threatening genocide, promising genocide of the slaves if slavery was not spread.

It's important to note -- and understand -- that Southern leaders were quite clear, quite proud, they were killing to SPREAD slavery. Not keep it. So many people today assume stupidly the Civil War had anything to do with keeping slavery.

Nonsense.  To the South, and they boasted of this, in context, loud and proud, and more, killed to spread slavery and boasted of that, too, there was one issue.  Spreading slavery -- spreading slavery for white survival, according to the leaders.

According to other leaders, spreading slavery for GOD, and biblical truth.

If you don't know about Southern War Ultimatums, don't blame me. Blame your history teacher.   Lincoln got back into politics BECAUSE of the actions of men who boasted they were killing to spread slavery.   Specifically, Senator David Rice Atchison.

Did you know that?

Lincoln had the effective -- and necessary -- habit, of at first seeming to agree with something, particularly in court cases and politics.

But then, Lincoln deftly -- often with humor -- would suddenly, but emphatically, kick the living shit out of that which moments before, he seemed to agree with.

Lincoln did this time, and time again.  He did it so often, and so well, and is rather unique in history for doing so, that historians should have a name for it.   But sadly, most don't seem to grasp this "Lincoln rope a dope" as we call it, was LIncoln's most effective tool.

Lincoln never fired a gun, in the Civil War, though he was shot at several times.  His weapons were words -- and the way he used them.

His "Lincoln rope a dope"  is central to understanding Lincoln.   And it's the only reason liars and stupid fucks can trash Lincoln using his quotes.


If you want to play word games about LIncoln -- FINE. Get all the words.  In context. And compare those to others. 



Douglas (Stephen A Douglas)  made it quite clear, over and over, that LIncoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger".

In speech after speech, Lincoln's enemies told the crowds Lincoln wants "Niggers" to sleep with white women -- your daughters.

Did anyone ever tell you that, at all?  
Fuck no.  NO one told you that.

Pieces of shit Southern apologist, and even "historians" trying to sound smart, will tell you only a tiny % of the words.

 Lincoln is powerful, even brilliant, and he kicks the living shit out of inequality.  He says -- ANY slave is equal to ANY white man.

No one told you about this?  Over and over, Lincoln would say any black is equal to any white, under the law.  Why the fuck not tell folks that?   Fucking hell, that's what Lincoln's basic argument was.


But the lying pieces of shit will leave out that part. 

Edit anyone, edit fucking Jesus, and they can made stupid fucks think that Jesus was pro devil. 

SO yes, you can take a few words here, a few there, and do not give context or the full quote. Happens all the time.  Over and over about Lincoln, because LIncoln gave over 3000 speeches.

But NO  ONE went where LIncoln did, when Lincoln did, and blasted the bastards who were pro torture, pro killing to spread slavery, pro religious lunacy.   We have never taught the insane ISIS like nature of Southern scum and Southern leaders.

Lincoln is accused of being a Nigger lover,  or worse, that he wants "Niggers" to sleep with your daughters. Did he want your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

FUCK NO.  But that is what Lincoln was accused of, repeatedly, to his face, in front of crowds.

Do you think  historians should tell you. Yes, they should, but they fucking dont.  Not in any meaningful way. And Southern scum "historians" are even worse, but guys like McPherson, Catton, Foner don't make that clear either.

Fuck heads. 

AFTER they accuse Lincoln of wanting to destroy the white race, AFTER they accuse Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers" -- Lincoln had to speak.

Do you grasp, yes or no?   Take your time.

Lincoln responds by saying he didn't say he was for perfect equality  --- he would have gotten a bullet in the brain a lot sooner if he had.  So Lincoln parses words. Read them close "I did not say I was in favor of perfect equality".

And that's right, he did NOT say that.  But then he kicks ass and says ANY slave is equal to ANY white man.

Do you wonder why they leave that out? Because they are ass wipes or stupid.  

Lincoln does not just mention blacks are equal to whites, any black is equal to any white, He YELLS that blacks and whites ARE equal. He YELLS that the lowest slave woman is equal to any white man.   

That's his central message. That is what the fuck he was doing there that day, and for years.

Maybe you should learn the whole story?


Nearly verbatim from the debates. 

But Southern leaders were the ones screaming out the ass that Lincoln was so obsessed with equality that he would -- literally -- destroy the white race.

No one bothered to tell you that?  Surprise, surprise.

Over and over -- to his face, in front of large crowds, Stephen A Douglas told crowds Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with Niggers. 

Lincoln's friend was killed for writing against slavery.Lincoln himself would be killed for speaking of voting rights for blacks.

In fact, compared to Lincoln, no one came close to being as effectively swift, radical, and zealous.   But to understand that, you have understand what the fuck was going on.

Others did speak powerfully for ending slavery -- but not to the people LIncoln spoke to, not where he spoke. In fact, none of the great "abolitionist speakers"  would dare go where Lincoln went, when Lincoln went.

Facts matter. Don't let ass wipes spewing bullshit make you hate people you should admire.

Meanwhile, Lincoln's enemies were claiming blacks were not even fucking human, but a species created by GOD to be the slaves of white men as biblical punishment.

Get the WHOLE fucking story, from original sources.  You wont be so stupid.  Most of the shit written after the Civil War is heavy on bullshit, edited quotes, and does NOT show how fucking dangerous it was to speak against slavery.


In all those examples, and much more, you can find an apparent quote or even letter, which backs that up.

But get ALL Lincoln's letters, ALL Lincoln's quotes, and mostly, learn what the fuck was going on, and you won't be so easily fooled.

Actions, of course, matter.  But in actions and words (when you get his complete words) show a fundamentally different story. 

In fact, Lincoln was kicking the shit out of slavery from 1846 on.  Not sorta, not kinda, not in a way.

Lincoln was hated -- from his first time in Congress, all the way tell they put a bullet in his head, for being radical against slavery.  

So how the hell do these "experts" claim Lincoln was "too eager to compromise"   "willing to let slavery continue"    if he was such a bad ass against slavery.

Because Lincoln was smart -- very smart.  And he waged the war the kicked the living FUCK out of slavery, so thoroughly, the Southern GOD of slavery died in the process.

And guess who said Lincoln was radical -- in fact obsessed-- for equality?

Guess who said LIncoln was "the worst kind" of abolitionist who would "destroy the white race"  by  his "love for the Nigger".

Go on, guess. 



If you want to be a bullshitter on LIncoln, it's no problem. Take a quote here, a quote from 6 years later, a letter at a certain time, ignore everything else, and you can make Lincoln seem anyway you want.

Northern and Southern folks HATED Lincoln -- and eventually killed him -- for being radical for equality.   No one told you that.  Lincoln took a bullet to the brain for being too radical -- he spoke of voting rights for blacks, and Booth changed his plan from kidnap to kill, because of that speech.

Did you know that?  

Evern NORTHERN newspapers trashed Lincoln for being a "Negro Worshipers".  Lincoln's friend was killed (burned to death) for writing against slavery.  He was trapped in his newspaper office, and Lincoln's enemies burned it down.

Douglas would say things like  "Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Niggers,  loves Niggers more than he loves his own country"

John Brown comes to mind.  He was more radical, but he was caught in about an hour, and executed.  As Frederick Douglass himself said (he was a goof friend of Brown's) John Brown harmed the overall efforts to end slavery, by feeding right into the hate and fear mongering about slave rebelling and the killings of whites in an early slave rebellion.

Southern leaders had long warned that freeing the slaves -- or even not spreading slavery -- was going to destroy the white race.  Did you know that?  

This was quite well known at the time.  The governors of Florida and Georgia wrote about this, at length.  If Lincoln just stopped the SPREAD of slavery, blacks would get their freedom and kill or degrade the white race, take the white women, and whites would be massacred or "brought to the degraded condition of the Negro" .

I can't help it if you didn't know these things. 
Blame the fucking idiots who write history books in the US.  Not me.  I am tell you who killed who and why. And what Southern leaders proudly said when they were killing people. 

More than anything, Lincoln was effective. 

 He got the job done.  

No one else did.

  No one else was able to get the majority of Northern citizens to eventually agree that slavery had to go.  

Lincoln had to deal with that fear and hate of the black man.  So he did. Another speaker -- getting paid to speak like the abolitionist speakers were, protected in crowds that already agreed with them -- did not do any good, or slavery would have ended long before.

Learn his FULL speeches.  From 1854 on, Lincoln was hated North and South for being a "Nigger lover"  a  "Negro Worshiper".

His friend was burned to death,  he would eventually get his own bullet the the brain, for being so radical about voting rights for blacks.

No one told you that -- and much more.  Funny, because facts make a difference.  Learn real history -- who killed who, and why, is real history.  All else is bullshit.



Fat lot of good that would do.

Lincoln could have been more bombastic in many of his speeches. But where he spoke, when  he spoke, to whom he spoke, no one even came close.

Lincoln's full speeches are epic, powerful,  they changed the living fuck out of the US as it was.

IF he  had been more like John Brown's speeches, he would have been radical in every sentence, and shot a lot sooner.

Did you know that?


Lincoln  himself would get a bullet in the brain,  for speaking too bluntly about voting rights for blacks.

You didn't even know that, did you?

Guess who knew?

Frederick Douglas knew. 

And Douglass knew exactly what the fuck was going on. I doubt you do, even if you are a history professor. I have yet to see a  history professor who seems to grasp just how radical Lincoln was.  Why?  Because they endlessly refer to a few out of context quotes from various speeches.

They ignore his amazing actions, usually they don't even know.

They ignore his full speeches.

They ignore what the fuck was going on. 

They ignore that others were killed, as Lincoln would be, for being too radical for equality.

SO they never tell you.


   Gee, Douglass had to be stupid, right?   


Fred Douglas saw a woman tortured to DEATH while the master shouted scriptures.

Fred Douglas was world famous, long before Lincoln ran for office.

Fred Douglas didn't take any bullshit.   He respected two white men in his life.  One was John Brown, the other was Abe Lincoln.

OF the two, Douglas said, Lincoln was far wiser in the way he fought slavery.   In fact, Douglas said Lincoln was "radical, swift, zealous and determined" to end slavery.    Only Lincoln did it with more brains, and was effective.



1846 -- and for the next 19 years -- Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass, as hard as he could, where he was, when he was.

That's not how you are taught, however, because often "historians" don't even mention Lincoln's full actions and words at the time.

Frederick Douglass knew a hell of a lot better than you do, what the fuck was going on, leading up the the Civil War.

Probably 99% of Americans have no clue that the "Mexican American War" was a war to double the size of slave territory, and that Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and called him on that, specifically saying Polk did it to spread slavery.

Nor do 99% of Americans know that the spread of slavery was at the heart of everything going on from 1820-1865.   It was no some side issue, not even just a main issue.  It was everything.

And Lincoln said so.

And Lincoln was right.Every election, every bill, every dispute, every newspaper, every politican North and South, was focused on slavery.  Many in the North loved slavery and got rich on it.

When Lincoln could finally get enough support from the country, he kicked slavery so fucking hard, the God of slavery died.  Bet you didn't know that.

But yes, Lincoln AT TIMES parsed words. He had to pick his battles. He had to speak -- at times -- about Union. As if that's horrible. Meanwhile, his enemies were speaking that GOD ordained slavery and promised to kill to spread it for GOD.  You don't know that, do you?

Did you know about Southern War Ultimatums? No.

Did you know about Southern leaders proud speeches promising endless killing unless slavery was spread all over, North and South?


Did you know Southern states all made it a crime to speak against slavery, write against slavery, and they even made it impossible to SPEAK about slavery in Congress for 12 years.


Douglass knew that, and a million other things, you don't have a clue about 

Douglas knew that most white people would not piss on a black person, if they were on fire.   He knew too, that just to TALK about ending slavery could get you killed, North and South, if you were too blunt about it, in the wrong place.

Did you know, for example, that in most of the US, when Lincoln ran for the Senate, it was ILLEGAL to speak against slavery?  In all of the South, it was a crime, punishable by torture, to speak openly or preach against slavery.  

Most people have no clue.

Even in Kansas, when Lincoln ran for Senate, it was a crime to speak or write a newspaper against slavery.  Those laws stayed on the books -- and may still be there actually -- until after the US Civil War.    Bet you didn't know that.

Stephen A Douglas -- the guy from Lincoln Douglas debates -- repeatedly told the crowd that Frederick Douglas and Lincoln were with a white woman that day, in a carriage.    The same Stephen A Douglas told the same crowd "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Today, right now, stupid people trash Lincoln -- for exactly the opposite reason.  And those are not all stupid people, some of those who trash Lincoln are just fucking liars, who make damn sure not to tell you Lincoln's FULL quotes, in context, and make damn sure they don't tell  you what Lincoln did.

Stupid people will tell you, Lincoln AT best ended slavery to keep the Union together, or that he "didn't really give a shit"  about slavery until the Civil War was almost over.

You can only say shit like that, by deception. Show ALL of Lincoln's speeches, and show what was going on, mostly show what Lincoln DID, and you can't say shit like that.

See what those fucktards never tell you....... 



Lincoln was effectively kicking slavery in the ass sideways from 1846 on, when he stood up to President Polk and rightfully accused him of killing to spread slavery, and creating a war to do it, against Mexico.


From 1858 on, in fact, politicians North and South claimed Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"


The big gripe against Lincoln, North and South, is that he was a "Negro Worshipper".

Lincoln had the audacity to say blacks should be considered equal under the law -- things he could have been killed for, and WAS eventually killed for.

Lincoln was vilified in the South as someone who will "exterminate the white race -- even in the North Lincoln was derided as "cares more about the Nigger than his own race ".

Most people -- even today -- have no clue that at the time Lincoln ran for Senate and President, it was illegal,  a crime, to speak against slavery, and the punishement was torture.

Did you know that?   In all of the South, and in Kansas, Southern leaders had made it a crime --yes, punishable by torture -- to speak, preach or write against slavery.  

Very basic -- and very well known at the  time. How has this escaped notice in any US history text book?

Because Southern liars and crybabies have never allowed the  harsh truth about their heroes to be mentioned in US text books, other than in vague and or bullshit terms, if at all.


Was Jeff Davis stupid?   Davis and others   said Lincoln was "the worst kind of abolitionist".

Was Jeff Davis lying, stupid, or just didn't know??


Was the Vice President of the Confederacy stupid?   Alexander Stephens  said Lincoln stood in the way of God's will to spread slavery to the entire white world. 

Yes, God's will. Stephens and Davis both -- both-- boasted that the Confederacy was based on the SPREAD of slavery as God and nature intended.

Oh, no one told you that either?   

Stephens and Davis were both very specific -- see below.  Their type of slavery was GOD'S type of slavery.  Perpetual slavery, where the children born are also slaves, in perpetuity.   No matter how light skinned a child is, for example rape of slave women, a slave "issue" --  a child--  is a slave, and any "issue" from such children are slaves by the will of GOD.

Furthermore, Stephens famously said- - Southern slavery is not only GODLY -- but Godly because white man is supposed to punish the black race for biblical sins.

You heard right.  And they BOASTED of this,.  And much more, till they lost. 


Was the  Confederate Secretary of State (Toombs) stupid?   He said Lincoln's refusal to allow the spread of slavery into Kansas --Kansas had rejected slavery by 95% -- was going to "exterminate the white race".

Oh, no one told you that?  Gee, surprise surprise. It's almost like Southern crybabies would not allow anything in our history books,  that their own leaders were bragging about the ass about, at the time.

So -- unless you know what the FUCK was going on, and you sure don't hear any of this in your school or from "historians" who suck up to Southern apologists even today --  you don't know shit.

Really, you don't know shit. And yes, "historians" are too stupid, or too busy with bullshit, to tell you bluntly, about Southern leaders actions, killing sprees, and much else. It's as if they are still afraid to speak bluntly about Southern leaders and what they boasted of at the time.


You can make Lincoln SEEM any way you want, by selecting four or five quotes, out of context, and ignore his actions. Happens a lot.

But at the time -- Northern and Southern newspapers, Northern and Southern politicians, accused Lincoln of being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Lincoln better watch what the hell he said, and to whom, or he would have been shot a lot sooner than he was. And yes, he was shot for speaking too bluntly. Hell, your "history" teacher never even tells you that.

To get elected -- and to not get shot sooner -- Lincoln learned to parse words.  So he did.  Others did not parse words as well, and were killed, like Lovejoy, Lincoln's friend, burned to death inside his building where he printed an antislavery newspaper. 

It was ILLEGAL -- a crime -- to publish anything like that in most of the US at the time. DId you know that?  It was legal in Illinois, but still pissed off some folks, so they killed Lincoln's friend.

When Stephen A Douglas reminded the crowds -- again and again -- that Lincoln was friends with Lovejoy, he was doing  all he could to ferment more hatred against Lincoln.  No one told you that, did they?

And unless you knew US  history very very well, you would not grasp that by yourself.  But Douglas -- almost in every sentence - was urging the crowd to hate and fear Lincoln.  And it worked. Douglas won that election.

In fact, Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, to Lincoln's face, in front of crowd after crowd -- accused Lincoln of not only being obsessed with equality, but told the crowd Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

In Charleston, Douglas went from side to side of the stage, slobbering and clearly drunk, yelling  in a way only Douglas could, that Lincoln would have black men marry your daughter.

LIncoln gave 3000 or so speeches.  In those speeches were over a million words, many of them written down.  A few words here - out of context -- a few words there,  and you can make him say whatever you want.


You are never told this -- but it was common knowledge, North and South, at the time.

Ending slavery would let black men on the same sidewalk, as white women.  Southern leaders were eager to bounce upon this fear.   The white race will be exterminated-- not sorta, not kinda, not maybe.  

Just stopping the SPREAD of slavery would exterminate the white race!   That is how crazy and fearful Southern leaders made people in the South.  

Stephen A Douglas was eager, glad, and loud in calling Lincoln a "Negro Worshipper"

New  York papers called Lincoln a Negro worshipper -- a common refrain actually, to call anyone against slavery "Negro Worshiper".

In fact, Southern leaders would accuse each other of being "Negro Worshippers"  if they were not suitably rabid.    Southern leaders competed -- and had to compete -- to be the most extreme.  Very much like hate mongers compete today, in the GOP and Tea Party.  If you are not hateful enough -- the next guy will be.

This, of course, was exactly the big fear.   This fear of black men taking white women was not a side issue -- end slavery, Douglas and others said -- and you will have your daughters taken by black men, your wife will be able to talk to black men, etc. 

But even that -- even just stopping the spread of slavery, was "burning us to death" over a slow fire.

So Lincoln had to be very careful how he spoke. He spoke with amazing power -- see  his FULL speeches.   But you can take a sentence here or there, twist it, not show the full quote, and not show his actions, and make people believe anything, anything at all.

But if you know ALL of Lincolns full quotes -- not the edited shit used by lying bastards and dumb asses --- you can't make Lincoln seem that way.  Lincoln was a RADICAL mother fucker, in fact, no one even came close to Lincoln for radical effective action.

Yes, most of the quotes by Lincoln haters and detractors are true -- they have changed a word or two, but for the most part, Lincoln did say, on a give day or in a given letter, the things they show.


In order not to get killed any sooner than he was, Lincoln  would SEEM to agree with a common sentiment, over and over he did this.  

But then, in the same speech, sometimes in the next damn sentence, Lincoln would kick the shit ouf of the sentiment he just seemed to endorse. 

Lincoln would say things like "any slave is worth any white man" -- including equal to Judge Douglas.   Any slave, is equal, to any white man.   Furthermore, Lincoln exposed the violent ISIS like Southern scum that killed to spread slavery.

Gee-- you never hear of those speeches, even though Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass in virtually all his speeches.  

So what Lincoln haters do, is just quote him selectively, and run like cowards, rather than show what Lincoln did.


So in his Peoria speech, you can take a sentence out -- many do -- and make it seem like Lincoln agreed with sending free blacks to Africa, the very popular idea of "colonization".    There is not one Lincoln detractor in  history that will dare show you his FULL speech, where is first seems to agree, then cleverly comes back to the idea, and shows it as unworkable, vile, and horribly unfair.

Why not show you that?   

No one was confused, who was there.  Lincoln did not mince words, but he did speak cleverly.  He did speak in a way he would not get shot. He did speak in a way people might agree with him.

His main focus was to first stop the killings and tortures used by the South to spread slavery. I doubt many people reading this know anything about Southern killing sprees -- some paid for by Jeff Davis was he was Secretary of War -- to not just kill to spread slavery, but to kill to silence opposition to slavery.

Lincoln spoke about those killings, too.  Southern leaders were actually very proud of them, bragged about them, at the time.  Lincoln wrote about the people involved in those killings- - someone wrote him and said we need to kill all those people who are killing to spread slavery.  Lincoln wrote back -- do you know what he wrote?

No. You don't.

YOu need to understand the facts of 1846, who killed who, who tortured who, what did Southern leaders brag about and do -- to understand Lincoln.  And if you don't know that, you really don't know shit.

You came to the right place, because I will tell you the things commonly known then -- commonly  bragged about by the Southern leaders -- that you never heard of. 

Not only did Frederick Douglass claim Lincoln was "radical" to end slavery -Lincoln's enemies, including Jeff Davis, said so too. Emphatically. Repeatedly.



Stephen A Douglas, called Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and "The worst kind of abolitionist."  He said it repeatedly, at length and in context.     Maybe the most emphatic Douglas (Stephen A Douglas) got, was in Charleston Illinois, during the famous Lincoln Douglas debates.  There, Douglas went from side to side of the stage SHOUTING, with great clarity and volume, spitting out the words, a reporter said, that "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers". 

And it worked. Douglas won that election -- and would have beaten Lincoln again, using the same "Nigger lover" approach, but this time, four people ran, Lincoln was the only one against slavery.  The pro slavery candidates divided up the 60% of the vote.  


What did Douglass know -- that would make him say Lincoln was swift, radical, zealous and deternined to end slavery?   

Turns out -- Douglass knew what the fuck was going on.

   You probably do not, if you were educated by US text books, and US teachers.  Most do not seem to have a fucking clue what was going on.

Like these "details"

1)  Southern War ULtimatums.    There is not a single text book in the US that even mentions Southern War Ultimatums, issued in 1861, and reported proudly in Richmond Newspapers as "THE TRUE ISSUE".    





Not one of the "scholars" or dumb asses who trash or belittle Lincoln ever -- ever -- ever -- mention why Lincoln got back into politics, and who was killing and torturing who, from 1856 on.

Very basic -- Southern War Ultimatums and their killing sprees, not only to spread slavery, but to silence anyone speaking against slavery, even in free states, is something these bastards simply omit.  

Or -- the sneakiest bastard in this regard, is Southern apologist and Jeff Davis apologist, James McPherson.   Yes, McPHerson has never written an honest sentence, much less paragraph or book, about Southern leaders -- their bragging, ISIS like, of torture, they bragged of killing. Jeff Davis paid over 1000 Texas killers to invade KS.  The way McPherson writes about these facts - there was "disagreement"  that "led to violence",

What the fuck?   Davis hires 1000 killers when he was Secretary of War, sends them to Kansas, led by US Senator David Rice Atchison, who there, in Kansas, boasts out the ass he is there to kill and torture to spread slavery, and McPherson tells you that by saying things like "disagreement". 

Fucking ass wipe.

McPherson briefly mentions -- but never makes it clear -- what Southern War Ultimatums were.  Not one word about Southern leaders  -- including Davis, bragging or justifying the killing sprees, killing sprees not only to spread slavery, but to silence all opposition to slavery.

The fact is, people were being killed -- and Lincoln eventually would be killed -- for speaking for equality for blacks.   These same folks who trash Lincoln never tell you even that much, that Booth changed his mind from kidnap to kill, when he heard Lincoln speak about voting rights for blacks.


Are not historians supposed to tell you what  happened -- and for the Civil War, who killed who, and why, is basic.  Get that right then add all the bullshit you want.

These guys don't get the basics right, they just lay on the bullshit.
Seriously, how the FUCK do you leave out Southern War ULtimatums -- war ultimatums that were not only spoken proudly, and headlines in Southern papers then, but acted on - Southern leaders killed and tortured BECAUSE some people refused to obey their War ULtimatums.

Did you know that -- ever hear of that?  FUCK NO.

But that is just tip of iceberg.

2) Lincoln was called "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" more times than he could count.   Douglass knew the hatred and fear in the NORTH that Lincoln had to deal with.   Lincoln's friend -- and hundreds of others -- had been killed  or tortured or jailed for speaking too bluntly about equality.    You have never been told any of that. But it was common knowledge then -- and Southern leaders were PROUD of the violence against anyone who even spoke about equality.

Did you know that? Did you know people were still being killed, for speaking against slavery in the US,  up to and through the US Civil War?

No -- you had no fucking idea. Your history teacher never told you because they don't know.  But Douglass knew -- everyone knew how violent the pro slavery lunatics were, North and South.

WTF?  LIncoln radical to end slavery???

WTF  Lincoln zealous?

WTF  Lincoln swift?


  Douglass has to be stupid.  Did he not  hear about that letter to Greeley? Lincoln was keeping the UNION together!

  Did Douglass not know those 10 sentences (picked out of 3000 speeches )?     


See, Douglas knew things your "history teacher"  never mentioned,  like how Lincoln was called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshipper"   who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers."

Douglass was no one's fool --  saw women whipped to death, chased to Europe, became the most famous AMERICAN in Europe for years,  and focused his entire life on slavery and equality for blacks.

Douglass also knew the situation -- he knew Lincoln's political enemies..

Mostly, Douglass knew that most white men would not walk across the street to piss on a black man -- and that white men were scared shitless that black men would, to be blunt, take the white women.   That's now how historians would tell you, but that's exactly what was going on.

Over -- and over -- and over -- Lincoln was accused of WANTING your daughter to sleep with black men.

No one told you that.  And that was what Lincoln got from Stephen A Douglas, openly, repeately, in the Lincoln Douglas debates!!  Not some sly comment in private, but as loudly and proudly as Stephen A Douglas could shout, that is what he shouted. Lincoln. Wants. Your. Daughters. To Sleep With. Niggers.

That is what Stephen A Douglas said, and there is not a single US text book that has the balls to tell you.

In the South, from Lincoln's Southern enemies, it was even worse, if possible. Lincoln will destroy the WHITE RACE by having your daughters sleep with "Niggers".

This entire aspect of our history is whitewashed -- not even mentioned.  Yet it was the heart and soul of the hatred of Lincoln.

So when Lincoln got up to speak, Stephen Douglas had just incited the crowd to hate Lincoln. Lincoln had to respond -- and he did, very powerfully, too.

But you have to get Lincoln's FULL quotes so you wont be so stupid.  US "historians" like Foner, McPherson, and others,  have never done that -- no, they have not. Instead these cowardly bastards try to tell you LIncoln was not "really" against slavery or some such drivel.

Fucking hell, someone should bitch slap those bastards, because no one kicked slavery in the ass like Lincoln. Lincoln used his words very carefully -- and wisely.   Yes he parsed his words, so you can take him out of context like most dumb asses, and many "historians" do.

But if you learn ALL his words, and mostly his actions, Frederick Douglass was right. Lincoln was radical. Lincoln was zealous. Lincoln was swift. 

To put it bluntly, Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass sideways like a mother fucker.   It's time people realized that.  



Telling folks that Lincoln wants  your daughters to sleep with and marry with "Niggers"  was Stephen Douglas way of trying to scare the shit out of Lincoln.

It worked. 

  Lincoln had to parse words -- but even when parsing words, Lincoln brought down the thunder.  Years later people could edit quotes, chop apart this, remove the context, and make Lincoln seem horrible.

No one left a Lincoln speech or debate with any confusion whatsoever.   No one walked away and  was confused.

You'd have to read Lincoln's full speeches -- in context.   And learn his actions, 1846 on.  


Did you know Lincoln was called "the WORST type of abolitionist" by  Southern leaders?  No.

Did you know that blacks were killed in the South, when Lincoln simply gave his "House Divided" speech -- where he said slavery had to end, or the Union had to end.

And Lincoln said -- the Union will NOT end.  Southern leaders went bat shit. Did anyone ever tell you that?   Southern leaders called this an "ACT OF WAR"  that Lincoln, then a Senate candidate, would dare say the Union or slavery would last, but not both. One would have to go.

No one ever told you that, did they?

Did you know Lincoln's friend was killed -- burned to death -- for writing a newspaper against slavery, in IL?  No.

Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas, where people were still being killed for speaking against slavery, and there, spoke against slavery?   No.

These are the kinds of things Frederick Douglass knew very well, and you never heard of.


 Do you know who accused Lincoln, to his face, in front of white crowds, that Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

No -- but Douglass knew.

In fact, Lincoln was lucky he was not shot a lot sooner.  Bet you didn't know that, either.

Did your your  history teacher ever tell you that Stephen A Douglas, again and again, to Lincoln's  face, and in other speeches, told the public Lincoln was obsessed with equality, and wants your daughter to sleep with and marry with Niggers.

No, your history teacher never told you a word about that. Probably has no clue.

Douglas (Stephen A Douglas) also insisted blacks were not even human beings -- not people, but property.   Therefore, Douglas said, Kansas could not reject slavery.  Later, Douglas had to change that line of insanity, but only after it backfired on him, and his train was met by large angry crowds, in city after city, from Boston to Chicago.

Bet your history teacher never mention that to you, either.

That's all been white washed, but was reported at the time very clearly, in papers at the time.

Lincoln wants your WIFE to walk down the street with "Niggers". 

New York papers called Lincoln the "Negro Worshiper".

No one ever told you that.  And much much.


 Douglas knew Lincoln was lucky he didn't get a bullet to the brain SOONER for his radical (yes radical, we show you) message to the public.

People today have no fucking clue how violent Southern folks, and Southern sympathizers were.  US Senator was beat on the floor of the Senate for speaking of things I tell you here.

Your history teacher SHOULD have told you -- 


You probably do not know -- your history teacher probably does not know either -- that blacks were being burned to death, and whites hung, for being against slavery.

Did your teacher ever mention that in all Southern states, and in Kansas, you could be arrested, tortured, and put in jail for just owning the wrong book? Hell no. You could be arrested and tortured for publishing anti-slavery pamplets?

Did anyone tell you that? FUCK NO.  And Lincoln went to Kansas and spoke against slavery, at a time doing so was illegal.

No one told you that, did they?

Hell no. 

Guess who knew all this -- and much more?

Frederick Douglass.

Guess who didn't know this -- YOU.  And likely your history teacher had no clue either.


It's only slightely overstating it, to say that at the time, in many areas (Southern Illinois one of those areas)  to be called an abolitionist was like today being called a child molester.

John Palmer, LIncoln's friend, wrote about this as an older man, saying that people of that day (1890) had no concept that just 30 years ago, abolitionist was a vile term in much of the US.  

No one, in fact, went were Lincoln did, and when Lincoln did, speaking as powerfully as Lincoln did. 

And if your history books weren't so full of bullshit, your text books would show you why both -- both -- Frederick Douglas and Stephen A Douglas called Lincoln radical.


Lincoln's basic message was -- keep the Union together, that will over time end slavery.  Slavery was a cancer, and Southern killing sprees, Southern War Ultimatums, were all about spreading slavery.  Stop that spread, and that has to end slavery.

No one -- absolutely no one -- seriously suggested the North should invade the South to end slavery by force.  First, there were not 100 men in the North that would try such a thing.   Southern leaders jumped up and down and accused Lincoln of that, saying if they could stop the spread of slavery, they could stop slavery where it already existed.

Stephen A Douglas, in the debates  called Lincoln, to his face "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  and told the crowds "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with, and marry with, Niggers" 

Over and over -- in high school and college  history courses, the same crap -- Lincoln didn't really care about slavery. Lincoln was ambivalent.  Lincoln "evolved".  Lincoln was racist and wanted blacks to go back to Africa...   Lincoln used slavery to get public sentiment on his side for political purposes.


Yes, you can take a sentence here, and there, and make Lincoln seem anyway you like.  That's the game often played.

Sometimes Lincoln haters repeat quotes that leave out certain words,  but Lincoln DID say things that, taken out of context, make him look horrible.

But get all the words -- and more, get context, and Lincoln's actions, and you will see, Douglas, Douglass, and Jeff Davis were all correct: Lincoln really was a radical abolitionist.





Hundreds of times, Lincoln began 

And get the full words.   Lincoln was often very careful how he said something.

Lincoln's basic approach was to FIRST mollify a crowd, most of whom either hated blacks, feared black men "being with" their wives and daughters, or at best, did not give a shit.

Again, and again, and again -- hundreds times, Lincoln "set up" his powerful words for equality under the law, by seeming to agree with a basic fear or prejudice of the day.  So yes, if you get the quote from that part of his speech, and don't give the full words, scum sucking pigs can, have, and will continue to make Lincoln look horrible.

But get the FULL speech, in context.  You won't be fooled by the lying bastards, or those that repeat that bullshit.

When Lincoln went further, however, he kicked ass, he mowed down the sentiment he just seemed to agree with.

We MAY not be perfectly equal, Lincoln said, in COLOR. No duh.  PERHAPS we are not equal in intelligence.  

Lincoln's full message was this --    in our natural rights, protected by the Declaration of Independence any black person, no matter  how low, is equal to any white woman, no matter how high.

THese fucktards have taken part of Lincoln's words  -- deliberately ignored the full speech, and more, the full context.

Southerners,  -- you probably don't know this -- hated Lincoln because he was "the worst sort of abolitionist"  who deceived the public by claiming to be first for stopping the SPREAD of slavery.

Make no mistake, Southern leaders said Lincoln WAS "the worst sort" of abolitionist"

But Southern leaders shouted as loudly as they could -- Lincoln was not just a "Negro Worshipper"  but that Lincoln wanted to end the spread of slavery because Lincoln knew that would kill slavery where it was.

Do not believe Lincoln, they said. He may focus on stopping the spread of slavery -- but he is actually going to kill slavery, as soon as he can.  Keeping slavery from expanding will destroy the white race, and Lincoln knows it.


And they were right. 


Lincoln was hated -- at the time - for being a "Nigger lover"  who was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  And he was killed for his speech about voting rights for blacks.

Lincoln would probably laugh, if you told him 150 years from now, people will claim he was not really against slavery.  Or that he just used opposition to slavery to win political favor in the North.

People in the North did not, by and large, give a shit about slavery, and sure as hell were not going to fight to free anyone.   The South were the "tough guys".   They were violent, and threatening, and beating up US Senators. They were torturing slaves, promising spread of slavery in their War Ultimatums.  

Most people in the North would not walk across the street to piss on a slave.   Lincoln had to be very careful how he spoke.

There are books -- by "experts"---- who tell you Lincoln didn't care about blacks or slavery.   

Or that Lincoln brought slavery as an issue only late in the war.

Or that Lincoln only used ending slavery as political issue because it was popular (idiots, Lincoln lost elections and was eventually shot in the head because ending slavery was NOT popular.)

Others, seemingly "scholarly" books claim Lincoln was "reluctant" to end slavery and that really,  he wanted to send all blacks to Africa.
BTW - no, Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were not personal friends.  Lincoln hated him, with reason.   Lincoln knew full well Douglas duplicity in working with Jeff Davis and Davis Rice Atchison to spread slavery, but that's another story.

No one tells you -- have they - how dangerous it was for Lincoln to say many of the radical things he said. You are not told how radical Lincoln was -- for his time and place,  no one was more radical.

Even in books ABOUT Lincoln-Douglas debates, such as by David Zarefsky, somehow completely ignore Douglas amazing calls to, essentially, violence against Lincoln, which Lincoln handled well, using humor. 

For example, did you know Lincoln was hated  -- North and South -- by millions of people because, as some claimed he was a "Nigger Lover"  and a "Negro Worshipper"? 

  New York papers showed him as a goofy "Negro Worshipper"   and Stephen A Douglas told crowds, as Lincoln stood there, that "Mr Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with and marry with Niggers"

No one ever told you that did they?

ANd there is much, much more. 



We all know -- no one would be at all surprised -- that people cherry pick the bible. A few words here, tie it to a few word there, and you can make the bible say anything you want.

Same with Lincoln's 3000 speeches, and his letter to Greeley.

But get ALL of Lincoln's speeches, all of his letters,  in context, and more, his actions, and no one comes close, in being as effective and powerful as Lincoln.


The only white person more radical than Lincoln -- according to Frederick Douglass -- was John Brown.   And John Brown's approach got him captured in about 2 hours, and hung in two weeks.

Worse -- John Brown's raid actually militarized the South and gave the most extreme folks like Robert Toombs justification for their crowd pleasing hate mongering.  Frederick Douglass - a good friend of John Brown -- said Brown's raid hurt, and did  not help, the abolition cause.

Lincoln's was as radical - but smarter.  Lincoln had to speak more carefully, especially when and where he was.

Lincoln gave over 3000 speeches, and by leaving out his full speech, his full meanings, you can make Lincoln say anything you want -- as we show.

 Some of these idiots even claim Lincoln had slaves and that the South was anti slavery, Lincoln was pro slavery.  




AND -- to his face, repeatedly, Stephen Douglas said Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Gee -- someone forgot to mention the full story?

 Lincoln eventually got a bullet in the brain because  he spoke about voting rights for blacks. No one told you that, did they? 

Booth heard Lincoln's speech about voting rights for blacks -- and changed his plan from kidnap, to kill.  
And if Lincoln had spoke that way sooner, he would have been killed sooner. 



Yes, there were folks out East -- talking to people who already agreed with them, preaching to the choir. But no one going where Lincoln went, when Lincoln went there, saying what Lincoln said. How the hell have most "historians" missed that?


Frederick Douglass sure didn't miss it, that Lincoln was radical and zealous.  But largely, "historians"  in last 50 years, have.

Lincoln would be shot later -- and others were shot at the time -- for saying the wrong thing. In all Southern states, and in Kansas, it was still a crime, yes a crime, to speak or write against slavery. In Kansas, people were being drowned, tortured and hung for speaking against slavery.

We don't teach any of that.  Did your teachers tell you abolitionist were still being killed -- white abolitionist -- when Lincoln ran for office?  You had to be very careful what you said -- or  like Lovejoy, Lincoln's friend, you could end up dead.

You have to know that -- as Frederick DOuglas knew well (he published reports of such things daily in his newspaper, the Northern Star.).

Lincoln's love for, and obsession with, equality for the "N*gger" (the word Douglas usually used) was woven in, and the basic fear and hate mongering by Douglas. 

As you will see - Douglas said this, repeatedly -- to stir up hate and fear against Lincoln.  People were still being killed at this time for letting white women, be anywhere near a black man. 

These may be idle words to you , but at the time, it was like calling someone a "child molester".  Douglas was heaping scorn on Lincoln as no other words could have, at that time.

The fear and loathing of black men, being free and being allowed near white women, was a huge issue at the time -- and Douglas used that over, and over, and over.


Lincoln might  laugh -- and so would his enemies -- to think people 150 years later said Lincoln was not really against slavery.   Actually, as you will see, Lincoln was lucky he didn't get a bullet in the brain sooner. In the South, it was even worse...... 



Lincoln's friend -- Lovejoy -- was killed by a mob, for writing a newspaper against slavery. He was burned to death inside his newspaper building - he published anti slavery newspaper.  Some say he was killed first, but others said he was burned to death in the building.

In fact, Stephen Douglas slyly mentioned Lincoln's friend Lovejoy, in the debates.   Yes, he knew Lovejoy was killed for being too radical for equality.  

Douglas was doing his best "dog whistle" - tying Lincoln to a man who many thought was dangerous, Lovejoy. Rather like many today tell of Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers, who was a radical in 1960's,

Always - always -- it was about black men being around white women. Douglas was blunt about that - Mr. Lincoln wants your daughters to "sleep with and marry with N*ggers"   

They don't teach you that in school.  So "history teachers" are too ill informed (aka stupid IMHO) to tell you. But that's exactly what was going on.

And it worked -- Lincoln was not elected to Senate, and furthermore, Lincoln was from then on seen as very dangerous man by many, especially in the South.

The term "Negro Worshipper" was common then, for just being against slavery.   Routinely, anyone in Lincoln's party was called "Black Republican" even in "polite" circles, in official documents by the South, such as letters from the governor of Southern states, to the people .

Murder of Lovejoy, Lincoln's friend.


Hell yes Douglas knew it -- and that's why Stephen Douglas again, and again told the public LIncoln was radical and obsessed for equality.

And Douglas used the Nword.  It was cleaned up in some papers, and in all history books, but some papers left "Nigger" in, and Stephen Douglas was well known for use of that word, even in the US Senate, both before and after the debates against Lincoln


And that was from NORTHERN folks, like New York newspapers and Stephen A Douglas.

  Lincoln will burn you to death by slow fire  .

From the South, Lincoln was called "the worst kind of abolitionist" who will "burn you slowly alive"  and destroy the white race.

As Robert Toombs said -- we (white race) are about to be "exterminated".   And the guy who would cause this was "radical"  Abraham Lincoln, by simply being against the spread of slavery into Kansas.


Pushing the envelope

No one did what Lincoln did.  

None of the great "anti-slavery" speakers went where Lincoln did - they went to places that already agreed with them,  mostly in the far east. Never in Quincy or Alton or Charleston.

Did anyone ever point that out? Those folks who trash Lincoln?


Did they show you the full speeches and context?


Certainly no abolitionist speaker went to Kansas,  as Lincoln did in in 1859, where people were still being killed for speaking against slavery.  It's amazing he got out of there alive, if you know what was going on in Kansas. Others were killed there, and Southern leaders boasted of that.

Only when you know the complete story -- not some slogans and out of context crap -- can you know how amazing Lincoln was.  Frederick Douglass knew what the  hell he was talking about -- your "history" teacher does not.

Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed for being outspoken against slavery. 

Lincoln himself did get a bullet in the brain, after his speech about voting rights for blacks, when Booth changed his plan, because he heard that speech, from kidnap to kill.

Gee -- your "history" teacher never mentioned that.

Guess who knew all this, and more??

Not your history teacher. 

Frederick Douglass knew it.   


You can take edited out of context quotes, and many do.  Play those word games, if you want, but get all the words -- and all the actions.

Lincoln was lucky he didn't get the bullet in the brain much sooner.


  See this....


As you see, you COULD take a few words here, and a few words from there, and make Lincoln say, "blacks are certainly not my equal".
This  movie clip  is edited so Stephen A Douglas says "Negro." 

Otherwise, the dialog is nearly verbatim, and show in context, with the meaning of both men faithfully expressed.

According to newspaper reports at the time, in two cities (Quincy and Charleston) Douglas spit the word "Nigger" out, with great emphasis

There is no mention of this in any US history text book, college or high school.   So how else would you know?  We got this from newspapers at the time -- and the speeches by Southern leaders, and Frederick Douglass,  at the time. 





Also  no mention that Lincoln operated in  time ENTIRELY under the Supreme Court order -- yes order -- that blacks were not human beings, not persons.  

That's another basic thing Douglass knew well -- everyone knew it.

But people today, do not.  

Dred Scott decision was far more vile than your history teacher probably bothered to mention. Douglas called Lincoln a traitor for even claiming blacks were human beings, BECAUSE the Supreme Court had ruled they were not human beings. 

That was Stephen Douglas logic -- and Jeff Davis.

The US Supreme Court had ruled blacks are not human beings. See below. NOT persons. Specifically -- by order -- NOT persons.

It did not suggest it -- did not mention it. The Court ORDERED it. Expressly ORDERED that.  

Most  history teachers look at you like you are out of your mind when you tell them. Then, you show them the decision, and how Jeff Davis/ Stephen Douglas used Dred Scott, and how they hated Lincoln for saying blacks WERE human and should entitled to all rights in the Constitution.
When you show them that -- clearly they never heard of such a thing --they act like they knew that.  They didn't know shit.

Douglas would pump Lincoln up as some kind of lunatic who WANTED - WANTED your daughters sleep with "NIGGERS"  as you will see.

That was in addition to his supposed "radical abolitionist" stance of claiming blacks should have all rights of Declaration of Independence.

By the way, the United States Supreme Court- - and Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly said the Declaration of Independence was "unconstitutional".  Another thing you never heard. In long drawn out speeches, the Declaration of Independence was unconstitutional.   Gee,  the things your "history teacher" forgets to mention.

After being called Nigger lover.  Lincoln was hit with all this.

After telling the crowd Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

After telling the crowd Lincoln was a radical abolitionist,
Lincoln had to get up and speak. 

Unless you know that -- and few people do -- you don't know shit about Lincoln, or Douglas, or what led up to the Civil War.



No one ever told you that. Frederick Douglass knew it, and much, much more.




   Measuring Lincoln by the "sentiment of his country"   Lincoln was swift,  zealous radical and determined.  

Douglass also knew Lincoln was not King.  He could, for example, end slavery be decree, or he would have.

Douglass also knew -- as did everyone alive in 1862, that Lincoln had to keep the border states in the Union.

If Lincoln did not keep those border states in the Union, the war is over.   The CSA  would be 3 times larger than USA.   

So Lincoln wrote that letter -- about Union.

Lincoln was called "Negro Worshipper"   and "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  by Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly and to his face, in the debates.

When not in debates, Douglas accused LIncoln of being a traitor -- literally a traitor -- to the United States, for the crime of claiming blacks were human beings, and as such entitled to all the rights in the Declaration of Independence.

This was in "direct violation"  of the United State's Surpreme Court ruling that blacks were not even human beings, not persons.  The court -- as you will see below - affirmatively ordered, yes ordered, that blacks will NOT be seen as human beings (not persons).

As property, blacks are indistinguishable to dogs or bucket or a load of hay. They have no rights

 The person owning them has the rights. And slavery shall therefore, by a second order in the same decision, the federal government will protect slavery, even in areas that voted 95% against slavery.

That's right. There were two orders of the court, in Dred Scott. One, that blacks are not human beings, not persons. Two, that it did not matter at all, that 95% of the people in KS were against slavery, as they were, and as they voted.

That Lincoln would dare disagree with that -- Douglas said he was a traitor. And "obsessed with equality for the N*gger"

This was the reality of the life in 1858.   Both for Lincoln -- and for Jeff Davis.

 Jeff Davis, of course, was thrilled with Kansas Act and  Dred Scott court orders. He sent Atchison to Kansas, and got reports of how the killing was going.


And contrary to what some tell you (like Erik Foner)  no, Dred Scott was NOT about citizenship and a "rather narrow ruling".

Foner insists that Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling" about citizenship and Congress's ability to decide slavery in Kansas.

Oh shit.  Far more drastic.

Blacks are NOT HUMAN beings.  Eric "forgot" to mention that, though LIncoln, and Davis, and the decision itself makes that clear.


 Did Frederick Douglass just need to learn about Lincoln's letter to Greeley?    No -- he published Lincoln's letter to Greeley.

Did Frederick Douglass just need to learn about those quotes from Lincoln in Charleston, and elsewhere?

No, Douglass knew those quotes very well.


 Douglass knew the full story -- not the selected bullshit so many people spout today, out of stupidity and or out of hatred even now of "The War Of Northern Aggression".

Sadly it is not just Southern apologist who claim Lincoln "didnt really care"   The slanted out of context bullshit is repeated so much, people believe the distoms 


But when you see ALL Lincoln said, and know how Douglas was saying LIncoln wanted your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  - no one in their right mind was confused.  

Lincoln did say -- she is "CERTAINLY NOT MY EQUAL IN CERTAIN RESPECTS"  . That's the part  quote.

 . That's the part  quote.

. That's the part  quote.

. That's the part  quote.

  But then he would reverse course and bring the thunder in the opposite direction.  


The equal of  any man.

The equal of every man.  IN her natural right -- in her rights under the Declaration of Independence -- she IS my equal. And the equal of any man.

That is a perfect metaphor for the tortured RHETORIC position Lincoln had to take.  The word game he had to play.

Try to grasp that.

No one ever left a Lincoln speech confused at all. He was FOR equality of the races under the law. Radically so. Profoundly so.

And his full actions, full speeches, make that clear.

His enemies -- to his face -- said he was a Nigger lover who wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

His friend -- Lovejoy -- was killed for abolition statements.

Others were killed for abolition statements.  It was STILL illegal in 12 states to even give speeches like LIncoln gave.   And it was dangerous to speak too bluntly to people where LIncoln spoke.

The amazing thing about Lincoln is how powerful he was -- but you need to read the FULL speeches. And know what was going on.



The famous abolitionist did NOT speak where LIncoln did, when  he did. They stayed in Maine, New York,  Chicago,  and spoke to crowds that already agreed with them. 

People paid to hear them, no one paid Lincoln. But that was a minority of people that would turn out to hear abolitionist speakers.

This was no secret then. It's just glossed over now.





Stephen A Douglas. 


Lincoln had to be careful -- his friend Lovejoy had been killed by a crowd for his "radical abolitionism".   Most white people in Illinois had never seen a black person up close -- and it was illegal for lacks to move to Illinois.

 Lincoln had to prove he was not saying your daughter should "sleep with Niggers".  Politically, it was suicide in those areas to be too "radical".  

Lincoln, even when speaking carefully as possible -- was called "Nigger lover" who "worshipped the Nigger" by some who wanted to enflame fear and hate.

Make no mistake, said some Southern leaders,  Lincoln "is the worst sort of abolitionist"  that will destroy the white race.

Lincoln would have been arrested in South
Some in the North wanted him arrested 

If you believe Lincoln, "our fate will be that of whites in St.Domingo"  -- whites were killed by revolting slaves there, an event everyone was well aware of.

When they accused Lincoln of wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers," and told the crowds Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race --  Lincoln was actually in danger, and would eventually get killed, get the bullet in the brain, because he was for equality, NOT because he was against it.

Lincoln responded --with humor and dignity, quite a trick when the other guy is more or less urging the crowd to hate and violence.

Yes, Stephen A Douglas was pro violence, he had a role in the beating of fellow Senator Sumner, laughing at him as he was beat, and predicting he would be beaten that day, earlier.  It's likely Douglas and others planned for Sumner to be beaten the floor of the Senate that day, according to people there.

Lincoln did sometimes parse words -- but no matter how respectfully and carefully Lincoln would say things, haters like Stephen Douglas, Jefferson Davis, and dozens of Northern Congressmen would attack him anyway, pump up the fear anyway.

Still, Lincoln had to parse words.  If he had said "Hell yes, any black woman is equal to you idiots"  he would have been shot.

But he did say -- any black woman is equal to any white man, in a way you never  hear about. Instead, they misquote Lincoln, omit the stunning statement and actions FOR equality, from 1846 on.



In fact, there Northern Congressmen who wanted Lincoln ARRESTED -- let me repeat that -- ARRESTED -- if he even said the words slavery should end, so the war could end.   They wanted to end the war, but keep slavery.

Lincoln said no.

And Lincoln had long history of kicking slavery in the ass. He stood up to President Polk, when he was a Congressmen, and called him out for stealing land from Mexico - - in order to spread slavery.  No one told you that, did they?

Lincoln also tried to get slavery outlawed in DC, as a Congressmen.

Lincoln tried 40 times to get Wilmot Proviso passed, to keep slavery out of the newly stolen territory, stolen by Polk and the US military, to spread slavery.

Gee - for a guy who didn't care, he sure spent 1846 to his death in a funny way.




What Lincoln "evolved" on was not slavery, but his ability to kill it. 

In 1861, most whites would not piss on a black person if they were on fire, much less go to war to end slavery.

The governor of Georgia said freeing the slaves would mean blacks and whites would live together contrary to the will of GOD, and nature.  And black men would  be able to talk to white women.   That was not allowed before.  Did you know that. 

No one told you that, did they?


Douglass  knew all this. And he knew Lincoln got up and blasted slavery -- again and again, as Stephen A Douglas said "repeatedly, over and over"  LIncoln spoke about equality for the the "Nigger".


Making fun of Lincoln for saying blacks were equal to whites. 


As a result, Lincoln had to parse words, which he did artfully.  His FULL quotes are quite amazing, and his actions, even more so.

Frederick Douglass was well aware of LIncoln's quotes -- and his FULL speeches, where Lincoln brought down the power.   Compared to anyone -- anyone -- where Lincoln was, when Lincoln was, speaking to whom Lincoln spoke to, no one else came close.

He was radical.  Yes, at times he parsed words, but the overall message he gave was one that stunned those who heard.  Lincoln effectively changed the course of the  nation, with those words. 


Yes,  Lincoln did not talk about Union -- in that week of 1862, those four states were about to go to the Confederacy, because John Fremont declared slaves in Missouri free, on his own authority.  

Instantly people in the border states  had extra reason to join the Confederacy.  And if they did  and the war is over.   There would only be a few states in the Union, against an overwhelming number of states in secession.

The South wins. And as the South promised, they would spread slavery.

Lincoln DID say he was trying to save the Union. No kidding. Wisely so.

But he ALSO said saving the Union was the way to end slavery.  Douglass knew that.  The House Divided Speech was about that -- about keeping Union together to end slavery.

If the Union stayed together, Lincoln said, slavery would end.  If the Union did not stay together, slavery would spread to all of the US.


 Southern leaders said Lincoln would destroy the white race -- just by refusing to spread slavery into the West against popular sovereignty.   Kansas had voted 95% against slavery -- yet (see below for proof) Southern War ultimatums were that Kansas must accept and respect slavery. 


Stephen A Douglas , and Southern leaders, said such things for a reason --  it worked. It worked to make people hateful and fearful.   Your history text books -- not even movies about slavery -- show this aspect.

Any "Western" politician (Illinois was considered west, then) who dared to be against slavery, even just against the spread of slavery, had to be very careful what they said.

No one ever told you that, did they?


  Douglass knew the whole story.  Not just the bits and pieces your are fed. 




Douglas (one s) claimed Lincoln was a "traitor" for just saying blacks and whites should be equal under the law, because Dred Scott decision said blacks were not even  human beings (not persons) but property.

Lincoln -- and many others -- had exposed Dred Scott as a way to force slavery into all of the US.  Speeches by Southern leaders verify this, they did in fact use Dred Scott decision to justify spread of slavery into rest of the US.

Douglass knew that too.



Obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"?   Huh?

It was not just Douglas (Stephen A)  that claimed Lincoln would have white women sleep with and marry blacks.   There were dozens of Northern papers, including New York papers, that ridiculed Lincoln for claiming blacks were equal to whites.

Oh - -I know, I know --  you heard the edited quotes, which were true, but out of context.  Lincoln said a LOT  of things - -- as he had to, but he was radical as hell, for his time and place.  


Lincoln was "out there" on equality-- and said so, if you get all the quotes.  This was not a word game, but if you want to play the Lincoln word game, get all his words.

Yes, he parsed words. There are a dozen of so times, Lincoln parsed words so much, his advisors were disappointed.  Like in Charleston Illinois -- but  Stephen A Douglas had just spoken, and went from side to side on the stage, calling Lincoln the usual "Nigger" stuff, but even more so now.



Douglas was extremely good at getting crowds whipped into a frenzy.   

 You may not now know,  Douglas was all but inciting hate -- he kept mentioning Lovejoy/  You probably don't even know who Lovejoy was.

Lovejoy was killed by a mob in Illinois, for being too outspoken against slavery.    When Douglas brought  up Lovejoy's name - which he did repeatedly -- Douglas was pumping up the hate. Tying Lincoln to his friend Lovejoy was good politics for Douglas, and dangerous for Lincoln/

But more that Lovejoy -- Douglas said outright -- Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers. Most newspapers and all history books have cleaned that up.  

One paper -- in Quincy and another in Charleston -- reported how mean Douglas was when he 'went into the Nigger stuff'.   He did not just say it,  he shouted it, he had drool coming down his lip.   He went side to side, shouting it.

Since you have no idea of this --  and you only know part of Lincoln's FULL speeches and quotes -- it's easy to come to exactly opposite conclusion.

Lincoln knew those people in Illinois, particularly  central Illinois, where LIncoln travelled extensively, day in, day out, for years.

Lincoln could use humor to defuse Douglas rants about wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers".

Lincoln would have been arrested if he travelled South -- it was illegal, a crime (you didn't know this either) to speak publically against slavery in the South.




Yes, at TIMES Lincoln parsed words.  But he kicked ass anyway, even when he parsed words  

It's common for stupid people -- and sadly, even common for some "historians" -- to just take the parts of Lincoln speeches where he parsed words.

They run like cowards from words -- AND ACTIONS-- where Lincoln kicked ass. 

Lincoln STILL said blacks should have equal rights under the Constitution, even though Douglas was all but physically accosting him for it. Any black person -- no matter how low in social status, no matter how dark their skin - was EQUAL TO ANY MAN. 

WAS EQUAL TO ANY MAN. The lowest of the low in social order of the time, was equal, Lincoln said to the highest of the high in their rights under the Constitution.

Why leave that out?  Fucking ass wipe lying pieces of shit, thats why.

Again, and again, and again, Douglas would tell the public Lincoln was "revolutionary"  and a "traitor" for saying blacks and whites are equal under the law, when Dred Scott decision said otherwise.


 Lincoln was  in a dangerous world for abolitionist -- in fact, the term abolitionist was a vile term at the time, North and South, to most people.  

WE consider "abolitionist" as good, now.   But  95% of the white public did not. 

  Forty  years later,  in 1890's, people writing about that time, would try to explain this. Abolitionist was like calling someone a pervert, or that they wanted your daughters to "be with"  Niggers.

   In Kansas, Southerners bragged about killing every abolitionist they could find!  You could be killed, even in Kansas, even in IL, for being too "abolitionist".

   Lincoln, of course, got a bullet to the brain, after Booth heard his speech about voting rights for blacks.

So, no kidding, Lincoln avoided that term. He would have been killed much sooner, if he did  not.

  Stephen Douglas claimed Lincoln cared more about the Negro than he did about his own race. 



You just know a small part of it, now. 

So tell me, was Frederick Doulgass stupid?

Should he have just listened to your high school teacher for 10 minutes?   Maybe read that letter to Greeley?

Consider this -- Lincoln was not the only white person to die, for being too radical for equality. He is just the best known.  It's a shame people are  now so stupid they often claim Lincoln "did not care"  or was not "really" against slavery.




  Don't pretend you knew this already


If you think you know history, and you do not know that from 1857 until just before Lincoln was killed, that officially, by order of the US Supreme Court, blacks were not human beings -- you don't know shit about Abraham Lincoln.

It's not your fault you don't know.   But Lincoln knew. Douglass knew.  Most of the country knew this. 

Small sentences.  Big wars.  

That whole "by order of the court"  that blacks are not  human beings -- you never heard that, did you?

Yes, see more below.   

Stupidly, again and again, in every US text book we have seen, and by "historians" like Eric Foner,  this is glossed over.  Foner inexplicably claims Dred Scott was a "rather narrow ruling" about "citizenship".

Citizenship? Jesus, do you Orwell much?   It was whether blacks were human beings, or not. The court said NO -- specifically they are property. They are to be seen as property.

They are "SO INFERIOR"  no white man could possibly think blacks are in the same caste (Jefferson Davis said blacks are in a different caste, delivered by God to be enslaved).

But at the time, this was BFD, the BIGGEST BFD. 

Douglas again, and again, and again -- dozens of times, both face to face with Lincoln, and by himself, degraded Lincoln for his obsession for equality of these "inferior beings".

Did you know that? HELL NO. You do not know that. Don't pretend you ever even heard of it.  Because this information is not in any US text book.  You have to read the Dred Scott decision itself, and newspapers books and speeches at the time -- how Jeff Davis and the South used Dred Scott to justify their killing sprees into Kansas.  And how they justified their War Ultimatums -- see below -- on Dred Scott.

Narrow ruling, said Foner?  Unreal.  Jefferson Davis and Abe Lincoln sure as hell didn't think it was a narrow ruling.     

Why the hell do you think LIncoln explained this about 50 times, in his House Divided Speech and elsewhere?  Do you think he was kidding?  

If Dred Scott held, there was no way to stop the spread of slavery into free states. No,Lincoln was not wrong.

In fact, Southern War ULtimatums prove LIncoln was not wrong.  Southern War ultimatums demanded Kansas -- already a free state by then -- must accept and respect slavery.

You had no clue about that either, did you?   Yes, Southern WAR ULTIMATUMS demanded a free state accept and respect slavery.  Kind of a big deal.

Another basic fact, overlooked in US textbooks.


Lincoln and Jefferson Davis did not agree on much.

But they both agreed, and said, Dred Scott changed everything Because of Dred Scott's order (yes order) that blacks are not to be seen as human beings (as persons) but property,  AND because Dred Scott order (yes order) that the fed government actually protect slavery, even in places is was rejected (like Kansas), there was no way to stop the spread of slavery.

This is what Lincoln said in House Divided.   It was nothing unusual -- hundreds of others had pointed it out -- including Jeff Davis and Southern leaders.    Of course, the South boasted of it. 

Lincoln decried the decision and got the 13th Amendment to supercede it. Most "history" teachers can not even tell you why LIncoln needed the 13th Amendment. The answer, was to get rid of Dred Scott decision. 

Dred Scott was  "logic" behind Southern war ultimatums, too, that appeared in Richmond newspaper headlines just before the Civil War (as you know it) started.  See more about Southern War Ultimatums.

So the Dred Scott decision was perfect -- and as Lincoln pointed out -- made that way, like a machine -- to spread slavery where it was impossible to spread slavery before.   Now, because of Dred Scott, it no longer mattered one iota if the people of Kansas rejected slavery 95% or  not. 

The Southern War Ultimatums were specific -- Kansas must accept and respect slavery. Why?  The Dred Scott decision.

So no, Lincoln was not wrong. 

He knew what the fuck he was talking about, and so did Jefferson Davis. .

I can't help it, that you don't know.  This is exactly what leaders on BOTH sides were saying -- Lincoln in the North, and Jeff Davis in the South.  Not kinda, not sorta, not in away.   This is exactly what they were saying. 

Short of renting billboard space on your ass, Lincoln could not make it any more clear.  Likewise, Davis made it clear.  

Dred Scott changed everything Davis said. Dred Scott ordered blacks to be property, and the federal government protect it.

How the hell do people not know this most basic thing? That Dred Scott court ordered blacks to be seen as not human beings (not persons).   

More importantly -- the South used this decision to justify killing and spreading slavery.  Over, and over, and over, Southern speakers, documents and newspapers referred to Dred Scott as the authority of them to put slavery wherever they wanted. 

And they wanted it -- in Kansas and all the way west -- even though Kansas voted against slavery 95%.

Southern War Ultimatums were about one thing -- spreading slavery.  

You had no clue, 30 seconds ago, that was even an issue.

Here is where most people (especially history teachers) pretend they knew.

If you don't know why Lincoln would be called a traitor, then you don't know enough about Lincoln, the Civil War, or Stephen A Douglas.




Lincoln would get a bullet to the brain,  in 1865, for the same reason Stephen A Douglas repeatedly taunted LIncoln -- to his face - for his obsession for equality "for the Nigger".

Yes, no shit, Lincoln parsed words.  He parsed words about voting rights for blacks, too, after which Booth shot him anyway. 

I can't help it, you don't know. That's not my fault. If you have a degree in history, and you don't know this, go ask for your money back. It's that basic. 

Why would Stephen A Douglas call Lincoln a traitor- - because he was disagreeing with Dred Scott, "the law of the land"  said Stephen A Douglas.

And guess what -- DOUGLAS WON.  

Gee - there is a lot, lot more you don't know.

In fact,  Stephen A  Douglas went from side to side of the stage in Charleston IL, spitting out the word "nigger" claiming Lincoln "cared more about the Niggers that he did about his own country."

Newspapers in at least two cities-- Quincy and Charleston -- reported Douglas had clearly been drinking, by the anger he displayed when saying the word "Nigger".

Lincoln wants your wife and daughters to "be with" Niggers.

People feared -- white males sure as hell feared -- that black men would be free to move to Illinois (it was illegal for blacks to even move to Illinois at the time) and "be with" their daughters.

So Douglas stabbed this raw nerve, again, and again, and again.



Lincoln was called a traitor -- and "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  for daring to say in public blacks and whites ARE equal.   Yes, he said that time after time, in various ways.

Isolated facts -- TORN FROM THEIR CONNECTION?   In other words, out of context.

Ironically, Lincoln's enemies accused him of being far far too concerned with equality -- let slavery continue, just keep it down South, was the attitude in the North. 

Douglass told folks, as plainly as he knew how, that Lincoln was radical. We can't go by this quote or that, out of context.  Lincoln had to play this game -- he was not king.  He did parse words. 

But parsing words -- he STILL kicked ass, if you know all his words.

It's just not taught like this. 

Don't pretend you knew this already -- because 99% of the people we ask, have no clue about this basic fact.   If you don't understand this, you don't know shit about Lincoln or the Civil War

" Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with and marry with Niggers." 
"Mr. Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger."  


   The United States Supreme Court ruled blacks  
   were not human beings (not persons) under the
   law, and Lincoln was a "traitor" for saying otherwise.

The fact most people today have no clue whatsoever that when LIncon ran for US Senate, then President -- the Supreme Court had already ruled blacks are not human beings.

Lincoln spoke against this with power -- over and over and over. 

And you never heard of that, did you?

Slap your teacher for that. But there is much more





You don't know what Lincoln faced,  but Douglass did. 

 Lincoln got much grief and threats from people in the NORTH.  Lincoln's political enemies in the NORTH wanted him arrested, or gave speeches to that effect, if he even said slavery should end for the war to end. 

Southern leaders were even worse -- Lincoln will destroy the white race.   When you learn what kind of violence (yes violence) Lincoln faced, you wont be so stupid.   People were still being killed for speaking too bluntly, in the wrong place, for equality.  Yet read Lincolns full speeches -- he kicked ass on equality, when you know the full speeches. 

In fact, no one spoke more powerfully than Lincoln, for where, and when he was, while running for office.   It was one thing to speak in Maine or to select crowds in Massachusetts, Lincoln was radical as hell -- when you learn his full speeches -- in Illinois and Kansas. 

  Some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested for just saying slavery should end for the war to end. 

  Southern leaders claimed Lincoln's House Divided Speech was a "declaration of war" against the South. 

   Lincoln shot in the head after Booth heard his 
  speech about voting rights for blacks

  Lincoln's Southern enemies said he was going to 
 destroy the white race and was "the worst sort of

  Lincoln's friend Lovejoy  was killed by a mob in   IL for speaking too blunty against slavery

No text book in the US shows this aspect of hatred for Lincoln IN THE NORTH -- and how dangerous it was for him to speak.


Lincoln's claim that the Negro is equal to any white man in his rights under that law is treason -- he cares more for the Nigger than he cares for his own race....


 Bullet in the head - Lincoln's reward for   being "obsessed  with equality for the Nigger".

Lincoln could  have gotten that bullet in the brain much sooner, if he had been any more blunt, sooner.

Somehow, Lincoln is the bad guy?  Here Southern leaders are bragging about killing to spread slavery for God -- and Lincoln, is the bad guy?

Lincoln's NORTHERN enemies are jumping up and down claiming Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger -- and Lincoln is the bad guy?

Fucking hell -- there was no one, no one -- like Lincoln.  Yes, some others gave speeches, for money.  Or in Boston, or Maine.

Show me anyone who went to Kansas and spoke like Lincoln.  Show me anyone who went to Alton, or Charleston, and spoke to those crowds, like Lincoln did.

Lincoln's FULL speeches are amazing.  If you want to play word games, play it, dumb ass. If you want to know what was going on, read 1000 Southern newspapers and speeches, and see what Lincoln was up against.



Douglass (Frederick)  was not fooled by word games, played later.

More than anything, Douglass knew that Lincoln HAD to parse words at times.  People were still being killed -- and Douglass knew that -- for speaking too bluntly about equality.

 As Frederick Douglass said, "we did not judge him by stray utterances" -- because Douglass knew all of Lincoln's speeches, he knew the Lincoln DOuglas debates well -- he published much of LIncoln's words in his own newspaper.

Sure -- you can play word games.  Go on, lots of people do. But if you want to know why Frederick Douglas AND Stephen A Douglas both said Lincoln was a "radical,"  you can't play word games.
You have to know what happened. 


Yes,  Lincoln  had to parse words, but if he had not,  Stephen Douglas would have been president -- Douglas was Jeff Davis buddy.

There may have been no Civil War -- Stephen A Douglas was fine with spread of slavery into Kansas.  He defended Dred Scott decision out the ass, again and again.

Dred Scott decision was the LAW OF THE LAND, per DOuglas.

So if you don't know what Dred Scott was about (and most people do not) you don't know how fucking horrible it would be, if he were President.






Douglas even showed up in a rail car with a cannon on the back, and he would come out of his car, when the cannon went off.  He was big-- real big - on theatrics. 

His central message -- Mr Lincoln is dangerous.  

His other message -- Dred Scott decision is law of the land.

The words Douglas used to give that message: Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

The effect of those words -- Douglas won that election.

Do you grasp that -- or not?  Douglas won that election.

If not for Lincoln -- Douglas also wins POTUS in 1860


Governor Brown of Georgia wrote a long "open letter" - very famous at the time, saying how Lincoln was going to make whites live a "degraded existence"   and have your daughters "be with" and marry with, Negroes (at least he said Negroes, not niggers).

Lincoln would cause the death of the white race -- just by stopping the spread of slavery 




WTF?  No one told us that.  Obsessed for equality of "Niggers"?

Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the Negro -- New York papers called him once a "Negro Worshiper" -- lingo at the time for anyone against slavery.

Read the FULL speeches -- holy shit, he kicks ass.  And learn context.  

Whatever the reason, no one  left a Lincoln speech, a debate, confused at all........ Lincoln was determined to "put slavery on the path to extinction" --and then, he did exactly that. 

Lincoln's enemies -- and all of the Southern demagogues  -- were screaming bloody murder that Lincoln was dangerous,  and would either destroy the white race, or at least make your daughters and sons be "on equal terms" with the Negro.

Lincoln was actually kicking ass about equality for the races, and ending slavery, all along.  

Lincoln HAD to empathize Union for those four border states.  And did. It worked. 

We all know now, those four states stayed in the Union -- but no one knew then.

Only Lincoln reassuring those states -- he did that through the letter to Greeley -- did LIncoln satisfy them that they would not lose slavery this way.  Lincoln would even offer slave owners in Kentucky payment to end slavery, and some accepted.

Lincoln said slavery had to end by LEGAL means -- a Constitutional AMendment. But until then, Lincoln would be obliged to deal with slavery, as the Supreme Court ordered in Dred Scott. 

Lincoln had to get 13th Amendment passed, and he did that as soon as possible.  He could not just end slavery by legislation or Presidental order.

Even the Emancipation Proclamation was a temporary order -- once the slave states stopped being in rebellion, that order would go away. It was an order based on martial - war time -- law.  When the war was over, slavery would return.

Unless Lincoln could get an Amendment to the Constitution. So he did. 


But Lincoln, before, and after,  Dred Scott decision, spoke thousands of times about the need to get rid of slavery, and how slavery would take over the US, like a cancer, or  the Union would remain.

But he would get rid of slavery legally. Not by an illegal order, or by legislation. The Dred Scott decision meant even US Congress could not end slavery. Only -- only  -- a Constitutional Amendment would work.

So LIncoln did that.

Keeping the Union together was the ONLY way to stop the spread of slavery.  Southern leaders agreed, if Lincoln would not let them spread slavery, they would create their own nation, based on slavery.

And they boasted about that.  They boasted they were creating a  nation based on slavery. Lincoln kept the Union together -- and said so -- to end slavery.  Ending slavery = keeping union together.  Keeping Union together = ending slavery.

He made that clear by House Divided Speech. And, he was right.




Because Kansas Act pushed slavery into Kansas -- and then Dred Scott decision said blacks are not human beings, Lincoln and thousands of other people, North and South, knew slavery was going to spread all over, or be kicked out.

Lincoln was hated in the newspapers -- in the South -- for House Divided. It was a in effect, said some in the South, a declaration of war against the South, saying slavery would end everywhere, or spread everywhere.

So when Lincoln did write the letter to Greeley (to the South, really, but via Greeley) he had already said repeatedly, 


When Lincoln's letter to Greeley is a prime example.

He actually wrote it to the Border States, which were going to join the Confederacy any day -- any hour.     The stupidity of Fremont in Kentucky gave slave owners what they needed -- see, Lincoln is going to free all the slaves and they will intermarry with  your white women.

Lincoln wrote it to Greeley, knowing very well by the next day or two, many Southern newspapers would print it.

If Lincoln does  not write that letter, or if it did not work (it worked)   the Civil War is over, and slavery spreads, per the War Ultimatums.   South had issued War ultimatums before the fighting started, demanding the spread of slavery.   

Mostly, those who trash Lincoln don't explain that many people alive in 1850's,thought blacks were more like monkeys that could talk -- not actual human beings.

Southern leaders BRAGGED blacks were subhuman, did you know that - or not? 

Southern leaders BRAGGED their "new nation" was based on the "great moral and scientific truth" that blacks were inferior beings, not human beings like whites.  

But Lincoln is the bad guy?



Learn the full story, not slogans. Lincoln's full speeches are amazing, powerful, and his actions to kill slavery were even more powerful.  

So read  his his full speeches, in context, and you won't be so stupid. 

"Lincoln would have taken a bullet to the brain, much sooner than he did, if he was not careful what he said --what  good would a dead Lincoln do, in 1856?"


Yes, Lincoln did parse words -- but read the full speeches.


The Southern War Ultimatums -- printed first in Richmond papers, with headline "THE TRUE ISSUE".

How war ultimatums appeared in Douglass's paper.

Full text of Southern paper

The TRUE ISSUE -- and their war ultimatums, were that Lincoln allow the spread of slavery into Kansas, and Kansas "accept and respect slavery."

The WAR ultimatum, let that sink in WAR ULTIMATUM -- that Kansas accept and respect slavery.

Kansas had REJECTED slavery and become a free state, and by a 95% vote!!   Do you grasp that?   FUCKING HELL.

No one told you -- ever -- that Southern War Ultimatums demanded a free state turn into a slave state. Did they? You never heard that? FUCK NO.

It would help if US text books mentioned it- - so all the US would know what scum sucking pigs and lunatic Confederate leaders were.  

COnfederate leaders didn't suggest it, didn't say it would be preferable.  They said in writing the war ultimatums.


They were not fucking bluffing.  They issued their war ultimatums, Lincoln would not obey, and they attacked.  They were already killing in Kansas, anyway.


Lincoln did evolve-- on his awareness how he could kill slavery so bad, for the next 150 years, Southern leaders would deny the very things they bragged about then.


Lincoln called "Negro Worshiper"  by New York papers.



Every high school history teacher can tell you about Lincoln's letter to Greeley, where LIncoln says if he could save the union without freeing and slaves, he would.

Sounds horrible?

Why would Lincoln write that letter to Greeley??

Actually, Lincoln did NOT write that letter to Greeley  -- he wrote to the border states, via Greeley, because Lincoln knew that in 24-48 hours, most people that mattered would read his letter to "Greeley".

More about that, below.

Meanwhile, Southern leaders are killing to spread slavery, bragging about it, and that's fine. Lincoln is the bad guy?  Seriously?

Remember, Southern leaders were BRAGGING they were killing to spread slavery.  And LIncoln is the bad guy because he, at that time, spoke about Union? 

He fucking had to.  A few more days, and those Southern states go with Jeff Davis. Do you grasp that or not?




Killing the God of Slavery. Lincoln's final gesture


No one seems to grasp this now -- but once Lee surrendered, do you know that no Southern leader, not one, not for the next 150 years, ever claimed that bullshit again, about God intended slavery, intended slaves be tortured (yes, they claimed that before, often) and that God wanted white men to enslave the black race.

That all stopped -- instantly.  An amazing difference.  Blacks were still beaten, some were in slavery illegally, many of the horrible things continued.

But that "God of slavery" was a very real God-- at least used daily by Southern leaders.   Lincoln killed that excuse.


Plus Lincoln's actions.  Have you ever heard about his "radical" actions from 1846-65?

Douglass knew all these.  Did anyone bother to mention them, to you?


The fact you do not know this -- everyone knew it in 1850's -- show how whitewashed the Dred Scott decision has been, we now teach it as something about "citizenship"  and Congress can not decide slavery "issues" in the territories.

As Jefferson Davis said -- Dred Scott was about blacks as persons or not. They are not persons, specifically they are not persons.

John Brown lasted about two hours, in Virginia, kicking slavery in the ass his way. Then he was hung, and so were his sons.

His other son already got killed, back in Kansas.

Lincoln fought a bit smarter -- and got the job done.



People  were arrested in the South, just for owning the wrong  book-- even preachers were arrested.

The article claims the South is the most moral, religious, and contented law abiding people on earth.   But those abolitionist are against God, against religion, against decency, and should be hung.  

The US Senator from Missouri boasted in his speech, he would kill to spread slavery, and kill to stop folks from speaking openly against slavery. That's not from some nut -- that was a US Senator boasting of it.

Those against slavery are against human virture, against modesty, they "must be hung or put in the penitentary" or the South will secede at once.


Frederick Douglass knew about articles like this -- because he reprinted them, in his own paper.

So Douglas knew the dangers to Lincoln -- and he knew Lincoln was trying to win elections, to get support of folks who thought blacks were sorta dogs that could talk and walk upright.

But Frederick Douglass already knew that.

Even in Illinois, speaking too candidly against slavery could get you shot - a fact Lincoln's friend Lovejoy learned too late. He was killed for his anti slavery newspaper.

Lincoln himself was shot in the head, by Booth, after Booth heard Lincoln speak for voting rights for blacks. Booth changed his plan from kidnapping, to killing, because of Lincoln's speech about voting rights.

Did anyone bother -- ever -- to tell you that?

I just did. Frederick Douglass already knew it.

People who saw Lincoln's speeches and debates did not say stupid things like "Lincoln is not really against slavery".     Nor did they say "Lincoln was reluctant to free the slaves".   
But see the video anyway, "Nigger" word cleaned up to "Negro" or not.  And go read his full speeches, his full debates -- and learn his full actions.

You may learn a  lot.  We did.

Douglass knew that most whites -- even in the North - would not walk across the street to free a slave, much less fight a war to do it.  He knew Lincoln had to gather support from millions of people who did not want blacks living anywhere near them, including Illinois, where it was illegal for a black person to move to.

Your "history" teacher may or may not know that. But Frederick Douglass lived it.  When you understand what Douglass knew, and why he said Lincoln was radical, swift, zealous, and determined, you won't be so stupid about the Civil War, or Lincoln.


Frederick Douglass was world famous before most people in  Illinois  ever heard of Lincoln.  He had been tortured, he has seen a slave woman whipped to death while the slave master shouted bible verses.

His biological father raped his mother, a slave woman, and would send bounty hunters after Douglass when he escaped.

Douglass  had seen slaves torn by slave dogs, specially trained to attack blacks who ran.


Other things NORTHERN politicians and NORTHERN newspapers called Lincoln at the time:






      'Lincoln is an ignorant man who, by stopping the spread of slavery, will be like burning us to death slowly'

     'Lincoln and black Republican's  true intention is clear, to abolish slavery in all of the states'


If you told people in 1854-1865, that Lincoln was not against slavery, most of them would have looked at you like you were out of your mind.

For that place, and to the people Lincoln needed to get to vote for him, he was radical -- and lost several elections, because of it.


Actually, though Lincoln did parse words at times, overall, read his FULL speeches, and see, LIncoln was kicking slavery in the ass sideways, from 1846 on, when he stood up as a fresman Congressman, to President Polk, and called him on expanding slavery, via the Mexican War.

In fact, where he was, and where he was, LIncoln was radical as hell, and he had to be careful or he would have been shot much sooner.    

Those who claim LIncoln was not against slavery -- are you nuts?  NO one else did what he did, long before the Civil War. Lincoln essentially did nothing BUT travel around IL because of Kansas Act, and work to unseat the man who got it passed, Stephen A Douglas.

Lincoln gave over 2000 speeches, and his full speeches are amazing -- and for his time and place, radical as can be.

Others did speak more candidly -- but not in Illinois, and not where he did.   The big "abolitionist"  speakers would not dare go where Lincoln went -- they were speaking to audiences that already agreed with them.

Llincoln was speaking to folks who thought blacks were somehow not fully human. At the time, Illinois did not even allow blacks to move there into the state -- did you know that?

Many whites would not walk across the street to piss on a black person, much less fight a war to free him.   Lincoln had to change those folks mind, and get their votes.

Lincoln was shot, for speaking too candidly, about voting rights for blacks.   Booth changed his plan from kidnapping to killing, when he heard Lincoln speak of voting rights for blacks.

Did anyone ever tell you that? 

Douglass knew about that.   You probably did not. And there is much, much more. 

Swift?  Radical?  Zealous?  Determined?

Lincoln called "Negro Worshiper"  by New York papers.

 Lincoln's enemies at that time trashed him for just the opposite reason, a fact Lincoln detractors today, seem blissfully unaware of.


LINCOLN?  Radical to end slavery?  That's hilarious!  Poor Frederick Douglass, such a sucker.   Man, Lincoln conned that fool.

Lincoln ZEALOUS?   

Are you kidding!!  Everyone knows Lincoln was "reluctant" to free the slaves, and promised the South he was not out to destroy slavery where it existed.

Didn't Douglass know anything?

 Even the "Lincoln" scholars admit old Abe wrote that entire letter to Greeley, that he was out to save the Union. 



Border states did not matter, no matter what Lincoln tried to say. 

Lincoln SWIFT?   Frederick Douglass may have been a genius, but he was sure a dumb ass about Lincoln, even though he was there.  Lincoln was so slow to do anything. 

Who cares about border states?  Lincoln did say he hoped God was on Union side, but he really needed Kentucky on the Union side, or all was lost.

What did Lincoln know?  



Going where he did, and when he did, was radical -- even dangerous.  Lincoln's friend, Lovejoy, was killed for speaking too candidly against slavery.  Did you know that, or not?

No one ever told you that, did they? Douglass knew.

Lincoln himself was killed, after he spoke too candidly, for voting rights for blacks.   Booth heard his speech about voting rights for "educated blacks"  and changed his plan from kidnapping, to killing.

No one ever told you that, did they? Douglass knew.

See, it matters what the hell you know. It would help if those trashing Lincoln would know his full speeches and full actions, but they don't, and they seem to like it that way. 


POLK SALAD  1846 - 1865

 Lincoln had a long history of 1846 on,  of taking radical (for the time) stands.  He stood to President Polk,  actually accusing Polk correctly, of pushing for a war against Mexico, to steal land that would be used to spread slavery.

No one told you that, did they.

When Lincoln could not shame Polk and others from a war to spread slavery, Lincoln pushed  for Wilmont Proviso 40 times,  that would have kept slavery out of the areas US just stole from Mexico.  Lincoln was on the "shit list"   of slave owners ever after.

No one told you that, did they?

Lincoln as Congressman,  tried to end slavery in DC.

No one told you that, did they.

Did those who trash Lincoln -- or act like he didn't care about slavery, ever tell you about  12 years that Lincoln did nothing but speak and travel around, get into office, as President, then kick slavery in the ass?

You mean they forgot to mention that?   But they told you about a letter to Greeley, out of context. 

That whole "kicking slavery in the ass sideways"   meant nothing, right?   

Even after Lincoln could have kept the Union together, but STILL kicked slavery until it was dead dead dead, that was just for show.

That letter to Greeley means the 2000 other letters, the 2000 other speeches, don't matter.   


That some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested if he even spoke the words "slavery must end, for the war to end" -- that means nothing?

Get the full set of facts, and those who trash Lincoln, out of stupidity or malice, won't be so stupid.  

Frederick Douglass was smart enough to know the full story. 

Douglass knew  context -- like the fact some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested for simply saying the Civil War should end slavery.  Douglass knew full speeches, and mostly, Douglass knew Lincoln's full actions.



Guess who knew that?   Frederick Douglass (and of course, Greeley knew).    

Keeping the Union together would end slavery over time. Slavery was like a cancer, it had to spread, or it had to die itself. 

Southern leaders said the same thing -- but they used LIncoln's comments as justification to leave the Union and spread slavery outside the union, as their own "War Ultimatums" made clear.

Frederick Douglass knew that. You did not.


Also, at the time Lincoln wrote that letter, some Northern Congressmen wanted Lincoln arrested, if he even said slavery should end, for the war to end. 

They did not say Lincoln by name, but they called for the arrest of anyone who said slavery should end, for the war to end.

Did you know that,  yes or no?  Saying slavery should end was some radical shit, until the last part of the Civil War.

And if LIncoln had spoken sooner, more candidly, the border states would have joined the Confederacy.

Did you know that?   Lincoln did, that's the big reason he had to speak carefully.

Guess who knew -- Frederick Douglass knew.


Douglass not only knew Lincoln, Douglass knew the scum what  Lincoln was up against -- North and South.


From Lincoln Douglas debates.  Douglas makes up stories about Lincoln's "Nigger" friends. 


Douglass was personal friends with John Brown, and he was paid to speak to crowds in the US, once his friends could literally "buy him"  from his slave owner, who was also his biological father.

Douglass Speech about Lincoln

Charles Sumner Speech about Atchison and Crimes in KS