Friday, June 10, 2016

Stuff you just won't get in history books...

but you should.....

(moving soon to

Obsessed for equality?  Lincoln?


 Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly, with great fanfare and bluster screamed (yes screamed, according to local papers) that "Lincoln want's your daughters to sleep with Niggers".   This is typical Southern newspaper hatred toward Lincoln because he "worshipped negroes"  and said they were equal to any white man.

Lincoln is a "Miserable Abolitionist"  said Southern newspapers, whose actual goal is to "Steal  your Negroes" .  Lincoln will "exterminate the white race"  by letting Negros walk down the street as free men, and someday vote, be on juries, and allowed to run for office.

Noooooo way.  My "history" teacher told me Lincolndidn't really care about slavery until half way through the Civil War!

Those stupid newspapers at the time, that stupid Stephen A Douglas, they should listen to my history teacher!!!


Was Frederick Douglass stupid? He claimed -- at length -- that Lincoln was "swift, radical, zealous and determined"  to end slavery.   

Yes, Frederick Douglass knew every one of Lincoln's speeches, he put most of them in his newspaper!   

Douglass, however, knew the FULL speeches, the total thing, and more, he knew the vile hatred of Lincoln for even being against slavery -- because anyone against slavery was accused of, as Lincoln was, "being a Nigger Worshipper"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Douglass also knew, and said, that Lincoln "was bound to consult" with others -- he was not King, he needed to get the public behind him, and the Congress, and most whites would not spit on a slave if they were on fire.  So Douglass was exceedingly aware how amazing it was that Lincoln -- in his FULL speeches -- was so radical.

Yes, you can chop up Lincoln's speeches, and make them say anything you like -- it's practically a hobby for some wanna-be "historians".

But anyone who ever went to hear Lincoln, anyone who knew anything about Lincoln and his history, were not confused.  Lincoln was quite clear -- in his FULL speeches -- that slavery was an evil, that it had to go, or the United States would end.   

Yes, Lincoln sometimes spoke of UNION -- and he had to, should have.  Had Lincoln only spoke of slave's and slavery, few people would even vote for Lincoln, and he would be branded as a lunatic -- people today associate "abolitionist" with good things. But in 1850's, in many parts of the North, "abolitionist" was seen as a dangerous person who would have "Niggers" walk the street and be on the same side walk as white women!

Frederick Douglass well aware of such things -- even if you "history" teacher has no clue.

There are entire books showing Lincoln was a racist, and wanted to send blacks to Africa, and just cared about Union.  One such book was "President Lincoln the Reluctant Emancipator." 

Apparently the author never bothered to read the Lincoln - Douglass debates in the graphic version, with Douglas screaming that Lincoln wants white women to sleep with "Niggers" .

And the author had no clue Lincoln's 20 year history -- before the Civil War- of kicking slavery in the ass when he could, how he could.   Southern newspapers reported it too -- hatefully.  Lincoln had tried to stop slavery in District of Columbia, which pissed Southern editors off to no end.

Lincoln and his " Free Negro" are our enemy, the papers said. Decide which you serve -- Lincoln our enemy, or Jeff Davis who protects our rights.  Thanks to Lincoln, the Union is "dissolved forever" and the South can have the "Southern rights" to push slavery into Kansas and beyond. 

The author repeated aspect of that theme on every page, if not in every paragraph. 

Here editors in Alton IL make fun of Lincoln, in 1846, trying to end slavery in District of Columbia by trying to buy all the slaves (pay the owners) and set all slaves there free. 

Ninety nine percent of history teachers don't even know Lincoln tried to end slavery when he was in congress, 1846-1848,  and fought with then President Polk, accusing the same of waging a war against Mexico for the purpose of helping the South spread slavery.

Did you know Lincoln while in Congress, in 1846, tried to end slavery? Did you know he stood up to President Polk and challenged him on the Mexican War being about helping slavery spread?

Did you know that forty times-- FORTY TIMES -- Lincoln tried to outlaw the use of the stolen (yes, we stolen land from Mexico after we waged a war there) to spread slavery.

Now -- these books and teachers which tell you Lincoln "didn't really care"  have one thing in common.

They never tell you such things.  

What they do, all of them do, is give you selected quotes, not the full speeches, and not his actions, and not the context. 


The power of out of context quotes



Over 20 years.

 Stephen A Douglas knew Lincoln and the issues involved better than anyone else you could name -- and spent many weeks with Lincoln personally, both in Springfield and around central Illinois. 

Douglas had Lincoln's speeches printed out, and quoted from them repeatedly -- studied them at great length.   So when Douglas claimed Lincoln "repeats over and over"  that the black man is equal to the white man,  and that Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger,"  he was not just yapping his gums.

Lincoln did indeed have a long history, in word and deed, fighting slavery from early 1840's on, as you will see.  For thirty years before the  Civil War, Lincoln was "stalking" slavery as one historian noted, waiting for the moment "he could kill it".

And that moment came later.

It all depends what part of which speech you want to quote.  Again and again, Lincoln would seem to agree with a racist sentiment of the day, in once sentence, but then two sentences later revisit that sentiment and mock it.  He did so, and you can see this, in the Lincoln Douglas debates many times. 

Check out the video below, from a 1939 movie clip. Sadly, the movie cleaned up Douglas's "Nigger rants"  and does not show him running side to side screaming that "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

But it does show how Lincoln handled those charges -- which at the time was very much like calling someone a child molester today.  It was still a crime for blacks to even move to Illinois, still a crime in much of the US to publicly speak against, or write against slavery (see more below).  

You can, if you are so inclined, quote Lincoln from the clip below as claiming blacks are not equal to whites. But if you watch the entire clip, and more, if you were at the debates, you would not be confused whatsoever.  Lincoln's full speeches were amazingly powerful FOR equality under the law.

Likewise Douglas's full speeches are powerful for his condemnation of the Declaration of Independence, and his hatred of the "Niggers" - he often discussed the "horrors" of black men being able to "marry white women".    In 1858, if you wanted someone shot or killed, you could accuse them of wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers" --and Douglas knew full well that was the raw nerve that people in Illinois were terrified of-- not freedom for slaves, but if you free them, they will take our white women.

It's an ugly truth, but well known then. And Douglas spent years attacking Lincoln for his "obsession for the Nigger".  And it worked- - Douglas won that Senate seat.   And it would have worked to keep Lincoln out of the White House, but three pro-slavery candidates ran, Lincoln was the only anti-slavery candidate. 

If Douglas could have gotten the other two pro-slavery candidates off the ballot, using the same attacks about "your daughters marrying niggers" -- Douglas would have been President. 

"Mr. Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with and marry with Niggers." 

Not just Douglas -- Southern leaders accused Lincoln of being so radical for equality he would "destroy the white race by making 
Lincoln was "nothing special" said one historian,  who got Pulitzer Prizes. 


Actually, as you will see, Lincoln's FULL speeches are stunning, powerful and clear.  Southern leaders  said Lincoln's words were a declaration of war.   Boiled down, Lincoln said 'We will end slavery -- and we will not allow slave power to spread slavery by their killings. '

 We "shan't let you"  end the union, and we shan't let you spread slavery,  yelled Lincoln in 1858, Galena Illinois, in one of the few outburst Lincoln ever allowed himself in public. 

Somehow, this and much else is "forgotten" when writing about Lincoln. Much easier to pick other quotes, ignore the full quotes, and ignore Lincoln's "radical"  (or as we would say today "kick ass")  actions.

The Union will end, or slavery will end, Lincoln said dozens of times, in very careful use of language.  "But I don't expect the Union will end".  

Southern leaders -- including Stephen A Douglas -- called Lincoln's "The Union will end, or slavery will end"  as a declaration of war on the South.   

The power -- and damage -- of a little knowledge.  

n only used slavery as an excuse to keep Union together".

Uh, maybe the people at the time knew a few things?  Just maybe?

Lincoln -- just being against the spread of slavery into Kansas - was going to "burn us to death".

Remember that, he makes this clear, JUST BEING AGAINST THE SPREAD OF SLAVERY INTO KANSAS was going to burn us to death..

The Secretary of State of Confederacy pushed crowds into frenzy of hate --claiming Lincoln was going to "exterminate the white race"  by being against the spread of slavery. 

These are not a few examples taken out of context,  these are a few of the many examples of the hatred for Lincoln, and anyone (but mostly Lincoln) because he was so radical that he would have equality for the "Nigger".

Lincoln's  "disrespect "  Douglas said, of the United States Supreme Court ruling that blacks were not persons, and could not be seen as human beings, but as property, was like  a declaration of war against the South. 

Lincoln, Douglas said, was going to cause war, just by saying that blacks and whites should be equal under the law.  The Surpreme Court had recently ruled blacks were "so inferior" they could not be seen as persons.   

In fact the court ORDERED, let me repeat that, because your teacher will never tell you even once, the Dred Scott court ORDERED that blacks could not be seen as persons.   They were "so inferior"  they were not to be seen as persons, but as property.

You would not make head nor tales of US history, or the Lincoln Douglas debates, if you are unaware of this basic 600lb gorilla in the room. Blacks are NOT persons, according to the Supreme Court, and the court further ordered (yes ordered) that the federal government must "protect" slavery in Kansas, even after Kansas voted 95% against slavery.

Did anyone tell you that? 

Did your teacher ever tell you that the SCOTUS ordered blacks to be seen as property, not humans?

Did your teacher tell you the SCOTUS ordered slavery protected, even in areas that rejected slavery?

Lincoln -- over, and over, and over, explained to crowds that these machinations, these abominations of logic, reason and law, would necessarily mean the entire US would be slave states, or there would be no Union at all.


One had to go -- said Lincoln --  the Union had to go, or slavery, because of the Dred Scott vile orders, the specific way Stephen A Douglas and Jefferson Davis used Dred Scott.   

Dred Scott decision officially - and proudly, and specifically -- ruled the Declaration of no effect.

 Every history teacher worth a damn should know that much -- because Stephen A Douglas boasted out the ass about this -- that Dred Scott decision wiped away the Declaration of Independence -- specifically. Officially, by decree.  And Douglas was proud of it.

Over and over in the Lincoln Douglas debates, Douglas made this clear --very very clear.  You can't possibly read the Lincoln Douglas debates and miss that.  It was the central point of the Lincoln Douglas debates -- Douglas claiming the Declaration of Independence was wrong and now of no effect, Lincoln saying it was right, and the nation needed to reverse Dred Scott by re-hearing, or Constitutional Amendment.

You probably never heard that officially, and in great detail, Jeff Davis and Stephen A Douglas boasted to crowds that the Declaration of Independence was no longer part of the United States government.

Therefore, said Lincoln,  unless the country could undo Dred Scott, either the Union would go, or slavery would go.  Between the Kansas Act and Dred Scott, the South had deliberately pushed slavery by means "foul and more foul"  -- by violence, by hate mongering, by torture, by war, by perversion of the Constitution in case of Dred Scott.

And Lincoln did exactly that -- he got the 13th Amendment passed, to destroy the vile Dred Scott order that blacks are not human beings, and that the Declaration of Indpendence had no bearing on the United States of America.

Lincoln signed several copies of the Emancipation Proclamation and the 13 Amendment, which officially ended the vile Dred Scott scam by Southern scum.  Over 600,000 men would die because Southern scum pushed through Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision.  

And Southern leaders -- virtually every Southern leader that was eager to push slavery survived the war nicely, only the fools and suckers died, very common scenario in wars --never gave those deaths they caused a moment's notice. Not one of them apologized to the slaves they tortured, the children they sold, the women they raped, the women they paid to have kidnapped. Not one.

The point is, either the Union -- with the Declaration of Independence -- would prevail, or slavery would spread. Because of Dred Scott, there was no longer any middle passage. 

And he did not expect the Union to end.

"YOU SHAN'T DO IT." Lincoln yelled back in one debate. "We won't let you destroy the Union"  -- be you never heard that.

But destroy the Union they must, in order to expand slavery by the Dred Scott decision and Kansas Act.

  Lincoln was "so radical"  he would cause your daughters to "sleep with Niggers"   Douglas ran from side to side of the stage -- according to newspapers at the time -- screaming  these slurs against Lincoln.  

Douglas did not just mention it, and go on. By far the most historonic and melodramic, and loud utterances of Douglas speeches, maybe of his life, was that Lincoln "WANTS YOUR DAUGHTERS TO SLEEP WITH NIGGERS.

Why on earth would Douglas do that?  Because he knew very well that was the raw nerve he could stab again, and again.  To be against the spread of slavery, by itself, Douglas and others conflated accuse anyone of being a "Nigger Worshiper".   

For political purposes (to get power, to get votes, to get the crowds to cheer) Douglas and others used this knife to stab Lincoln again, and again, and again.

  (Yes, Douglas and Davis were right, The SCOTUS actually ordered that blacks be seen as NOT human beings, not persons).


How do we know the Dred Scott order for the government NOT to see blacks as human beings was actually a basic fact?

We know Dred Scott order (yes order) that blacks CAN NOT be seen as human beings, but as property, because the leaders on both sides said so, repeatedly. 

Lincoln said this over and over, and over.  The purpose of the Dred Scott decision is to make property out of human beings.   And he was fucking right, it was in the damn order in the decision itself.

Plus, Jefferson Davis boasted of this -- in writing no less, in his own book, Rise and Fall. He didn't just admit it, he boasted of it -- as the logic for the Civil War.   

Why the fuck -- I want to know, seriously -- why the fuck no "historian" of note, has ever shown this, in a candid way.  Both leaders going into the Civil War, and during the Civil War, said it was the Dred Scott decision that ordered blacks not to be seen as human beings.

That made the Civil War inevitable, because the Dred Scott decision literally made the Declaration of Independence of no effect, and ordered (yes ordered) the federal government to protect slavery even in areas that had already rejected slavery.

You don't get more basic- - ordered the government to protect the spread of slavery, even in areas that had already rejected slavery.  A detail "historians" are almost criminally stupid about, as in the Worlds Dumbest Criminals, historian edition.

Yet guys like Eric Foner idiotically insists  "Dred Scott was a relatively narrow ruling preventing Congress from outlawing slavery in the territory.

Narrow? Narrow?  That's what the supposed expert Foner claims.  Narrow decision about citizenship and Congress inability to keep slavery out of the territories.

Actually the fucking decision ORDERED the federal government to see the black race as non-human (not persons)  and ordered the federal government to protect, literally protect, slavery

Here is the exact language, taken as screen shot, from the decision itself.  "recognizes [blacks] as PROPERTY."

Then "pledges the Federal government to protect it".

Maybe these "historians" could take a few minutes to read it, and read how Lincoln and Davis both insisted this was central.

Did Foner bother to fucking read the decision?  Nine times, nine fucking times, the decision said blacks were inferior beings -- a buzzword at the time in use to deny blacks were more than dogs that could talk, as Davis said "A different caste"  and sent by God "as a divine gift"  for white men to enslave.

Have you ever seen a book about Davis where they tell you he boasted blacks were sent by GOD as a "Divine Gift"  fit only for servitude? 

Fuck no.


How about having a few "historians" read Lincoln and Davis both saying essentially the same thing.

There is not a single text book in the USA -- that we know of -- that even hints this basic fact.

Lincoln was hated, feared, and crowds brought to their feet when his enemies told the crowd Lincoln was going to have their daughters "SLEEP WITH NIGGERS"

Yet this was a powerful -- the most powerful -- tool hate mongers used, and men like Stephen A Douglas used, repeatedly, to stir up the nation.  

Warnings --

1) Under construction-

2) Crude language, because it's needed here.

3) Really, much of this you can not find this anywhere else (but original sources)  We stupidly have let Southern cry babies and liars write the basic narrative of the US Civil War, and of Lincoln.

Lincoln radical?

Lincoln obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"?

And much more. Common knowledge then -- so why on earth is this not in any US text book (that we know of). Nor is it covered in any meaningful way, in almost any popular "history" such as McPherson or Foner or Catton.

Why?   We know the answer now, but see if you can guess why.


"She is my equal and the equal of any man" 

Trashing Lincoln - then and now - by out of context isolated "quotes".

But get the full quotes, the full speeches, in context, with his amazing actions,  and you will see, Frederick Douglass (Lincoln's friend)  and Stephen A Douglas (Lincoln's enemy)  were right.

Lincoln was kick ass radical, who ended up not only kicking slavery to death, Lincoln did more: he killed the Southern lunatic's God of Slavery.

It's a shame,  a travesty, we do not teach the Civil War as a religious war.

 Southern leaders bragged out the ass it was a religious war, bragged out the ass they were killing to spread slavery for GOD.

We have never taught that basic truth.  Too ugly?   But true.

Lincoln had to deal with Southern lunatic's God of slaver, the Northern folks who didn't give a shit about blacks, and the very violent Southern leaders, who were killing and torturing long before the Civil War started, and they were bragging -- bragging -- they were at war, and would not stop killing until slavery was in the North and the West, against states rights.

We have never taught the ugly truth about US Civil War, because Southern cry babies and liars actively prevented the basic truths of what Southern leaders did, and boasted about at the time, in US text books.

We'd like to change that bullshit.  Someone should --150 years of bullshit and distortions is enough. ________________________________


You need also to learn Lincoln's radical as hell actions, 1846 on.   Stupidly, neither aspect of Lincoln is taught, or even considered candidly, in any US text book, with a similar failure in popular "histories" of Lincoln and the Civil War. 


"She is my equal, and the equal of any man".

When you read Lincoln's full speeches,  in context, no one was as radical and effective as Lincoln. No one was a bit confused -- Lincoln had called down the thunder, promised either slavery would end, or the union would end, and he was not about to let the Union end.

Slavery had to die, Lincoln essentially said, over and over, or the Union would die. And he was not going to allow the Union to end.  Keeping the Union meant death to slavery.

Your "history" teacher probably never mentioned this, but the South took Lincoln's "The union will end, or slavery will end, and I do not expect the union to end"  as a provocation to war.

But Southern leaders themselves claimed Lincoln's intentions were clear, from the many times he repeated "The Union must end or slavery must end" idea.  

To Lincoln, as he said over and over, and as he actually accomplished by his actions, keeping the Union together was the only way to prevent lunatics in the South from spreading slavery by violence, as they were trying to do.

Stephen A Douglas did  not just say Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  He shouted it, ran from side to side of the stage screaming it.

Newspapers at the time reported it.  Why the fuck have we taken out the violence and danger Lincoln faced -- and of course slaves faced?    Why the fuck have we not told yet, the truth of what went on, leading up to the Civil War. 

"Niggers" will be sleeping with your daughters  was not a side issue. It was the main issue,  the main "knife" as Lincoln called it, used to stab anyone who dared speak against slavery and the violent spread of it.

It was the central issue of the day, the raw nerve of the day. 

  More than anything, get Lincoln's kick ass actions, 1846 on.  We show you some of that here.   


Douglass was not fucking around.
Either was Lincoln.

We won't either. 




Lincoln was actually kicking slavery in the ass -- 1846 on. 

Actions matter -- ever hear of that?

Lincoln did speak against slavery, powerfully, thousands of times. Read the full speeches instead of out of context bullshit.

But his actions were even more amazing.  

Lincoln  first got attention for what he did, not the speeches, which came later.  In 1846.  Lincoln was powerfully challenging slavery with his words and actions in 1846.

In 1846 he stood up to President Polk for stealing land from Mexico -- starting a war to steal it- - so Southern leaders could spread slavery into the newly stolen land.

Hell most people do not even know the US actually did (not kinda,  not sorta, not in a way) start a war to steal land, and steal that land to spread slavery.

Lincoln is one of the few people to call Polk on that.  And -- Lincoln tried 40 times (40 fucking times) to make it illegal to use that newly stolen land to spread slavery.


When Lincoln was accused of "wanting your daughter to sleep with Niggers"   how did he respond.

This is  how -- though they took out Douglas's  "Nigger" rants spoken of by reporters at the time, and they did not show Douglas running from side to side of the stage screaming it.   But this is how he responded, so he would not be attacked, as others were.....  see the video here.


Southern leaders -- from the South -- made it a crime to speak or write against slavery in Kansas.  You are not even told that "detail".

But what did Lincoln do, after Southern leaders (yes, Southern leaders)  made it a crime to speak or write against slavery ?

He fucking went to Kansas and spoke against slavery there.   Did your "history" teacher have a clue?  No. 

Lincoln's trip  to Kansas after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas.   

Very basic -- both the fact Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery (and it was that was for 20 years or more in the South).  Even preachers could be tortured (yes, tortured) for owning the wrong book in the South.

Lincoln was a "traitor"  and Southern owned publications called for his death, and the death of anyone in Kansas who dared speak against slavery and not obey their law to "accept and respect" slavery. 

All that is whitewashed away now -- people are told some watered down bullshit about this book or that being "banned".  Wrong, dumb ass,  there was not a list of banned books.  Rather, anything could get you arrested and or tortured in the South on a given day.  Including this woman who was tortured in public for saying the wrong thing in Memphis, just before the Civil War.


Where Lincoln stood for speech against slavery

After Southern leaders made it a crime to do so.

After Southern leaders made it a crime to do so.


Did you know Southern leaders made it a crime, punishable by torture, to preach against slavery? To speak openly against slavery?  To publish anti slavery books or newspapers?

Fuck no -- no one told you.   So  how would you know? You weren't there.

This is the basic failure of US "historians"  re the US Civil War.  They have whitewashed the vile and violent actions of Southern leaders, including tortures, hangings, and whippings of WHITES who dared speak against slavery.


Oh you may see some reference to such and such book was banned. 
Dumb asses -there was no list of banned books.   Anything -- a newspaper in your house, a book someone sent you in the mail, could get you arrested and tortured.

A comment in public, could get you stripped and whipped in public.  Women too.

No one told you that, did they?   Instead, you hear this shit about honorable men of principle in the South. Fuck no.

But that is the world Lincoln lived in, a world of ISIS like lunacy by Southern leaders, where they burned men to death (yes they did) who fought back against slavery, where they branded and raped women, and sold children (yes, they did).

Southern leaders said Lincoln was trying to "exterminate" the white race by being so radical. 

Not all newspapers repeated Douglas "Nigger rant"  that Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" -- they were more politically correct, but the message was the same.

Lincoln will make your daughters be with "Niggers".



Others were beaten, arrested, hung, or tortured for saying things that Lincoln dared say, when he said it, where he said it. 


Part of the problem with understanding Lincoln -- we have never taught how ISIS like Southern leaders were, like their boasting of torture and killing to spread slavery. You can't understand Lincoln, unless you understand  how crazy and violent SOuthern leaders were. 


See -- it helps to know what the fuck was going on.   People were still being killed for speaking against slavery in the 1850's.   One of the places they were being killed was Kansas.

Lincoln went there and spoke against slavery, 1859.

Lincoln stood up to President Polk and called him on creating a war against Mexico in order to double the size of slavery

How many "history" teachers even know that?   They don't even know Polk and the US started the war, in a clear effort (successful) to steal land from Mexico, and to spread slavery in that land.

Lincoln called Polk out on that. 

Then, Lincoln tried 40 times -- FORTY FUCKING TIMES -- to make it illegal to use that stolen land for slavery.

How many people know that?


Really -- how many people know?

This was common knowledge at the time -- even Southern leaders admitted it. Some were proud, but some were deeply offended.  Even slave owner and Kentucky leader Henry Clay spoke out epically against stealing this land for slavery.

Lincoln spoke up and challenged President Polk.  It was an open secret that the whole thing was done to steal the land, and that Southern scum would use the land to spread slavery. 

Yes, Henry Clay gave epic speeches against stealing this land, and he admitted what everyone knew anyway, it was a theft of land to spread slavery.  He was a slave OWNER,  but against stealing land by war to spread it.

Bet you didn't know that.


Then, Lincoln tried, in the 1840's, to get slavery stopped in District of Columbia.  And when he became President, he rapidly moved to do as President what he could not do as Congressmen in 1840s -- by his order, he ended slavery in District of Columbia.

Lincoln was hated for all this -- all the speeches he made against slavery -- challenging Polk in the 1840's, pushing to stop US from stealing land to spread slavery, then trying to stop that land from being used for slavery.

So Lincoln was very well known as someone who was kicking slavery in the ass as hard as he could.    The public was not with him -- he lost the Senate race, in 1856 and 1858.  One reason -- he was "too radical"   and "obsessed with equality for the Niggers"  said Stephen A Douglas.

Virtually all of the South hated Lincoln, and many in the North.  They accused Lincoln of "not supporting the troops".

Sound familiar?   

But since you are not even taught that US stole that land, killed, invaded, and stolen that land,  it's not that surprising  you are not told that Lincoln stood up against it, and challenged the President on that. 

But -"historians"  should know, even if they can't figure a way to tell you.  And they sure as hell should not tell you Lincoln was "nothing special" about slavery, because he was kicking ass, and would kick a lot harder when he got public support to do so.


In fact, Lincoln  would kick slavery so fucking hard, the GOD of slavery died.   Bet you didn't know about the God of Slavery, either?  Yeah, lot of things you don't know, if you don't read Southern documents, speeches, books, sermons, and newspapers at the time.

The spot in Kansas Lincoln spoke -- after Southern leaders
made it illegal to speak or write against slavery in Kansas.

Maybe your "history" teacher needs to learn before they teach something? 



So when you hear some "history" teacher tell you "Lincoln didn't really care"  or  "Lincoln only became against slavery after the Civil War started"   they are dumb asses.  

Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass -- hard, fast and often, 1846 on.

For example, Lincoln stood up to President Polk -- while Lincoln was in Congress, and not only called Polk on starting the war in Mexico in order to spread slavery (gee, why doesn't Eric Foner ever mention that)  Lincoln also tried 40 times -- 40 fucking times -- to stop slavery from going into the area the US just stole from Mexico, in a war.

Then, Lincoln also tried to stop the slave trade in District of Columbia,  in 1848.   Very odd for a guy who "didn't much care" about slavery one way or another, wouldn't you say?


Lincoln stood up to President Polk During the Civil War
Accused Polk of starting the war to gain land to spread slavery.

Then tried to stop Southerner from using the land for slavery.

Then tried to stop slavery in DC.


There is a fucking REASON Lincoln's enemies said he was "radical and obsessed for equality for the Nigger"  -- and they even listed the reasons they said he was "obsessed for equality for the Nigger".

The reasons they said that?  Lincoln's actions and FULL speeches. 

When Douglas (Stephen A) repeatedly claimed Lincoln was obsessed with equality -- it was because he had grown into adulthood with Lincoln in central Illinois, saw him speak against slavery at least 300 times, and knew better than anyone what Lincoln was doing, and how.

Don't be fooled by Lincoln's jokes and demeanor -- Lincoln wanted to have your daughters be with "Niggers". Lincoln wanted blacks to vote, to be on juries, to go to school, to be elected to office -- even to the office of President!   Douglas spoke dozens of times to that effect, to cheering crowds, warning them of LIncoln and his "Negro Worship". 

So why the fuck don't "historians" tell you that?   I wish I knew-  ask one of those stupid bastards if you see them.


We have yet to meet any history teacher who even knows Lincoln went to Kansas, and that Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas.  But Lincoln went there, and spoke against slavery, even though people were still being killed in Kansas for speaking against slavery.

People were still being killed, whipped, hung for daring to speak against slavery  --- even in Kansas, a Northern state.  

Did you know Southern leaders sent 800 men (mostly from Texas) to Kansas to kill and terrorize in 1856?  

Did you know those men made it a crime to speak against slavery, publish anything anti slavery in Kansas (it was already a crime to do so in the South).

Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery - and there spoke against slavery?

Maybe you be learn all the facts, so you won't be so stupid. 

North and South it was the issue that mattered.

They were told that  -- Yanks would make your daughters marry "Niggers".

How the fuck -- really, how the fuck -- have so many "historians" just whitewashed this basic and very real issue -- one that shaped not only Lincoln's actions, but Southern leaders speeches.

Southern leaders pumped up the fear and hate of that black man (Nigger)  being with your white daughter.

Lincoln had to say - hey hey hey, I never said I was for PERFECT equality, meaning marriage and sex between black men and white women. 


Southern leaders and their lackeys in North regularly called anyone against slavery "Nigger lovers"  or "Nigger Worshippers".   

The term "black republican"  was more common than just writing "republican".   One Southern writer just wrote "Niggers = Republicans". 

And called for their DEATH.



Slaves, insisted Jeff Davis, were "the most contented laborers on earth".   It was the evil "abolitionist"  causing slaves to be "dissatisfied".

Robert E Lee wrote that if "abolitionist" will stop their "evil course"  the slave owner would eventually be able to civilize the black race.  Learn about his torture of slave girls, from his own slave ledgers.  Pain, Lee wrote, was "necessary for their instruction"  and God knew and intended slaves "endure painful discipline"  which he paid others to carry out.

Meaning, he paid men to whip slave girls as he stood by screaming at the girls.  That was reported in newspapers then, and Lee validated those reports in his own hand written slave ledgers and letters.

Yet we teach Lee -- idiotically and fraudulently - as either not owning slaves, or being loved by his "servants".  Utter nonsense. 



Early on, the South had more anti-slavery publications than the North.  Did you know that?

But as time went on, from 1840's on, Southern leaders saw that free speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of press did not co-exist with slavery. 

People could ridicule slave owners, with free press. Preachers could preach anti-slavery sermons, if there were freedom of religion.   Horror stories of the rapes, tortures, and burnings of blacks (yes, blacks were at times burned to death, for fighting back against slavery), could be shown on any newspaper, if it were legal to do so.

Slave owners did not like to be ridiculed. 

So they made it illegal. Did you know that? Anyone tell you?

From the 18340's on, Southern states made it a crime --punishable by whipping -- to publish or say things in public that would "dissatisfy a slave".

You may have heard this book or that was banned in the South. Bullshit, no such list ever existed.   Anything -- a sermon, a newspaper, a book, even mail against slavery could get you arrested. 

And the stated logic?  They weren't going to say "Sorry, slavery is so vile we have to stop anyone from speaking or preaching or writing against it".   So they said they prevented public communications that might "dissatisfy a slave" 

Orwellian much?

Let that sink in.  In fact, it was the "radical Negro Worshippers"  said Southern leaders, who "were against GOD"  that caused slaves to be "dissatisfied".

   Never mind that slaves never got near any abolitionist, and never heard these speakers, and were not allowed near newspapers.

Even whites in the South were punished -- including torture, hanging, drowning -- for owning the wrong book, or public comments and writings against slavery, or trying to vote against slavery.

I can't help it if your "history" teacher doesn't know or leaves out the original documents that prove all this, and was common knowledge then. 

You did not have to be pro slavery -- you just could not be anti -slavery. 

The country was told by leaders North and South that Lincoln was so "Nigger loving" and so "radical for equality"  that he was killing the white race, he would "exterminate the white race".





So then, after being called Nigger lover, after being described as "wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers" -- Lincoln had to speak to crowds that fully or partly believed that crap. 

Unless you know that, you don't know shit about Lincoln or the civil war.

Lincoln would be amazed if he came back now, and people didn't know how much he was hated, and eventually killed, for being "a Nigger lover".

Leave a few facts out, and you destroy the basic truth of our past.  This is one such truth. 

Lincoln was "causing slave rebellion" in South by his "radical Nigger loving speeches"  according to a Texas newspaper at the time.

Never mind that it was illegal and virtually impossible for the slaves to learn any of Lincoln's speeches, or any news about him.

Never mind that Lincoln spoke very carefully, with no rancor, no bitterness.  In fact, Lincoln bent over backwards NOT to offend the violent Southern culture.   


'If you are against slavery, you are against God"

"God has silenced all opposition to slavery by his Holy Word" 

But Southern leaders took any comment that even questioned slavery as an assault on their manhood, their honor, and their GOD.


  In the South, it was a crime to even speak or preach against slavery, and preachers could be, and were, arrested and subjected to torture for simply owning the wrong book.  Did you know that, or not?  You need to know that, to make sense of Lincoln.

And people were killed and tortured even where Lincoln went, at the time.   No one told you that, did they?


According to Southern documents -  at the time --  Lincoln's speeches were so extreme, they caused slave rebellions in the South.  

No, Lincoln's words did not cause slave rebellions -- as Texas newspapers screamed at the time.

But pumping hate for Lincoln,  and convincing the public that slavery had to spread (for GOD) or the white race was doomed, was how extreme Southern leaders were.  

Crowds in the South cheered-- according to newspapers entirely approving of it, when speakers said they were spreading slavery for God as "punishment" of the black race.

You are not told that Southern crowds cheered the speakers of the day, for claiming GOD not only wanted slavery, but wanted slavery in order to punish the black race.

Guess who knew that kind of horror? Lincoln knew.

Guess who else knew?  Frederick Douglas.

Guess who doesn't have a damn clue?  You -- your history teacher, and any US text book publisher.  This is not some side issue, some "trivia" . This was the heart of the matter --the hate, fear and those who pumped the hate and fear, that lead directly to the civil war.

 Anyone who said anything against slavery, North or South, could be hated for "wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

All that has been wiped out -- completely -- from any US text book, in fact, it has never been allowed in any US text book.  As Lincoln said, the text books of today will be the reality of tomorrow.

And our text books, our "historians" have done a shit job of telling anyone the ugly truth about Southern heroes -- what they did, who they killed, what they bragged about doing.

Southern leaders BRAGGED about killing, BRAGGED about torturing, in order to spread slavery.  They did not admit it, they bragged about it. 


Southern leaders actually told their suckers Lincoln would "exterminate the white race"  just by being against the spread of slavery.

Let me repeat that -- just by being against the spread of slavery, Lincoln was "burning us to death slowly"  because black men would "be with" white women.

 Southern papers would actually quote Northern papers, and show comments against slavery, and that was proof that Northern folks were trying to destroy the South and force "our daughters" to "sleep with Niggers".

That is an ugly truth, but it is exactly what was going on.  Exactly what Lincoln faced. Exactly what the country faced.

Not sorta. Not kinda. Not in a way. 

When confronted with the cruelty of slavery,  Slave owners and their apologists had no choice -- claim it was from GOD. Claim Lincoln and anyone against slavery was against GOD.

Just speaking (remember this) just speaking against slavery was a crime in the South, did you know that?  In fact, in US Congress, before the Civil War, Southern leaders in Congress wanted folks arrested in the North, who dared publish books in the North, against slavery.

Not only did they arrest and torture people in the South for public speaking or preaching against slavery, they wanted anyone in the North arrested for it, too.


"YOU SHOULD BE KICKED LIKE A DOG"  Stephen A Douglas to Charles Sumner

When Douglas (Stephen A) was screaming that Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers" -  he was not just wasting breath.  He was sending a message to Lincoln: Back Off.

Others - including a US SENATOR -- were beaten almost to death for being too outspoken against slavery.

Lincoln wisely used his amazing wit and wisdom to defang Douglas enough, but he said Douglas was "using knives"  against him -- and the "knife" was about Lincoln wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Very basic.  Why are you not told? You should be, it was the central issue of the day, and Douglas counted on the crowed being afraid of Lincoln, and Lincoln being afraid of being beaten, as others were.

By the way --Stephen A Douglas participated in beating a man nearly to death himself, bet you didn't know that?

And Stephen A Douglas told Charles Sumner, shortly before Sumner was beaten on the Senate floor, that he should be "beaten like a dog".

Remember that.

Southern newspapers showed drawing -- correctly - of Davis seated just feet away from Sumner, as Sumner was beaten.  They showed Davis smiling, and likely, he was. 



Although Orwell, of course, was not yet born during the Civil War, the use or Orwellian absurdities abounded regarding slavery.  According to Jefferson Davis "African slaves are the most contented laborers on earth"

Robert E Lee too -- it was a common theme -- that because God ordained slavery, therefore the only reason slaves were "dissatisfied"  was the lies by "abolitionist"  that made them so.  This was by no means limited to Southern leaders, virtually any slave owner you can find -- I have never found otherwise -- whose words survive about how they justified slavery, was that it was a "godsend"  or  "fortunate indeed"  that blacks were enslaved.   Otherwise, they would be "unsaved heathens" in Africa.

The institutional force to oppress slaves were the whipping posts, the torture racks, the laws (yes laws) that escaped slaves must be tortured  and bounty hunters.

Lee himself used bounty hunters, in fact according to his slave ledgers he regularly employed bounty hunters -- and even paid hunters for kidnapped women, women they found in the North that were not slaves or escaped slaves. Just women that had the horrible luck to be discovered by Lee's bounty hunters.

Oh you didn't know freed blacks were kidnapped in North and taken South?  Yes, they were. And Lee was one of the men who bought them.

Lee and others spoke of godly discipline. God "knew and intended" slaves should feel pain. Physical pain. Pain, wrote Lee, was "necessary for their instruction."

(See "Reading the Man"  by Elizabeth Pryor, in her book about Lee's slave ledgers and letters, or as she called them "personal papers". 

No one told you that, either.

They didn't say torture- but that is what it was, sadistic torture, Lee had various means of physical torture, such as whipping followed by salt brine -- he could inflict extreme pain, but not damage the backs of women too much.   Slaves with major scars did not sell well.   

The point is -- discipline is the word they used, and justified it by the bible. But it was torture, life changing, sometimes fatal torture, including gouging out eyes, cutting off hands, castration, and partial burnings).

If slaves were the "most contented laborers on earth"  why on earth did South employ hundreds of bounty hunters,  and an elaborate system of night time patrols to catch any slaves anywhere but in their sleeping quarters.

Slave dogs -- dogs trained to chase and rip apart any black person running -- were let out at night.  Slaves trying to escape not only risked torture and death, they risked their loved ones being whipped if they left. Yes, a slave owner could torture the relative of the escaped slave.

Yet, the laws of the South claimed it was illegal -- ILLEGAL -- to "dissatisfy" a slave by allowing them to hear anything of abolition speeches, sermons, writings, etc. 


Jefferson Davis insisted slaves were "the most contented laborers on earth"  and only the lies about freedom caused them to not be happy laborers as God intended.

Did you know the basic spiel by Southern leaders was that GOD designed slavery, and slaves were happy with God's plan.   It was only the lies from the North, if the slaves would hear of them, that made slaves unhappy.

It was a matter of life and death, they said.  What if slaves learn that people claim slavery is evil?   They will "be discontented" -- seriously,  if slaves ever hear sermons or speeches against slavery, they will be "discontented."

Can't have slaves "discontented" now can we? 

 Never mind they were torturing slaves who dared tried to escape, and burning men to death who fought back against slavery.  It's a truism of human nature - when you torture, kill, oppress, enslave, you must must must justify it.  

So they justified it, and blamed anyone else for slaves being "disconnected".


Seriously,  A Southern newspaper said Satan was "the first abolitionist".   Satan was against slavery. God was for it.  

The Texas Declaration of Secession said if you were against slavery, you were against GOD. That's not some nut in the bar, that's the official document, Texas Declaration of Secession.  To be against slavery was to be against God.

Banners in Alabama in 1860 read:

 "Resistance to Lincoln = Obedience to God.

Today we see "abolitionist" as a badge of honor. Not so in the North or South till long after the war.  Writing in 1890, John Palmer, who knew Lincoln and Stephen A Douglas better than anyone sill alive in 1890, said by then the term abolitionist did not mean what it did before the Civil War.  Before the Civil War, even in the North, abolitionist was seen as someone so radical they would have your daughters "sleep with Niggers." 

Those famous abolitionist speakers you might have heard about William Lloyd Garrison for example?  He was very careful where he spoke, to whom he spoke.  

US Senator Atchison promised to come back to Kansas with 5000 men, and simply "kill every abolitionist in the territory" when a Kansas newspaper, contrary to his order, continued to publish an anti-slavery newspaper.   Atchison Was not some nut in a bar -- he was the US Senator that passed the Kansas Act, with Stephen A Douglas. 

And he was in Kansas killing and terrorizing anyone who dared speak openly against slavery.  There is not a single text book in the US that shows that Atchison did, nor what he bragged about doing. Not one.

As you will see, such abolitionist speakers -- self identified abolitionist -- would face danger and death if they went to the wrong place.


Too bad you are not told.  You should have been.

Entire books have been written about Lincoln being "reluctant" to free the slaves, or that he "didn't care"  and was "just your typical white supremacist" .

You can cherry pick from about 12 Lincoln quotes --"ripped from their full meaning"  as Frederick Douglass explained, to distort Lincoln.


Get the full quotes -- in context.  Over and over -- and over, and over, and over, Lincoln spoke against slavery, spoke of the evils, of how it is a cancer and will either destroy the Union, or the Union will destroy it.

Yes, Lincoln cared about Union -- no shit.  And he cared about it, for the exact reason he said.  Keeping the Union together meant slavery dies.  Either slavery goes, or the Union goes.  

Slavery will either spread -- like a cancer, or be killed itself, Lincoln said.  And the only way to stop the spread of slavery in US, was to keep Union together.

So stupid people -- even many academics -- distort Lincoln's full speeches, and ignore the basic fact. Lincoln was so eager to keep Union together, because otherwise, Southern scum lunatics (yes, they were) were going to spread slavery to the rest of the US.

And Southern leaders boasted of that. Southern leaders boasted (see below) they would spread slavery to the rest of the USA, including the North. Yes, the North.

Davis made it very clear.

He will spread slavery to the entire West and North.

Makes a big fucking difference, when you know what Southern leaders boasted of, till they lost.  Davis was not the only Southern leader boasting out the ass about spreading slavery by force.   Too bad you were never told. 

Guess who knew that?  Frederick Douglass knew.

Guess who never apparently never heard of this -- your history teacher.  If they knew it, why not teach it?

Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, very Trump like - screamed to the crowd that Lincoln was a "Negro Worshipper"  who wants  your daughters to sleep with "Niggers."

This was not a "throw away line".  Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  was the central message of the Lincoln Douglas debates, the emotional knife Douglas (Stephen A) used to stab Lincoln again, and again, and again.  And it worked -- he won.

Guess who never even mentions basic facts like this in "history books"?    

  1. Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas - and the punishment was arrest, torture and or death.  A big fucking deal -- your "history" teacher does not have a clue.
  2.  Stephen A Douglas screamed -- repeatedly, loudly, in the debates that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  A big fucking deal -- your history teacher does not have a clue. 

Entire books are written about the Lincoln Douglas debates, and so far, we only know of one that even mentioned the "Nigger rants"  and screaming by Stephen A Douglas. 

Even then, the author (Allen C Guelzo)  waits till page 180 or so to even mention it, and then briefly, when actually it was the central emotional issue of the day.  

Lincoln had to be very fucking careful what he said, and how he said it.

 Southern soldiers would say they fought the Civil War because the "North" wanted our daughters to "marry niggers".   

It's ugly stuff -- but it was the central issue, North and South, at the time.   It is what Lincoln actually had to deal with.

It was a big fucking deal, and one of many big fucking deals your "history" teacher doesn't know about, or knows in vague terms, and does not grasp their importance.


When you learn Lincoln actions -- amazing, brave, powerful, and effective -- you won't be so easily mislead by bullshitters.    And get his full speeches, not the edited out of context crap.


Southern soldiers said the same exact thing -- you will make our daughters sleep with Niggers.

A quote by southern soldier, at the time, why they fought.

No one told you this either, did they?

There are entire college courses devoted to the Lincoln Douglas debates.   Thousands of articles, hundreds of books.  Yet only one that we know of  even mentions Douglas screamed about Lincoln being a "Nigger Worshipper"  and that Douglas ran side to side of the stage screaming this.   That book was by Allen Guelzo, and even  he did not see fit to do much more than mention it.

Yet nothing is more important to understand the times -- that the slave power folks used one set of tools -- fear, hate, violence. to spread slavery.

And Lincoln said that too.   See his letter to Speed below.  Lincoln, and most of the people alive in 1850-1860, were well aware of the killings, tortures, and hangings going on in Kansas and the South, against anyone who spoke or published newspapers against slavery.


In Atlon Illinois, Lincoln's friend was killed,
possibly burned to death, 
for publishing anti-slavery newspaper.

No one told you that.  Yet, it's a BFD.


Guess who knew Lincoln spoke "over and over" about equality for the black race?    Stephen A Douglas knew, and he was right. He should know, he heard many of those speeches. 

Douglas wisely (he won the election)  pumped up the hate and fear -- of white women going for black men.

Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "NIGGERS".


Douglas was well known -- after he threw in with Jefferson Davis -- of using the word "Nigger"  in the Senate, and was admonished for it by Charles Sumner.  Later Douglas would sit by why Sumner was beaten almost to death on the Senate floor.   Newspapers showed Douglas seated nearby - smiling.



Most "history" teachers will claim Southern states cared about "states rights".    And further, they will tell you an even more absurd distortion (because they know no better)  that Kansas Nebraska Act was done to "resolve the problem of expansion of slavery".

Idiotically -- your history teacher will not know they are repeating the basic Southern distortion after the war, that is, that they were for state's rights.

Actually US Senator who passed Kansas Act, went to Kansas immediately after he passed it (with Stephen A Douglas, his business partner)  and there started killing and terrorizing to stop states rights. In fact, he boasted he was killing and torturing to stop folks from even speaking against slavery.

You may not know this -- your history teacher won't -- but killing and torturing folks for speaking or writing against slavery was common in the South.  You could be, and were, arrested, subjected to torture and worse, for even owning the wrong book, in some cases.

Atchison did nothing more in Kansas, than what was already going on for decades in the South.

As Lincoln made clear -- and US 'historians" seem too stupid to realize -- at every step of the way, people killed and tortured and terrorized to spread slavery.  There was never a true vote on slavery that led to slavery.  Always, as Atchison proved and boasted of himself in Kansas, he was there to kill and torture to spread slavery, and he did so with the open support and pay of Jefferson Davis.

You should know that.

Your history teacher should know that.

What Southern leaders boasted of openly, and what they did (kill to spread slavery, and promise endless killing to spread it to Pacific and into North) has just been stupidly ignored.

We hope to change that awful and hideous stupidity on the part of most  US "historians".


Douglas was also involved in the violent beating of another man --he himself took part in that one.  His partner, Senator Atchison, was the leader of 800 men in Kansas, and Atchison boasted of killing and torturing to spread slavery.

You are not told any of that, are you? Not one damn word! 

  The drawing of beating of Charles Sumner. Douglas is drawn in -- far right, shown smiling. Douglas taunted Sumner before the beating, saying he should be kicked "like a dog".


The point is, Douglas made this charge against Lincoln repeatedly -- and Lincoln then stood up and said it again.

Did Douglas hope to scare Lincoln off the entire issue?  Or set him up for violence? 

  Later, Douglas would essentially confess to John Palmer, that he had been conniving all this while, but claimed he was really trying to set up Jeff Davis to be violently attacked, not Lincoln.

To understand Lincoln, you have to get his actions, and his full speeches, in context.   Turns out, Licoln's enemies were right -- he was radical as hell for the "Nigger equality" in speech and actions.

But- - you have to get Lincoln's FULL speech, not the edited bullshit selected to distort. 

Guess who else knew Lincoln was right about the endless violence to spread slavery?

 Frederick Douglass.

Guess who has no damn clue Stephen Douglas basic emphasis -- most dramatic emphasis -- was about Lincoln's  "love of the Nigger" and "obsession for equality"?


A note from the author of this "blog" -- soon to transfer to "". My name is Mark Curran.

My email is

Another "Mark Curran original documents" page -- because historians have put out bullshit so long. I believed that bullshit till I was about 60 years old.
While writing a screenplay, doing about two years of reading Southern documents, Southern books, Southern speeches, Southern sermons, of  the 1850's,  I kept going "What the fuck ".  I saw things so often - Southern leaders bragging about killing for God to spread slavery kind things -- I thought, surely someone covered all this. Surely the "big historians"  now or previously covered it.  Southern leaders boasting out the ass they were killing for GOD?   Boasting they would keep torturing and killing till slavery was spread in the North (yes North) and South?    Jeff Davis himself boasting of sending armies North and enslaving all blacks there. WHAT THE FUCK? 
The leader of the Confederacy, brags -- brags out the ass - about killing to spread slavery, brags he is doing the will of God -- and 100 other things, and this is not important enough to candidly explain?   That's just one fucking example. Remember, these are original docs I was reading -- not shit made up later to make Southern scum leaders (yes, they were scum) look bad.  These were the documents they generated.   Not someone else.
 Why was so much of this mentioned at all, or only in bullshit, even Orwellian terms. "   Why not show what Southern leaders boasted of -- why not show that Lincoln was in physical danger repeatedly while running for office, and his political opponents were trying to get him killed, beaten, or for him to back off.  They had got others beaten and killed.  Why the hell not say that?
It took me several years to figure out, most of what we are told about Lincoln and the Civil war may sound okay, but it's largelyl bullshit, repeated over and over.  
Basic things -- like Southern War Ultimatums, like Lincoln being in physical danger, like Douglas role in beating of others, and essentially urging crowds to beat Lincoln -- why is that just whitewashed?

I have never seen any of the "historians" I once respect go into any of this- - none -- in a candid way. Some "historians" will mention it, but why so few? And never candidly? Are they stupid?  Did they not see these documents, books, papers?  Hell I still don't know if they were stupid or just didn't care. I would love to know.  They seem to avoid it, and lay on layers of bullshit, instead. I  show the documents that really matter, regarding what Lincoln and the United States faced, leading up to the Civil War.
   Now --back to the show..
_____________________________________ Your history teacher.   Well at the fucking time, the people involved said it was Lincoln's obsession for equality for the "Nigger".

Do they know anything?

Guess what Southern leaders pumped up  -- in the South directly, and in the North by men like Stephen A Douglass?    Hatred and fear of black men taking white women.

Lincoln had to be very careful what he said -- or he would have been killed earlier, like others were.  We don't teach that.

Lincoln was amazing, in his full speeches.  He was powerful, clear, and extreme -- for where he was, and when he was saying these things, no one else comes close.

Lincoln even went to Kansas - after, after, after-- Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas.

Why the fuck don't you know that? You are never told.

But guess who did know that, and a thousand things like it?

Frederick Douglass knew.



True, this is very hard ugly truth to teach now, even in high school classes.  But we do not teach it at all.  

Instead of teaching the basic and very ugly, very violent truth, we essentially teach bullshit.

 The killing and tortures that followed, came because first, men like Jefferson Davis, Stephen A Douglas, David Rice Atchison, Alexander Stephens, Robert Toombs, and 1000 others pumped up white fear and white hate -- based on black men taking white women.

Not. One. Fucking. Word.  There is not one fucking word about this in US history books, but it was the overarching, basic issue.  And you are not told about it, at all.








Were newspapers at the time, North and South, stupid?  Was Stephen A Douglas stupid?

  They called Lincoln everything from "black Republican"  to "Nigger lover"  to "obsessed with equality for Niggers".

Two questions.  

1)  Why would so many people at the time call Lincoln obsessed with equality for "Niggers".

2)  Why the fuck do "historians"  not even mention this, nor mention to any significant way, what Lincoln did?

This is the story of the  power of lying bastards using partial quotes, and forgetting to tell you (or not knowing) the full speeches, and most importantly, Lincoln's kick ass actions.


We repeat the warning -- blunt language and cursing ahead.   It's appropriate, absolutely necessary in fact, to convey what the fuck was going on.  You won't get this in any "history" book we know of (and we spend a lot of time looking).  You have to get it from original sources -- especially the boasting, bragging, and war ultimatums by Southern leaders, their supporters in the North.

Douglas said  (Lincoln) repeats over and over that the Nigger is part of 'all men are created equal".  Douglas claimed Lincoln was a liar and a traitor. Douglas explained at least 20 times that the United States Supreme Court ruled that blacks are not persons,  and that the Declaration of Independence is superseded by the Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott.

Why the fuck -- really, why the fuck -- is that not taught?  Because Douglas was right, about Dred Scott. Literally the Supreme Court ruled blacks are not human beings (not persons).   Furthermore, the Dred Scott court ordered, (yes ordered) the federal government to protect the spread of slavery, even into areas that rejected slavery by vote.

Dumb ass "historians"  of today.

You will hear "historians"  like dumb ass Eric Foner say Dred Scott was "a rather narrow ruling"  about Congress -- that Congress can not outlaw slavery. Oh fucking hell.   Read the damn decision Eric, and how Southern leaders were screaming, bragging, and making it very very clear, they were justified to kill to spread slavery because Dred Scott decision ruled that blacks are not human beings (not persons).

STEPHEN DOUGLAS was right, and had facts on his side.   Lincoln was "obsessed"  with equality,  despite the out of context bullshit we so often see.

But you are not told, even, that Douglas said this-- screamed it, yelled it. It was the central, emotional aspect of the Lincoln Douglas debates. And no one told you. 

No one.  No US text book

No US historian in any meaningful way.

No one.

But it was common knowledge at the time.

It was not a side issue. It was not an academic issue. It was not a small issue.  This is why Stephen A Douglas won.


Not a single text book, that we know of,  in the United States,  college or high school, shows what was actually said during the Lincoln Douglas debates. 

 If you can find a text book that shows Douglass -- repeatedly, loudly, proudly, and with great fanfare -- told the crowds that Lincoln "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   please let us know. We have looked for years.

It's in newspapers at the time -- it was very much the central issue, and much more than a few dozen repeated phrases in the debates.. It the emotional and fear mongering issue by Douglas and others.

But it's simply not taught, or even mentioned, in US text books.  A fundamental and grievous failure to tell the public what happened at the time.

We don't teach the ugly truth about Lincoln Douglas debates-- how brave and amazing Lincoln was, the dangers to him (yes, he was in danger, physically, as you will see).  It was dangerous -- deadly dangerous- - to be in the wrong place, talking to the wrong people, about slavery, even in the North.


Look what happened to Sumner -- and how no historian today even mentions this amazing connection...

Not long after -- see what happened to Charles Sumner, he was beaten on the Senate floor.   We show you the connection between Stephen A Douglas, and Sumner being beaten nearly to death, a few feet from Douglas, who sat there, according to witnesses, smiling.

Although at the time, the press showed, and mentioned, that Stephen A Douglas had taunted Sumner, and called him a "dog that should be kicked"   but not days alter, Sumner was nearly beaten to death -- while Douglas sat close by, smiling.

Does that mean Douglas hoped Lincoln would be beaten?   

Impossible to verify -- but consider this.  Douglas never, in his entire life of drama and over the top speeches, ran from side to side of the stage, screaming someone was "trying to make your daughters sleep with Niggers".

And why fuck -- seriously -- why the fuck, does no text book in the US, and no "historian"  even mention these basic, very emotional and violent realities of the time?

There is a VERY interesting conversation between Stephen A Douglas and John M Palmer not long before Douglas's death. Your  history teacher will likely not even know who Palmer was, or why Palmer's conversation reveals Douglas's amazing duplicity, including Douglas openly urging violence against specific persons, at the time.


Guess who knew that? 

 Guess who knew that Lincoln was called "Nigger lover"  who was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Guess who knew that people were still being killed, even in the North, for being too "abolition" ? 

Guess who knew that Lincoln, while he parsed words at times, actually kicked the living shit out of slavery -- not only by his words (see the full speeches for that, NOT the edited quotes)  but in his actions?

Frederick Douglass knew that.

 He knew Lincoln could have gotten a bullet to the brain much sooner than he did, but stayed alive long enough to kick slavery in the ass.

And Douglass also knew of Lincoln's amazing history, 1846 on, openly fighting to end slavery, and essentially devoting his every waking hour to fighting slavery, after Kansas Act.

Guess who doesn't know it, and does not teach it?

US history teachers, that's who.


Telling folks Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with "Niggers" -- screaming it, running side to side of the stage,  was a type of terror.  Douglas did not do that for exercise.

He did not do that as a joke.  



Lincoln video -- taken nearly verbatim from debates. 

 This is from a 1939 movie -- it does not have the "Nigger" words, nor the taunting of Lincoln for being with a "Nigger" and a white woman in a carriage that day. That was whitewashed. 

The movie did not show Douglas running from side to side of the stage shouting Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  But he sure did, as several newspapers reported at the time, and it was not that big of a deal to people then.

Douglas even claimed Lincoln was a "traitor" and a "revolutionary"  for saying blacks were human beings -- persons -- for purpose of the Constitution.

The US Supreme Court, Douglas correctly pointed out, had just declared blacks can not be seen as people for purposes of the Constitution.  You are not told that, either.  Lincoln was a "dangerous" man fermenting a "civil war" for not respecting the Dred Scott decision -- a decision that literally ordered (yes ordered) that the federal government MUST protect slavery. Jefferson Davis and Stephen A Douglas insisted the federal government must protect slavery even in Kansas, which had rejected slavery by 95% vote.

But each of the words used by both men, and the topics each bring up, is a good representation of their speeches, other than Douglas's wild "nigger rants" spoken of in several cities newspapers at the time.

 But you can learn how Lincoln used humor and clever words to avoid getting beaten.  

More important than not being attacked, Lincoln actually changed minds with this approach.  He SEEMED to agree with a proposition (such as blacks are not equal)  then blasts that proposition to hell, moments later.

Lincoln used this rhetorical technique so often, so well, that it should actually be called "Lincoln's rhetorical genius". 




This video shows you a very cleaned up version of what Douglas said -- but it does show you how Lincoln handled Douglas accusation of being obsessed with equality for the "Nigger" 

The video cleans up the language- - Douglas was well known, even in DC, for shouting about "Niggers".   He was especially virulent with his "Nigger rant"  said Quincy papers, in the Quincy debate.

Douglas is shown by artists-- at the time -- smiling while Sumner was beaten.

Killing of Lincoln's friend - possibly burned to death in the NORTH   for publishing anti slavery newspaper. No one told you.

Douglas even mentioned Lovejoy in the speeches -- he did that to INCREASE the hatred of Lincoln.   


No one ever walked away from a Lincoln speech confused whatsoever.  Slavery was an evil, Southern leaders were pushing slavery by foul means,  we will be all slave (states) or all free states, Lincoln said emphatically. House Divided Speech, and a common refrain in many of his speeches.

And as you will see, Lincoln was right. Lincoln was not being rhetorical, he was not hyping anything.   When he said we will be all slave states, or all free, he was saying it, because that was the goal of the South: to spread slavery all over.

Not kind of, not sort of.   Southern leaders said the same thing, only they (even Jeff Davis) boasted we would have slavery all over the US, and beyond.   See Jeff Davis speech saying he would spread slavery North, and other documents, below.


Not just slavery -- Southern leaders made it clear, IN CONTEXT, repeatedly, that they created a country (CSA) in order to spread "God's slavery"  of punishment (yes, punishment) to blacks, as a biblical truth.

NO  one told you that either?

Frederick Douglass knew that.  So did Lincoln.  So did Southern leaders.   There is a lot you are not told-- Lincoln had to deal with the reality of that period.  Just like Lincoln being a "Negro Worshiper"   who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"   is not in your text books, not in history books, so too Southern leaders in context boasting of killing to spread slavery, and their War Ultimatums to that effect, is not in your history books.

Lincoln did not deal with the white washed bullshit in your history text book.  He had a far more violent and religous based lunacy to deal with.  If you told the truth about what Southern leaders boasted of, and did, it would seem like you are attacking the bible and religion itself.

All of that -- not just the quotes themselves -- have been completely erased from our national consciousness, and is absolutely not even mentioned in US text books. 

I can't help it that you don't know Lincoln's  history  of action and speeches for years, that allowed  Stephen A Douglas to charge Lincoln with "obsession for equality for the Nigger".

Not my fault no one told you.  

By the time Douglas claimed repeatedly Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger"  Lincoln had already spent 4 years doing nothing but travelling and speaking against slavery.  In hundreds of cities -- including in places no one else would go into, to speak against slavery (see below, for Lincoln's trip to Kansas). DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

1846  Lincoln, a freshman Congressmen, stands up to President Polk, accusing him of starting a war against Mexico, to steal their land, and double the size of slavery with that land.

You are not told about that, for the same reason you are not told the US did in fact, start a war with Mexico, and the reason was in fact, to double the size of slavery.


As you will  see, even after the South stole that land to double the size of slavery - they almost immediately claimed they did not have enough land for slavery, and demanded the spread of slavery from Kansas to California.



Lincoln explained this over and over.  The South's violent and relentless efforts to spread slavery by means "foul and more foul"

As to the Missouri Compromise, Lincoln correctly said "What compromise"?

Slavery, he wrote, was always spread by killing.  The Mexican war, the killing sprees in Kansas, the Southern War Ultimatums, all show Lincoln knew what the fuck he was talking about.

Douglass knew that too -- and he knew what the fuck he was talking about.

If your "history" teacher doesn't know this, they don't know what the fuck they are talking about. 

No one told you that, either.

From 1846 Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass, or trying to, as you will see below. 

  He stood up to President Polk, as a freshman Congressmen, and bluntly accused him of causing an illegal war against Mexico - in order to use the land the US would steal (yes, we stole it)  to spread slavery.  DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

Both Stephen A Douglas, and Frederick Douglass, knew all about Lincoln's past 20 years activity.

Douglas was actually social friends with Lincoln in Springfield, until Douglas sought Southern approval for his railroad schemes. 


No, Lincoln was NOT reluctant to end slavery, whoever said that shit, should learn some fucking history.

Notice, they never tell you things like THIS:


  • Called out President Polk for going to war, to steal land to spread slavery

  • Tried 40 times to stop the spread of slavery into the land just stolen from Mexico

  • Tried to stop slavery in District of Columbia
  • Was accused of "not supporting the troops in the field" during the war that he knew, and everyone knew, USA started to get more land to spread slavery.

  • All of this 20 years before Lincoln pushed 13th Amendment through 

No one told you that, did they?  

There is a REASON Stephen A Douglas trashed Lincoln for being "obsessed with equality for the 'Nigger'"     Because Douglas knew what the fuck Lincoln had been doing for over 20 years.

I can't help it if you didn't know.

I can't help it if your dumb ass teacher gives you some bullshit to the contrary.

People at the FUCKING TIME said Lincoln was radical to end slavery -- because he fucking was, as his actions and full speeches show.

Lincoln wouldn't give a fuck, actually, if 150 years later, a bunch of dumb asses pissed on him, distorted his actions, lied about him, or didn't learn the full story.

Lincoln cared about kicking slavery in the ass, and he ended up doing so.


Did anyone ever tell you US started a war against Mexico to steal land to spread slavery? Fuck no. But Lincoln, and many others, knew that very well, and Lincoln tried to stop it. DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

When Lincoln would not stop the theft of land from Mexico, he then -- 40 times-- tried to stop the US from spreading slavery into that land just stolen. DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

NO one to you that either?  Surprise, surprise. 

And from 1854, the day Stephen A Douglas and David Rice Atchison passed the Kansas Act, Lincoln did little but go around exposing the Kansas Act as the violent ruse it was -- a ruse to push slavery into free states and territories, that before were outlawed. DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

There was no one else -- literally no one else -- who devoted so much time, travel and his own expense, to travel where he did, when he did, devoted to ONE purpose. Expose the Southern plan to push slavery into the rest of the country.  

There were abolitionist speakers -- yes. But they dared not go where Lincoln went, when Lincoln went.  They went to groups who already agreed with them, and most of them were paid speakers. Lincoln went by himself, paid  his own expenses, and did little else in life for years, after 1854. DOUGLASS KNEW THAT.

Lincoln's basic message not taught today...

You might be surprised to learn, schools do NOT teach Lincoln's basic message today.  Lincoln's basic message --  Southern leaders are violently spreading slavery in ways that will, by necessity, push slavery to all of the United States, unless it is stopped.

 As you will see, Lincoln was precisely right. Not kind of right. Not sort of right. Not "in a way" right.  Because Southern leaders THEMSELVES boasted out the ass they would spread slavery, by violence, into the North (oh, no one told you this, either?)

See more about Southern leaders confirming Lincoln's clear repeated statements that Southern leaders were spreading slavery to the NORTH and to the WEST by violence, and we must stop them.


Essentially we are taught a watered down version of Jeff Davis's narrative of "state's rights"   and a "complex set of variables about agrarian vs industrial economies."

Bullshit. When you read SOUTHERN leaders own War Ultimatums, own speeches, own documents at the time, they focused on violence - - remember that -- violence, to spread slavery. I can't help it if your "history" teacher  tells you some other bullshit.   Southern leaders themselves were practically shouting from the rooftops, they will spread slavery North and West, and they would kill to do so.

They did not just brag about it. They did it.


You can, if you'd like, claim Southern leaders were kidding,  That these were speeches and War ultimatums and documents that were to rally public spirit, or rattle the "sabers"  .  Problem is, those who bragged about killing to spread slavery -- were actually killing to spread slavery at the same time they boasted of it. 




Lincoln's genius was how to get the country to change their fear and hatred of blacks, at least enough to help fight the civil war.  In fact, while Lincoln did get the 13th Amendment passed in Congress -- it still had to go to the states.  Did you know that?  (Amazing, most people have no clue).

Do you know it was not at all certain the states would pass it!  But Lincoln's death -- yes his death -- created a huge tenderness of feeling for Lincoln, and played a major role in the state's ratifying it themselves.

  How did he do that?  See below -- when he was alive, he did it with WORDS.  And when he died, his words did not. They -- Lincoln's words -- got the 13th Amendment passed in the states, too. 

Douglas beat Lincoln in the 1858 Senate race.How?  He pandered to public sentiment where whites were told to be afraid of blacks, because they would sleep with your daughters!

Try as he might, Lincoln could not come up then with the words to pacify the crowd of whites, though he tried his damnedest.


Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  was a feature of the "Nigger rant". 

Why didn't you know that?

Lincoln's had a pattern of speech, that he used in nearly ever speech he ever gave.   Careful never to offend the violent South, and even more careful not to alienate public sentiment of fear and hate of blacks at the time, Lincoln would SEEM to agree with a given prejudice.

But after he SEEMED to agree, Lincoln  blasted  they hell out of that which he seemed to agree with.  You can see a good example of that in the video above, and the words are virtually identical to the Lincoln Douglas transcripts, though the "Nigger"  rants were edited out.

And Frederick Douglass was right -- Lincoln was radical, swift zealous and determined to kick slavery in the ass.

Lincoln had to first, however, get the public to support freeing the slaves. Most whites --at best --did not care.  Millions of whites would have prefered blacks stay slaves.

Lincoln knew that.

Frederick Douglass knew that.

Stephen A Douglas knew that.

You did not.



Another thing you never heard -- Stephen A Douglas told crowds, before the debates started, that he saw Lincoln with a white woman and a "Nigger man"  in a carriage together.

The "Nigger" Douglas claimed was with Lincoln and the white woman,Douglas claimed, was Frederick Douglass.  Of course, Lincoln would not even lay eyes on Fredrick Douglass till he was President.   But Stephen A Douglas knew that tying Lincoln to Frederick Douglass, and a white woman, was a fast way to gin up the hate for Lincoln, and fear of white women going for black males.

Not only did no history teacher, or text book, mention such things -- they did not tell you that kind of information could get you attacked, even killed, in certain places? 


See the video above!


1) Lincoln said "over and over"  blacks were equals -- 

TRUE.  Lincoln said that over and over. Including in the speech used for the video above.

2) The Dred Scott decision declared blacks can NOT be equal, and the Declaration of Independence can not apply to them  
  TRUE -- in fact the Dred Scott decision officially ordered, yes ordered --blacks are not to be seen as human beings, "not persons"  Lincoln spoke of this often, including in the speech used above. 

3)  Douglas spoke of "Lovejoy" Lincoln's friend.

True.  Lovejoy was a good friend of Lincoln -- his brother was killed in the NORTH, near one of the Lincoln Douglas debates, years earlier, for publishing an anti-slavery newspaper. 

Douglas mentioned this, and everyone knew he mentioned this -- to pump up the hate for Lincoln. 

4) Douglas said "we can be the terror of the world" 

True, Douglas was talking about the US spread an empire into Mexico, Cuba, and South America - a common fantasy of Southern leaders, especially Jefferson Davis, who was Stephen A Douglas close friend.  

Southern leaders spoke proudly of spreading  this "special" slavery for God, to the all of the white world. See the VP of Confederacy speech about that exact thing, called "The Cornerstone Speech" 

Douglas used this hate and fear mongering for a reason -- it worked. He won. 

Douglas won the 1858 election for Senator, because he was able to tie Lincoln to the "radical love for the Nigger".  People did not want their daughters to "sleep with Niggers".

So if you have no fucking idea Douglas (Stephen A) repeatedly and with great drama, urged the crowd to believe Lincoln was a "Negro Worshiper" -- you will get sucked up in the minute of bullshit about Lincoln "deftly separating Stephen A Douglas from his Southern support".

Lincoln -- so he would not be hated and perhaps killed --  tried to convince the public he wanted equality under the law for all races -- not "perfect social equality"

But see Lincoln's FULL speeches, he was kick ass radical as hell, and therefore Frederick Douglass and Stephen A Douglas were actually correct. Lincoln did say "over and over" that blacks are equal to whites in their natural rights, by virtue of the Declaration of Independence.


This was not the first time Douglas urged violence upon a political enemy.  See his role in the beating of Senator Sumner, on the Senate floor, not long before Lincoln Douglas debates. 

Oh you never heard about that?  Yes, Douglas sat by Sumner and smiled as he was beaten almost to death. He also taunted Sumner that he would be beaten.

Douglas hit Lincoln with even more vile comments than he hit Sumner .  If you think Douglas did not want someone to hit Lincoln,  or at least scare him back, you don't know Stephen A Douglas very well, or what was always used on people who were against slavery.

Even in the SOUTH  if you were not eager to spread slavery -- you could be called "Negro Worshiper".  And it was illegal, a crime, to speak publicly against slavery, or publish anything written against slavery.



And in the North - in Kansas it was illegal to publish anti-slavery newspapers, after Jefferson Davis sent US Senator David Rice Atchison there, to terrorize the citizens and set up what's now called "bogus legislature/

Atchison bragged out the ass he was killing to spread slavery.  Do you know who Atchison's partner was?

Stephen A Douglas.


No one every told you that, did they?

Do you know which Senators got Kansas Act passed?  David Rice Atchison and Stephen A Douglas.

Do you know why Lincoln got back into politics in 1854?  Because Douglas and Atchison passed Kansas Act.

Do you know who helped Atchison all he could to do his violence in Kansas?   Stephen A Douglas.

Do you know who Charles Sumner was talking about -- by name -- for hours-- when he was beaten on Senate floor?

He was speaking about Davis Rice Atchison, and his paid killers, in Kansas.

So now you know why Douglas sat there smiling and laughing as Sumner was beaten.

And your "history" teacher never had a fucking clue. 


Lots of things your "history teacher"  forgets to mention, because you have to read all Lincoln's letters, speeches and the documents of the day.

Your history teacher didn't do that. 

Not enough to  just read  the booooshit repeated endlessly, later.  In fact, the booooshit repeated later can make you stupid, it leaves out so much. 

The US text book publishers are centered, and have always been, in Texas.  They had to comply with Texas School board wishes --and Texas school boards did not want anything vile or candid about Southern leaders in the text books.

That's the biggest reason we have generations of people, including teachers, who just know boo shit. (Bullshit).



Douglass (Frederick) was a slave, an escaped slave. He was beaten himself, he saw a woman whipped to death, by a man yelling scriptures.

He was not easily fooled.   

And he knew, as he would later say, that Lincoln HAD to abide by the public sentiment of the day. Lincoln steered that sentiment, Lincoln changed the sentiment.  But until Lincoln could get the North willing to make the Civil War about ending slavery,  he could not do it by himself.

"Public Sentiment Is Everything" said Lincoln in Ottowa Ill, one of the debates sites. 

LINCOLN "In this and like communities, public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.

Consequently he who moulds public sentiment, goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes and decisions possible or impossible to be executed

Lincoln could not just "pronounce" things as president.  Even Northern generals at the time said they would not fight if the war was about slavery.

So Lincoln spoke about Union.

Northern men refused to fight for "nigger equality" -- Lincoln could not have got 100 men to fight to end slavery and give blacks equality, but he could get 100,000 men to fight for the Union. So, he wisely spoke of Union.

Douglass not only knew that -- BUT SAID it.   I can't help it if people today don't grasp that. Lincoln said it, and said things like it, dozens of times.  Was he kidding?

Was he just joking?

Douglass also knew that Lincoln's big problem was as much the white's in the North (like Stephen A Douglas)  who had slaves, or had profit in slaves, or who agreed that black men would take "our women".

Douglass published the Northern NO ONE WOULD DISAGREE -- Frederick Douglass knew things your history teacher did not know. Here are just a few, on top of the ones we already mentioned.....

  • Lincoln was hated by people North and South for being a "Nigger lover"  or "Negro Worshiper"  
  • LIncoln had an amazing and powerful history of kicking slavery in the ass at every opportunity, long before he ran for President
  • Per Southern leaders, Lincoln was going to "exterminate the white race"  just by stopping the spread of slavery.  

  • Lincoln was going to "burn us to death slowly" just by stopping the spread of slavery into Kansas -- which already rejected slavery by 90%.


  • Lincoln stood up to slave owners and President Polk, accused them of starting a war to spread slavery into land the US was stealing from Mexico (yes, US stole land from Mexico)

Think back to history class -- or even anything recent about Lincoln. Did anyone even mention Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and accused him of starting a war, in order to steal land. Then that land to be used to spread slavery?

Not in any history book or course I ever took. Not even at college level.

Did anyone mention a "Southern GOD'  in the South -- where it was illegal, a crime punishable by torture --to preach against? You did not have preach pro slavery, but it was a crime to preach against the Southern God of slavery.

No one told me that.  Guess who knew that ? Frederick Douglass knew.



Freshman Congressmen Lincoln was kicking slavery in the ass -- or trying to - long before he became President,where he kicked slavery in the ass so hard, he killed the Southern GOD of slavery.  

Lincoln was called all manner of names -- Negro Worshipper was the least offensive. Newspapers claimed Lincoln was against the troops, because he did not support the war against Mexico.  

  • Lincoln tried over three dozen times to either stop the war against Mexico, which US did start to spread slavery, or to stop slave owners from spreading slavery into that land, which was prohibited by law. 

  • Lincoln spent years traveling the US  -- and went to places no other "radical" abolitionist would go and speak.

  • Lincoln was killed for his "radical" speech about voting rights for blacks.
  •  Southern leaders spoke of genocide of blacks, rather than free them. We must "kill them with our own hands".



Lincoln didn't give a shit about slavery, right?

Lincoln was "as racist as anyone,"  right?

Lincoln just used slavery as an excuse to keep the Union together, right? 

Lincoln was reluctant to free slaves, right?

There are quotes  --  even experts tell us these quotes -- Lincoln saying he didn't care about freeing the slaves right?


Uh -- maybe we should learn Lincoln's FULL speeches, not edited bullshit.   

Maybe learn Lincoln's kick ass actions, too.  Not just words (and his full speeches were radical as hell) but  his actions.

Actions -- like standing up to President Polk, and telling the truth....the Mexican War was a land grab to spread slavery.   

Did anyone even tell you the Mexican war was that?  And that Lincoln called Polk on it?


Did anyone tell you Lincoln tried 40 times -- 40 fucking times-- to outlaw slavery in the land just stolen from Mexico?


Did anyone ever tell you Lincoln tried, as freshman Congressmen, to stop slavery in District of Columbia?



And that's just the fucking beginning.

You want to play word games about Lincoln? Fine. Let's play. But get all the words, and his actions.

Only this was no fucking game. This was life and death shit, and the South was killing, torturing and boasting of it, to spread slavery.






 Gee, I wonder why not?

The TOP leaders in the South boasted -- let me repeat that -- boasted they were killing to spread slavery.  Not sort of, not kind of, not in a way.

People were still being killed - IN THE NORTH - during Lincoln's life, for speaking too bluntly against slavery.   His friend Lovejoy was killed -- burned or shot, then burned, in his own printing business, near Alton IL, for publishing anti- slavery newspaper.

Those famous radical abolitionist speakers would not dare go where Lincoln went -- did you know that?  




Did anyone every tell you Lincoln went to KANSAS  to speak against slavery -- AFTER, remember that AFTER -- Southern leaders in Kansas made it a crime to publish anti-slavery newspapers, and had killed people there for being anti-slavery?

Fuck no,  No one told you.

Lincoln was a fucking bad ass, when you know the facts.  

That's why you should get all the facts. Not some edited boooshit.



 Lincoln did at times parse words -- say them very carefully.  He had to, even most whites did not give a shit for helping blacks, in fact slavery apologists at the time  kept up the very effective hate and fear of blacks by telling them "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Remember, the guy who yelled (yes yelled, according to newspapers at the time) that Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  was the most powerful speaker of the era.  Not some nut at a bar.  

Stephen A Douglas knew exactly what he was doing, playing on the white males fear -- and hate -- of blacks, because they might "take your women".  

You are NOT told that basic truth, in any meaningful way, if you are told at all.   

But get Lincoln's FULL speeches.  Holy fuck, he was powerful. He brought down the thunder - and he brought down the thunder in a  very effective way. A way that changed minds at the time.

Remember that. Lincoln skillful reponse to "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  was the best possible way to answer that fear and hate mongering by Douglas.

The fear and hate mongering no one ever fucking told you about.

Lincoln had to deal with THAT.  

Too complicated?   Fuck you. This isn't about you. This is about how Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass. 

If you don't know that Southern leaders were killing, torturing and boasting about it, to spread slavery, don't blame me.  If I wrote the history books, I would put in Southern War Ultimatums and speeches. I would include the basics -- Southern leaders and apologists in North were screaming about blacks taking white women.  Things you never fucking heard of, should have been on page 1 of every history book, in the parts about Civil War. 


Turns out, Stephen A Douglas was right, Lincoln did repeat "over and over" that blacks are equal to whites.   

But no one told you that. 

So why don't we hear about that -- Lincoln said over and over -- harped constantly said Douglas -- that Lincoln repeated blacks and whites were equal?

OH that's right you hear the edited or slanted bullshit, not the full story.  


Lincoln had to deal with the reality of the time.

Not just Southern leaders boasting they were killing to spread slavery.

A bigger problem -- most whites in the North did not give a fuck.  

Many white males in the North wanted slavery out of sight, and out of mind, and were scared black men would take the "white women".



Why would white males  in the North be afraid black men would take their women?  

That's what hate and fear mongers, like Stephen A Douglas told them.  That's why.

Did you know Stephen A Douglas sometimes showed up for debates in his own train?   And at the end of the train, Douglas had a cannon he had set off, as he stepped from the train. A group of his supporters -- all of them patronage employees (Douglas controlled thousands of jobs, and used the employees to pump his support)  --would cheer and scream wildly.

Lincoln's men tried to counter the show put on by Douglas.  But the main show was when Douglas would call Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

Douglas would even start early, telling the crowd that he saw Lincoln, that day, with a black man and a white woman in a carriage together - something that could still get you attacked in Illinois.

No one told you shit like this.  So you did not know.

Frederick Douglass knew.


Did you know that?

Lincoln DID NOT have the luxury of dealing with slavery as it's presented in whitewashed US text books.

If the Civil War was like we are told in "Gone with the Wind" type movies-- or even like Ken Burns "Civil War"  documentary, ending slavery would have been almost a walk in the park for Lincoln .

But no one tells you -- not even Ken Burns (thanks to Shelby Foote, who adored Jefferson Davis and the Confederacy)  about Southern War Ultimatums and killing sprees, starting in 1854.


LINCOLN'S ENEMIES WERE RIGHT, he was radical to end slavery. And did.

Yet Lincoln was actually radical as hell -- get his FULL speeches. Learn his ACTIONS.

Those folks that tell you Lincoln "didn't really care" about slavery, and "was not for equality until later"   never tell  you a few "details".

Like Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and the entire South, in calling the Mexican war a land grab to spread slavery. You don't even know -- do you -- that the US war against Mexico was a murderous illegal enterprise done in order to have more land for slavery?

You didn't know that, but you should, and Lincoln knew it, and called the President on that.  See more about Lincoln and Mexican War below.

Lincoln then tried at least 40 times to stop slavery in that land we stole from Mexico. Gee, no one told you that either.

Then Lincoln tried to make slavery illegal in Washington DC as a freshman Congressmen.  No one told you that, either.

Then Lincoln spent almost every day, from 1854 on, for one purpose -- to warn the country that Southern scum (he did not call them scum)  were spreading slavery and would spread it all over the USA - North and West, and South, 

That was their plan, he said, and slavery all over would be the inevitable result, he said, if we did not stop slavery. By stoping it, we will kill it everywhere. 

There will be slavery everywhere -- he said hundreds of times -- or there will be slavery nowhere.


Stupidly, historians dismiss Lincoln's alarm of slavery everywhere- - or it will be no where. Yet the facts show Lincoln was exactly right. Southern documents, Southern speeches, Southern books, Southern newspapers, and Southern actions show Southern leaders BOASTING of spreading slavery to all of the USA.

Including Jefferson Davis himself, as you will see. Lincoln was not saying anything about slavery, that the South did not brag of -- spreading it West and North.   

But you would have to know Southern War Ultimatums -- they made it clear they would spread slavery into states that were already free states.  Davis himself boasted he looked forward to the day "by force of arms"  slavery is in the North too.

But it was not just Davis -- it was the entire Southern political leadership, as  shown by their own speeches and documents at the time. 


Go check any US text book.  You will look almost in vain for any mention -- even mention -- of SOuthern War Ultimatums of 1856 and 1861.  Lincoln and all leaders on both sides were well aware of the War Ultimatums, as should be every school child in the US since then.

How would they know, unless someone told them?

Did you ever hear of Southern War Ultimatums, by Southern leaders and Southern newspapers boasting of them -- that slavery MUST be accepted and respected in Kansas, and all the way to the Pacific?

No, you never did.  

And the 1861 Southern War Ultimatums, came after -- after -- Kansas was already a free state. Very specifically, very clearly, Jefferson Davis himself made it clear - KANSAS MUST ACCEPT slavery.  

Kansas already was a state, by the time Davis stated this proudly.  

Did Ken Burns tell you?


Did James McPherson tell you?


Did Shelby Foote even mention it?


Did Eric Foner mention it?


Did Bruce Catton mention it?


Do you know who did mention it?  At the time?  Jefferson Davis.  

Do you know who else mentioned it?   David Rice Atchison, the Senator that passed Kansas Act, then went to Kansas, and there, started killing and torturing -- and bragging about -- to spread slavery to the Pacific.

So -- I can't help it if you think Ken Burns Civil War film is great. It's not.  He left out the vile crazy stuff by Southern leaders, including their boasting of killing to spread slavery, and their War Ultimatums.

Of course, the main thing Burns and others omitted -- do to stupidity -- is the violence itself.  The killings and tortures by Southern leaders who were bragging loudly and proudly about those killings, about those tortures, at the time. 

Yes- - even Jefferson Davis boasted he would spread slavery North by "force of arms" and enslave all blacks there in perpetuity.  Has his "Address to the People of Free States"  ever been in any US text book?   Fuck no.

But it's just one of many boasts by Southern leaders they would keep killing until slavery was spread everywhere.  There were -- and they said they were -- doing the will of GOD.

And it was against the law in the South to preach any other GOD, but the God of slavery and violence.   See this 



The "Nigger Rant," as reporters called Stephen Douglas's tirades against Lincoln,  were not some  trivial comment, some throw away joke.

They were central to the entire debates, and the entire decade of the 1850's.   Yet there is not a single US history textbook which even mentions this, much less makes it central to understanding Lincoln, or what led up to the Civil War. 

EVEN IN THE NORTH  Others WERE killed, others were tortured, others were hung, who dared to speak too bluntly about equality for the races.

No one ever told you that. 

Not just in the South -- in the NORTH.


Douglas ran from side to side of the stage, SCREAMING about Lincoln and your daughter,  in Charleston. Did you know that.   Scared the crowd half to death. And it worked -- Lincoln lost that race.

Douglas never lost an election -- until 1860, two years after he beat Lincoln for Senate.  But he only lost that race, because 3 pro spread of slavery candidates ran.  Lincoln got far less than 50%.  Sixty percent of the public were just fine with the spread of slavery, as long as whites in the North were not bothered by it.

Stephen Douglas pumped up the fear -- just like others did -- that black men were going to sleep with your daughters.  Only they did not say BLACK, they said "NIGGERS".

Douglas was just using the tried and effective way to get power -- pump up the fear and hate.  It works!  It worked then, and works now. 

 Black men taking your "women"  was the emotional dynamite that slave supporters and their allies used all the time.  No one told you that.

   Lincoln knew, everyone knew, and LIncoln's enemies made sure, North and South, Lincoln was painted as  "Negro Worshiper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Lincoln had to address that.  

No one else did it like Lincoln -- the powerful "abolitionist speakers"  simply did not go where Lincoln went, and sure as hell would  not stand on a stage being called "Nigger lover"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

I cant  help it your history  books have cleaned up this basic fact, not my fault. But unless you know how vile and violent Southern slave power was, you don't know shit.


The ISIS like brutality of Southern leaders...

promises of endless killing for GOD --

A basic problem in telling the truth about Lincoln -- you'd have to tell the truth about Southern leaders lunacy,  like Lee's torture of slave girls, as he taunted them, and justified it by the bible. 

Does anyone teach that? NO. Not one text book in the USA, as far as we know, even mentioned such things -- quite the opposite, we are told Southern leaders were either kind to slaves, or did not have them!



Did you ever see speeches were Southern leaders -- including Jeff Davis- - boasted of killing to spread slavery?


Why not? Southern leaders were proud -- let me repeat -- proud of that at the time. Only after they lost did they go into this bullshit "we weren't doing anything to spread slavery".

Before and during the Civil War, top Southern leaders BOASTED.  B O A S T E D.  They boasted they were killing to spread slavery, and made that very clear.

Why not show in our text books what they boasted of, and what the did?

Here is why.  Because Southern school boards have never allowed such information in national text books, and Texas had -- for generations, and still does have -- almost all the text book publishers there.

Publishers never had a big interest in shaming the South anyway. Much easier to put out bullshit, so they did.


You only know what you are told. What if they left out a few "details"?

Who killed who, and why, is real history. Everything else is bullshit.

If you do not have all the basic facts, it's impossible to understand what the hell was going on.

All kinds of shit was going on -- including killing, tortures and beatings. In fact, Charles Sumner, the man who repeatedly ask Stephen Douglas to stop shouting "Nigger" was beaten on the Senate floor -- with Douglas sitting by smiling, according to reports in the newspaper the time.

Did you know  Douglas was shown in the above drawing, as sitting there smiling as Sumner was beaten?   He was sitting there smiling. 

Douglas had the same thing in mind for Lincoln.  But Lincoln handled Douglas's verbal attacks with humor, as you will see.

 Read on.

It was a violent time.  And as you will see, Douglas repeatedly telling crowds Lincoln's wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  was part of that violence.

Over, and over, and over, Lincoln had to first assure the public he did NOT want your daughters to sleep with this person or that.    See how he handled this  in the video below.

Southern War Ultimatums --  did you know about those? Promises of more killing, endless killing, until slavery was spread to the Pacific, and to the North.


As Frederick Douglass knew, Lincoln first had to get the NORTH to care about blacks, to care if slavery spread.

 Not only did most people in the North not give a shit about slavery -- people were still being attacked in the NORTH, in some areas -- including areas Lincoln travelled to, and spoke .
Did anyone -- ever-- tell you it was physically dangerous to go in some places, and speak against slavery.  No,  not just the South.  Of course it was illegal to speak or write or own any book or pamplet against slavery there. It was against the law in the South to preach against slavery.

But it was dangerous to do in the "wrong" places in the North.  Lincoln's Illinois was once such place.

That's exactly why Douglas kept harping in cities in Southern Illinois that "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers". 

Douglas didn't say that in Northern part of Illinois, like Galesburg.  But he ran from side to side of the stage, screaming it, in Southern cities.  

And he did it, for a reason.  Because he wanted the public to see Lincoln as the cause of your "daughters"  to sleep with "Niggers".  

And Douglas often said "Nigger"  even in the US Senate, and was admonished for it, by a man later beaten nearly to death by a friend of Stephen A Douglas- - we tell you about that below.

Frederick Douglass knew all this, and a thousand times more. Douglass was not fooled by anyone. He was exasperated by Lincoln -- but as you will see, he realized Lincoln first had to get elected, then he had to get the su pport of whites who never did care about blacks in any meaningful way.

In fact, there were dozens of white politicians in the North, like Stephen Douglas, actively helping slave power, for their own financial and political rewards.

Douglass (Frederick) know all about the Southern War Ultimatums, and the violent history of southern leaders personally and collectively.

Frederick Douglass knew all about Stephen Douglas role in the beating  Charles Sumner, and knew exactly why Stepen A Douglas taunted Lincoln -- in the most crude language possible, in public, to his face, again and again.

Douglass reprinted the Southern War Ultimatums in his own paper, the Northern Star.  And he printed the accounts of Sumner's beating on Senate floor. And of  women being stripped and whipped in the South, in public, just for saying they wanted to go North.  All kinds of things you never heard about, Douglass knew.

  The Vice President of CSA went on a five city speaking tour, to cheering crowds BOASTING they created the first nation on earth to do God's will to punish blacks for biblical sins in perpetuity.  See  his speech below.  And no, he was not misquoted, he explained later he actually HELPED reporters after the speeches, get his words right!   A country BASED on punishing blacks for biblical sins, in perpetuity





 There are Pulitzer Prize Winning authors who have made very good livings, and got big time professorships, by claiming Lincoln was reluctant to free the slaves, and would have never freed the slaves.

Go read their books.  Notice what's missing?

Douglas telling folks Lincoln was a "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"  is missing.

Lincoln's powerful  fight against President Polk - - calling Polk on helping South spread slavery by causing a war in Mexico, then stealing their land -- that's missing. 

LIncoln trying 40 fucking times to stop the spread of slavery into Kansas, and elsewhere,  is missing.

Lincoln exposing Dred Scott decision, and Kansas Act, as the violent means to push slavery into the rest of the USA -- is missine. 

In other words, these fucking bastards cherry picked what they would tell you -- and got away with it.

Fucking bastards.  They really are fucking bastards. 



These ass wipe "historians"   try to make Lincoln's efforts to keep the Union together seem like a bad thing.

Get a fucking clue- - as Lincoln said, and the Southern leaders said -- keeping the Union together was only way to stop the spread of slavery.  If the Union held together, Southern scum leaders could not spread slavery.

Lincoln knew that, and said as much.  Southern leaders knew that, and said as much.   Union meant the 50 or 60 Southern leaders behind the killing sprees and bullshit like Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision, could not prevail.

Yes, Lincoln wanted -- and did -- keep the Union together. That was the ONLY FUCKING WAY to stop the Southern scum leaders, Davis, Atchison, Toombs, etc.

YOu are not even told, are you, that the entire push for slavery was done by a small group of scum sucking pigs.   Most of the South did not care at fucking all if slavery spread.

But the leaders -- especially Davis, Atchison, Toombs, and their Northern suck up, Stephen A Douglas, did all they could to spread slavery. 

Now -- you know more than you history teacher.  


  Lincoln "was not the great guy made out to be"  said a Illinois State University professor recently, to a crowd of students gathered to hear a visiting Southern apologist berate Lincoln and praise Southern leaders who boasted (at the time) they were killing to spread slavery.   But the Illinois professor sure as fuck was not going to mention that, about their boasts to kill to spread slavery,  even if he knew. 

 And the slave owners were "not the bad guys"  people made them out to be suggested the Illinois State "expert".   

  In fact, history professors have told us, with a straight face, Southern leaders were anti-slavery, and Lincoln was actually fine with slavery, and wanted to send blacks to Africa anyway. 

    And always, it seemed, they had "quotes"  to prove it.


And actions?  Shit, who has time to learn actions or context?  Not the Pulitzer Prize winners. 

Not the smug ass Illinois state history professor.

Not the high school history teacher, or my Uncle Ralph.   They all got all the information they need. 

Frederick Douglass said Lincoln was radical to end slavery? WTF would he know? Was he there?   Did he ever even read Eric Foner?  Man, that Douglass, sad. 

Stephen A Douglas,  who hated Lincoln, was just making up shit. Lincoln obsessed? Lincoln repeats "over and over"  that blacks are equal to whites?   What's that fucker know? 

 Was he there?  Did he not ever read Bruce Catton, the expert on belt buckles for North and South soldiers?  


Did Lincoln actually harp constantly that the black man is equal to the white man?

YES. And if you read all of Lincoln's speeches, the full speeches, you would know that.   Literally over and over.  

But you have to read all the speeches, IN FULL.  Don't believe anyone who tells you they read all his speeches closely and know them well.

Lincoln spoke for hours on end at times, and went into the details of US history that are profoundly important, but essentially ignored today.  Lincoln's basic message was always that the Founding Fathers put slavery on "a course to extention"  and specifically prevented the GROWTH of slavery, in the firm believe the madness and cruelty of slavery in the South would end, as all cancers end.

Again and again, Lincoln compared slavery to a cancer. Either it would grow, and kill the host, or it would die, and not kill the host.

Specifically, the Kansas Act and Dred Scott put the cancer on steroids and was about to spread that cancer to all of the US, or it would die in the effort.  

Bluntly stated, Lincoln said slavery was going to die, or the United States was going to die, and he did not expect the United States to die -- meaning, he expected slavery to die.


One of the most unreported -- but profoundly important --aspects of Lincoln's House Divided Speech (not just one speech,  he said these kinds of things dozens, if not hundreds of time)  was the South's extreme reaction.

A "declaration of war"  said one Southern newspaper. Lincoln saying slavery or the Union would end, was a defacto declaration of WAR.

Stephen A Douglas also said as much -- Lincoln was "a traitor" who was going to cause a civil war,  by antogonizing the South with the "radical" talk.

Stephen A Douglas was not lying. In fact, Lincoln would get up immediately after Douglas accused him of being for equality -- and then explain YES, any black person IS my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas.

So how the fuck do they show Lincoln quotes to the contrary?  Because they only show part.  Lincoln did have to parse words -- or he would have been shot a lot sooner (see below).

Lincoln was also trying to get votes from people who were very much afraid -- and they were told over and over to be afraid - of black men "sleeping with your daugthers"

Lincoln had to deal with that.




Douglass (Frederick -two s's) knew Lincoln well, and at times was exasperated with him.  

But Douglass knew what you don't. and what your teacher never told you, because they don't have it in their text books, anyway.


People were still being killed or beaten IN THE NORTH, in certain places, for speaking out against slavery too much

Very basic to understand Lincoln -- he went where few men running for office dared go. Like to Kansas (see below).

Every US text book should show Southern War Ultimatums about Kansas, the killing sprees in Kansas, and how Lincoln fucking WENT to Kansas and spoke there, after (remember this) after  Southern leaders made it a crime to speak in public against slavery, and against publishing anything in writing against slavery.

You don't even know Southern leaders sent men to Kansas and created a "bogus legislature"  which made it a crime punishable by death to publish anti-slavery newspapers,  and resist anyone from tearing down your newspaper.

And the only reason you don't know -- no one told you. Nor did they tell you that most of the US, in terms of square miles, it was STILL illegal to preach, write, or publically speak against slavery.   Southern leaders sent men to Kansas in 1854 to make Kansas another slave state, and the first thing they did, was create these laws against speaking and against publishing anything against slavery.

Lincoln fucking WENT there and spoke, anyway.

Why the hell do people not know this?  No one told them.


While Southern killings and tortures and War Ultimatums were huge problems for Lincoln -- that was nothing compared to Lincoln's problem with whites in the North, most of whom would not walk across the street to help a black person.

And the REASON whites in the North would not help -- they were told repeatedly for  years, black men will sleep with your daughters.  

So what is this shit that Lincoln never cared?  What the fuck?  Essentially, that was Lincoln's only issue!  Stopping slavery.  He didn't have any other issues.  This is what the fuck he did, all day, every day,  especially after Southern leaders violent ruse --the Kansas Act.

The first violent action Lincoln tried to stop -- the war against Mexico.  The second violent action Lincoln tried to stop -- Kansas Act, and the killings and tortures in Kansas and beyond.  

What the hell do they think Lincoln was doing from 1854 on? Painting landscapes? Knitting?  FUCK NO.   Why not tell that Lincoln, from Kansas Act on, did almost nothing BUT expose the South's efforts to spread slavery to all of the US.  

 In fact, there is not a single US text book that even shows the violent obsession over decades, of Southern leaders to spread slavery.  It's mentioned almost as a side issue. Fuck no it was no side issue.

The spread of slavery was the "oxygen in the air"   It was the sure fire topic to get crowds cheering, or hateful. It worked very well for the men who took control in the South, and more from 1840's on.

Any Southern politician who was NOT eager for the violent spread of slavery could be himself called a "Negro Worshiper".  Did you know that?  HELL NO.

So the radicals -- Davis, Toombs, Atchison, worked with Stephen Douglas to get Kansas Act Passed.

Lincoln and many others knew exactly what the South was doing, as proven by Southern leaders sending killers to Kansas 1850's.  They were killing to spread slavery, and doing all they could to make it seem legal, by the Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision.

This was widely known at the time. 



  Was Lincoln-- as his detractors said at the time -- obsessed with equality for the "Nigger" 

  Lincoln's enemies accused him of not supporting the "troops in the field"  in the Mexican War -- a war the US started, in order to steal the land and spread slavery there.   I can't help it if you are not told that was the stated reason for the Mexican War.   US Grant made it clear, he was sent to the Mexican War to take the land - start the war,  then claim Mexico started it, then take the land.

Lincoln had the balls to call out Polk on exactly this.   It was an open secret -- everyone knew it - but some had the honesty to say so. Not just a war to steal land, but a war to steal land to spread slavery

In case you think the war was not specifically for land to spread slavery, consider this. After Lincoln failed to get Congress to not approve the war itself, Lincoln tried 40 times to get slavery outlawed in that land, just stolen.   If the object of the war was not, as Lincoln and others said, to spread slavery, why not then preclude slavery there?

Because Lincoln was right, and everyone knew it. It was always about spreading slavery.

So Lincoln never cared about slavery?  Actually, Lincoln did little else his entire life, after 1846, except push against slavery, eventually kicking it in the ass, sideways.   But to know that, you need to know his full speeches and actions.

Not just edited, cherry picked, partial quotes. 

 just like all dumb asses always attack someone who is against a vile unjust war.  And the war against Mexico -- in order to use the land for slavery -- was as vile as you can get.  

The hatred of Lincoln for challenging Polk, and calling him on starting a war to spread slavery (which it was) never went away in the South, because they knew, he was right. 

In fact, Lincoln tried 40 or more TIMES to either expose that war, or stop the effect -- he tried to keep slavery out of the territory we stole from Mexico, in order to spread slavery.

By the way, don't blame me if you don't know US went to war against Mexico, stole their land, and used that land to spread slavery.  I would have told you that, as Lincoln and others said at the time.

The above  is hardly an exhaustive list of what Douglass knew about Lincoln, and you did not.   Maybe Douglass knew what the fuck he was talking about -- and you don't?

It's amazing to me that so many "history teachers" who have no clue of the above,  will tell you what Lincoln should have done, and how "reluctant" he was.



Word games much?

To be fair, you can quote Lincoln out of context, meaning just take one or two sentences, and omit the overwhelming message.   

And, that they do.  Entire books have been written based on the distorted and incomplete quotes -- and of course, they ignore Lincoln's amazing kick-ass actions 1847 on. 


Do you think Frederick Douglass just needed to spend a few minutes with your "history teacher" who only knows a tiny sliver of distorted facts.  

Yes, Lincoln did say "IF I could save the Union.."  

Lincoln knew exactly what he was doing, in that letter to Greeley. For some reason, every idiot alive knows that letter, but NOT the other speeches and letters, and they do NOT know what was going on.

IF I could save the Union?  Lincoln had said over and over, slavery had to go, or the Union had to go.   House Divided Speech, maybe you heard of it?

 Either slavery would perish, or the Union would perish -- and he did not expect the Union to perish. 

Southern War Ultimatums, 
including this speech, 
by Jefferson Davis promising to invade North, turn all states
into slave states. 

So when Lincoln wrote that -- in order to keep Kentucky in the Union -- he was not lying whatsoever.  He was cleverly saying what he had said dozens of times, in another way.

IF -- IF  I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would. 

That was just the point, he could NOT save the Union and keep slavery.  The Southern leaders War Ultimatums made that impossible.

Do you even know what Southern War ultimatums were? 

Fuck no you do not. Lincoln knew -- Vice President of CSA tried to visit him, and give the ultimatums to Lincoln personally. Lincoln refused to see him, and sent him a note.  Do you know what the note said?

No -- you don't know. 

There is a lot you need to know, mostly  how fucking violent and creepy Southern leaders were. Their violence was NOT just to slave women and children. They also killed, and boasted they killed, anyone who tried to stop slavery.   Don't believe me?  GOOD.

 Not just once, not just twice, but at least three times, Southern leaders promised to kill, and keep killing, until slavery was spread North, South, and West.

Don't believe me?  GOOD. I couldn't believe it either, until I found it in South's OWN  documents, like Jefferson Davis papers.  He himself was involved in all three War Ultimatums, in 1856, in 1861, and 1862.

That is exactly the kind of thing  Frederick Douglass knew -- he showed the Southern War Ultimatums that were in Southern papers, himself.  

AMazing -- a few details here, there, like the Southern War Ultimatums.

Southern leaders had demanded as a WAR ULTIMATUM, the spread of slavery into areas and states where already free. Yes, they did, see their war ultimatums below.   Blame the SOUTH for demanding slavery everywhere, including the West, including the North.   

It was all or nothing after the South issued War Ultimatums. It was Union, or it was slavery.

For example, Douglass knew that Stephen A Douglas was trying to get Lincoln to either be attacked during the debates -- as Charles Sumner was beaten not that long prior to Lincoln Douglas debates. In fact, Stephen A Douglas repeatedly taunted the crowd, before the debates began, telling them he PERSONALLY saw Lincoln that day, with Frederick Douglass, with a white woman in a carriage.

Did you know that?

Did you know that could get you physically attacked, or killed, at the time?

Did you know Lincoln's friend's brother, Lovejoy, was killed not far from one of the LIncoln Douglas debates, and that Stephen A Douglas REPEATEDLY associated Lincoln with the dead abolition newspaper man, not to praise Lincoln, but to damn him? 


So, again and again, Lincoln (in order to stay alive, and possibly win votes too) had to tell the crowd things like he never said he believed in "perfect social equality" of black  men sleeping with your daughters. 


As in this video, from a movie using Lincoln and Douglas own words (except they did not show Douglas doing his "Nigger rants" or running back and forth screaming, as local reporters in two cities reported)  Lincoln SEEMS to agree at first, but then kicked that prejudice in the ass, sideway.


Now -- why did those lying pieces of shit, who trash Lincoln, not tell you that?  Any clue?

Lincoln set up this thunder -- by FIRST seeming to agree.   Then rephrasing the question, and effectively changing people's minds.   No one left a Lincoln speech confused.

Lincoln again, and again, and again, and again, said slavery had to go, or the Union will go -- and he did not expect the Union to go.

In other words, in a powerful way -- Lincoln was saying SLAVERY IS GOING.

And the South, with Lincoln's enemies in the North, went ballistic. Lincoln was taunting the South, Lincoln was promising war, blah blah.  Nonsense.

The South itself boasted they were spreading slavery, their War Ultimatums were all about the spread of slaver, they had been killing and using violence and deceit "means foul and more foul"  with one goal in mind -- spreading slavery.

LINCOLN ROCKED THE  HOUSE -- RADICAL ANSWERS -- like "every slave is my equal and the equal of any man".  But those  who trash Lincoln, or like to piss on him to prove they are not "Lincoln devotees"   never tell you these things. 

You probably hear  this shit that "Lincoln wasn't really against slavery"  even by those who should know better, and would know better, if they knew what Douglass knew.

You may hear that "Lincoln used slavery as an excuse to win the Civil War."

You hear all kinds of bullshit.   

But check out how actually, Lincoln was hated in the NORTH, and detested in the South, for being a "Nigger lover". 

Sorry to use the "N-word" here but we are using it for a fucking reason - because those who tore into Lincoln for being a "Nigger lover, obsessed with equality"  used it, and we are quotes those bastards.



 ou won't

Yes -- at times Lincoln DID parse words, talk very carefully.  He had to, becaues most whites in the North would not piss on a slave if they were on fire.

More, most white males in the South were afraid black men would take their women.  Did you know that?

This is why Douglas (Stephen A) and many others repeatedly gouged at Lincoln's "eyes" -- went after Lincoln's "love for the nigger"  and "obsession with equality".   Lincoln would have your daughters sleep with NIGGERS".

Lincoln then had to get up to speak.  There is nothing in your life that can help you appreciate what bravery Lincoln had to have, just to get up and respond.   The most powerful speaker of the day, just shouted -- emphatically, for "rants"  as the newspapers said -- about Lincoln and "niggers".

Lincoln was trying to get elected, and he needed the support of the white males -- no one else could vote! 

White males -- the only voters!   And they were told, over and over, Lincoln would have your daughters and your wives sleep with "Niggers." 

We apologize for using the word "Nigger"  but it's vile to NOT tell the public today, what Lincoln had to face then.

Yet in his FULL SPEECHES, Lincoln was kick ass, radical, powerful.  But you have to know his full speeches, not a few words here or there. 


Frederick Douglass said- - and he knew -- that the United States was "false to its past".   And his own knowledge is a good example.

Douglass, for example, knew that Lincoln's biggest problem was NOT to defeat the South militarily, but to get and keep an army in the field, if they thought they were "helping the Niggers". 

This was Lincoln's basic dilemma, because over and over -- and over, he was taunted, called "Nigger lover" "Negro Worshiper"  not just by people in the South, but by people in the NORTH.

Southern leaders not only  claimed Lincoln would make white women "be with" black men,  Southern leaders claimed Lincoln was going to "EXTERMINATE THE WHITE RACE".

Exterminate the white race HOW?

By not allowing slavery to expand into Kansas -- which had already voted 90% against slavery, and already become a free state.

The Southern WAR Ultimatums are another thing Douglass knew well -- he printed them in his own paper.  He knew exactly what Southern leaders boasted of -- but you do not.

Southern leaders were BOASTING -- not admitting, they were boasting-- of killing to spread slavery  into states and territories that had already rejected slavery.  How the fuck this is not taught in our schools today it the biggest diservice "historians" do.   Southern leaders were clear, loud and proud, about not just spreading slavery, but killing to do.

And they bragged about that -see below-- until they lost.





 You had no idea anything like that ever happened, only because no one told you.

Lincoln's friend was killed,  in Alton, one of the debate cities, for publishing an abolition newspaper.   No one told you that.

People were STILL being killed and or attacked and beaten -- in the NORTH -- for speaking against slavery.   No one told you that.

It was ILLEGAL -- a crime punishable by torture - in most of the USA -- to publish anti-slavery newspapers, when Lincoln was in Congress, 1846, and all the way up to the END of the Civil War, 1864.

No one told you that.

The big time "abolitionist speakers"  did not dare go where Lincoln went, or speak to crowds Lincoln spoke to. 

No one told you that.

Douglass, however, knew all that. Your "history" teacher does not know shit - seriously -- if they don't know those basic facts, because Lincoln was, as Frederick Douglass said "radical" to end slavery.   

First, Lincoln said correctly, we must stop the bastards (he did not say bastards in public) from spreading slavery. 


The House Divided Speech is mentioned in just about every history text book in US.  It was not just ONE speech, but a regular part of Lincoln's speeches. 


Go read the speech!   More, learn what Southern leaders were doing -- killing, and bragging of kililng, to spread slavery West and NORTH. 

Yes, Southern leaders boasted, including Jeff Davis, of spreading slavery West and North, not just the South.

Not some "gotcha" quotes.  Not some errant over excited utterances. Southern leaders boasted their goal was to spread slavery -- for GOD -- to all of the US.  Yes, they did. Not kinda, not sorta, not in a way.

Lincoln was exactly right - and if they could have, the South would have, spread slavery North and West. Once again, they boasted of it.  It's not my fault you history teacher doesn't know or tell you.

But Frederick Douglass knew. Lincoln knew. And Southern leaders knew -- they were bragging of it.

See-- you need to know the full story, to make sense of how violent it was, how Lincoln was lucky  he did not get a bullet in the brain sooner.

  But you would have to know the above, to know why Douglass said that.  Lincoln was a bad ass mo fo, to go where he went (Kansas)  and speak as he did. 

No one told you that, did they? Not ever.

Not once.


And Lincoln was, as Stephen Douglas said -- in order to get people to hate, and maybe attack, Lincoln  "obsessed with equality for the 'Nigger".

Lincoln did in fact, go around, as Douglas said repeatedly, "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".   Newspapers in the North made fun of Lincoln too, for his "Negro Worship".

But somehow, because lying bastards just told you part of the story, (Im talking to you McPherson, Foner, and others)  they paint Lincoln as "nothing special"  or "reluctant" for equality.

Lincoln was damn reluctant to piss of the militant South - yes.  Very very few whites in the North, at the outset of Civil War, would walk across the street to stop the spread of slavery.  Lincoln knew that.

So Lincoln had to speak about UNION.  The South was trying to destroy the UNION, in order to spread slavery.  If they could not bust the UNION, Lincoln said repeatedly, they could not spread slavery.

And Lincoln was correct. Keeping the Union together meant - slavery had to end. One or the other would go, Lincoln said. Either slavery would go, or the Union would go.

But you would have to know Lincoln's full speeches, and actions and context.

Most "history" teachers don't have a clue. They know a few slogans, a letter here, a out of context quote there.  And  that's all they teach you, too.

Get the full story. Get all the facts. 

Mostly you did NOT know Southern leaders boasted of killing to spread slavery -- and certainly no one told you, they boasted of spreading into places that already rejected slavery.

Frederick Douglass knew that.  And he knew Lincoln had to somehow get whites- - who generally did NOT care about slaves, to support stopping the SPREAD of slavery into the rest of the country.

But for some reason (dumb asses, repeating bullshit, is the reason, by the way) we are told the South was trying to keep slavery, and Lincoln was trying to end it.

Well, not exactly, it was much worse. Southern leaders were killing to SPREAD slavery, and boasting of that.  Most people did not care, until Lincoln woke them up about South's plan to spread slavery North and West.

Lincoln had his hands full, just to get volunteers to fight to stop the SPREAD of slavery.   Lincoln, as you will see, had to convince people that Southern leaders were trying to spread slavery NOT just in the South, but in all of the USA.

You won't see one text book that tells you in a clear way, Lincoln over and over and over -- and over -- told the public The South was trying to spread slavery into all areas, Kansas, California, and all of the North.

Was Lincoln lying about that?  FUCK NO. Southern leaders were boasting of it.   

To keep the South from spreading slavery North and West, we must keep the Union together.   And he was right. Because Southern leaders were trying to do just that -- no matter what bullshit you hear that the South was trying to "keep" slavery -- they were clear as can be.  They were killing to spread slavery.


   But Douglas (Stephen A)  had a "thing" about the word "Nigger" after he threw in with Jefferson Davis  and David Rice Atchison.  Douglas was asked repeatedly in the US Senate to stop using "Nigger". 

Even Southern Senators said "Negro" -- or "black".  Not Stephen A Douglas.  And newspapers at the time reported it, such as Quincy papers saying Douglas "went into  his 'Nigger rant'  about Lincoln. 

No.   You have never heard that, until now.   But Frederick Douglass always knew that, and much, much more.

 There are Pulitzer Prize winning books, written by dumb asses, that claim Lincoln was "Nothing special" about slavery and was "as prejudiced as anyone else".  

Nothing special? 
 the guy that wrote that shit, think was going around daily, from 1854, speaking to thousands of people, with ONE focus -- to warn the public that Kansas Act, and later Dred Scott decision, meant slavery would spread everywhere, unless stopped.

Who does Foner think was called "obessed with equality for the Nigger"  and who "wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers"?

Who does Foner think Northern newspapers made fun of, and Southern leaders said Lincoln was going to 'exterminate the white race' by stopping the spread of slavery?

Does Foner think that was Will Rogers?  Mark Twain?  

There was only ONE human being -- just one -- that Stephen A Douglas accused of being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".  Foner and others don't even mention that, much less show it was as basic as hell to vile shit going on, leading to the Civil War.


  Lincoln made it very clear -- as did Jefferson Davis -- that Dred Scott meant no state to keep slavery out

Dred Scott decision ordered- - yes ordered -- Kansas to accept and protect slavery.  Yes, it did, we show you the decision itself.

Jefferson Davis boasted of that fact.   He BOASTED that Dred Scott decision ordered slavery accepted and protected, even after Kansas became a free state.  

Did you know that?

Do you know what Foner said of Dred Scott decision?  This "rather minor ruling". about Congress not being able to keep slavery out.   FUCK NO.  The Dred Scott decision ordered- - o r d e r e d  Kansas accept and protect.  

Did this fucking Foner guy even bother to fucking read the Dred Scott decision? How about reading Jeff Davis boast the Dred Scott decision justified the civil war?

How about reading Lincoln repeatedly explaining what Dred Scott decision was about?

Holy fuck, Foner.  Seriously "a rather minor ruling".

And remember, this dumb ass got the Pulitizer Prize.

  How fucking stupid can some of these guy be?  Seriously.


Lincoln had to parse words at time, no fucking kidding.

IF he had not parsed words, in the most important time, Kentucky would have joined the Confederacy, and the Civil War would not only be over, but slavery, as promised would have been spread to all of the West, as Southern leaders promised.

Oh -- you don't know Southern leaders promised to spread slavery West and North if they won the Civil War?   

See below -- that is exactly what the did.

It  IS true Lincoln had to -- occasionally - parse words, or as you will see, he would have gotten a bullet to the brain much soon, and Kentucky goes Confederate, and the Southern leaders spread slavery as promised.

There was a month's period of time there, when all hung in the balance, Kentucky was very close to going with Confederacy, until Lincoln wrote that famous letter to Greeley.  Of course, he was NOT writing to Greeley, as much as he was writing to the officials in Kentucky. 

But take a look at Lincoln's kick ass actions-- yes, he was kicking slavery in the ass -- long before he ran for President. As you will see, Lincoln was a radical mother while in Congress in the 1840's -- that's right the 1840's.   

Lincoln, for example, stood up to President Polk, and correctly called him out for going to war against Mexico in order to spread slavery. I can't help it that you probably never fucking HEARD the US went to war against Mexico to steal their land (yes, they did) and that the purpose of that land grab was to spread slavery (yes it was).

Lincoln called the President out on this -- no one told you, did they? 

Lincoln tried 40 times -- go on, count to 40 for a minute -- to either stop that land grab to spread slavery, or to prevent slavery from spreading into that stolen land.

Forty fucking times.  Count to 40 again. Go on.  That's how many times Lincoln tried to stop that shit.

And there is much more.  But just from that alone, now try to tell me Lincoln was not against slavery.  



To get a narrative -- a valid narrative -- you need all the facts. 

 These ass wipe "historians" don't even bother with the the facts.  Leave out a few basic facts, and these lying shit heads can make you believe anything.

And the REASON they leave out basic facts we show here - if they showed those facts, they could write these bullshit books.

Historians tend to be lazy bastards anyway, who want to sound smart.  For 60 years, I though historians WERE smart -- and they do a great job at bullshitting.

They don't do such a good job at telling you what the fuck HAPPENED,   Real history is this -- who killed who, and why, said the world's best honest historian Mark Curran (okay, that's me).  

Instead, the typical "Lincoln scholar" sit on their fat ugly asses, pick out words from this speech, jump to conclusions.  Fine, get the the words from the speeches, debates, letters.

But get them ALL.    Play all the fucking word games you want.  But fuck you for leaving out the full speeches.

And fuck you even more for not telling Lincoln's full actions, and not telling you who was killing who, and why.  In other words, leaving out CONTEXT.

When you understand what the fuck was going on, Lincoln is, as Frederick Douglass said - - RADICAL SWIFT ZEALOUS AND DETERMINED.

We show you what Frederick Douglass knew, and no "Lincoln scholar" we ever read, including shit heads like Foner and McPherson, ever had the brains or balls to mention, much less make clear .

Fucking shit heads.


Plus -- 

Oh fucking hell.  The record shows Lincoln a bad ass, radical, zealous -  and effective -- to destroy slavery?  Frederick Douglass said so, and he was there.  

Southern leaders sure claimed Lincoln was "Nigger Worshiper" who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"

Northern newspapers made fun of Lincoln for claiming blacks and white are equal.

But Lincoln had to be careful.  What you DO NOT know, because you are not told, is that Lincoln was lucky he did not get a bullet to the brain sooner. 


Why on earth would Frederick Douglass, the genius of the age, claim Lincoln was radical and zealous to end slavery?

Was he stupid?

Did Douglass just needed to know about Lincoln's letter to Greeley!   Maybe ten minutes with your "history" teacher could straighten Douglass (and many others) out.

Lincoln radical?

Lincoln obsessed with equality?   



Make no mistake -- as you will see-- Lincolns full speeches were kick ass, extreme, and powerful, for equality.   But to now that, you'd have to read the full speech, not lift one sentence. 

There were men who spoke against slavery-- but what you don't know, they did NOT go where Lincoln went, when he went, and change the audience.   The "big name" abolitionist - they went to audiences who already agreed.  And they were paid to go, the audiences were NOT in Alton Illinois or Atchison Kansas.

Big fucking difference -- and no one told you that, did they>


Lincoln gave over 3000 speeches, wrote hundreds of letters.  If you want to play word games -- fine, get all the words in context. You wont be so stupid. 

Theres is a damn good reason people from 1846, and certainly from 1854, claimed Lincoln was obsessed with equality -- do you know what that is? 

Lincoln quit his law practice, and with his own resources, went from place to place, on horse, on wagon, walking, by rail, whatever it took, speaking of the dangers and horrors of slavery.

Lilncoln's emphasis -- and rightly so -- was on something else you never hear about, the violence by Southern leaders to spread slavery, by means "foul and more foul".

By the Kansas Act -- the Senator who got that passed went to Kansas and started killing and torturing folks, when supposedly Kansas Act was going to allow Kansas citizens to decide themselves.  Lincoln knew that was a fraud, a violent fraud, and he called it a violence.

Lincoln even went to Kansas -- to the city named for the guy who had been killing and torturing anyone who dared speak or try to publish newspapers against slavery.  

Did you know that, yes or no?

Douglass knew that.  One of the million or so things Douglass knew, that you do not.

Did you know Lincoln's friend Lovejoy's brother was killed in Alton IL, by a mob who burned him to death inside his building, for publishing an anti slavery paper?

NO one told you this -- did they?  When Lincoln spoke, people, including people in the North, could be killed for speaking too bluntly for equality under the law.

Lincoln himself would be killed -- a bullet to the head, a few hours after his speech about voting rights for blacks.


Oh that's right, Douglass, the genius of the age, just needed to know those 8 quotes by Lincoln, in the debates?    Wrong.  Douglass knew that Lincoln's problem getting equality for races, and to stop the spread of slavery, was NOT so much the South, but those in North like Stephen A Douglas, who helped Southern leaders.  

Stephen A Douglas knew it too. He and his partner, David Rice Atchison passed the Kansas Act -- which immediately caused Lincoln to quit law practice, and go nonstop to warn the people about Kansas Act, and then Dred Scott decision, which made it impossible (yes impossible) to stop the spread of slavery into all states, and all territories, even in the North, unless someone did something.

Lincoln did something.

No one told you -- did they -- what Frederick Douglass knew.

Until now.


Frederick Douglass knew this like this -- Stephen A Douglas was all but urging, repeatedly, dramatically, folks to attack Lincoln (yes, he was, see below).

Stephen A Douglas shown in drawing- - laughing as Charles Sumner was beaten nearly to death on Senate floor

Douglas has said Sumner would be beaten, and laughed as he was beaten.  The same kind of rhetoric Douglas used about Sumner, he used about Lincoln.

No one told you that, did they?

That's the kind of thing Frederick Douglass knew, and you didn't have a clue.,

No one told you that, did they?


Others spoke against slavery in the safety of geography -- none went where Lincoln went, when he did,  trying to get electedand spoke so powerfully.

When you read the FULL speeches, and know Lincoln's FULL actions, you won't be so stupid or easily fooled by bullshiters, and those who repeat bullshit. 

There is not a single US text book -- even in Kansas -- that highlights LIncoln going to Kansas  AFTER Southern leaders in Kansas made it a crime, punishable by torture, to speak or write openly against slavery there?

Frederick Douglass knew that.  Hell, I've yet to meet a "history" teacher who knew Lincoln ever went to Kansas, and that Southern leaders (Atchison, Stringfellow, working officially for Jefferson Davis) had made it a crime punishable by torture to speak or publish anything against slavery in Kansas.

Maybe you need the full story, not bullshit? 

"Most people have no fucking idea today, just how violent those who pushed slavery were. How they tortured, hung, drowned, and promised endless killings.

Thanks to Southern school board crybabies for last 100 years, no US text book tells that story. Or ever has"

Not one."


Southern leaders -- yes leaders--  tortured, they killed, and they bragged about killing.  They hired others to torture and kill. 

Lincoln's friend -- Lovejoy -- was killed, possibly burned to death -- inside his printing building, for printing anti-slavery newspaper IN ILLINOIS.

No one told you that, did they?

And of course, Lincoln himself was killed, just hours after Booth heard him speak about voting rights for blacks.  No one told you that either, did they?

See-- knowing what the fuck happened actually does matter.  And Frederick Douglass knew, but no one ever told you. 

Instead, you get a bunch of bullshit.   Get the full story.  Enough bullshit by Southern crybabies and the stupid shits that just repeat the BS.



Southern leaders BOASTED about killing to spread slavery, and promised to kill "every abolitionist who pollutes our soil".

NOT some nuts in a bar. The top Southern leaders BOASTED of killing anyone who got in the way of slavery. 

They boasted they started killings as a war to spread slavery.  They did not admit it, they boasted of it, they were proud of it, at the time. 

And you are not told about this in any school, North or South, today.

Why the fuck not?   Southern leaders were shouting it from the rooftops at the time. 



WHAT THE FUCK?  Dude - learn what the fuck you are talking about, you won't be so stupid. 

He was the most radical mother fucker around -- Southern leaders were RIGHT, Lincoln's real goal was to kick slavery in the ass sideways, forever.

And he did -- in the USA. 

No no no -- it cant be?  Douglass (Frederick Douglass, notice the two s's)  was wrong!    He just needs to talk with your history teacher.  He just needs to read that letter to Greeley (WRONG -- he published the letter to Greeley).


Unless you know how dangerous it was -- meaning, it could get you killed -- to speak too candidly to end slavery, in places Lincoln went, and at the time he went,  you don't know shit about Lincoln, or the Civil War.

For example, in most of the US it was still against the law (you had no clue it was ever against the law) to speak or write openly against slavery.

Even in Illinois, it was dangerous. Lincoln's friend Lovejoy was killed in Alton IL -- possibly burned to death in his building -- for publishing anti slavery newspaper in the wrong place.

More, Lincoln of course was trying to WIN an election in the Lincoln Douglas debates -- not get killed  like his friend Lovejoy.



Lincoln's enemies were not stupid. They went after Lincoln with "knives" said Lincoln. 

Lincoln spoke often of Douglas's "knives"  -- everyone in the audience knew what he meant - calling Lincoln a "Nigger worshipper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  was a knife.

"Over, and over, and over" said Stephen A Douglas,  Lincoln insisted the "Nigger"  has equal rights under the law.  

Lincoln was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" - another knife.

Lincoln had to learn -- so he did -- how to use humor to disarm those knives.  See how Lincoln did that, in the video

 "Lincoln insists  NIGGERS are equal to whites, because the Declaration of Independence says all men are created equal"  said Stephen Douglas. 


But the Supreme Court -- said Douglas correctly, ruled that blacks are inferior beings.   Did you know that US Supreme Court ordered-- ordered- that blacks could not be seen as  human beings?

You had no clue, did you?

Hell no.  

Read Lincoln's speeches, Douglas (Stephen A)  was correct. Over and over  Lincoln said slavery was wrong -- and gave the long violent history of slavery, including the "violence"  of the Dred Scott decision, and the killing sprees in Kansas.

There is a lot of history -- vile history -- not taught to you.  Lincoln got back in politics in 1854 because of the violence in Kansas and the Kansas Nebraska Act, followed by the Dred Scott decision.

In fact, nearly ever word -- every syllable -- of the Lincoln Douglas debates are about those two things, Kansas Act, and Dred Scott decision.

Douglas insisted Lincoln was a traitor -- and wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers.

Lincoln explained the history of slavery's violent expansion, and the "machinery" of Dred Scott and Kansas Act.   Douglas, of course, was the guy that pushed Kansas Act through, with his friend, David Rice Atchison, who then went  personally to Kansas, and started killing out there, to spread slavery.

So it helps if you know what the hell was going on.  Sadly, most history teachers don't even know -- they don't grasp Stephen A Douglas role in the beating of Sumner, nor how he worked with Atchison to push slavery by killing in Kansas, with the ruse of Kansas Act as cover.

But Lincoln knew

And Frederick Douglass knew.

And you never had a clue. 

He showed how cruel it was -- how violent those who spread slavery were, and how they used Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision to push slavery were the people themselves would not vote for it.

Douglas, of course, famously claimed to be for "popular sovereignty"  but supported the Kansas Act -- in fact, he and his partner pushed it through -- and Dred Scott decision.

Those two things -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott -- said Lincoln and many others, made it impossible for anyone, any state, any territory, and legislature, any vote of the people, to stop slavery. 

That, said Lincoln, meant the Union must end, or slavery must end. One would die -- one would continue.  Slavery would now die, or the Union would die.

That is what the House Divided Speech was about.

That is what the Lincoln Douglas debates were about. 

But you never see those quotes do you?   

Douglas then reminded the crowds Lincoln was a "traitor" and that he was a traitor.  United States Supreme Court not only said the black race was not equal, but they were "inferior beings"  and are to be seen as "property"  not persons.



 After  -- remember that after -- the best speaker of his era (Stephen A Douglas) screamed to the crowd that Lincoln was a "Nigger Worshiper" and "Wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  Lincoln had to speak.

Kind of a big fucking deal, no one told you.

There is not one text book in the USA, that I have been able to find, that before Lincoln could speak, first Douglas would tell the crowd Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Not one.

The ONE book about the debates themselves even mentioned it, and then almost casually,  on page 245.

Guelzo's book is the only one that even mentions it
on page 245

Newspapers at the time reported it, saying Douglas went into "Nigger rants"  about Lincoln's love for the Negro.

In Charleston, the reporter described Douglas as running from side to side on the stage, SCREAMING  about Lincoln's love for the "nigger".

Fear of the black man taking white women, was the underlying fear that Lincoln had to deal with.

Not just to get votes -- remember, Lincoln was trying to win votes --- but to stay alive.


You may not know this -- again, no one tells you in any text book, again, you have to get it from original documents.

Stephen Douglas had a role to play in violence, already.

Newspapers AT THE TIME reported Douglas did all he could -- even taunted Senator Sumner before he was beaten on Senate floor, that he would be beaten.

Look closely at the drawing -- at the time.   
Douglass is shown in the background, laughing. 

Douglas stood by and smiled as another of his adversaries, Charles Sumner, was beaten on the Senate floor, two years before the Lincoln Douglas debates. Douglas also predicted Sumner was going to be beaten someday, then pumped up the hatred for that man.

So when he debated Lincoln -- and screamed in at least two cities, and ran side to side on the stage, that "Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" -- was just a throw away line?

Remember, he ran FROM SIDE TO SIDE of the stage, screaming it, in Charleston. Screaming that Lincoln wanted your daughters to sleep with Niggers.



"She is my equal and the equal of any man"

 Douglas knew that the best way to get someone beaten, physically,  was to tarnish that person as a "Nigger Lover".   You are not told this was a central feature of the Lincoln Douglas debates, one that Lincoln handled with humor -- because he had to.

Lincoln could not say "Yeah, I want equality for the Nigger, and fine by me if your daughter sleeps with Niggers". 

So Lincoln instead -- wisely, and deftly, said he did not know if  Douglas meant Lincoln wanted to "sleep with Niggers".  Lincoln said "I don't need to have her for a wife. I can just let her alone. But in her natural right to eat the bread she made with her own hands, she IS MY EQUAL AND THE EQUAL  of ANY man.

Now, why the fuck do you suppose no one told you that?  Because their bullshit sounds better, and they want to piss on Lincoln, or trash him, or at least show they don't honor him too much.



As Sumner was being beaten with a heavy cane -- Douglas, according to people who saw it, sat nearby and smiled.

No one told you history teacher about that, and they are almost always too stupid and lazy to read 100 or 200 newspapers from that era, and see for themselves.

And they were too stupid and lazy to read the transcripts BEFORE THEY WERE CLEANED UP, about Douglas trashing Lincoln for "Wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers"..

See-- details matter. Amazing what you can do, when you leave out the basics. And this is but one of hundreds of exmples.

So Douglas smiled as Sumner was beaten almost to death, and later made fun of Sumner while he recovered from the beating.  Sumner was in a coma for months. 

  The person beating Sumner was a hero -- and is to this day a hero, to many in the South.

No one ever told you that, either, did they?

Douglas apparently knew Sumner was going to be beaten.

So Lincoln knew -- everyone knew -- what Douglas (Stephen A) was up to .  At very least he wanted to scare the shit out of Lincoln, whose friend was killed (Lovejoy) for being a "radical abolitionist" in Illinois.

And by the way -- Stephen A Douglas reminded the crowd, over and over, Lincoln was friends with Lovejoy.  No one ever mentioned that, did they? 


Think Douglas telling the crowd  -- over and over -- that Lincoln wants your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  was an accident?

Running from side to side of the stage-- accident?

Going into his "Nigger rant"  as newspapers called it then, was that an accident?

Or did Stephen Douglas know  this was the raw nerve, the fear, that he could go after, to make the audience fear and hate Lincoln?

Urging violence on others -- accident?

Gloating when Sumner was beaten - accident?

And this was not just Douglas.  Southern leaders were openly proud of violence.   They controlled slaves, by violence. They spread slavery, by violence.

And any challenge to them -- was met with violence.

This was not just Stephen A Douglas,  

Lincoln;s friend -- Lovejoy-- was killed, probably burned to death, in Illinois, for being too loud about equality for blacks.

Read all Douglas words -- he actually accused Lincoln of, that day, being with a black man (Frederick Douglass) and a white woman, in a carriage.  Of course Frederick Douglass was not there, but Stephen A Douglas knew what he was doing.

 This is exactly how Douglas got where he was in politics  to begin with -- pumping up hate and fear worked very well for him, and he expected it to get him into the White House.  


  Let me repeat that, because you are not told of such things -- Not in the South, but in Illinois, Lincoln's friend was killed,  horribly  and not far from where one of the debates took place.

Douglas made sure -- very sure -- the audience knew Lincoln was friends with Lovejoys- - because Douglas would bring up Lovejoy's fucking name, and for the same reason.

To scare the public, and scare Lincoln. 


(Actually it was a letter to Kentucky)

Every dumb ass, it seems, knows about Lincoln's famous letter to Greely, where Lincoln does say, If I could save the union without freeing a single slave, I would.....

They ignore his 3000 other speeches, his letters, and his repeated very clear message, that to keep the Union together, meant slavery would end.

Slavery HAD to end -- and the South agreed -- if it could not spread slavery. 

Not just slavery would end -- the white race would end, if slavery was not spread.

  Did you know the South made that very clear?  Their own War Ultimatums, (yes, the South issued War Ultimatums)  was for the SPREAD of slavery.

Just stopping the SPREAD of slavery would doom to us to a life of "Nigger equality"   and "be like burning us slowly to death".

See more about that, below.

Lincoln's letter to Greeley came when Kentucky was in great turmoil -- fighting, blood spilled.   John Freemont had gone to Kentucky, and against Lincoln's orders, Freemont grabbed a bunch of slaves, and set them free.

Yet slavery was STILL legal, in Kentucky and elsewhere.  As Lincoln said, until he could get the Dred Scott decision overturned, or pass a Constitutional Amendment, he as president had "no legal authority"  or "no warrant"  to forcibly end slavery anywhere.


LINCOLN stood up to President Polk in 1846, accusing him of starting a war to spread slavery (Mexican War). Lincoln tried 40 times to get Congress to prevent letting anyone use that stolen land for slavery.
 How many Lincoln haters bother to mention any of this shit?  Zero, that's how many 


Lincoln was hated -- newspapers claimed Lincoln "refused to support the troops in the field" --  as others are always attacked, when they are against a war.

The point is -- Lincoln was fucking amazing, in his FULL text, and his actions, from 1846 on. These stupid fuckers who claim Lincoln wasn't really against slavery, etc, just never mention these many other facts, to the contrary. 

Later, Lincoln would free millions of slaves -- per his Emancipation Proclamation -- but only as a "war measure" and only because the "states in rebellion"  were violently in opposition to lawful authority. Because the South used slaves in the war effort, as a war measure, Lincoln declared those slaves in such states, would be free.

But Kentucky WAS NOT IN REBELLION.  Kentucky was still in the Union.  And Lincoln wanted to keep them in the Union.

As Lincoln said -- "We all want God on our side, but I have to have Kentucky".   If Kentucky joins the Confederacy, the war would be over.  The sheer number of Southern states and Southern population and area would dwarf the North, unless the Union kept Kentucky.

Freemont's illegal acts -- in direct defiance of Lincoln's orders -- very nearly cost the war to be lost. To pacify Kentucky, Lincoln wrote to Greely, which of course would be picked up by every newspaper in Kentucky.

And -- it worked.  LIncoln wrote that IF he could keep the Union together freeing all the slaves, or none of the slaves, he would.  That's just it -- Lincoln could NOT keep the Union together if he freed all the slaves then, because he could not do that.  Nor could Lincoln free none of the slaves, and keep the Union together, because the South was already at war, already killing to spread slavery.

LIncoln did not lie-- he was exactly correct.  

As Lincoln did so often -- thousands of times -- Lincoln would say things in a way, so that he didn't get shot, and that could avoid war if possible.

When Lincoln wrote to Greely -- he was actually writing to the people of Kentucky. And it worked.



We do not teach the violent nature of slavery - but we should.  The killings, and tortures by those pushing slavery was ongoing, and more, the South boasted of it.

So how did Lincoln handle being called a "Negro Worshiper".  

Sadly even this video clip, did not show Douglas run back and forth on the stage screaming (as he did in at least two cities) Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"..

Even this video did not show Douglas claim Lincoln was in a carraige with a white woman and a black man that day.

Even this video did not show Douglas seating a few feet away, smiling, as Charles Sumner was beaten almost to death.

If you don't know that -- and there are many more example, you can't have a clue how amazing Lincoln was, in how despite the hate and fear mongering, despite the dangers to himself, Lincoln was able to change the nation, which he did.

I can't help it if no one told you. I found out by original documents -- by newspapers AT the time, by private letters, AT the time, by reports of what Douglas was up to AT the time, by the very people he was helping.  



Ive actually had people say to me, why didn't Lincoln just say all men are created equal? What kind of dumb ass was I talking to? Someone who thought they knew Lincoln!

Lincoln said that over, and over, and over, and over.  And he did much more. Powerfully, with thunder, in a way that changed America.  Lincoln did not win that election, but Lincoln had forever changed the question.  

Lincoln had declared blacks are HUMAN BEINGS -- Senator Douglas emphatically declared they are not human beings,  and he had the Supreme Court ruling to proof it.

That's right, you are not told this either.  The Supreme Court -- really, literally, actually, emphatically, declared blacks are not human beings (not persons) and can not be considered as such, therefore Kansas could not keep slavery out of their territory, any more than Kansas could keep a horse, a dog, a pig, or any possession by a white man.

Blacks are not persons.

And if you read the Lincoln Douglas debates, THAT was the central issues. Are blacks human beings per the US Supreme Court?  Douglas shouted YES, he agreed. Blacks are NOT human beings.  And Lincoln, Douglas told the crowd, was "fomenting revolution" to say otherwise.

No one told you that either.

Lincoln's problem was to NOT say "He dumb ass, I never said I wanted your daughter to sleep with anyone, go fuck yourself, you fat little drunk. "  Maybe history would be better off, if Lincoln did speak that candidly.

Nor did Lincoln dare say "You idiot -- you sold out to Jeff Davis, now you are yelling "Nigger" all over the stage, trying to scare  up trouble".

But that was a true statement, too. 

Nor did he say  "What's the problem Douglas, your wife going to leave you if a black man walks down the street?"

Personally I wish Lincoln had done that, but Lincoln was brilliant, he knew what had to be done.  It's easy to say Lincoln should have done this, or that, every dumb ass today, especially dumb ass history teachers, love to say what Lincoln should do.

Yet almost none of them know what was really going on.  Lincoln was the person who changed the country by wisely changing the the rhetoric.   And Lincoln probably would have been shot much sooner, if he had responded as I suggested above.

Even in the South, to show ANYTHING but lack of eagerness to spread slavery - could get you called "Nigger lover"   even if you owned slaves.

But you don't know that, cause no one told you.

Lincoln had to handle that, or he could have been shot (as he eventually was) .  Lincoln actually lost this election - - Douglas was able to make enough people far too afraid of blacks "sleeping with" their daughters.

There is a reason -- a good reason -- Stephen A Douglas used this approach time and time again -- it worked.

Lincoln did it with humor and grace -- but he still lost.

 How to be against slavery, but not be shot, or not be accused of "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".




From the 1856 killing sprees led by the US Senator who passed Kansas Act, (see below) Lincoln spent nearly every day, 365 days a year, going place to place, exposing the violence and subterfuge used by Southern leaders to spread slavery by force, into areas -- and states -- that voted, or would vote if they could - to reject slavery. 

Lincoln's long letter to Speed shows he (and the rest of the country) were well aware of the killing, torturing, and violence used by Southern leaders to force slavery into the entire west --even if your history text book glosses over that.


None of this -- absolutely none of this -- is taught in US schools.   Lincoln was actually a radical mo fo -- yes  he was -- to kick slavery in the ass, and did.    See the full story, and no, you don't know yet. 


 After Douglas (Stephen A) sought Southern support to be President, he changed his words in the Senate.  Most Senators -even Southern Senators, did not use "Nigger"  on the Senate floor.

But Douglas did -- and Douglas, according to newspapers at the time -- went into "Nigger rants" in the debates, telling the crowds Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".   

The fear of black men being free --coming North - and taking white women, was very much the raw nerve Douglas aimed at, and hit, time after time.  

You may get a "historian" to mention this basic aspect of US history -how Southern leaders pumped up hate and fear of your daughters sleeping with "Niggers".   But if they mention it at all, they don't mention Stephen A Douglas, the most powerful speaker of the time, shouted this in Lincoln Douglas debates, to Lincoln's face, and that it was a theme in the debates, and in national life.

Anyone against slavery -- against the spread of slavery -- was called "Negro Worshiper"  or "Nigger lover".   Douglas (Stephen A)  pumped that up, by running from one side of the stage to the other in Charleston, spitting out the words "Lincoln will have your daughters sleep with Niggers".

Then -- Lincoln had to speak.



Stephen A Douglas created enough hate and fear -- as did others in political life -- and Douglas won the Senate race.  If three candidates, all of them pro spread of slavery --did not run against Lincoln in a four man race --Douglas would no doubt have beaten Lincoln again.

Linclon was hated, by some in the North and by virtually all leaders in  South, for being a "Nigger lover" who "was obsessed for equality fore the Nigger".

And -- Stephen A Douglas could and did, list why he said Lincoln was obsessed with equality.  No one even mentions that, much less teaches it. 

Funny -- (not really) how now, some  like to trash LIncoln for not caring, not even being against slavery.

And the only way they can say this -- or believe it -- is to be dumb  about Lincoln's full actions, and full speeches.


Frederick Douglass made it clear -- he knew Lincoln had to appeal to a nation that feared blacks, and he knew that people would have shot Lincoln much sooner,  and he would never have been elected dog catcher, if he spoke any more candidly that he did, at times.


Lincoln again, and again, and again, said to end slavery, we have to stop the growth.  He was right.  Slavery had to expand, or slavery, like any cancer, will kill the host.

And the South agreed. 

 There is very little Lincoln agreed with Southern leaders about -- except the need to spread slavery to survive.

Southern leaders -- try to grasp this -- made it very clear. We MUST expand slavery or we will be exterminated. The white race will be overtaken, the slaves will revolt and kill us.  Over and over this is the kind of thing Southern leaders said -- with a smattering of "GOD WANTS US TO ENSLAVE".

GODS will -- white survival, Southern leaders would use anything.   Over and over -- and over. 

Lincoln spoke too-- over and over-- of the best way to end slavery, was to stop the spread of it.  There was no other solution in the 1850's -- almost no one alive was willing to fight Southern toughs.  The South was very much a violent place, and their leaders were almost all slave owners, who did not hesistate to torture, kill, and even burn to death, slaves who fought back.

Nor did Southern leaders bluff.  If they said they were going to kill and torture -- which they did -- they meant it.  You are  not told about this.


And there was  no earthly way to stop  slavery, unless first, we stop the spread of it. So Lincoln DID speak about ending the spread of slavery -- as  a way to end slavery everywhere, over time.  There was no will in the North to fight to end slavery -- that would not come till late in the Civil War, when finally, many men like Grant (who earlier said he would never fight to end slavery) realized Lincoln was right all along -- slavery had to end.

  So when you hear these stupid shits tell you Lincoln didn't care about slavery.... the fuck he didn't.  There was no one else going where he went, saying what he did, as effectively as he did. 

It was an "act of war" said Southern leaders, to elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery.   No, they did not care if someone was anti-slavery. Just being against the SPREAD of slavery, elect anyone against the SPREAD of slavery, was an act of war.

That is what they said -and meant.  If the North elected anyone against the SPREAD of slavery, that was an act of war.

Not sorta, not kinda.  And remember, they did not bluff.


Let me repeat that.  Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, said it was an act of war to elect anyone against the spread of slavery.

Jeff Davis not only said it, he sent killers to KS to kill and terrorize anyone who published anti slavery newspapers, or tried to give public speech against slavery. 



Why was "spread of slavery"  such a huge fucking thing to Lincoln?

Because Southern leaders were already -- already -- sending killers to Kansas, as they had sent them to Missouri, as they would send them later --- to spread slavery.

Over, and over, all through US history, from 1800 on -- no one teaches you this -- Southern leaders had been killing to spread slavery.   Most people think white folks in the South loved slavery. Oh fuck no.  The slave owners, and the politicians, made sure you could not even speak against slavery, preach against slavery,  or own books against slavery, from 1840's on.

You could be tortured for simply owning the wrong book in the South.

You could be killed, even in the North, in some areas (Illinois was one)  for speaking too openly against slavery.

How many of those trashing Lincoln, tell you that?  How many even know?   Probably none.

Southern leaders pumped up the fear and hate -- hate for anyone who spoke against slavery, hate for anyone who just was against the SPREAD of slavery.

Try to grasp that.

They told the public, North and South, that stopping the SPREAD of slavery would destroy the white race by making "Niggers sleep with your daughter".

Try to grasp this -- and no one told you. This is new information to you. 

Actually  the value of slaves, the price of slaves,  was going down, down down, as there were just too many slaves.  There were slave FARMS pushing out 12-14 slave babies per slave woman.  There was also illegal importing of more slaves from Cuba -- thousands arrived illegally every year. 

By 1850, Southern leaders had so many slaves, there were more black people than white in many areas of the South.   |And whites were worried as hell.

They knew -- and said, that if they did not spread slavery, blacks would outnumber whites and eventually they would kill the whites. 

That's what crowds were told.  That's  how you got crowds to hate men like Lincoln.  And that's why LIncoln had to be careful what he said, to who. 

Stopping  the spread of slavery-- would have destroyed slavery.  And the only way to stop the spread of slavery, was to keep the Union together. 

Lincoln said -- and so did the South say -- if the Union stays in tact, slavery can not spread.  Try to grasp that.

If slavery can not spread, slavery dies.

When those fucks blame Lincoln for trying to keep the Union together, understand this -- keeping Union together was the only way to keep slavery from spreading.  Southern leaders agreed.  Lincoln agreed. Keeping Union together = ending slavery, one way or another. 

No one really tells you, what Lincoln was up against -- the ISIS like SOuthern lunatic leadership were in many ways as violent as ISIS. Leaders promised war,  got crowds cheering about GOD and slavery, got crowds eager for war, by claiming Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.

No one told you anything about this. But it was extremely well known then -- Southern leaders boasted of it, in speeches, in books, in sermons.

Try to grasp that.

And Douglass knew it all.

Douglass saw the black race go from being considered "dogs that could talk"  that "God ordained to be enslaved and punished,"   to men who were in the Union Army, who would get to vote,  and get to actually be considered HUMAN.

Did you know that?   Seriously, did you?

Did you know that in 1854, when LIncoln got back into politics, blacks were not even considered human beings by most whites in the US.


And did you know, that the United States Supreme Court ordered --  yes ordered-- that blacks be seen not as human beings, but as property?

Officially, blacks were not human beings, by law.  By order of the court.

Not sorta, not kinda.  Not as a trivial detail.


Lincoln got called a traitor -- by Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly, emphatically, specifically because Lincoln said blacks were human beings!!  

Did anyone tell you that?  No. 

Read Stephen A Douglas's speeches.  He was called a traitor behind his back, in Douglas speeches, but to his face, Douglas would not call him a traitor, just call him "obsessed with equality or the Nigger" who "will cause a revolution by disobeying the Supreme Court".

No one told you that.

That's the kind of thing your history teacher should tell you, but they don't know either. They would have to read all of the Lincoln Douglas debates, and newspapers of the time.  Instead, they read whitewashed bullshit, published since.



No one told you that the United States Supreme Court ordered -- ordered -- blacks to be seen as NON HUMAN.  Did you know that?

That was a big fucking deal -- and well know-- at the time.  But this amazing fact is not taught in any US text book.

Blacks are NOT HUMANS by order of the court.  Jefferson Davis himself said this order --this decision -- by the Supreme Court changed everything, and changed it because now, the federal government, the states too, could not stop slavery.  The government must respect and protect slavery, as property.

No one told you that?  This was the whole fucking point of most of Lincoln's speeches.    And it was the basic point Stephen A Douglas threw into Lincoln's face, time, and time again.

Should be easy to spot, just read the damn LIncoln Douglas debates. Or just read Lincoln's other speeches too. He said this repeatedly. 

Lincoln said this again, and again, the Supreme Court had ruled that blacks are NOT HUMAN BEINGS but property.  And Lincoln said -- then did --we must undo that decision.  His 13th Amendment was 100% in response to the Dred Scott decision that ordered, yes ordered, blacks not to be seen as persons, not human beings, but property.

No one told you that.  So when Lincoln got up and was accused of treason for being against the Dred Scott decision, when Lincoln got up after being accused of wanting y our daughter to sleep with "Niggers" --- Lincoln was a radical mother fucker.   

That is why Frederick Douglass called Lincoln radical -- because he fucking WAS.

Lincoln kicked slavery in the ass sideways, and knew his FULL speeches.  Douglass knew Dred Scott decision, and how blacks were officially NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  You are never told that.

Douglass knew -- see Lincoln's speeches about this, in the debates. Again, and again, and again, Lincoln railed against the Dred Scott order that blacks are property, not human beings.

In other words, if Lincoln had been any more radical, the whites would not help to keep the Union together, if they thought the war was to end slavery.

And that is true, even US Grant said (as did many others) they would not fight for the Union, if they thought the war would end slavery.  Grant would later say Lincoln was right, slavery had to go.  But at the out set of the war, most whites did not want to, and would not, walk across the street to free a slave, must less go fight, or send their children to fight, for freedom for slaves.

So yes, Lincoln DID speak about Union -- no fucking shit, and wisely so.  But he also was powerful and radical, in his full speeches, for equality for blacks.

Why is that not taught? Virtually nothing that was vile, ugly, and true, about Southern leaders, is taught.   But of course, Frederick Douglass knew it, first hand.

Lincoln must -- must -- appease the people of the North, or they would never have fought the Civil War.   Douglass knew that. 

 If Lincoln said "Yeah, I want your daughter's to sleep with Niggers, like my opponents tell you," He would not live to get home that night.


We are  not told anything in US text books about the "Niggers will sleep with  your daughters" rant, that endangered everyone against slavery.


When we searched for 10 specific facts -- such as Lincoln standing up to President Polk, accusing him for starting the Mexican War to help the South spread slavery, 0-- absolutely 0 -- US text books even hinted at it, much less made it a major turning point in.

We did not yet cover all text books, or even close to all.   But so far, no text book in any public school shows things like Southern War Ultimatums or Lincoln being called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers." 


Nothing, and I mean nothing, was more clear at the time than the Kansas Act, as Lincoln said repeatedly, was a violent ruse to force slavery into all of the US (along with Dred Scott decision).

In fact, that was the basis of "House Divided" speech.  

Lincoln was not wrong --  nor were the thousands of others who said the same thing.  Kansas Act was a violent ruse to spread slavery.  We know that for a fact, because the man who got Kansas Act passed, with Douglas, BOASTED out the ass about it, and went to Kansas, led a group of paid killers to invade Kansas.

What the fuck?  So why do history books  and history teachers claim it was an effort to get get "popular sovereignty"  -- the "right of the people to decide their institutions"?

What the holy fuck, how stupid can you be.  Kansas white males already voted against slavery, before the Kansas Act - and Stephen A Douglas repeatedly said no one is fool enough to think Kansas citizens would vote for slavery. 

And Kansas citizens voted against slavery -- after years of violence by David Rice Atchison to stop them -- again. In fact, Kansas became a free state in 1861, just before Lincoln took office, because they voted 90 and 95%  against slavery.

Lincoln stood up to President Polk, and accused him of helping the South spread slavery, by the Mexican War?  Yes, he did.  And no one told you.

Lincoln's hero -- Henry Clay -- stood up to President Polk too, in the most amazing way, which shocked the shit out of his own state, and the entire South.  Clay, a slave owner, stood up in the most amazing speech of the 1840's, and accused Polk of pushing slavery further, by the war against Mexico -- stealing Mexico's land.

Lincoln did the same thing Clay did.  Stood up and accused Polk of helping the South spread slavery.

Guess who know all this -- Frederick Douglass. 

Guess who didn't have a damn clue -- YOU.

Guess who doesn't tell you that -- ever -- in a clear way? Your history books, and your history teachers. Don't blame those idiots, they just repeat what other idiots told them, 

 Douglass actually explained it very well, and if those "experts" would read more original sources, they would likely come to the same conclusion as he did.

But Lincoln was "marked man" for his candid stand on Mexican War.  He was accused of "not supporting the troops"  and had to explain to the stupid, that yes, he supported the troops, but not the killing and creating a war to spread slavery -- the mission.

Lincoln knew, and so did most people know, that the War was started to expand slavery,  with the rah rah bullshit that American was blessed by GOD.   Apparently God hated the Christians in Mexico and sent the US into Mexico to kill them, create a slave state, and room for 5 more slave states.

Also, Lincoln tried 40 times to have slavery banned in the territory just stolen from Mexico, per his own explanation.    Of course, no dice.  They were not about to ban slavery, in the lands they just stole, to spread slavery.

Southern leaders sure told folks then. Northern supporters of slavery -- like Stephen A Douglas -- told folks then.

Your  history teacher never said a word -- probably no one told them.


At least one teacher put some mention of slavery into his power point presentation, about Mexican war.

That's rare.  But even then, it's not front and center. Slavery and the spread of it, sure as hell was front and center,  back and all sides, of national life from 1820-1860.


TO justify the spread of slavery, Southern leaders had precisely two arguments.  Lincoln, and everyone in the USA, had to deal with the excuses to spread slavery, and the actions by Southern leaders, such as invading and killing, torturing, drowning, and hanging.

1) God wanted it.

2) White race will be exterminated if we can't spread it.

Just stopping the spread of slavery will kill the white race, or "burn us slowly to death" .

Did you know that?

Your daughters will sleep with "Niggers".  God wants slavery.  Lincoln will destroy the white race.  This was the rhetoric of the time.

And people were still being killed for being "too abolitionist".   Abolitionist was a dirty word in the 1850s, even in much of the North,


Were Southern leaders wrong when they declared just stopping the spread of slavery would kill the white race?

Were they wrong when they told crowds, expand slavery or we will perish?

Fuck yes they were wrong, but it worked to enrage the stupid.  It worked very well. 

It was illegal in the South to preach, teach, or write anything contrary to such drivel.   That's right, against the law.   If you were against slavery, you best shut the fuck up or leave. 

Did anyone -- ever -- ever  -- ever -- tell you Southern leaders claimed God wanted slavery, and the SPREAD of slavery.   That may sound goofy to you, but slavery was "Ordained by GOD"  and even Robert E Lee said it is not up to us to question God.

Stephen A Douglas (and others) made this "Nigger worship"  by Lincoln a central emotional feature of not only the debates, but of the but of the entire argument to justify slavery and the spread of it. That's right, a central argument (particularly in the South) was that whites would be exterminated, if slavery was not spread.

We do not even teach that Southern War Ultimatums were about 1 thing -- the SPREAD of slavery.   We not teach what Southern leaders boasted of then.  Of the five war ultimatums Southern newspapers boasted of in 1861, all five were about the spread of slavery, one way or another.

Not one word, in these War Ultimatums, about tariff. Not one.  Not one word about the right of Kansas to decide the issue themselves, because Kansas already decided, and said no to slavery.

Not one word out economic oppression by the North --all words were about the South's "right" to take their slaves to Kansas, and as Davis would say in "Perpetual Speech"  to take slaves and have slavery protected North, South, and West.
And why not? Remember slavery WAS OF GOD.  Slavery was ordained by God.  If you are against slavery, said the official declarations by state of Texas, you are against GOD.   



When Jefferson Davis explained in his own book, about the reasons for the Civil War, he wrote that the resistance to the SPREAD of slavery was "the intolerable grievance".    

Think of that.  The intolerable grievance, the sin that could not be forgiven, was Kansas resistance to the spread of slavery.


  Davis wrote, in his own book, in context, that the resistance to the spread of slavery -- into Kansas  -- was intolerable.   When Davis wrote this, Kansas had already voted 90% against slavery.

Davis insisted Kansas could not reject slavery, by "logic" of Dred Scott decision, which ordered -- yes ordered -- blacks not be seen as human beings, not persons.

Very clear -- and Lincoln exposed this about 50 times, almost in every speech from 1857 on.  Davis was boasting blacks were not humans and Kansas therefore could not keep them out -- they were property. Nothing but property.


 THE CONSTITUTION (in other words, we on SCOTUS) see blacks not as human, but as property.  Further, the federal government must protect slavery.  Lincoln had to obey that, until the undid the shit, by 13th Amendment. 
The Dred Scott decision, as Davis made clear, ordered the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that voted against slavery.

So Southern leaders did not dare say they gave a shit about state's rights at this point.   The excuse, suddenly, was that Kansas citizens, Kansas legislature, not even the federal Congress, could keep slavery out.

THE SCOTUS had just decided slavery.  And oh, by the way, we order the federal government to protect slavery, even in areas that were against slavery.

 Remember, those boasting of killing to spread slavery, were not some drunks. They were the US Senator, and his men.  Their own documents.  Their own publications.

And Jeff Davis himself, along with other top Confederates, boasted about it, one way or another. 

I can't help it that  your teacher didn't tell you.

Let that percolate.  Davis did not say Kansas citizens wanted slavery, or that Kansas citizens  held a fraudulent vote.  Davis said Kansas citizens, nor their legislature, nor Congress, could deny slavery. In fact, Kansas MUST respect and protect slavery.

And his logic -- God gave the black race to the white race, to enslave.  Blacks were "so inferior" they were not persons, not human beings, for purposes of the Constitution.

Davis was clear -- Kansas must not just allow slavery, but respect and protect slavery.  Clear too, about his logic -- blacks were not persons, and could not be seen as persons.

Did anyone ever tell you that?   Did anyone ever tell you the logic of Southern War Ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings?  But by decree -- inferior beings.


Lincoln, however, said this over, and over.  Dred Scott was part of the ruse, to make blacks not human beings, but property.   He said that, over and over in one way or another.  
Was he wrong?   No -- Davis boasted of it. Lincoln and many people said this -- Dred Scott decision was to make    blacks into NOT HUMAN BEINGS.  

Davis said that -- but he was proud of it.

Not one text book, and not one Pulitzer Prize winning book about Lincoln or Davis, saw fit to include this basic fact, as important enough to make clear.  James McPherson used the words "Southern Ultimatums"  but could not bring himself to tell the read what the fuck those ultimatums were. 

Go read McPherson. Go on. Not one word about the basic justification for attacks and war ultimatums, was that blacks are not human beings.  

Go read Eric Foner -- that fucking idiot.  He claims Dred Scott was "a narror ruling"  about Congress's inability to decide slavery in Kansas.  Fucking idiot, Dred Scott decision itself was clear -- BLACKS ARE NOT HUMAN BEINGS by order of the court.

And then, Jeff Davis boasted of that.  Davis own book bragged that Dred Scott changed everything.   Maybe Foner could actually read Dred Scott decision, or Jeff Davis book, or Lincoln's statements in dozens of speeches.  Dred Scott was done to make slaves into property -- NOT HUMANS.

Did Foner, Catton, McPherson tell you that?  FUCK NOT.

You can't just go around hanging and torturing, nor can you go around issuing war ultimatums (see below) without bringing God and survival into it.  So, Southern leaders did just that.

Stephen A Douglas regularly, and with great fanfare, great emphasis,  used the "Nigger will sleep with your daughter" argument, but you could not possibly know that, from any US text book.  Not one mentions it, much less show how powerful and violent the arguments were about this. 

In an informal quick survey (we are conducting a more systematic survey) of text books and major prize winning biographies of Lincoln, we found no US textbooks even mentioned that Lincoln was hated North and South for being a "radical" for equality for the "Nigger"  who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".


"You really don't know Lincoln, unless you know what ISIS like bastards he was up against.  US text books don't tell you about the religious lunatics, violent fucks, and sociopaths Lincoln had to defeat, to end slavery." 

Why would Northern papers call Lincoln a "Negro worshipper"?

Why would Stephen A Douglas, repeatedly, loudly, claim Lincoln was obsessed with equality for the "Nigger"  and wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"?

Why would Southern crowds cheer, and sometimes lynch or torture people, when told Lincoln was going to "exterminate" the white race by stopping the spread of slavery.


Let me repeat that -- Lincoln, they said, was going to exterminate the white race, just by stopping the spread of slavery.


Southern leaders claimed Lincoln -- and anyone else -- who even spoke against the SPREAD of slavery, was really out to destroy the South, and would exterminate the white race by this "Ungodly"   resistance to slavery.

Slavery was "OF GOD"  and to be against slavery, was to be against GOD himself, said the Texas official Declaration of secession.  

 Individual Southern leaders claimed they would like to see every Yankee dead, because of the "heretic belief that slavery is wrong."

The North, said Southern documents, was committing a "grave sin"  just to be against the SPREAD of slavery.

And no one ever fucking told you?

Yes, it's  hard to teach this, but imagine trying to live through it.  This is why Lincoln got a bullet in the brain.

To justify torture, rape, selling children -- all the vile things that make up slavery you are not told about, you had to defend it by extreme means - by claiming it was from GOD.

SO they did.

  Because GOD ordained slavery, and the white race will be destroyed- -your daughter will sleep with "Niggers" as Douglas said repeatedly.

NO one even mentioned this.This is the hysteria of the era -- pumped up by men like Jefferson Davis, Robert Toombs, Stephen A Douglas  and others, in the North.


Go on, ask a "historian" or even a  history teacher about this.  They won't know what you are talking about, first, because they get their information from books, not original sources -- from Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern sermons, Southern documents, Southern declarations.

But they will still pretend they know all this, then say "Oh I never said it was not a factor, sure, it was a factor, but there is a multitude of factors....."

Blah blah blah.   Southern leaders THEMSELVES said why the killed and tortured.  Not me. Southern leaders themselves wrote their War Ultimatums, not me.   Southern leaders themselves boasted and promised to keep killing till slavery was spread. 

This is the kind of basic shit you never heard of, because Southern school boards sure as hell was not going to allow this in the national text books.   Texas was, and still is, the state most responsible for US text book printing, and due to the school boards there, editing.

Nothing true and horrible about Southern leaders -- like their boasting of killing to spread slavery, boasting that anyone against slavery should be in prison, boasting they would keep killing till slavery was in all of the US.

Let me guess, no one told you Jeff Davis himself boasted he would like to see, by force or Confderate arms, invasion of the North and capture of all blacks there, and make them slaves, too.

Well, we show you that  -- but there is so, so much more.  And you never had a clue.
 New York paper Making fun of Lincoln for his "worship" of the Negro.  Lincoln said blacks were equal to whites under the law, any black is equal to any white.  Go read the Lincoln Douglas full debates, not the edited bullshit.
One paper in New York suggested Lincoln should obey Southern War Ultimatums -- did you even know Southern leaders made specific  War Ultimatums?  

The War Ultimatums -- Kansas (already a free state by this time)  must respect and protect slavery. Not just accept it, but RESPECT slavery and PROTECT slavery.

Kansas was a free state by then.

Should Lincoln obey that? FUCK NO.  Did he?  FUCK NO.

Are you even told about Southern War Ultimatums?  Southern leaders were quite proud of them at the time.   Why not show the War Ultimatums in US text books?  




As you will see below, no one spoke more powerfully against slavery, and for equality under the law, than Lincoln.  Yes, at times, in some places, he parsed words. He spoke carefully, or he would have been shot sooner.

But read his full speeches, not this bullshit out of context crap, were Lincoln parsed words in one sentence, but then kicked ass in the next sentence. 

Tellingly, those who trash Lincoln always leave out one of two things -- context, or the full speech.

No one who ever went to a Lincoln speech, left confused.  Lincoln was going to kick slavery in the ass as soon as possible.  Not only was slavery vile shit, but the men pushing to spread slavery were lying bastards  using violence and subterfuge. 

We perish as a country -- or slavery perishes  I don't expect us to perish.
__LINCOLN'S HOUSE DIVIDED SPEECH____________________

Everyone heard of Lincoln's "House Divided Speech".  But your history teacher acts like Lincoln is bemoaning the fact the country is divided over slavery.

Fuck no.  Lincoln's house divided speech -- and he gave versions of it repeatedly -- was about one thing: how  Southern leaders conspired by means "foul and more foul" to spread slavery.

Specifically, LIncoln focuses, in nearly every speech he ever gave after 1854, the Kansas Act, as the "first bit of machinery"   in a concerted effort to spread slavery.  

Remember that, because David Rice Atchison is the US Senator, with Stephen A Douglas, who got Kansas Act passed.

Meanwhile, Southern leaders were saying Lincoln was going to exterminate the white race.  So in the North, Lincoln was accused of wanting your daughters to sleep with "Niggers'  and in the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.

Equality for the negro -- the hate mongers would drive the point home -- means your daughters, your wife, and your life, would be with "Niggers" allowed to roam where they wanted, have sex with who they wanted, marry who they wanted.

To be for those positions, at the time, got you killed. Remember that. Abolitionist was a dirty word in 90% of white America, including the North. In the South, abolitionist were "of the devil"


Generally, historians never even mention this. If they dare mention it, it's in a sentence or two, toward the back of the books, and never shown to be the central and spoken issue of the day.

Lincoln, though, gave over 2000 speeches, for  years, that's all he did, go place to place, speaking against slavery, and arguing for equality under the law

Yes, he had to parse words at times, but read the full speeches. Holy fuck, once Lincoln got going, he kicked ass.  The lowest slave woman is equal to me, and equal to Judge Douglas, and equal to ANY man.

Why the fuck not quote Lincoln there?

Lincoln gets back in politics, because of KANSAS ACT

  But not only did Lincoln mention Southern subterfuge and deceit in spreading slavery into Kansas, he specifically said  the KANSAS ACT -- passed by Atchison himself, was the South's effort to push slavery into Kansas and beyond.


How fucking stupid are "history teachers"  that, not only don't they know Lincoln got back into politics because of what David Rice Atchison did -- they don't even fucking know what the hell David Rice Atchison did!

And Atchison was boasting of it. 


But of course, history teachers are not stupid. They only know what they are told.  Since the very beginning of US text book publishing, Southern crybabies and liars, have made sure nothing gets in text books, that shows how fucking ISIS like, violent, and proud Southern leaders were -- with the focus to SPREAD SLAVERY.



Funny thing is --  Southern leaders agreed with Lincoln. Kansas Act was the start of spreading slavery into millions of square miles, it was off limits before.  It was off limits before, because Southern leaders made slavery "open" in millions of square miles in the South, by Mexican War, and then demanding more land, in the "COMPROMISE OF 1850".

There was never a compromise -- Southern leaders made demands, they were met, and called compromises.

Lincoln asked, in one of the Lincoln Douglas debates --"What compromises"   We should have always taught how Southern leaders, again, and again, and again, promised violence if slavery was not spread.

Each time, they got what they demanded.  Each time, they came back and demanded -- not suggested -- more.  And if you don't fucking believe that, read Southern War Ultimatums

But when any "historian" even bothers to comment on Lincoln's hundreds of accusations that the South was trying to "nationalize" slavery, like the idiot y others -- including SOUTHERNERS bragging about it.  The South was in no ways sorry or ashamed of Kansas Act, remember, David Atchison boasted he passed Kansas Act, and boasted he went to Kansas and used men to invade Kansas, and kill, terrorize, to push slavery West.

Lincoln was not guessing or dreaming up some conspiracy, because Southern leaders cited those two exact things -- Kansas Act and Dred Scott decision, as justification for invasion of Kansas, and justification for Southern War Ultimatums (See Jeff Davis own book, and see more in this  blog). 

Southern leaders -- already, from 1856, before Lincoln even ran for Senate -- were boasting they were spreading slavery and would continue to kill and torture,  until slavery was spread to the Pacific, even spread into places that were already free states. And the Kansas Act was the specific justification, then Dred Scott came along, and they of course used that, too.

In fact, Dred Scott decision came about because Atchison could not get enough people killed, fast enough.  He predicted a quick victory in Kansas against civilians, with his armed men, but it did not work that way.

So Southern leaders had to justify Atchison's killings after his initial efforts failed.  Jeff Davis himself claimed Dred Scott justified everything Atchison did.  Did you know that?

No one told you that, did they?

So when Lincoln said slavery will spread everywhere -- or it will end -- he was not kidding.  Southern leaders said the same thing, before and after Lincoln gave House DIvided Speech.

See, facts matter.

No one mentions that, not in any US textbook.  So it's impossible to know what Lincoln actually faced, from those text books, which have been whitewashed since text books started, to the satisfaction of Southern state school boards, mostly Texas.

In fact it seems wacky, when you first hear that Southern leaders were killing and torturing, and boasting of it, to spread slavery into areas that were already free states. But that was well known at the time. Lincoln wrote and spoke about it, but oddly, that's not given any credence in US text books. Those kinds of things, Southern school boards would not allow in books.  Not ever. Not once. 

Lincoln was not that blunt, in public. In letters, yes, he was far more blunt.  But in public, Lincoln spoke a much kinder and more diplomatic tone.  Yet stopping the spread of cancer (slavery was a cancer, that would kill the hose, or be killed if it could not spread) was always the central point Lincoln made.  

Slavery was vile - it was a cancer, it would either destroy the US, or the US would destroy it.


What most people today, even "historians", don't get, is how violent Southern lunatics were, and how they were proud of it.

Slave owners tortured women, sold children, and were PROUD that they did what GOD wanted.  If we taught history honestly, everyone would know this ISIS like lunacy of Southern leaders. But we teach none of that.

Jefferson Davis, and others, were used to getting what they wanted -- spread of slavery, over and over -- by violence and threats. Every single time South spread slavery, they did it by violence.  There was no exception.

  Jeff Davis. 

Ulysis Grant quoted Jeff Davis proud claim that he would "wipe up all the blood" spilled below the Mason Dixon line, with his handkerchief.   

This is typical of the bravado and macho duck dance, Southern leaders always did. 

David Rice Atchison predicted all the South had to do, was a quick show of force, and they would get to spread slavery, as they always had before, by force, into Kansas and beyond.  Give me 5000 men, Atchison boasted, and I will kill every abolitionist in Kansas.  

Pollard, boasting.  Just voting for someone who was against slavery, was "a declaration of war" against the South

"We will annihilate from our shores".  As events proved, 90% of Kansas citizens were against slavery. Atchison tried to spread slavery there anyway, with quick show of violence.

It almost worked. 


And Atchison would have killed them all,  if he had been able to  hire 5000 reliable men, instead of about 1000 unreliable men, there only for the money.

See below, for actual speech promising war.  They were not kidding, and they delivered the violence they boasted about.

There was no desire on part of the North for a war against the violent, ISIS like South.  

Only one man tried to fight the South, in the South, John Brown, and he was caught in an hour, and hung in a week.

Who did Frederick Douglass admire more?    John Brown, his personal friend, or Abraham Lincoln?

Surprisingly to folks today, Douglass made it very clear, Brown actually harmed the push for equality and freedom.  Why?  John Brown's raid caused a massive backlash in the South -- because Brown played right into the hands of those who claimed Lincoln would exterminate the white race. 

 Speech by US Senator, bragging about killing to spread slavery, calling it a war "For the entire South"  1956. More important than any speech Lincoln made, and Lincoln makes no sense, unless you know what the hell was going on, like this. 

We will be destroyed as a country, or slavery will be destroyed, is the  blunt version of Lincoln's House DIvided Speech, which drove Southern leaders crazy.   Lincoln did not overtly threaten anyone -- Southern leaders issued macho threats and promises of death, Lincoln was not about to get into a macho man trade of threats with them.

But that is how Southern leaders took Lincoln's House Divided Speech, and Lincoln gave that speech, or used the idea from it, in many of his speeches. 

 Jeff Davis used his friend (yes, Stephen Douglas was personal friends with Jeff Davis) to scare Lincoln off the national state.

Lincoln didn't scare that easy, as you will see. 

Douglas knew which cities in Illinois he could call Lincoln a "Nigger lover" --or other such epitaph  - and which he could not.   The cities Douglas could call Lincoln "obsessed with equality"  included Quincy Alton, and Charleston.

Quincy papers spoke of Douglas going into his "nigger rant" against Lincoln, which no one was surprised about, except maybe your history teacher. 

Douglas made it a point, before the debate began, to tell the crowd he saw Lincoln with Frederick Douglass, and a white woman, in a carriage.  That was a direct enticement to violence, and not the first time Douglas said such things, nor the last. 

No one told you this, but Stephen A Douglas taunted Lincoln to his face, and all but urged the white males in the audience to attack Lincoln.  

Douglas's "rant about Niggers and Lincoln"  was covered in newspapers at the time, but not even mentioned now.   

Douglas used that  hate and fear to excite the crowd, and to scare Lincoln.  He was not just exercising his jaw.  The basic message to the crowd was always "Lincoln is a dangerous abolitionist who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

Entirely overlooked now. 




 Others were attacked -- in fact, Stephen A Douglas sat a few feet away from US Senator Sumner as he was beaten on the Senate floor, for speaking too powerfully against slavery.

Douglas, papers reported at the time, almost predicted Sumner would be beaten, and seemed pleased as the beating took place. Douglas used the same type of rhetoric against Sumner, as he did against Lincoln. 

Sumner was beaten -- 10 feet from Douglas's chair -- nearly to death, 34 wackes in the head with a  heavy gold cane.   The cane was and still is, shown as a bit of bravery in the South

 Sumner being beaten in US SENATE

Some of the men watching, are laughing.
Douglas reportedly was amused. 

Two years later, Douglas was once again essentially threatening Lincoln, by telling the crowd all kinds of things, like Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

How did Lincoln handle that?  See the video.  

Go on, to learn how LIncoln handled those kinds of charges, SEE THE VIDEO. You won't know unless you do, cause no one told you any of this in school.

Nor are you told, either, that Stephen A Douglas won --because Douglas was able to scare the voters re Lincoln's love for the "Nigger"  and the danger of being against just the spread of slavery.  
You hear this nonsense about Douglas being for "right of the people to choose".   Sounds nice, and stupidly historians have accepted Douglas public con game.  But behind the scenes, as Lincoln knew, and so many others did too, Douglas had helped Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison force, or try to force, slavery into Kansas.

Douglas did beat Lincoln for Senate; Douglas's  enemy in the Senate (Charles Sumner) was in a coma for six months.  And thousands of people would die, before the violent men who promised killing sprees, and actually committed killing sprees, were defeated. 

Douglas fear and hate mongering, worked,  because he stayed in the Senate, and was able to help his friends Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison behind the scenes as Chairman of the House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

 This led directly to the Civil War.  Lincoln could not overcome the stigma of his "Nigger Worship"  as New York paper called it.

So how does a "Nigger worshiper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers"  end  up being called all kinds of bad things later?

This same man -- Stephen A Douglas -- repeatedly and dramatically told crowd after crowd that Lincoln wanted their daughters to sleep with "Niggers".

Southern newspapers were even worse -- "Lincoln will destroy the white race"  Lincoln will make your children work besides blacks, your daughters sleep with blacks, etc etc.

Every politician who was against slavery got this kind of treatment -- Lincoln just got it a lot worse.  He got it in person, spoken by the most powerful speaker of the day -- Stephen A Douglas.

 You have not heard any of this, UNTIL NOW.


You didn't have to be a slave owner to be afraid of Lincoln -- North and South, liars like Stephen A Douglas, many newspapers, and almost all Southern leaders, made damn sure  you saw Lincoln as giving away your daughter to a "Nigger".


Above all Lincoln was EFFECTIVE.

100 years of textbook bullshit. 

 For over 100 years, US textbooks were essentially written by Southern school boards, because they made sure none of the stuff that showed how ISIS like, how violent,  and how cowardly, Southern leaders were.   It's ironic-  (not really) -- that those who pushed for killing and torturing and war to spread slavery (yes, they pushed and got a war to spread slavery, as you will see), were personal cowards.  One of the many facts that never made it into any US text book.



When you show the speeches by Southern leaders to most folks, they will say "Oh that's just one guy".  Fuck no, it's not one guy, it's dozens of speeches, documents, and war ultimatums.   

And these are the top leaders, not some nut in a bar.

Jeff Davis boasting of spreading slavery into the North by force of arms.

NO one told you.

Southern leaders boasting of killing to spread slavery.

No one told you.

The fact anyone who dared be against spread of slavery was called a "Nigger lover"  who wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers".

No one told you.

 Remember that.

 If Abraham Lincoln boasted about killing and torturing anyone, I'm sure Southern school boards would put that in their math books, their biology books, and their first grade readers.

But for their own leaders boasting of killing, boasting of torturing, boasting of spreading slavery for GOD -- go look for it. It seems bizarre because, that entire aspect of US history is whitewashed. If they mention it at all, it's in Orwellian double speak or vague phrases in the back of some book, without attributing names or context.


Yes, Lincoln was going to "destroy the white race"  by being against the violent spread of slavery.  And yes, the spread of slavery was violent.


This sounds goofy if you did not know, the excuse by those who were killing and terrorizing to spread slavery (see below)  claimed the white race would "perish" if we can't spread slavery to the  rest of the USA.

Did you know about this?  Hell no

But the killing and promises of endless killing to spread slavery, was common knowledge at the time.  


ABE LINCOLN --- who helped more?

In fact, Frederick Douglass only knew one white man more dedicated than Lincoln to end slavery and make blacks equal under the law -- that other man was John Brown.

But Brown gave his life for no effective improvement of any black life.  He was caught within a few  hours, and hung in a week.  Few slaves even knew who he was, but were hated and feared even more, because of Brown's ineffective way?
John  Brown was hung by the neck until dead for his efforts. Lincoln would get a bullet to the brain for his efforts.  But Lincoln was effective, and Frederick Douglass cared about that, most of all.


It would do the world, the country, and Lincoln, no good, to be killed, like others were, earlier than he was.    As Frederick Douglass himself pointed out, LIncoln had to parse words at times.  


"It mattered little to us what language he might employ on special occasions, it mattered to us, when we fully knew him, whether he was swift or slow in his [actions] "



TORTURE. Not sorta-- the punishment was torture.

So from 1820's on, Southern states wrote "anti-incendiary laws"-- and when Southern leaders send killers to Kansas in 1856, the first thing they did, was to make it a crime to speak or publish newspapers against slavery.   Not one person in the USA was surprised that Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery in Kansas, they had done exactly that for a generation already, in the South.

To be fair -- the South did warn the North that they would have to make it a crime to publish articles against slavery --see this from Congressional record, 1836.  And soon after, they did indeed, in Virginia, pass such laws...

Closer look..

Not long after -- since the North refused to make it against the law to write against slavery in North, anything which might make it to the South, the state of Virginia did indeed to exactly that -- made it a crime to have or publish or EVEN SPEAK against slavery.

See this.

All other slave states passed similiar laws, and citizens could be tortured -- even preachers could be tortured, for just owning the wrong book. Very ISIS like.

Guess who knew that? 

Lincoln. And Frederick Douglass.  And most people alive in 1840s - 1860 in the USA.   

But no one told you, because it's not even mentioned, much less emphasized, in US text books.   But nothing came close to perpetuating slavery, and expanding slavery, than making it a crime to speak or write against it.


Since no one told you shit about this- - you had no idea people were still being arrested, even killed, for speaking against slavery, in most of the USA in the 1850s.

In all of the South, in all of the slave states and in the Kansas Territories, slave power had made it a crime to speak or write anything against slavery, on the bullshit claim that to do so would "dissatisfy"  a slave.

Slaves, said Southern leaders, including Jeff Davis, were "contented laborers"   and only became "discontent"  if the "lie of freedom was whispered in their ears".

Blacks, of course, could not read, and it was a crime to teach them to do so. It was also a crime for them to meet together off the slave plantation, or to preach against slavery themselves.

Slave power was not that concerned about BLACKS hearing things against slavery in the press, or in books, or in speeches.   But to allow whites to speak or write against slavery -- that is how slavery ended in the North.

You either made it a crime to speak or write against slavery, and made it a crime to preach against slavery, or slavery was going to end. 

And the Southern leaders knew it.

Whites were still being killed for speaking against slavery, when Lincoln was in politics -- and unless you know that, you don't have a damn clue how bad ass Lincoln was to go to Kansas, or even to speak in Charleston, or Quincy or Alton.

Lincoln's friend's brother was killed in Alton Illinois for speaking (writing) anti slavery newspaper.   Later, Southerners made it a crime in Kansas to speak or write against slavery, too.

You are not told any of this, at all. But this is the shit Lincoln had to deal with.



You hear or read all this shit by "scholars" who claim Lincoln was reluctant or hesitant or had to be dragged into ending slavery.    These stupid bastards never tell you, and do not see to know, how amazing Lincoln was, when you understand where he was, and when he was.

Some "scholars" will name abolitionist like Garrison,  and others, and claim Lincoln fell short of their dedication to end slavery.  Fucking idiots.  None of those -except John Brown -- dared even travel to where Lincoln went, or spoke to crowds Lincoln spoke to.

Not only do they not seem to grasp Lincoln was doing what no one dared do (except Brown, who was quickly killed for it), but they refuse to give Lincoln's full quotes or full speeches.  While Lincoln did parse words at times -- necessary to stay alive as you will see -- he kicked ass if you read the full speeches. Leaving out the full and clear meanings  lets these dumb fucks lay out the bullshit.   They don't exactly lie, they just don't include all the basic facts.

Lincoln speaking in Kansas is one example.



Did you know Lincoln went to Kansas, and spoke there, AFTER Southern leaders made it a crime to speak against slavery.  Has your history teacher, any movie, any documentary, anyone every told you about that?

NO. There is no known text book in US that even mentions Lincoln went to Kansas, and related that to Jeff Davis and David Rice Atchison's "bogus legislature" (a violent group sent to Kansas to pass anti free speech laws).

Since you don't know all slave states made it a crime to preach or speak publically or write publicly against slavery, and you don't know Davis sent Atchison to Kansas, where he made the most violent punishment-- death --the effective "remedy" to stop speech against slavery,  you can't know then, how bad ass Lincoln was.

 You need all the facts, to make a reasonable narrative. You don't get all the facts, if these "experts" leave out how violent, (systematic violence) the South was, and how Lincoln and others were killed by the kind of violence -- the violence against SPEECH.


It takes a special kind of stupid for "experts" to belittle or minimize Lincoln - notice if you read them, not one of them mentions Lincoln got a bullet in the brain, precisely because of his "radical" speech.

The speech Lincoln gave -- was about voting rights for some blacks --  just after the unofficial end of Civil War.  Booth heard Lincoln give that speech about possible voting rights, and changed the plan from kidnap to kill.

No one told you that, did they?






If you don't know even US Senators were attacked, on and off the Senate floor, one was beaten almost to death, for speaking about things Lincoln spoke about, you don't know shit.



The main problem in US history -- Southern cry babies and liars have made damn sure no one says anything horrible about their leaders. 

Southern war ultimatums? No mention.

SOuthern leaders sending killers to Kansas and calling it war to spread slavery?  No mention.

Southern leaders bragging they were just doing the will of God to punish the black man for biblical sins?  No mention.



Lovejoy killed in Illinois.
Lincoln would appoint his brother to Attorney General. 


Southern leaders said Lincoln would not just have your daughters "sleep with Niggers"  but that Lincoln and "black republicans"  would destroy the white race,  by allowing black men to "be with"  white women.

Did the politicians who said such things believe them?  Did LIncoln "want" your daughters to sleep with this person or that?

Was Lincoln going to destroy the white race?   Who knows if they believed it -- or not. The point is, they used this kind of fear and hate mongering against Lincoln, and he had to deal it.



Lincoln's friend -- Lovejoy - was killed, very likely burned to death -- in his print shop, by a crowd who hated him for being too blunt about equality. Anyone against slavery faced the same charge -- you want black men to "sleep with and marry" white women.

That was always the rant, the appeal to white men.  Not that slavery was good, but that black men, if freed, would take your wife or daughter.

And it worked.  The appeal to be afraid your daughter, or wife, would take up, or "be with" or be raped, was the nerve which men like Stephen A Douglas, and many others, stabbed again and again, to get or keep political power.

This basic aspect of that era, is 100% white washed from any US text book.  Yet nothing came close to as central to Lincoln's opponents, and how the attacked him, and beat him, for Senate in 1858.

No one told you that, did they?   The central issue of 1854,  1856, 1858, and 1860 elections, was black men taking white women.  


Get the full story. Not the edited bullshit partial story.  Like Lincoln's political enemies calling him "Negro Worshipper" who is "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

No one told you.  It's  not even hinted at in your history text books, but was - by far --the major issue of Lincoln's attempt to get into the Senate.   His opponents all but urged his assassination or physical assault (yes, really) by this approach -- and it worked. Lincoln lost the race for Senate, and never did get a majority of votes, even for President.  

"Mr Lincoln is obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 

No one ever told you -- did they -- that Lincoln was hated in much of the North, and attacked in public repeatedly, to his face, that he was "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".

IN fact, no one told you, either, that Lincoln was "obsessed" with equality from 1846 on. Nor do they show  you his full quotes, full speeches, or tell you of his full actions.

 Did you know LIncoln, as freshman Congressmen, stood up to President Polk, and called Polk out, for invading Mexico, and stealing their land (which he did) for the South's efforts to double the size of slavery?

Did you even know many considered (rightly) that the slave owning President, according to Frederick Douglass, had made up the war to double the size of land for slavery?   

Lincoln agreed.   No one ever told you that, either?  It would be almost 20 years before Lincoln and Frederick Douglass met. 



nor does the idea even creep into, US text books.....

Lincoln had to deal with that -- and he did.  This is a perfect example of  how Lincoln dealt with it, see the video.




Detractors game -- is to quote Lincoln out of context, and ignore his actions.

You can pull up 500 Lincoln quotes, in about 2 seconds.  Fine.  Get all Lincoln quotes, there are plenty that kick ass-- 

But quotes won't do it -- you need context, and his full actions. 

 Springfield, Illinois
August 24, 1855
Dear Speed:

You know what a poor correspondent I am. Ever since I received your very agreeable letter of the 22nd. of May I have been intending to write you in answer to it. 

You suggest that in political action now, you and I would differ. I suppose we would; not quite as much, however, as you may think. You know I dislike slavery; and you fully admit the abstract wrong of it. So far there is no cause of difference. But you say that sooner than yield your legal right to the slave -- especially at the bidding of those who are not themselves interested, you would see the Union dissolved. I am not aware that any one is bidding you to yield that right; very certainly Iam not. I leave that matter entirely to yourself.

 I also acknowledge your rights and my obligations, under the constitution, in regard to your slaves. I confess I hate to see the poor creatures hunted down, and caught, and carried back to their stripes, and unrewarded toils; but I bite my lip and keep quiet. In 1841 you and I had together a tedious low-water trip, on a Steam Boat from Louisville to St. Louis. You may remember, as I well do, that from Louisville to the mouth of the Ohio, there were, on board, ten or a dozen slaves, shackled together with irons. That sight was a continued torment to me; and I see something like it every time I touch the Ohio, or any other slave-border. It is hardly fair for you to assume, that I have no interest in a thing which has, and continually exercises, the power of making me miserable. You ought rather to appreciate how much the great body of the Northern people do crucify their feelings, in order to maintain their loyalty to the Constitution and the Union.

I do oppose the extension of slavery, because my judgment and feelings so prompt me; and I am under no obligation to the contrary. If for this you and I must differ, differ we must.

 You say if you were President, you would send an army and hang the leaders of the Missouri outrages upon the Kansas elections; still, if Kansas fairly votes herself a slave state, she must be admitted, or the Union must be dissolved. 

But how if she votes herself a slave State unfairly -- that is, by the very means for which you say you would hang men? Must she still be admitted, or the Union be dissolved? 

That will be the phase of the question when it first becomes a practical one.

In your assumption that there may be a fair decision of the slavery question in Kansas, I plainly see you and I would differ about the Nebraska-law. I look upon that enactment not as a law, but as violence from the beginning. It was conceived in violence, passed in violence, is maintained in violence, and is being executed in violence. I say it was conceived in violence, because the destruction of the Missouri Compromise, under the circumstances, was nothing less than violence. It was passed in violence, because it could not have passed at all but for the votes of many members in violence of the known will of their constituents. 

It is maintained in violence because the elections since, clearly demand it's repeal, and this demand is openly disregarded. You say men ought to be hung for the way they are executing that law; and I say the way it is being executed is quite as good as any of its antecedents. ( ed. Meaning, this is the way slavery has always been spread) 

It (Kansas Act) is being executed in the precise way which was intended from the first; else why does no Nebraska man express astonishment or condemnation? Poor Reeder is the only public man who has been silly enough to believe that any thing like fairness was ever intended; and he has been bravely undeceived.

That Kansas will form a Slave Constitution, and, with it, will ask to be admitted into the Union, I take to be an already settled question; and so settled by the very means you so pointedly condemn.

 By every principle of law, ever held by any court, North or South, every negro taken to Kansas is free; yet, in utter disregard of this -- in the spirit of violence merely -- that beautiful Legislature gravely passes a law to hang men who shall venture to inform a negro of his legal rights. This is the substance, and real object of the law. If, like Haman, they should hang upon the gallows of their own building, I shall not be among the mourners for their fate.

In my humble sphere, I shall advocate the restoration of the Missouri Compromise, so long as Kansas remains a territory; and when, by all these foul means, it seeks to come into the Union as a Slave-state, I shall oppose it. I am very loth, in any case, to withhold my assent to the enjoyment of property acquired, or located, in good faith; but I do not admit that good faith, in taking a negro to Kansas, to be held in slavery, is a possibility with any man.

 Any man who has sense enough to be the controller of his own property, has too much sense to misunderstand the outrageous character of this whole Nebraska business.

But I digress. In my opposition to the admission of Kansas I shall have some company; but we may be beaten. If we are, I shall not, on that account, attempt to dissolve the Union.

On the contrary, if we succeed, there will be enough of us to take care of the Union. I think it probable, however, we shall be beaten.

 Standing as a unit among yourselves, you can, directly, and indirectly, bribe enough of our men to carry the day -- as you could on an open proposition to establish monarchy. Get hold of some man in the North, whose position and ability is such, that he can make the support of your measure -- whatever it may be -- a democratic party necessity, and the thing is done.

 Appropos [sic] of this, let me tell you an anecdote. Douglas introduced the Nebraska bill in January. In February afterwards, there was a call session of the Illinois Legislature. Of the one hundred members composing the two branches of that body, about seventy were democrats. These latter held a caucus, in which the Nebraska bill was talked of, if not formally discussed. It was thereby discovered that just three, and no more, were in favor of the measure.

 In a day of two Dougla's [sic] orders came on to have resolutions passed approving the bill; and they were passed by large majorities!!! 

The truth of this is vouched for by a bolting democratic member. The masses too, democratic as well as whig, were even, nearer unanimous [sic] against it; but as soon as the party necessity of supporting it, became apparent, the way the democracy began to see the wisdom and justice of it, was perfectly astonishing.

You say if Kansas fairly votes herself a free state, as a Christian you will rather rejoice at it. All decent slaveholders talk that way; and I do not doubt their candor. But they never vote that way.

 Although in a private letter, or conversation, you will express your preference that Kansas shall be free, you would vote for no man for Congress who would say the same thing publicly.

 No such man could be elected from any district in a slave-state. You think Stringfellow & Co. ought to be hung; and yet, at the next presidential election you will vote for the exact type and representative of Stringfellow. 

The slave-breeders and slave-traders, are a small, odious and detested class, among you; and yet in politics, they dictate the course of all of you, and are as completely your masters, as you are the master of your own negroes.

 You inquire where I now stand. That is a disputed point -- I think I am a whig; but others say there are no whigs, and that I am an abolitionist. When I was in Washington I voted for the Wilmot Proviso as good as forty times, and I never heard of any one attempting to unwhig me for that. I now do no more than oppose the extension of slavery.

I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor or degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes

" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic].
Mary will probably pass a day to two in Louisville in October. My kindest regards to Mrs. Speed. On the leading subject of this letter, I have more of her sympathy that I have of yours. And yet let me say I am

Yours friend forever

A. Lincoln


Every "history teacher" I ever met, insists they know the Lincoln Douglas debates well, and read them all.  Not one of them seems to have a clue that Kansas Act was, as Lincoln said repeatedly a ruse, a violent effort, to spread slavery where it could not possibly go by an honest vote of the citizens.

Why don't they know that?  No one told them. 

Nor do they know that Douglas was emphatic - and gave evidence for - LIncoln's obsession with equality.


How the hell did they miss that in Lincoln Douglas debates?  Because they skimmed it, that's how.




1856  1856 1856




. David Rice Atchison boasted of it.   He made his own war ultimatums, in his own speeches and writings.  We will kill until we have slavery to the Pacific.

Atchison even told his men, they would be "amply paid" and could keep anything they stole from the houses they looted.


WTF?  Was Frederick Douglass stupid?   Did he not know about Lincoln's letter to Greeley at New York Times? (Yes, he knew, he ran it in his own paper).   See more about that famous letter, below...

Yes of course Douglass knew, and he knew the "full measure" of Lincoln, not the edited or out of context bullshit.

And more, Douglass knew what was going on at the time. 

Lincoln was called  "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" -- repeatedly, loudly, proudly, in public, to his face, by the most powerful speaker of that generation.   And no one ever bothered to tell you. 

Not in any text book. Not one text book. Let me repeat that, not one single text book in US, has ever made it clear, Lincoln was repeatedly, emphatically, to his face, charged again and again, with "obsession for equality for the Nigger".

But those text books will include partial quotes, out of context,  by Lincoln, to claim Lincoln didn't really care, or Lincoln was reluctant.

Bullshit -- Lincoln was reluctant, okay, reluctant to get his head smashed in, or a get a bullet to the brain, any sooner than he did. And such things did befall folks who, even in Illinois, were perceived as too radical for the "black man"  because the "black man" wanted to "sleep with, be with, your daughter".

Black men. Would take. Your wife. Your daughter.

Lincoln would "slowly burn us to death"  by not allowing the spread of slavery. That's right, very clear, just not allowing the spread of slavery -- was like burning us to death.

The open letters to the public by other Southern governers, much the same thing. Lincoln would destroy the WHITE RACE, just by not allowing us to spread slavery.

That was the big fear, and Southern leaders jumped up and down on that raw never. Lincoln was vile -- he was destroying the white race, don't believe him that he does not intend to force the South to give up slavery.  He will destroy us, just by trying to keep slavery out of the rest of the country.

Were you ever told? FUCK NO. 

Go on, go find any text book that mentions it, much less shows what a BFD that meme of Lincoln being obsessed with equality was, and the impact it had on how he stayed alive, and how he hoped to win elections despite the hateful physical attacks on others, including his friends, and the threats to him personally.

No one told you that, did they?.

And that was in the NORTH -- remember that.



In the South, Lincoln was accused of destroying the white race.  Southern editors and leaders boasted that electing Lincoln -- or anyone against the spread -- yes spread -- of slavery was like an ACT OF WAR.

Did you ever see that in your history book. Electing anyone against the SPREAD of slavery was an act of war?   Think about that, think real hard. 

And they boasted of it, they did not admit it, they fucking boasted of it. And they were not bluffing. 

To understand those times, you either know, or you don't know,  how important it was that  Lincoln was regularly called "Nigger lover"  and "Negro Worshiper" by powerful people in the NORTH.  Not the South -- they were even worse.  

But in the NORTH, Lincoln was hated by the most powerful people in Washington, including US Senators Davis, Douglas, and David Rice Atchison, because he was"obsessed with equality for the Nigger".



Did Jefferson Davis hate Lincoln personally, did Stephen A Douglas?   Did Davis really believe God sent him the black race to enslave?   Did Davis really believe it was cruel to blacks NOT to enslave them?

No.   But Davis, Douglas, Atchison, Toombs, etc, got power, got status, got prestige, got money, from spouting such things.   Yet their followers, who believed this shit, were dangerous. God ordained slavery - the white race will be exterminated? - Lincoln wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers"?

It worked.

All those things, and many more, Southern leaders shouted to crowds, said in 100 ways, and it worked.   Those who did that demagoguery got the leadership, got the presidency of confederacy, got to be US Senators.

Did Foner ever tell you that Lincoln was widely accused of being a "Nigger lover"?  Did McPherson, Catton?Did Ken Burns mention anything like it? 

No. Only one historian I know mentioned this basic aspect, and he did that rather late in one book, that book is " Lincoln and Douglas, by Allen Guelzo.

But even Guelzo presents the "Nigger rant" in an almost comical way, showing Douglas went from side to side of the stage shouting it, perhaps even drunk.   The "Nigger rant"  was always about white women being with,sleeping with, or walking with black women.

So even when this "Nigger rant" habit of Douglas is mentioned, you don't see it, or hear of it, in context of the killing sprees, the violence, the hangings and tortures.   Southern leaders hit this again, and again.  If we do not spread slavery, we will be equal to blacks, and we will be exterminated, or have to live in equality with them.

Unless you understand that -- you can not know or even imagine how fucking radical Lincoln was, to stand up, and push back, and claim in the most amazing powerful term, that "any slave is the equal of me any and man.....  she is my equal, and the equal of Judge Douglas.

Gee-- wonder why they never show those parts of the speech? Wonder why they don't show how fucking stunning Lincoln was, to push back against the "You want our daughters to sleep with Niggers" accusation.



Guess who knew Lincoln was called "Nigger lover" who wants your daughters to sleep with "Niggers".  Guess who knew what happened to men that were thusly accused (they could be killed).  

Frederick Douglass knew.  Lincoln knew. Stephen A Douglas knew, Jefferson Davis knew. 

Hell yes, Stephen A Douglas knew -- that's why he used this approach. That's why he brought it up, and spoke of it for hours, wove it into every speech.   This was the basic message of Stephen A Douglas  "Mr. Lincoln is radical and obsessed about equality, and would have your daughters sleep with Niggers".

 Every Southern leader knew the power of hate and fear by whites, of black men "sleeping with white women" --and how that would "exterminate the white race". Oddly, though, Southern leaders were not nearly as quick to shout "Nigger".  Douglas did that, very likely to show his Southern friends (like Jeff Davis) that he was worthy of their support of President and or Chairman of House and Senate Committee on Kansas.

This is so vile -so strange- - to our ears, but it was not strange or even unusual at the time.  Your "history books" just skim over it, or not mention it, at all.

ut if you read Southern books, Southern speeches, Southern newspapers, Southern documents, Southern letters, at the time, and if you know of the ongoing killing and torturing and terror used by the South -- proudly -- to spread slavery, you won't be so easily fooled by academic bullshitters like Foner and McPherson and others.  

But it was central to the times, to the elections, and to the nation.  How Lincoln was hated for being a "Nigger lover" and who wants your daughter to "sleep with Niggers"  was the very real, very powerful, and very dangerous meme -- that worked.

This has been whitewashed for at least 100 years.  Southern crybabies and liars have never allowed that stark, ugly truth into any US text book.

In fact, entire books, entire series of books, have painted LIncoln as a "racist who wanted to send blacks to Africa"   and paint Southern leaders as principled men who intended to end slavery.   Such bizzaro bullshit is accepted as rational, and worthy of merit.

Fuck that. Learn what the hell was going on.

To his face, repeatedly, the best speaker of the 19th century, beat Lincoln in a race for US Senate, by calling Lincoln "obsessed with equality for the Nigger" 
The reason it's important -- you are not taught the hatred and fear of black men, taking white women,  and how THAT was central to the Civil War.   Southern leaders made it very clear -- if they could not spread slavery, the white race would be destroyed.

The hate and fear pushed by Southern leaders, and by men like Stephen A Douglass, is simply not mentioned in any meaningful way, by any historian in the last 50 years. Whitewashed by bullshit. 


I was almost 60 years old, before I realized  historians, like most folks, are full of bullshit.  

Sadly, "historians"  are often afraid to praise Lincoln too much, lest they be accused of hero worship.  Others just trash Lincoln for attention.

Some trash Lincoln,  omit  his actions (like his amazing battle in Congress to stop the war with Mexico, and to prevent slavery in the territory we stole from Mexico).

Why not show that amazing story? 

Maybe some bullshitters want to "appear balanced"  -- and fuck all that. I'm still waiting for a biography of Lincoln that tells what he did.  You get maybe one or two sentences about Lincoln push back against US theft of land to spread slavery, and they dont even mention, Lincoln rightly accused the South and Polk of creating a war to spread slavery.

When you learn what Lincoln did --  and see what the fuck was going on -- it's hard to disagree with Frederick Douglass, paraphrased,  Lincoln was a bad ass, radical mother fucker.


Read any -- any -- US text book, you would never have a clue about that, or hardly a clue, from any Lincoln biography that I know of. 



These came from NORTHERN politicians and NORTHERN PRESS.  Bet no one told you that.  

Not sorta, not kinda.  That was the big hammer, the sometimes spoken clearly, sometimes spoken in code, told to demonize those who sought to end slavery. That too, is completely, 100%, absent from US text books.  

Even as early as 1890, "old timers" like one of the men who founded the GOP,   had to remind the public that at one time, abolitionist was a dirty word, on parr now with child molesters in some areas.  

Palmer also explained how vile and violent the south was.  Southern leaders used to brag -- before they lost the Civil War, that they would spread slavery anywhere they wanted, and Northern men would run away.   Jeff Davis himself said he could wipe up all the blood spilled in the South, if any way came because of the efforts to spread slavery.  He did not believe anyone would stand up to the manhood of the South, and he was nearly correct, until a man named John Brown proved them wrong, in Kansas,

You never heard of Southern leaders boasting of the killing, have you?  Nor boasting of how easy it would be to spread slavery where they wanted -- no one told you that, did they?

Really, this sounds absurd to people today, but it would be no surprise at the time. 



Who did what, to whom, is real history. All else is bullshit.

To get a narrative -- an overarching theme -- for a period in history, it should come as no surprise, that you need first to know facts -- most importantly, who killed who, and why.

If you approach US history from 1800 to 1865, but you don't know, care, or base your narrative on who killed who, and why, you don't know shit.  

Here is a basic important fact --Lincoln and other knew it, said it, and acted upon this truth.

You are not taught this --  slavery was always spread by violence.  Killers and the most cruel men, were hired, or volunteered to spread slavery.  Slavery never spread by consent of the white public, by vote, contrary to what you may assume.

In fact, where there was free speech, free press, and preachers were allowed to speak ill of slavery, slavery died.  The reason slavery ended in North -- it could be despised in public.  Books and newspapers could report the tortures, the rapes, the cruelty of the slave owners.

No one could do that in the South.  It was illegal.

No one even told you that much, did they?

This is what Lincoln had to  deal with - --- not the watered down nonsense that makes Southern leaders seem like rational men.

War ultimatums -- demanding Lincoln (the federal government)  help the spread of slavery into Kansas, which rejected slavery -- was irrational as hell.

 Their war ultimatums were were as nuts as anything you will ever learn in world history.  But it made perfect sense to Jeff Davis, who made it very clear, that was a war ultimatum.    He said the "intolerable grievance"  was the resistance to slavery in Kansas, even after Kansas became a free state by 90% vote.

The South knew Lincoln would not help them spread slavery by force.  It was not a serious demand, just posturing to stupid people.  Southern leaders created a toxic hate and fear filled narrative -- and had people hateful, fearful that their daughters would sleep with "Niggers" . 


STEPHEN A DOUGLAS  Speaking, making the case, a vote for Lincoln is a vote for your wife being with "Niggers" 

"The last time I came here to make a speech, while talking from the stand to you, people of Freeport,  I saw a carriage—and a magnificent one it was—drive up and take a position on the outside of the crowd; a beautiful young lady was sitting on the box-seat, whilst Fred Douglass and her mother reclined inside, and the owner of the carriage acted as driver. I saw this in your own town........ All I have to say on that subject is, that those of you who believe that the negro is your equal and ought to be on an equality with you socially, politically, and legally, have a right to entertain those opinions, and of course will vote for Mr. Lincoln.  (No, No, down with the Niggers)"
Papers often, even at the time, cleaned up "Nigger"  to "Negro", but some quoted Douglas verbatum. Douglas was well known for using "Nigger"  even on Senate floor,  and was admonished for it, repeatedly.   Even Southern Senators used the term "Negro"  in such settings., Not Stephen A Douglas. 

In the Charleston debate, Douglas, well aware of the fear of black men taking white women had in that city, screamed these things about Lincoln wanting your daughter to sleep with "Niggers"  as Douglas went from side to side of the stage. in the most dramatic way possible.

This was a basic approach Douglas used to some extent, in the debates, and when he spoke around the country without Lincoln being there. In some places he would be more extreme - some say he was drunk -- but always, in each speech, his goal was to get people to fear anyone who was against slavery.   

Douglass -- Frederick Douglass -- knew what Lincoln was up against.   


That was in the newspapers at the time, and was no surprise to anyone.  Fear of black man sleeping with your daughter and "being with" your wife, was the common retort to anyone who was against slavery.  And it worked.  

The fear and hate mongering by Douglas, worked very well.  Lincoln lost that election, and would have lost the Presidential election too, if the hate and fear mongers did not split the pro slavery vote three ways. 



Scaring the crap out of the males in the audience -- the only ones that could vote -- worked. Despite all his efforts,

  Lincoln had to use humor and much of his time, deflecting this claim he wanted "your daughters to sleep with Niggers"

 Lincoln lost to Douglas in the Senate race, and would have likewise lost in the Presidential race, but the pro-spread of slavery folks had three candidates. 

 Lincoln was the ONLY candidate against slavery, with the very mild platform of no spread of slavery.


White people were still being killed, even in the North for being "radical abolitionist"  .

Southern leaders BRAGGED blacks were subhuman, did you know that - or not? 

Southern leaders BRAGGED their "new nation" was based on the "great moral and scientific truth" that blacks were inferior beings, not human beings like whites.  

But Lincoln is the bad guy?



"Lincoln would have taken a bullet to the brain, much sooner than he did, if he was not careful what he said --what  good would a dead Lincoln do, in 1856?"


Yes, Lincoln did parse words -- but read the full speeches.


The Southern War Ultimatums -- printed first in Richmond papers, with headline "THE TRUE ISSUE".

How war ultimatums appeared in Douglass's paper.

Full text of Southern paper

The TRUE ISSUE -- and their war ultimatums, were that Lincoln allow the spread of slavery into Kansas, and Kansas "accept and respect slavery."

The WAR ultimatum, let that sink in WAR ULTIMATUM -- that Kansas accept and respect slavery.

Kansas had REJECTED slavery and become a free state, and by a 95% vote!!   Do you grasp that?   FUCKING HELL.

No one told you -- ever -- that Southern War Ultimatums demanded a free state turn into a slave state. Did they? You never heard that? FUCK NO.

It would help if US text books mentioned it- - so all the US would know what scum sucking pigs and lunatic Confederate leaders were.  

COnfederate leaders didn't suggest it, didn't say it would be preferable.  They said in writing the war ultimatums.


They were not fucking bluffing.  They issued their war ultimatums, Lincoln would not obey, and they attacked.  They were already killing in Kansas, anyway.


Lincoln did evolve-- on his awareness how he could kill slavery so bad, for the next 150 years, Southern leaders would deny the very things they bragged about then.


Lincoln called "Negro Worshiper"  by New York papers.



Every high school history teacher can tell you about Lincoln's letter to Greeley, where LIncoln says if he could save the union without freeing and slaves, he would.

Sounds horrible?

Why would Lincoln write that letter to Greeley??

Actually, Lincoln did NOT write that letter to Greeley  -- he wrote to the border states, via Greeley, because Lincoln knew that in 24-48 hours, most people that mattered would read his letter to "Greeley".

More about that, below.

Meanwhile, Southern leaders are killing to spread slavery, bragging about it, and that's fine. Lincoln is the bad guy?  Seriously?

Remember, Southern leaders were BRAGGING they were killing to spread slavery.  And LIncoln is the bad guy because he, at that time, spoke about Union? 

He fucking had to.  A few more days, and those Southern states go with Jeff Davis. Do you grasp that or not?




Killing the God of Slavery. Lincoln's final gesture


No one seems to grasp this now -- but once Lee surrendered, do you know that no Southern leader, not one, not for the next 150 years, ever claimed that bullshit again, about God intended slavery, intended slaves be tortured (yes, they claimed that before, often) and that God wanted white men to enslave the black race.

That all stopped -- instantly.  An amazing difference.  Blacks were still beaten, some were in slavery illegally, many of the horrible things continued.

But that "God of slavery" was a very real God-- at least used daily by Southern leaders.   Lincoln killed that excuse.


Plus Lincoln's actions.  Have you ever heard about his "radical" actions from 1846-65?

Douglass knew all these.  Did anyone bother to mention them, to you?


The fact you do not know this -- everyone knew it in 1850's -- show how whitewashed the Dred Scott decision has been, we now teach it as something about "citizenship"  and Congress can not decide slavery "issues" in the territories.

As Jefferson Davis said -- Dred Scott was about blacks as persons or not. They are not persons, specifically they are not persons.

John Brown lasted about two hours, in Virginia, kicking slavery in the ass his way. Then he was hung, and so were his sons.

His other son already got killed, back in Kansas.

Lincoln fought a bit smarter -- and got the job done.


People  were arrested in the South, just for owning the wrong  book-- even preachers were arrested.

The article claims the South is the most moral, religious, and contented law abiding people on earth.   But those abolitionist are against God, against religion, against decency, and should be hung.  

The US Senator from Missouri boasted in his speech, he would kill to spread slavery, and kill to stop folks from speaking openly against slavery. That's not from some nut -- that was a US Senator boasting of it.

Those against slavery are against human virture, against modesty, they "must be hung or put in the penitentary" or the South will secede at once.

Frederick Douglass knew about articles like this -- because he reprinted them, in his own paper.

So Douglas knew the dangers to Lincoln -- and he knew Lincoln was trying to win elections, to get support of folks who thought blacks were sorta dogs that could talk and walk upright.  Lincoln lost elections BECAUSE Douglas appealed over and over to fear and hate of blacks.

You probably didn't even learn, the United States Supreme Court  ordered --  yes ordered -- that blacks be seen as NOT human beings (not persons)  but as property.

That is why LIncoln spent every day, for years, going around telling folks the South has set things in motion to spread slavery into all of the US, by Kansas Act, and Dred Scott decision.

Thousands of speeches.

Thousands of miles.

Daily.  "Over and over and over"  according to people accusing Lincoln of "wanting your daughters to sleep with Niggers,"  Lincoln said blacks and whites are equal under the law, and we must change Dred Scott decision, by appeal, or by Constitutional Amendment.

And he did just that -- exactly that. Lincoln pushed through the 13 Amendment, in Congress, just days before he was killed.

And he was killed for being "obsessed with equality for the Nigger".


Lincoln is going to "burn us to death"  by just being against the spread of slavery.    Not by coming South and ending slavery, just being against the spread of slavery was going to

Let that sink in your head. Official Southern document -- you never heard of it. 

Lincoln will "burn us slowly to death" just by being against the spread of slavery.  The spread of slavery he was talking about, was into Kansas, and Kansas had already voted against slavery 95%.  And they would vote against slavery again, by 95% again.

But slavery MUST go into Kansas, anyway, said Jefferson Davis.

Lincoln is going to "torture" us to death, by "slow fire"  just by being against the spread of slavery.

The governor of Georgia wrote a long "open letter" to the people of the South, telling them the same thing. Lincoln will destroy us by BEING AGAINST THE SPREAD OF SLAVERY.

If you don't know how insane, extreme, and violent Southern  leaders were -- killing to spread slavery for decades-  don't blame me.  Blame your white washed history text books, which fail to mention Southern leaders boasted of torture, of killing, to spread slavery.

They also don't mention how fucking radical Lincoln was. 

There is a REASON Frederick Douglass claimed Lincoln was radical, zealous, swift and determined.

There is a REASON Stephen A Douglas claimed Lincoln was "obsessed for equality of the Niggers".

What was that reason?  

1) They were there.  

2) They knew LIncoln's full speeches 

3) They knew Lincoln's actions

4) They weren't fooled by bullshit



Douglass knew -- what you don't have a clue about. How it was dangerous as hell to go into certain places, and be an "abolitionist".   In many parts of the country, an "abolitionist"  was one rung above a child molester.   Later, we would see abolitionist as a noble thing -- not so, in fact it was dangerous, even in some Northern states, to be called abolitionist.

Immediately, when anyone was even against the killing to SPREAD slavery, they were called "abolitionist"  and "Nigger lover".     

No one told you that, did they?

Even in the South, if you were not violent enough, eager enough to spread slavery, you could be called an "abolitionist"  and "Negro Worshiper".

No one told you that, did they?


 In fact, no abolitionist went to where Lincoln went, and dared say what he did.

Far from being timid about kicking slavery in the ass -- Lincoln was radical as hell, when you know what was going on.   Those big famous "abolitionist" speakers?  Think they went where Lincoln did, said what he did?

Hell no.  That would be insane.  People were still being killed, even in Illinois, during Lincoln's adult life, for being abolitionist. His friend, Lovejoy, was killed, possibly burned alive, in his newspaper building in Alton IL, by a crowd who warned him to shut down his "abolition"  newspaper.

He did not shut it down, and they burned him, and the newspapers building together.   To make sure no one  used the equipment again, they threw that into the Mississippi River.

Other folks in other places -- IN THE NORTH -- were killed and their presses thrown into rivers.

No one told you that.


But no one told you that.  For example, Lincoln went to Kansas AFTER it was illegal in Kansas to speak or write publicly against slavery.  

Did you know that?

You didn't even know Southern leaders went to Kansas, set up a "bogus legislature"  and passed laws against speech or writing against slavery, did you?

Very basic -- Southern leaders, namely Jeff Davis, sent killers to Kansas in 1856.  Their, they made it illegal to speak or publish newspapers against slavery.

And Lincoln went there ANYWAY, and spoke ANYWAY.

Name me on other person running for public office in ANY state, who did that. Go on, look. You can't find anyone.

And no one fucking told you.  Not your fault, but no one fucking told you a word about it. 

That's because Lincoln was a bad ass.  And effective.  And because "history text books"  have white washed the crazy ass Southern leaders, violent paid killers, and how ISIS like Southern leaders were.

And how bad ass Lincoln was.



See if you can guess what that might be?   To know, though, you would have to know what Douglass knew.  And no, you don't know.   This is not taught in any text book, or even mentioned in popular "histories".

Douglass, knew for example, things you won't find in any US text book -- like Stephen A Douglas (Lincoln's opponent for Senate, and President)  all but urged people to physically beat Lincoln, as Douglas had urged fellow Senator Charles Sumner be beaten -- and Sumner was beaten, on the Senate floor.

Douglass knew that, because he knew Stephen A Douglas had a role in getting Charles Sumner beaten, almost to death, on the Senate floor.   No one to you that, did they?

It was reported in newspaper AT THE TIME, before Sumner was beaten, Douglas promised Sumner they would "kick him like a dog".  Days later, Sumner was beaten.

Douglas speech included promises to Sumner, that they would kick him like a "dog in the street" that he may "get sympathy and just chastisement". 

And indeed he was beaten nearly to death, as Stephen A Douglas stood nearby, reports showed, smiling, as the old man was hit 32 times in the skull, with a metal object. 

 But more than anything -- as Lincoln and Frederick Douglass knew, that your "history" teacher does not,  was Douglas role in the killing sprees Kansas that followed the Kansas Act.

Lincoln went to Kansas -- after Southern leaders made it a crime to speak or write publically against slavery in Kansas, in 1859.  There, he spoke against slavery.

 How many Lincoln haters bother to mention any of this shit?  Zero, that's how many 


Lincoln's speeches were powerful, dynamic, and compelling.  But he did have to parse words in parts of some speeches, especially the debates.

See his other speeches, where he did not have to worry about getting attacked, as others were. His Peoria, Bloomington, or Springfield speech. Stunning.

Even in those speeches where Lincoln "parsed" words, he kicked ass.  He was radical as hell. You just have to learn the full speech, not the edited bullshit.

And you have to know what the fuck was going on. 

Lincoln's friend was killed (Lovejoy)  possibly burned to death, in his own building, for printing an anti slavery newspaper, in ILLINOIS.



Do you know -- your history teacher should know -- what Senator Charles Sumner was speaking about, when he was beaten nearly to death?

Your teacher will NOT know, but claim they do.  Ask them, ask them who Sumner was speaking about, and what Sumner accused that guy of doing.

Sumner was speaking for HOURS -- two days, about what Atchison and his men did,  after they passed Kansas Act.  A list of crimes -- tortures, killings, hangings -- done after Atchison got Kansas Act passed.  

Kansas Act - supposedly -- was a "sincere effort to settle the question of domestic institutions".  Domestic institutions meaning slavery.

But 90% of the people in Kansas were AGAINST slavery already, already voted, and would vote again 90% against slavery.

Instead of letting Kansas folks "be perfectly free" to decide themselves - the guy who passed Kansas Act raced to Kansas and started terrorizing, and later, killing.

Common knowledge at the time, all but forgotten today.  Worse, idiots teach the lie -- that Kansas Act was about "popular sovereignty".  Fuck no it was not, it was a ruse, a violent plan according to Lincoln himself, to force slavery into Kansas.

How the fuck does anyone teach that Kansas Act was about popular sovereignty, when the guy who actually passed it, boasted he was in Kansas killing and terrorizing to STOP people from voting against slavery?

One of the mysteries of stupid people, repeating other stupid people, I suppose.  


Douglas (Stephen A) and David Rice Atchison passed Kansas Act, after which Atchison rushed out to Kansas and started terrorizing, later killing.

He was speaking about David Rice Atchison, the man who, with Douglas, passed Kansas Act. Specifically, Sumner exposed the killings and tortures carried about by Atchison's men.   

So no, Stephen A Douglas taunts of Lincoln wants your daughters to "sleep with Niggers"  was not some innocent throw away line.

Douglas was hoping someone would beat Lincoln nearly to death too.  

Time to wake up your history teacher, have them read Lincoln's full speeches, Douglas taunts to Lincoln and others, and his role in helping Southern leaders invade Kansas and the killing sprees that followed. People were well aware of it then. 



After Lincoln was called "Negro Worshiper" in the press, and in person "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" -- Lincoln had to speak.

Others were beaten, even killed, if the wrong persons would hear of it. People were still being killed -- white people -- for being too "abolitionist".   In fact, the famous abolitionist speakers dared NOT to go where Lincoln went, and speak to crowds Lincoln spoke to.    Another tid bit your history teacher never knew, and didn't tell you.

We all know LIncoln's humor -- he was famous for it then, and now.  But did you know Lincoln had to use this humor, to deflect the attacks Douglas made, about Lincoln wanting your daughter to "sleep with Niggers".


Lincoln is going to "exterminate the white race"  by being against the SPREAD of slavery.  

Remember this -- for just being against the SPREAD of slavery, Lincoln was called "Nigger worshiper"  who "wants your daughters to sleep with Niggers" 

He will burn us slowly to death.

He will exterminate the white race.

Just by being against the spread of slavery.

If you don't understand that -- how violent Southern leaders were, how they pumped up the hate and fear of Lincoln -- you can't understand anything about Lincoln, or the Civil War.



How did Lincoln handle this? 

He was called the most vile things -- the movie clip below, like most accounts of Lincoln Douglas debates, have white washed it, toned down the language, such as saying "Negro"  instead of "Nigger"

Newspapers at the time, in Quincy and Charleston, reported Douglas went into "rants about Niggers"  and screamed at the audience about Lincoln's obsession for equality.

In Charleston, local reporters showed Douglas actually ran back and forth on stage, when he came to this subject, and spit out the words with great venom.

That's not reflected in the clip below, but it's the closest we can come without hiring actors to restage what reports showed at the time...

Notice, Lincoln used humor, below, in the video, based on Lincoln Douglas debates, from a 1940 movie, which just happened to touch on this aspect of the Lincoln Douglas debates.

 Smart people will, upon learning something new, adjust their opinion.   Most people just dig in and say it doesn't matter.  No, you did not hear this before.  Most of this is not in any US text book -- but it should have been in all text books.